|
Post by delusionalgrandeur on Jan 2, 2011 2:49:20 GMT -5
If everyone has their certs, where's the short? It was paid for when you got your certificate.
|
|
|
Post by towtruck78 on Jan 2, 2011 8:23:01 GMT -5
This pr did not contain as much info as I would like to see after not hearing anything from the company for 3+ months, but at least we got something.
Questions in my mind for the company: 1)Why are they not pursuing Al Hodges for info to acquire the real money along with the aforementioned suits? The clearly foremost question many of us have. 2)What will it take for them to qualify to be allowed to trade again? I can't believe the paperwork would be that difficult. 3)How much money is needed for the venture with 1010? 4)What is in those d*mn untested samples from 2005 and 2006? 5)Why are they not actively seeking trading status again? If there is allegedly a 2.5 trillion short, there would have to be some serious money to be made on a squeeze. They could do a separate offering to raise money for the venture with 1010.
I was going to wait until Monday or Tuesday to log-in again but curiosity got the best of me.
Bill
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Jan 2, 2011 8:35:20 GMT -5
Bill,
Unfortunately, Tyler will not provide answers to real questions. Just a laundry list of uncollectable lawsuits and a way for a few people to earn a nice, steady income..
That about covers it.
I can guarantee you that should this whole "packets" thing be a load of garbage, Jan will be a very busy month for getting on people, getting the answers and making changes, including with the fellow shareholders that may be purposing misleading others....
2011 will not be the norm in CMKX land..
Trying to be patient and kind for the coming week. I do find it interesting, though, that as I made advances with the TX securities commission, the updates came out, and the promises of great wealth arriving went over the top..
And should we be disappointed, those that can not see clearly here and keep defending any of these misleading parties, will have to accept the fact that we will not take any more deceit and put up with our efforts, which will not be deterred by anyone.
I hope it doesn't come to that..
Let us not forget that most of this "stuff" you are reading on the boards is purposely being leaked by an attorney.. an attorney.. rather than issuing a professional, concise, statement of factual happenings.
The clock is ticking.. for all here... Nonetheless.. will keep restrained.. and hope for the best..
J WB
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Jan 2, 2011 9:04:35 GMT -5
I have also wondered about the TA.. I believe that it was stated recently about 8,000 accounts were registered with the TA. What if part of the trust agreement (if it exists) states that the shareholders must be paid through this entity and if they are not registered and paid this way within the deadline, the unpaid portions will be returned to the government or perhaps the company..
So why make it too public.. when the unclaimed funds could revert back to the government, the company or those that paid penalities in the first place. Maybe that is why we are being milked along. That more that forget, drop dead or give up, the more that comes back.
Quite a windfall, if true..
J WB
|
|
|
Post by gusjarvis on Jan 2, 2011 11:11:39 GMT -5
towtruck, because bill worked the mission with al and the rest of the super lawyers, he was our lawyer who signed the nda's and then worked with urban right after he got all the sec info per the evidence on the boards. He then pumped the naked short angle and confirmed the goods while over five hundred billions shares traded at the exact same time, that was the cover or he is guilty of aiding and abetting urband and john edwards.
He will never go after the information as that is the compartmentalized ending, we are trying to decompartmentalize it and make them invesigate, which will end this immediately.
All authorities in canada and the united states, al, all lawyers in cmkx, and bill, with the sec and doj are hiding the truth as it was an operation, so it is tough to crack this one. But we are very close if it drags, trust me.
The only reason the nut isn't cracked is most shareholders got pacified by the boards and the constant message of imminent payment, if you thought it would drag you would have done something more as a group long ago. But I got slammed for questioning this eight months ago, or ten months ago, now it is ok as they crossed most peoples line finally. Remember when I was looking for support going into filing a complaint against our company and bill many many months ago, the day before I read my own personal email to bob which was sent to me by another poster. The day we filed the complaint that email was pinned on all boards and in the statement with it it said what I was doing was causing death threats agains al, immediately the whole boards at once attacked me and there was absolutely no support for going after the company, they squashed it 100% at that time. If people even had an incling of what was about to happen in the following months they would have joined me then.
