|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 4, 2011 12:32:07 GMT -5
BHollenegg Diamondologist Re: GI « Reply #47 Yesterday at 10:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 10:18pm, flyfishing wrote: Flyfishing...A poster, Specimen, sent a complaint letter to Mr. Maheu about me and attached a message that I did not post. Mr. Maheu forwarded it to Attorney Hodges. I am out of the loop on information. Thank you, BHollenegg crackerjack Dr. Of Diamonds Re: GI « Reply #48 Yesterday at 10:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- so according to bob now- mahue has accomplished contact with hodges! Lol glta BHollenegg Diamondologist Re: GI « Reply #49 Yesterday at 10:44pm » Yesterday at 10:41pm, crackerjack wrote: glta Crackerjack...you are sharp and quick. cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=8274&page=4 georgie18Somebody help my little pea brain understand this........BHollenegg attempts to contact Peter with no luck....and now an anonymous poster sends a letter about BHollenegg to Peter and Peter finds it important enough to forward the letter about a man he wouldn't speak with to Hodges..who he claims he doesn't know.....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 4, 2011 18:50:16 GMT -5
ty sunbean777......
Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread*** « Reply #150 Today at 4:54pm »
mnwriter: harvscorvette today: We have won what is due us, F/P of $.80 cents per share plus trust fund monies. PLEASE trust Mr. Hodges. He has accomplished so much for us.
mnwriter: Just the losing team started a brawl at the end of the game, just keep your head up/shareholders need to keep there head up and look at the final score, it is posted on the scoreboard.
mnwriter: "WE HAVE WON" nothing the losing team can do about it except cause a delay in our celebrations. Losing team is being escorted of the playing field.Harv
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 5, 2011 10:54:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 5, 2011 11:00:49 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 04 Feb 2011, 10:28 PM EST Rating: Msg. 993341 of 993417
Jump to msg. # Wow, so Atty Hodges was correct, our journey was in territory none of us could have navigated. That's not to say our emails and antics may have helped but for a certainty the itch we needed to scratch, needed more than wishful thinking.
Regardless to what these packets say or eliminate, look what that cert pull did for us.... Thanks to UC, IBM, Tyler, Hodges & crew, those with heart inside our government and you.
cal
By: yfi4me2 04 Feb 2011, 10:35 PM EST Rating: Msg. 993345 of 993417 (Reply to 993341 by calvinwinters)
Jump to msg. # Calvin
when Bill wrote the dev letter it wasn't a week before he backed off
We all know why
By: calvinwinters 05 Feb 2011, 04:56 AM EST Rating: Msg. 993381 of 993417 (Reply to 993345 by yfi4me2)
Jump to msg. # yfi4me: Im not sure, why.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 5, 2011 11:01:31 GMT -5
By: cmkm_2011 05 Feb 2011, 06:33 AM EST Rating: Msg. 993384 of 993417
Jump to msg. # For Cynic, DONALD STOECKLEIN DEPOSITION, 1-24-06 In said deposition, Donald Stoecklein testifies that a naked short expert from Oregon with 25 years experience told both Bill Frizzell and him that a 14 to 1 short position exists in CMKM stock. That means that for every one legitimate share that exists, 14 naked short shares exist, which in turn means that numerous naked short sellers exist. In said deposition, Donald Stoecklein testifies that they obtained a NOBO list and the number of CMKM shares on that NOBO list exceeded the number of CMKM shares on the list of 1st Global Stock Transfer, which in turn means that naked short sellers exist.
By: sharasilva 05 Feb 2011, 07:17 AM EST Rating: Msg. 993388 of 993417 (Reply to 993384 by cmkm_2011)
Jump to msg. # AH with 30 + years experiance announced imminent cmkx payment, 50,000 packets must be lost in the mail
By: calvinwinters 05 Feb 2011, 08:00 AM EST Rating: Msg. 993391 of 993417 (Reply to 993388 by sharasilva)
Jump to msg. # sharasilva:That's why you're here, so our focus wont be loss. Thanks so much, cause for you to leave would make us feel loss. We'd have to think it was over, because there's no profit for you.
cal
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 6, 2011 12:41:58 GMT -5
ty bikinipro.....
harvscorvette Question to harv: We don't know what has happened in the last silent 3 weeks - do you?
