|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 17, 2014 6:20:34 GMT -5
Elwood P. Dowd DIAMOND JEDI Post by Elwood P. Dowd on 3 hours ago
I remember feeling good when Roger Summers AKA phxgld was named to the Board. I though he was one of the good guys from all the research and recordings he made way back when.
We never heard from him.
Why?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 17, 2014 8:50:19 GMT -5
Elwood P. Dowd DIAMOND JEDI Post by Elwood P. Dowd on 3 hours agoI remember feeling good when Roger Summers AKA phxgld was named to the Board. I though he was one of the good guys from all the research and recordings he made way back when. We never heard from him. Why? The only one heard from... was Stan Polsom aka Cautious via his resignation letter below.
Thanks...Elwood P. Dowd for the repost. You left Stan Polsom, former Director of CMKX off your list. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby tender my resignation from the Board of Directors of CMKM Diamonds Inc. In accordance with the rules and regulations, I must give my reason for resigning. They are as follows: 1. First, I must point out that it is my belief that this is a "make work" only program for the Executive Branch based out of Tyler, Texas. I have asked repeatedly for an accounting of upcoming court cases, the anticipated cost of conducting same, and the anticipated revenue left over to be put in treasury as shareholder equity. To-date, no answer has been forthcoming. However, when we look at the past performance, every cent of equity collected during the past four years has been consumed by legal expenses, day-to-day expenses and wages. Therefore, if there is never to be any value for the shareholders, why are we doing this? 2. Secondly, our Tyler group (including legals) appear to approach each case as if it was their personal case. The Board of Directors were never consulted regarding the direction of these cases, and if we were asked about anything, it was late in the day when the only decision left was their decision. The Roger Glenn case is a good example. After sitting through every minute of the trial, my conclusion was that we were ill-prepared and too quick to assume that the documents we had were going to win the day. Our witnesses were will-prepared, while their witnesses were well rehearsed in how they were to present their evidence. Our expert witnesses came off as weak and without strong knowledge of the rules and regulations regarding the stock market. On the other hand, their witnesses appeared to be well rehearsed and were prompted by their attorney at the right time and with the right questions, so that what they had to say was totally devastating to our case. Our cross-examination was weak and without direction, consequently the verdict went against us. To give you an example, rarely did we "object" to the evidence and statements offered by the other side. However, there were many objections by the other side that forced us to stop our line of questioning because the objection was upheld by the judge. Again, we appeared weak and indecisive. 3. The pending of Well Fargo case only confirms that there will be little or nothing in the form of shareholder equity. Already I have heard of varying amounts from five million up to 70 million dollars as expected settlements. Whatever the amount is, by the time you take out 40 percent for legal costs, probably another 10 percent for special costs, office expense, interest on loans, salaries, etc., what will be left to share amongst the 690 billion shares? Again, thought it may appear to be a sure thing, as in the Roger Glenn case, we may be running up high bills with no guarantee of return. 4. There is also the matter of five or six properties that we will be attempting to seize under court orders. The total value of these properties will most likely to be in the three to four million dollar value. However, if the value of these properties follows the pattern set by the Georgia and Virginia properties, probably much less will be realized, even if we are successful in our court actions. Again, since most of these properties are outside the Texas Law Jurisdiction, extra legal costs will be necessary. 5. Insofar, as the Saskatchewan diamond/mining claims are concerned, as a Director, I know very little about the circumstances of discussions held between the Executive Branch and Emerson Koch. The only thing I am aware of is that Emerson Koch is demanding a two million dollar payment to include us in the venture. No mention has been made to the Board of Directors regarding the magnetic overviews, the number of test drill holes made, the result of geological reports, assay reports or the likes. I cannot and will not commit the shareholders to this venture unless there is a very detailed report made to the Directors regarding all of the above. 6. Lastly, we are committed to paying $14,500 - that is $8,000 to Mr. James Lowden and $6,500 to Mr. Kevin West to carry on the work for CMKM. However, since our only endeavors appear to be "legal cases", and since we are already committed to paying legal expenses for these cases, the Board of Directors felt that bi-weekly time sheets showing what work was being done for CMKM would be appropriate. After making the request in September 2011, we have had no response from the Executive Branch. Like so many of our requests, it appears that if they don't like it, they ignore it. 7. After much discussion and prodding, we finally arranged for Mr. Steve Walker to become our Public Relations Officer. The Board of Directors felt that there is little in the way of CMKM news that would harm the company, but the shareholders have a right to know, and should know what we are doing with their company. However, it appears that the Executive Branch would prefer that Mr. Walker held the title in name only, and that he would have little contact with the shareholders. The lack of information is not the fault of Mr. Walker, but the fault is with the directive of CMKM. 8. Finally, the Board of Directors has no funds to finance the overseeing of the direction and management of CMKM. This makes the job of the Board of Directors impossible. For this and all of the above reasons, I must in honesty and fairness to the shareholders, tender my resignation. Whatever the future decisions that are made by the shareholders, I wish you good fortune in your endeavors. Signed: ______________________________________________ Stan Polsom, Director of CMKM
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 19, 2014 14:36:25 GMT -5
regarding Stan Polsom's Resignation letter above ......
