Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 18:32:30 GMT -5
This isn't a courtroom Jerry, as much as you wish you could be a lawyer. C-Dub Bob, So you are going on the record without doubt that you can personally state on 1/30/11 you have complete knowledge of all the share holdings of the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges, and that these holdings are intact as reported, and no shares have been sold over the course of the Bivens action, including 2010, by the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges. You have seen their stock certificates so you know they still hold all their reported shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. I just want to make sure that you don't perjure yourself. I will be saving your answer for further reference. J WB
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Jan 30, 2011 18:34:42 GMT -5
Wolf, I am going to ask this one more time because your memory is really short, CUT THE CRAP ALREADY AND LET PEOPLE BE. WHATEVER IT IS YOUR DOING OTHER THAN THE AG, KEEP IT TO YOUR d*mn SELF AND STOP HAVING SUCH A SARCASTIC ATTITUDE WITH EVERYONE THAT DOESN'T AGREE WITH YOU!!!!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 18:38:58 GMT -5
As for the rest of you busy attacking Bob...he's not your enemy. He's your conduit to where Mr Hodges is going...Mr Hodges, the guy who is working to get you your money, remember?
Enough is enough....geesh!
C-Dub
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 30, 2011 18:47:35 GMT -5
Can you ask bob if he heard anything about packets being sent on Monday or Tuesday? It seemed from Mona that was the newest rumor (that was posted on this board). Any truth? Can you ask Bob to ask Dennis to pay my dry cleaning from last month... My "knickers" are still bunched up!!!! Would like to hear from the State of the Hodges again. Hello Gjfromfla... I have not heard "anything about packets being sent on Monday or Tuesday?" from Attorney Hodges. I am not conveying it is right or wrong, just I have not heard these two days from Attorney Hodges. The last I heard from Attorney Hodges, he is confident we will be paid in the near future, if not this coming week. Thank you, BHollenegg Great to hear Bob...Al thinks we are getting paid in the near future, maybe this week...awesome! but haven't we heard that before? wasn't it like a year ago when we all put our faith in Al and his "Imminent" payment speeches? How long are we supposed to wait on this? and what will be said when we do find out that Al has stolen the assets and is moving forward without us? What will your excuse be then? oh wait I know what it will be...must be part of the plam, he had to steal everything to keep the info from the enemy and I'll be in touch with the shareholders with an update thru Acca, but I'm sure he'll have a different name by then... Pay attention drones...the info that the AG and Wolf is uncoverring is real, not made up, not hearsay, not nothin! It's real info that he is working for, the truth remember?
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 30, 2011 18:48:40 GMT -5
sorry quoted the wrong post, but you guys can figure that out, right?
|
|
|
Post by z06mike on Jan 30, 2011 18:59:51 GMT -5
Wolf, Verification? I'm afraid the Peter M. call is the same as the PA AG call on MLK day. Again, Korsakoff's syndrome, suspension of disbelief, or payroll. Take your pick. The house of cards continues to implode. One of my sources tells me next week is it-done! Even that source is losing faith. Again, a majority vote will NOT be the most efficient path. Wary shareholders should pull up all the guru plugs from acca, Lt.kk., Chucky, et al, and compare to where we are-nowhere... Well, nowhere except the AGs. Folks, we tried to explain this back in the late summer, early fall. We put the AG action together for a reason. Many joined and some dropped out because they wanted to "wait-n-see." The November election and the 10-day orientation of the newly elected, and Al's refile, and the hearing, and the dismissal, and Al's betting man prediction, and Al's update of 80 cents and Global Intelligence, etc., etc., have all past. There is no genius IBM plan, no genius PLAM, no 40-years-experience slam dunk, no 4x Bivens case winner strategy, no WGS. The strategy is a classic paradox. Hoodwinked is an understatement. This is soley about control of assets that we have been ruled as having no right or interest in. And, the appeal will rule the same since the chance to provide evidence has passed. Don't believe it? Just start at now and work backward. You'll see it's bifurcated. One arm is control, the other is pennies per click. Neither are related, but independently support each other. Perfect! Mike Mike...I don't appreciate your MLK jab. I did call and was informed they were closed for MLK and the following day due to elections and will be open on Wednesday. I am surprised at your twisting the facts as you have done before in taking up for Wolfbela. Why don't you hire an Attorney and work on releasing the funds to the shareholders instead of going after the ones working on releasing the funds? If you do not believe in the funds, then let the ones who want their funds continue with pursuing the funds do so. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob, I had hoped it wouldn't come to this, but if I've twisted the facts before, I would think you "wouldn't" be surprised. And, if I have, please feel free to point them out because I try very hard to make sure I provide accurate information, as you do. However, stating you had been turned in by people in the AG Action, and are being investigated because of it, along with your payout being delayed because of the investigation, was more than just a tad misleading. As for the PA AG, it was my understanding that you stated you had communicated with the PA AG on MLK's birthday and that you had a call scheduled for that Wednesday. If that's wrong, I stand corrected. But, I'm not sure why, if you did call on MLK's birthday, you would feel the need to post as much since you didn't, in that post, let us know it was closed. Additionally, Bob, I am not going after anyone, especially those working toward releasing the funds. If you know of someone I'm after, please state as much. My work is with the State Attorneys General to begin with the Marketmakers and Brokers that NSSed our stock. So far, there's thirteen of them in the mix. If you have any recommendations for a good attorney, let me know. And, how much was your retainer with Al? My funds are low from helping out shareholders in need, so I don't have a lot. Mike
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Jan 30, 2011 19:08:37 GMT -5
May we all just have some rest this Sunday evening. Gnight.