Answer from harv: (KNOW WE HAVE WON HUGE, losing team is being escorted off the field. Best answer you will receive for the last 3 weeks of silence )
Harv
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:22:13 GMT -5
bikinipro Gossip Column Queen Re: The Weekly Buzz 01/31 « Reply #45 Today at 11:50am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Makes you go hmmmmm secretsantaRe: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #175 Today at 11:37am » Harv, It is really time for you and others to cut the crap and come clean with the shareholders. There IS NO Supreme Court directive related to any of this. You know it, I know it, some of the plaintiffs know it, and I confirmed it last week. I spoke with a SC paralegal and an attorney that argues cases at the SC. I even offered to pay him to look into it. He did it for free. This whole story was contrived along with some of the other tall tales to keep shareholders quiet. Why? I am trying to find out and so should everyone else. Anyone with a contact should be asking tough questions right now and not taking ANYTHING at face value. This includes the remaining plaintiffs. The shareholders are just a bit more intelligent than to buy off on a story about this directive that NO one has seen. Not even Al. So he is either being played or he is playing us. And the bottom line is the shareholders don’t deserve this BS. Brief Recap Al told some shareholders in December that if he was a betting man, he would bet we would be paid by Christmas. DIDN’T HAPPEN Chucky told everyone that because of this mythical SC directive we HAD to be paid by the end of December. DIDN’T HAPPEN Bob H said if you were still here in January you are not a shareholder. Well it’s February, I’m still here, and I still have my certs. Al said the Dinar would be revalued the weekend of the 14th right after his update. DIDN’T HAPPEN Al said that everything would be finished on the 21st. DIDN’T HAPPEN “WE HAVE WON” might make some of you feel good but it isn’t doing crap for our bank accounts. I will only FEEL GOOD when they distribute the funds, this is over, and I am on to something else. Best to all the loyal shareholders. millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ad=37227&page=9 millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37212&page=3
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:25:42 GMT -5
swmiller3 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #326 Today at 1:29pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- secretsanta did come up with some very good points...and I am willing to bet all of those points have crossed our minds more than once. I will say though, that I am still of the mind that a Supreme Court directive can exist and it not be public knowledge. Does it exist, I don't know, but I believe it can be done. Lumiere (an attorney) was kind enough to give a hypothetical (but legal) way it could happen. Therefore the statement concerning the Supreme Court directive that secretsanta made about him having an attorney check, does not give a final answer to this question. Just because the attorney that secretsanta worked with didn't find anything doesn't mean it does not exist. BUT, I will say this about a SC directive. If it does exist, and PM is defying that directive, then why hasn't the SC just had PM arrested and GI closed? Harv says that no one can defy a SC directive...well wake up...because someone IS defying the SC and has been doing it for well over 30 days now. IF the directive exist. We are coming up on the 1 year anniversary of when we were to get our money. Remember, our trust was released and the taxes paid in Dec 2009. Al stated that within 45 days of the trust being released we would have our money....that would be mid February 2010....which is the 1 year anniversary we are 1 week away from. It didn't happen though...the govt and others got in the way. We have been told numerous times that payment is "imminent", and yet, 1 year later we are still waiting. We have been told numerous times "we won"...yet none of us having anything in our hands or bank accounts to prove or show we have won. We hear the Dinar RV was to have already happened, yet it hasn't and most banks have not even heard it is to happen. We have heard about the WGS, but no one else in the world seems to know about it. You would think that if $42 trillion dollars were about to be released into the world that more than a few CMKX shareholders and some conspiracy website people would know about it. The news of the US going to gold backed US Treasury Notes would be on every news channel and every financial paper in the world...but it isn't. It seems as if CMKX shareholders and conspiracy websites are the only people and places that have heard of any of these monumental, world changing events. Why is that? How do you keep these massive events secret from the world...except for a few CMKX shareholders? Now I believe our trust exist...I believe Al is working to get our trust for us. But all the other...stories....are just tall tales and conspiracy flutter to confuse anyone that checks into what we are doing. Look at it this way. Al told us himself that the world would never be allowed to know what happened...the sting operation...the reverse sting by Robert Mahue (yes, reverse sting, because Mahue worked for the govt to run the sting against the financial naked shorters...but he also trapped the govt with their hands in the cookie jar, that is the only reason the govt allowed almost $4 trillion dollars to be put aside for us...IMO)...the almost $4 trillion dollar trust, none of the truth will ever reach the light of day...ever. But how do you hide almost $4 trillion dollars and 40,000+ shareholders and their truth? How do you keep it quiet? How do you keep