|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Feb 17, 2011 18:12:01 GMT -5
I just got off the phone with the US Treasury. They checked my name and SS# with any funds paid or authorized in my name. The last amount paid in my name was last years tax return. Am I suppose to believe there is a check paid to me setting in a warehouse waiting for an 'ok'; however, there is no record of it . There is nothing to suggest any of this nonsense is true. I spoke with Cottrell , he is in fact waiting on a phone call. The same one he has been waiting on for years and years. Briwadd Briwadd....you got money back.... I guess he claimed his CMKX share as worthless.. NOT FUNNY... ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Feb 17, 2011 18:52:52 GMT -5
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 21861 / February 17, 2011 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sakwinder Singh Narwal, Justin Beck, Brian Hill, and Larry Downs, United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:11-cv-00303-JAH -POR (filed Feb. 16, 2011). SEC Charges Three San Diego-Based Stock Promoters and a Canadian Citizen in a Pump and Dump Scheme The Securities and Exchange Commission charged three principals of Del Mar Corporate Communications, LLC, a San Diego-based investor relations company, and a Canadian citizen for committing fraud while promoting a penny stock company headquartered in British Columbia, Canada. In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, the SEC alleges that Sakwinder Narwal, a British Columbia resident, hired Del Mar Corporate Communications, which is now defunct, and its principals Justin Beck, Brian Hill, and Larry Downs to conduct a telemarketing campaign designed to dupe investors into buying the stock of Pax Clean Energy with exaggerated claims about the company’s future prospects and stock price. The SEC alleges that beginning in February 2009, Narwal hired Del Mar Corporate Communications to promote Pax Clean Energy and its planned merger with another company. The SEC alleges that Narwal funded and controlled the entire fraudulent campaign. He directed Beck, Hill, and Downs to hype the stock by telling investors that Pax Clean Energy would be the “next Google” and its price would rise to $100 per share by the end of the year. The SEC contends that by April 2009, the defendants successfully pumped the stock price to an all-time high of $11.24 per share. During this time, and without disclosing to investors, Narwal and Del Mar Corporate Communications repeatedly sold Pax Clean Energy shares — the very securities they were recommending investors to buy – reaping proceeds of almost $455,000 and $140,000, respectively. The SEC’s complaint charges all four defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement, a civil penalty, and a penny stock bar against Narwal. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, Beck, Hill, and Downs have agreed to settle the charges against them. All three agreed to an injunction, and additionally, Downs consented to a penny stock bar. Beck and Hill also agreed to certain undertakings and a five year conduct-based injunction. The SEC requires all of them to pay disgorgement relating to Del Mar Corporate Communications’ stock sales along with pre-judgment interest, and Downs to pay a civil penalty, but waives these payments based on their sworn financial statements. The SEC did not seek a civil penalty against Beck or Hill. The SEC has entered into cooperation agreements with Beck and Hill. The terms of their settlements reflect credit given to them by the SEC for their substantial past and anticipated continuing cooperation in its investigation and enforcement action. The SEC previously suspended trading in Pax Clean Energy on April 28, 2009, due to questions about the accuracy of the information circulating in the market about the company. See www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2009/34-59827.pdf. The SEC would like to acknowledge the assistance of the British Columbia Securities Commission in this matter. SEC Complaint
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Feb 17, 2011 20:02:30 GMT -5
So I take it that we are not going to hear from AH again? I don't know why we heard from him the last time...
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Feb 17, 2011 21:46:42 GMT -5
JDMerlin_CMKX: I emailed Marilyn last night if Leo was attached to CMKX,,,she responded
JDMerlin_CMKX: Hi, XXXX... Lee Wanta's funds are in no way tied to the CMKX funds. The subject has come up because when I wrote the first article on News With Views about Lee, I got a lot of emails from CMKX/CMKM investors who read my articles. I asked Lee about it (January 2010) then. Until that point in time, I was unaware of CMKX/CMKM.
JDMerlin_CMKX: Lee explained then that there was no connection between his funds and the CMKX funds (other than the fact that both have an unknown hand preventing access to the funds). That entire situation is so disgusting -- such a good example of the total lack of the Rule of Law and no political will or respect for our Constitution... it makes me ill.
JDMerlin_CMKX: I do wish you well and wish I could help. Regards, Marilyn
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Feb 17, 2011 22:02:01 GMT -5
So what we've become is basically a 'Leo Wanta' entity. 10 yrs from now there will some other thing, maybe not a stock, but some group or person entitled to $X trillion saying they are about to get paid along with the cmkx'ers. This thing is just never gonna happen. Fphucket
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Feb 17, 2011 22:23:04 GMT -5
Yeah, you're probably right...
Might as well just go back to what you were doing b4 you started following this stuff on the message boards...
|
|
|
Post by davesaint on Feb 17, 2011 22:56:39 GMT -5
I just reviewed the 80 page Transfer Online transaction summary from the Marco Glisson case.
What does canceled mean and what does issued mean exactly?
I see a name the amount of shares and canceled. Then a lot of times I see the same name below with issued next to it.
Interesting. I see Cluney, Hamilton, Treffey, Morris, and even a Casavant in the document.
Can someone please explain how to read the document.
Thanks, Davesaint
|
|
|
Post by chris on Feb 18, 2011 7:42:35 GMT -5
As an observation it's hilarious to watch Mona and how out of touch she really is. She still thinks cautious_guest posting garbage on RB for the last couple of days is the real cautious (current BOD member) from the past, and is asking the imposter do call her. And she has people following her? Unreal
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Feb 18, 2011 10:35:25 GMT -5
yawn.
|
|
|
Post by z06mike on Feb 18, 2011 11:16:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Feb 18, 2011 13:33:38 GMT -5
Was that a rumor or fact ?
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Feb 18, 2011 13:35:23 GMT -5
Was that a rumor or fact ? Definitely a fact. The vibe on the boards sucks now that the Guru's have been outed. I wish I could go back to being a millionaire tomorrow sorta thing.
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Feb 18, 2011 13:44:33 GMT -5
Was that a rumor or fact ? Definitely a fact. The vibe on the boards sucks now that the Guru's have been outed. I wish I could go back to being a millionaire tomorrow sorta thing. Too funny... We are having Rumor withdrawls !! I think that because Football season is over too.... Did the rumor die about being on Level 2 or 3 for the Funds distribution? I thought that was the last rumor? This is worse than a Daytime Soap Show..... Anything new? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler?
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Feb 18, 2011 13:53:55 GMT -5
Definitely a fact. The vibe on the boards sucks now that the Guru's have been outed. I wish I could go back to being a millionaire tomorrow sorta thing. Too funny... We are having Rumor withdrawls !! I think that because Football season is over too.... Did the rumor die about being on Level 2 or 3 for the Funds distribution? I thought that was the last rumor? This is worse than a Daytime Soap Show..... Anything new? Anyone? Buehler? Buehler? Level 2 or Level 3 distribution? Tier 1 tier 7 who the eff knows. What ever happened to the tiers of payment? 1 in the same?
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Feb 18, 2011 14:00:23 GMT -5
throw us a bone AH?
|
|