|
|
slappy
Dr. Of Diamonds
Posts: 120
|
Post by slappy on Jan 30, 2011 19:23:19 GMT -5
If some on this board would put as much effort into their jobs and their personal lives as they do trying to discredit Bob, they would already be freaking millionaires!
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Jan 30, 2011 19:51:33 GMT -5
Bob, So you are going on the record without doubt that you can personally state on 1/30/11 you have complete knowledge of all the share holdings of the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges, and that these holdings are intact as reported, and no shares have been sold over the course of the Bivens action, including 2010, by the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges. You have seen their stock certificates so you know they still hold all their reported shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. I just want to make sure that you don't perjure yourself. I will be saving your answer for further reference. J WB Jerry..You keep going on and on and on, just like an Eveready Battery...unfortunately only one has a positive side. You do not qualify to be a judge. I do not have to worry about perjuring myself...never have and never will. I have a right to post messages on a public message board to keep shareholders who want to be informed. Your constant badgering, immature threats and remarks are not seeking the truth....it is seeking attention and suppressing the truth. Honesty will prevail. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by bobbyz47 on Jan 30, 2011 19:56:04 GMT -5
bob, thank you for keeping in touch, its good to see you have the determination to hang in there till the end, some of the crap you have to deal with is insane, all your trying to do is help. thanks again.
|
|
|
Post by brockley on Jan 30, 2011 20:01:07 GMT -5
Your patience and virtue will some day be rewarded........
Hopefully soon..........
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Jan 30, 2011 20:01:55 GMT -5
Bob, So you are going on the record without doubt that you can personally state on 1/30/11 you have complete knowledge of all the share holdings of the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges, and that these holdings are intact as reported, and no shares have been sold over the course of the Bivens action, including 2010, by the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges. You have seen their stock certificates so you know they still hold all their reported shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. I just want to make sure that you don't perjure yourself. I will be saving your answer for further reference. J WB Jerry..You keep going on and on and on, just like an Eveready Battery...unfortunately only one has a positive side. You do not qualify to be a judge. I do not have to worry about perjuring myself...never have and never will. I have a right to post messages on a public message board to keep shareholders who want to be informed. Your constant badgering, immature threats and remarks are not seeking the truth....it is seeking attention and suppressing the truth. Honesty will prevail. Thank you, BHollenegg I posted this earlier with no response....I am seeking the truth so perhaps you can answer my post.... Steve... I addressed this earlier. The appeal process requires absolutely no participation by any of Plaintiffs; it is merely a pursuit by counsel to have the Appellate Court review the legal questions which are raised. I have seen legal documents about the Trust Funds, but not the account statements for the trust accounts. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob ....can you state what legal documents about the Trust Fund you have seen....this could put an entirely different light on things.....maybe I am the only one but I never saw it mentioned before....are these documents stating that the Trust exists..and who were the documents prepared by....thank you...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Ghost, Global Intelligence has contracts with the government. An appeal would provide a court record documenting sensitive information which the government does not want publicized. Consequently, the government will put pressure on Global Intelligence to release the funds. Thank you, BHollenegg This statement leads to an interesting question....a rhetorical one perhaps....if the Appeal would put pressure on Global why wasn't this done from day one in anticipation of any delays.....we have previously been delayed so many times...I would think some precautionary steps would be advised based on previous delays....IMHO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Ghost, The Bivens would not have been filed if the payments were made to the Shareholders. The result of filing did get the ball rolling to release the funds. The latest filing is an additional pressure, which combined with the rest of the pressure tactics, sends a strong message that we are not going away until the funds are released. They can use the National Security excuse to keep the information low-keyed, but as Attorney Hodges stated in his last Shareholders' update , there are no more reasons to delay the release of the funds to the Shareholders. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob are you saying that the National Security was just an excuse all this time.....