newspapers and news teams off the scent? HOW? By making the shareholders look like a bunch of conspiracy nuts, that is how! Tell the shareholders a tale of World Global Settlements totaling $42 trillion dollars, Dinar RV, the entire US monetary system switching to gold backed Treasure notes, China running the show, the Queen involved, etc...and then let the shareholders and their imagination take over. Soon the story is so immense that it now has a life of its own. Soon a good number of the shareholders will believe so strongly in the tales that it will take on a life of its own...and shareholders will protect the story and the people telling the story as is they were protecting their children. And then when a legitimate news person looks into CMKX, what do they see....a bunch of fanatical people talking about fantastic tales of World Global Settlement, secret cabals controlling govt, China taking over, US financial system secretly being replaced..........an so the legitimate news people just turn around and walk away. No one will take us seriously because there is not one shred of "documented", "verifiable", "legitimate" evidence to prove any of the tall tales we have been talking about for a year. And so the 1 core truth....the CMKX trust....is protected from the public, by burying it in a pile of conspiracy tales that keep everyone else away.. It is a brilliant plan! Hide something big (our trust) by wrapping it in something bigger and crazier (WGS, Dinar RV, switching US currency, etc)! Brilliant! Stay focused on the 1 core truth....the CMKX trust....forget all the tales associated with it! IMO Steve « Last Edit: Today at 1:40pm by swmiller3 » millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37211&page=17
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:29:46 GMT -5
digger DIAMOND JEDI Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #320 Today at 12:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I would like to hear some answers to Secret Santas questions. Every time another date or promise passes, you kind of feel drained. When I look back I can't believe I'm still sitting here day after day for more than 7 years. I know, no one has made me sit here. However, all the speculations, in two week, one month, or even next week intervals have kept most of us glued to our computers. We check in daily or more, waiting and hoping. I'm still long and strong, and pray to God we are not being played, and or worn out. groundfog DIAMOND MINER Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #321 Today at 12:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The time for feel good posts is long over. The time for feel good mp3s is over. It's time to see the results of this effort-good or bad. I don't need my hand held, and I certainly don't need someone to rehash over and over what Hodges said in his last update, which at best is questionable and at worst contrived. spiritlife DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #323 Today at 12:56pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am often reminded as I look daily at this board of 1 Timothy 6:10 "For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows." We have certainly pierced ourselves through with many sorrows chasing after a return on this "investment." supercim DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #324 Today at 1:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It should be time to remove all the BS craps about Dinars. We've invested in CMKX, not Dinars and there is no relationship between them. No more distraction from BS rumors !!! Let's focus on the packages and find out whether or not they are real. Otherwise, we will be wasting time & waiting for something that may never exist. spiritlife DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: The Buzz Chat 01/31 « Reply #325 Today at 1:10pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:06pm, supercim wrote: It probably should be obvious to us by now that they are not real. We keep falling for the same stories over and over again. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37211&page=17
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:31:46 GMT -5
swmiller3 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD **.80 cents per share theory** « Thread Started Today at 2:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Personally, I think the holdup is still the govt and the original bad guys (the companies that naked shorted us and had to pay) trying to get the money from us. With it legally in a trust, no one can get to it unless the trust agreement allows that (which I am betting it doesn't). So the govt can't get the money...and the bad guys can't get the money.........but they can stand in the way of us getting it! Why? Because I think they are wanting to wear us down so that we will take less. Remember last year we received news stating that Al was given a counter offer from the govt of a few cents per share instead of the whole $5-$6 dollars per share. The govt and bad guys want the money, so they figured they could buy us off with a small portion of it and we would take it and run. But we didn't. And so the money has never been released to us. Now we hear of a .80 cent per share "fine and penalty" payment coming to us from the govt. They want to pay us this because they were wrong to withhold our money.....but yet, we don't have our money. Think of this everyone....IF the govt really wanted to give us this F&P money, then why would they let anyone, like PM, stand in the way of us getting it? If it is on the up and up, then the govt would be on our side and would throw the full weight of the govt onto PM shoulders and make him release the funds....but they don't seem to be doing that....why? Well, possibly