That is the game I have had to play against all this time, all sides who want this quiet have worked together that is clear, and the boards have been worked that is clear.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jan 2, 2011 12:44:11 GMT -5
Gus, Wolf, Mike, time to burn the liars house down.
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Jan 2, 2011 14:10:20 GMT -5
I think it is time for the new members of congress to hear from us!
|
|
|
Post by humbledd on Jan 2, 2011 17:19:45 GMT -5
and they will .......after tuesday..............
|
|
|
Post by z06mike on Jan 2, 2011 18:34:48 GMT -5
Just a thought: What if the message/interpretation from the Federal court decision that the shareholders essentially have no right or interest in the company assets and therefore have not been victims of a taking (5th amendment) was the intent of the Bivens in the first place? In other words, now it's writing... By the way, the DOJ attorney for the Sec DEFENDANTS never stated the trust exists. He merely relayed that if it's in the DTCC, the SEC has no jurisdiction to release it. The claims is where the value is folks. Left hand right hand...
Mike
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jan 2, 2011 19:17:33 GMT -5
Mike, are you saying that the Bivins was filed to keep the trust from shareholders but do so looking like it was to get it for us?
If that's the case LOOK OUT!
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Jan 3, 2011 8:11:44 GMT -5
Just a thought: What if the message/interpretation from the Federal court decision that the shareholders essentially have no right or interest in the company assets and therefore have not been victims of a taking (5th amendment) was the intent of the Bivens in the first place? In other words, now it's writing... By the way, the DOJ attorney for the Sec DEFENDANTS never stated the trust exists. He merely relayed that if it's in the DTCC, the SEC has no jurisdiction to release it. The claims is where the value is folks. Left hand right hand... Mike My thoughts exactly. I would like to hear AH explanation of why we were drug thru a whole year of this, and why he filed a second time; provide no d*mning evidence; and never saw this decision coming. It was a great way to drag out the year. The appeal would be a waste of time as AH can not introduce any new evidence. IMO
|
|
|
Post by towtruck78 on Jan 3, 2011 10:08:23 GMT -5
Gus, Wolf, Mike, time to burn the liars house down. I will second that motion. Here to assist. Bill
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 11:04:44 GMT -5
All we have to do is ask ourselves one question....Have I been paid?...we all know the answer.... until we are paid or see official notice ANY scenario still fits....that is partly why this is so freaking insane! The scary clown circus from hell rolls on Just a thought: What if the message/interpretation from the Federal court decision that the shareholders essentially have no right or interest in the company assets and therefore have not been victims of a taking (5th amendment) was the intent of the Bivens in the first place? In other words, now it's writing... By the way, the DOJ attorney for the Sec DEFENDANTS never stated the trust exists. He merely relayed that if it's in the DTCC, the SEC has no jurisdiction to release it. The claims is where the value is folks. Left hand right hand... Mike
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Jan 6, 2011 13:35:43 GMT -5
Tyler did update us on June 25th, 2010 and told the shareholders that there will be a shareholders meeting with in a year. I hope that they live up to their statements. cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=f*ckers&action=display&thread=6099"CMKM intends to hold its first ever official shareholder’s meeting within the next 12 months. As you could imagine, this event will be an extremely large undertaking with a great deal of organizational and monetary requirements to make it happen correctly. To begin preparing for this event now, it will be necessary to have current information for as many shareholders as possible. If you intend to be able to vote via proxy you will need to have a certificate in your name and have a current address on file with the transfer agent. If you have electronic shares only, then your vote(s) will be held by the brokerage or clearing firm that is theoretically holding the bulk certificate for your position." cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=f*ckers&action=display&thread=6099f*ckers&action ;D
|
|
|
Post by NobleForce2 on Jan 6, 2011 22:32:26 GMT -5
Actually, they covered their rears by saying they INTEND to hold its first ever shareholder's meeting...
There's always an out when it comes to CMKX, right?
|
|