Hebbeke...your question "nothing came true from the last update till now?" . I am not sure what you are asking ? Correct, the filing is an additional pressure and insurance that the funds will all be released. If all the funds are released then the appeal is dropped. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob...All should be done by JAN 21,2011...that did not come true...or did it?
The Dinar on the Forex....The Dinar RV....that did not come true....or did it?
We have won....that did not come true .....or did it....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hebbeke...the filing was planned as a added measure to ensure all of the future payments are made. I posted about the appeal a couple of weeks ago. Thank you, BHollenegg If the so called SC directive was disregarded...what would make you think the the appeal would ensure anything?
Bob as always thank you for taking time to keep us aware of the events taking place....I would be grateful if you could add some clarity by answering the above questions.....
|
|
|
Post by cmkxerlong on Jan 30, 2011 20:09:55 GMT -5
Thank you Bob for standing up him and keeping the shareholders inform. Bob, So you are going on the record without doubt that you can personally state on 1/30/11 you have complete knowledge of all the share holdings of the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges, and that these holdings are intact as reported, and no shares have been sold over the course of the Bivens action, including 2010, by the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges. You have seen their stock certificates so you know they still hold all their reported shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. I just want to make sure that you don't perjure yourself. I will be saving your answer for further reference. J WB Jerry..You keep going on and on and on, just like an Eveready Battery...unfortunately only one has a positive side. You do not qualify to be a judge. I do not have to worry about perjuring myself...never have and never will. I have a right to post messages on a public message board to keep shareholders who want to be informed. Your constant badgering, immature threats and remarks are not seeking the truth....it is seeking attention and suppressing the truth. Honesty will prevail. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 20:15:16 GMT -5
I posted this earlier with no response....I am seeking the truth so perhaps you can answer my post.... Georgie, What does Bob owe you that you feel gives you a right to badger him for a response? He posts when he has information to relay. He posts when he can to clarify things he's said. He's not the holder of all evidence, and he's certainly not accountable to answering each and every thing that enters your mind. Pestering the person who actually cares enough to keep you informed isn't a strategy that will engender his desire to answer, or make your check arrive one minute sooner. He'll tell us what he knows and can share...he has all along. With Respects, C-Dub
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Jan 30, 2011 20:38:07 GMT -5
Mike...I don't appreciate your MLK jab. I did call and was informed they were closed for MLK and the following day due to elections and will be open on Wednesday. I am surprised at your twisting the facts as you have done before in taking up for Wolfbela. Why don't you hire an Attorney and work on releasing the funds to the shareholders instead of going after the ones working on releasing the funds? If you do not believe in the funds, then let the ones who want their funds continue with pursuing the funds do so. Thank you, BHollenegg Bob, I had hoped it wouldn't come to this, but if I've twisted the facts before, I would think you "wouldn't" be surprised. And, if I have, please feel free to point them out because I try very hard to make sure I provide accurate information, as you do. However, stating you had been turned in by people in the AG Action, and are being investigated because of it, along with your payout being delayed because of the investigation, was more than just a tad misleading. As for the PA AG, it was my understanding that you stated you had communicated with the PA AG on MLK's birthday and that you had a call scheduled for that Wednesday. If that's wrong, I stand corrected. But, I'm not sure why, if you did call on MLK's birthday, you would feel the need to post as much since you didn't, in that post, let us know it was closed. Additionally, Bob, I am not going after anyone, especially those working toward releasing the funds. If you know of someone I'm after, please state as much. My work is with the State Attorneys General to begin with the Marketmakers and Brokers that NSSed our stock. So far, there's thirteen of them in the mix. If you have any recommendations for a good attorney, let me know. And, how much was your retainer with Al? My funds are low from helping out shareholders in need, so I don't have a lot. Mike Mike...The reason I stated I called Monday is because I said I would call Monday during the weekend exchange of messages between the shareholders . I did call and was informed they are closed for regular business Monday for MLK Holiday and Tuesday for elections and will be open Wednesday. I posted I called and will be calling back Wednesday. I provided the number so anyone can call and check it out. Why are you making it out like it didn't happen. I have my phone bill I will be glad to submit. As far as the AG investigating, Wolfbela said I was turned in and I am being investigated by several State Attorney Generals. I pointed out the worst that can happen to me because I have been posting the truth is a possible delay of my distribution. I was not misleading anyone. You stated you are not going after anyone, especially the ones working on releasing the funds. Your support of Wolfbela's actions and your statement doesn't sound convincing, "There is no genius IBM plan, no genius PLAM, no 40-years-experience slam dunk, no 4x Bivens case winner strategy, no WGS. The strategy is a classic paradox. Hoodwinked is an understatement. This is soley about control of assets that we have been ruled as having no right or interest in. And, the appeal will rule the same since the chance to provide evidence has passed." Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|