because the .80 cents per share is not fines and penalty....but instead, it is the whole amount the govt and bad guys are willing to pay and then we sign over documents (in the packet) releasing our claim on the rest of the trust. We get the .80 cents per share....they get the rest. But PM as the trustee stepped in and stopped the offer from getting to us, he is refusing to release the packets. Remember, Al stated in his update that there may be a good reason for PM holding up the release.....maybe this is the reason. Forget the WGS, Dinar RV, new US gold backed currency, etc....focus on our trust. I think the govt and bad guys are still after it and that is the ONLY reason why it hasn't been released into our hands. IMO Steve gangusgreen DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: **.80 cents per share theory** « Reply #1 Today at 3:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is something to think about. What IF the $0.80 was all that we were going to get and the rest is to cover us under your blanket of lunacy conspiracy theory. I've always had a hard time wrapping my head around 3.87 TRILLION set aside for little old us. As of right now it is all fantasy because I am not seeing a ROI and until I do there will always be that nagging thought in the back of my mind. All IMHO Gangus millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37339
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:35:04 GMT -5
swmiller3 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: **.80 cents per share theory** « Reply #8 Today at 3:26pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 3:11pm, merrymithras wrote: Essentially you are correct, the burden of proof is Al's responsibility. But, if the govt had proof the trust didn't exist, bringing that info into court would immediately discredit his entire case...both to the court...but more importantly to his clients and all the shareholders. It would have been devastating to Al's case and the govt would not have passed up the opportunity. If the govt could have kill the case and discredited him from the beginning, they would have. But they didn't. Steve merrymithras DIAMOND DIGGER Re: **.80 cents per share theory** « Reply #9 Today at 3:48pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve, (and i am not being an ass) - what proof can be brought showing that something doesn't exist? It is impossible to prove non-existence, which is why the burden of proof always falls on the prosecution. Think about it outside of CMKX - if someone accuses you of having a magical bean buried someplace on the planet... how would you prove that you didn't? Even if you unearthed the entire planet, the prosecution would then say that you put it on a spaceship... which is why the burden of proof always lies 100% on the prosecution. Best Regards, MM millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37339
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:49:07 GMT -5
debintex DIAMOND JEDI Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #221 Today at 6:11pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 3:57pm, portrush wrote: Port, I think your post to SS was respectful and you made a couple of good points. However, I have to respond to this comment: "Now it seems there is a new sport for denigrating anyone or anything unless it meets our comfort zone of understanding. Not good, imo."That is not the only new sport going on around here. It appears the other sport is to demean or cast doubt of the loyalty of anyone who questions that which they don't understand. I personally believe that sport has done more to tear this board apart than anything. I've seen some posters get a pass for what I deem as very disrespectful responses to people. They appear to get a pass because they 100% support all the rumors and their posts are usually directed at people who question the rumors. I've frankly been a little surprised the mods have let this go on. I've always been a big fan of yours and I have supported the other mods 100% in the past. However, I respectfully have to say, I think the mods have done a disservice to this board by not discouraging this kind of non-stop arrogant, condescending reactions to respectful questioning by shareholders that have been around for years. Deb' millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37227&page=12
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:50:32 GMT -5
debintex DIAMOND JEDI Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #203 Today at 3:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:46pm, john3339 wrote: John, you are so wrong about SecretSanta! He's a loyal shareholder and has always believed there's money for us. He's always supported Urban too. He's pushing back against the numerous rumors which logically don't make any sense. I think we all need a good wake-up call. We all want to believe so bad, we are trying to justify things that don't even pass the giggle test. I believe Al is a good guy and on our side. I've appreciated what he has tried to do. However, he's either purposely giving us disinformation or someone is really playing him big time. I think it's all disinformation that Al thinks is serving a purpose somewhere. I can live with that as long as people don't hang on every word and get hurt/disappointed time and time again because things don't transpire. I really had to step back after Al's last update... it raised a lot of questions in my mind. Maybe it's time some of us start addressing the elephant in the room (and remember, these are things TOLD to AL)....for example: 1. Chucky told us in late November there was a SC directive which separated us from the WGS and directed payout by December 31st. Both Harv and Al supported Chucky. Now, does it make any sense that Peter would go to the SC AFTER Christmas to get us separated from the WGS and the SC grant that motion with 48 hrs to pay. Why do that if there was already a directive? Not to even mention that the SC was not in session between Christmas and New Years. Do we honestly think our trust is important enough to get the SC's attention during their break? Chucky thanked Al for an update which I think contradicted what he had been saying... where's Chucky now and why did he not question this update?? 