pianoplayer
Global Moderator
Re: the fight to release our money, then and now
« Reply #5 Today at 9:21am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TY BHollenegg
I am posting my response to Gusjarvis because Gus posed a question, which some Shareholders feel is a valid concern and needs clarification.
Yesterday at 5:28pm, gusjarvis wrote:
you said we are not shareholders after jan, and here we are. So instead of complaining I will simply ask you a question.
What will you do to help end this? Will you give me a statement of facts as you know them to put into the Canadian authorities and one for the ag investigations the shareholders initiated? Only what you have already put on the boards is fine.
You said you supported the ag movement and the quest for closure, and said you would jump in if it went past dec 31st. We are here, so my only question is what can you do for us to help.
thanks dave
Gus.....
I supported the AG as long as they support those who are getting the funds released to the Shareholders. The AG publicly supported and privately assisted Wolfbela who tried to stop me from posting information to the Shareholders by threatening me with providing my posts to the agencies and making negative statements on the reaction of the agencies reading my posts, and working with disgruntled Shareholders to bring a lawsuit against Attorney Hodges, the Plaintiffs, and me.
This is the choices I have at this time based on the following information...
Support Attorney Hodges...
who is determined to release the funds to the Shareholders,
who is intimately involved with the details, facts, and knowledge,
who has not wavered in getting this monumental task completed,
who has not charged the shareholders base,
who has taken on the responsibilities and expenses to get the release done,
who is qualified and understands the sensitivity, safety, and security issues of what is involved,
who understands the laws and can use the legal system to make the release happen,
who has the support of most of the Shareholders and the company,
who brought the Shareholders from the abyss of rumors of funds to the legal documentation of funds using the court system,
who will ensure all the funds are released to the Shareholders by using the appeal process,
who is positive and confident the funds will be released and that we are at the end of this arduous journey.
Or I could go with you, Gusjarvis, and your actions...
who provided information to the shareholders,
who made known the CMKX plight through the Russian Television Network,
who has collected funds from the Shareholders and provided details to the Canadian authorities...they have not accomplished anything toward the release of the funds,
who has posted and support those that have posted, false information and innuendos about Attorney Hodges, about me, about what is transpiring,
who has supported those who threatened me with legal action for keeping the Shareholders informed,
who does not understand or appreciate the security issues involved and the effect it will have on National Security,
who feels knee-jerk reactions will release the funds,
who is inpatient when dealing with facts and people,
who lets emotions overrule legal strategies and could jeopardize the progress at hand..
There are no doubts in my mind that both Attorney Hodges and you, Gusjarvis, want the funds released to the Shareholders. However, I have my doubts about your approach. It will not release the funds. It may provide more information, but at what cost?...the cost of more legal maneuvering and investigations by those who do not know or do not believe the CMKX situation? You can spin information but you cannot spend information.
I am sticking with what I feel is the rational choice... support Attorney Hodges in releasing the funds to the Shareholders.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
gusjarvis
King of Diamonds
Re: the fight to release our money, then and now
« Reply #6 Today at 9:59am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gusjarvis
God of Diamonds
Re: Bob you said you would bring the bat if needed
« Reply #17 Today at 10:47am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am happy Dennis put out an update as really it could only be good or we would have gotten the bad news already, they would never ever set us up for this again like the other times in the last year.
It is funny that Al was part of the operation and given the evidence, just handed to him, he didn't even have to subpoena it, it was just handed to him on a silver platter. I and all others have tried to get it and have been turned down as there is full collusion to hide it between all parties who have it.
It is equivalent to the teacher given the test to some students and them bragging they have it and making fun of others who don't. The only thing is the test is almost over and you all got an f, luckily for you all the last question about er is worth 99.9999% of the test, so when you get that question finally right you will get an A, and the rest of the test will have been forgotten.
It is funny when you give the info from the plaintiffs now to your group that follows off boards, and every poster here knows what I am talking about even those tired of me, 50% just laugh, 40% just get angry and tell me to shut up, and 10% care.
So Bob you can give me a hard time and stick with Al, that is a great move as I am a mental health worker from Kelowna, Al is a real lawyer with all the evidence, good choice, but the real choice would have been working with the shareholders as well as we deserve respect not condescention.
Hope you are feeling well, cheers dave
gusjarvis
King of Diamonds
Re: the fight to release our money, then and now
« Reply #7 Today at 10:01am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z06mike
God of Diamonds
Re: Bob you said you would bring the bat if needed
« Reply #15 Today at 9:17am »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob,
What is posted on these boards is public. I'm still confused about the threat part, but it keeps getting brought up. All I remember was Jerry asked you to stop posting information that might give people false hope. It's already been made clear that your post was used for good, not to turn you in, not to threaten. You are not under investigation because of it. Your post, and others, were used for exactly the reasons that I stated before. You're a respected shareholder that most everyone trusts to bring us clear, well written updates.
It's just one more thing to get them to pay attention and look at the facts versus Googling CMKX and finding Nevada Corp. and turning us away. Seems I remember Al Hodges writing a letter to the NY Attorney General an getting a similar response. We're just following up and it's making a difference.
The AG Action is not tied to any California Bar Association inquiry or action at all.
Any calls to the Texas Securities and Licensing divisions to get publicly available information on the Board structure should not be threatening to anyone. I have a corporation and an LLC and I get calls all the time because the County and the State sells their databases to marketers. They know the names of the co-owners and the officers in the company.
Again, just trying to make sure there is clarity. I only know what I know and I may have missed something.
Mike
tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15580