2. I'm sorry, but a $150M fine with another $13M weekly... SERIOUSLY??? Think about it people... do you think Peter or anyone else would be sitting on packets if this were the case??? 3. The dinar. The IMF is loaning money to IRAQ. I've read the September letter of intent between IRAQ and the IMF. Here's one of the agreements..."Monetary policy will continue to aim at keeping inflation low, predominantly through a continuation of our exchange rate policy". This was also stated in a report that the IMF released in late October. Does that sound like they are going to revalue their currency to the rumored insane rates anytime soon? www.imf.org/external/np/loi/2010/irq/091810.pdfI don't want to burst any bubbles and I would love for someone to LOGICALLY address the issues I am pointing out. Call me a basher or what ever floats your boat, but it's time we all brought a little common sense back to this board. This board was originally the best place to go for dd/discussions. It's turned into nothing but rumors with two or three people jumping on shareholders who question the rumors. Questioning rumors does not mean someone isn't "Pro"... it means they're using their heads and not going to be lead around on a leash. I am confident there is money for us, but I think it's time we broaden our focus (outside the dinar and SC). Deb' millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37227&page=11
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 19:52:53 GMT -5
merrymithras DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #211 Today at 4:08pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pete, Not one piece of verifiable evidence has ever been provided to support ANY of this nonsense: Secret Supreme Court Directive - NO Dinar Reevaluation - NO That World Global Settlements is real - NO That there is a Trust - NO That the trust is designated for CMKX Shareholders - NO That there is a trustee - NO That money was every collected to fund this trust - NO That any of the NS 'bad guys' ever paid a cent - NO That Peter M is involved - NO That there are packets out there - NO That the packets contain money for us - NO That there was a secret meeting between CMKX reps and Banks - NO The only thing that is verifiable at this point is that a significant legal precedent has now been set at the federal-level against which any subsequent CMKX cases of the like would have to overcome. And that same precedence is about to be set at the 9th district; thereby covering just about all the legal bases available to us under a massive impenetrable protective umbrella of negative legal precedence against which any future cases would have to overcome... Can you smell what the rock is cookin'? Best Regards, MM tvcop DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #212 Today at 4:23pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What we do know as Fact is that an attorney and his staff has spent over a year and a considerable amount of money in travel, court fees, staffing and court appearances. We also know that the company has retained a transfer agent and is paying a considerable fee for this service. I ask why? Maybe you can shed some useful insight as why any of this would occur for a revoked pink sheet stock some 6 years later merrymithras DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #216 Today at 4:34pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TvCop, How many hours someone puts into a project is irrelevant when discussing the validity of the outcome. If i spend 50 years writing a book, does that make it a good book? Of course not. As for the Transfer Agent - Tyler won a couple of law suits and CMKX/CMKM/whatever is still registered as a CORPORATION not a sole proprietorship - they have to make a valid effort to keep track of the shareholders if they are to take receipt of their lawsuit winnings as a corporation. Best Regards, MM millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37227&page=11
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 6, 2011 20:01:39 GMT -5
majraddoc DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Supreme Court Directive « Reply #217 Today at 4:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- John, that's simply not true; I've been in this stock since 2004, and followed the saga with great hope. I don't believe a lot of the "information" stated as "facts", but remain hopeful. But trust me, one becomes quite frustrated and irritated when all of these statements of "fact" regularly fall through. Blind trust in this saga is simply silly. you can "BELIEVE" all you want, but nothing has come to fruition after all this time. Today at 11:43am, heat wrote: Becuse you took it too seriously! IMO, ifthis person actually held these beliefs, he/she would not be on the boards on a Sunday, blasting the longs and believers in the stock. Fac(opinion) is, if this poster actually believed what is in this post, this poster would have been long gone. I can only think of one reason why such a dis-believer would still be hanging around a message-board on a weekend...and it's NOT because of waiting for the eventual payout of the trust! Consider the tone...consider the source...consider it nuff said. BELIEVE! I do! john millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=37227&page=11
|
|