ines DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD yesterday at 11:38am
I have been thinking of our general situation and also Kevin Frizzell management. Everything I thought is confirmed and listed in this letter by Stan Polsom.
When Tyler gang took over Cmkx it is clear they took a stand that nobody can touch them, they can do whatever they want.. and they did not give a d**n about shareholders or what they have to say.
They attitude was obvious and glaring in action and communication. Which made me think what has happened here and why.
To behave and act like that, its like somebody that got a "free card" to do whatever.. and my thinking is along the lines.. that these guys have made some kind of deal with SEC and maybe others.. basically selling us down the river.., in regards anything that Government.. did not want put out, meddling in, and in exchange... they got "free card" to profit personally from whatever they can get out of this shell..
The fact that Frizzell "lost" the Roger Glenn case.. may not be incompetence in this scenario, but just another fakeout for the shareholders.. to appear they are doing something that we would expect them to do, so they staged this incompetent scenario, while again possibility.. Frizzell made money in the settlement on the side.
Stan Paulson did write a good letter, listing events of how kevin and frizzell have treated this company and shareholders. They basically don't give a d**n.. and such strong attitude has to come from some kind of realization that they can do whatever.. or a "free card".
Stan is right. Nothing will ever come to shareholders from this company with Frizzell in it. He set it up that way. I spoke with SK and told him flat out about my dislike for how frizzell has set himself up, and for what he has done.
Still, SK says that basically Frizzell has input himself in every lawsuit possible.. to get the cut, so there is not enough left for any other hired lawyer to come in. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Its been years. We don't have to wait more years to assess what has happened so far and to make conclusions on people like Frizzell. Stan Paulson is straight up guy for writing it like it is, and removing himself. That says it all. Frizzell has ceased the opportunity and boxed the company and its shareholders and any value and profits that can possibly come out of it.
My conclusion is .. the only reason anybody is still there is because of possibility of Wells fargo lawsuit, additional real estate properties and its value, and the value of cmkx shell itself. Basically more money somebody cant extract from this for themselves, and nothing else. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 27, 2014 17:35:12 GMT -5
From Steve Kirkpatrick's Update on December 19, 2013
"As previously reported, I have cancelled the Webex subscription to conserve cash, but will host one more event on the Webex format without incurring additional cost. I will change over to the free Paltalk format in January. I have already designed a Paltalk room under New Horizons Holdings, Inc. which you can preview prior to the first event."
So have we rec'd a date for January's Paltalk Room meeting?? Times arunnin' out!!
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 27, 2014 18:52:05 GMT -5
From Steve Kirkpatrick's Update on December 19, 2013 "As previously reported, I have cancelled the Webex subscription to conserve cash, but will host one more event on the Webex format without incurring additional cost. I will change over to the free Paltalk format in January. I have already designed a Paltalk room under New Horizons Holdings, Inc. which you can preview prior to the first event." So have we rec'd a date for January's Paltalk Room meeting?? Times arunnin' out!!
SINGLE Darn I looked at the NHHI Website before poting the above post.....and did not see the update Just saw that It was posted on RB 2 hours ago.... Went back to check after posting it here and still nothing?? Seems my NHHI page does not update until I refresh the page.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 16, 2014 22:09:22 GMT -5
I checked the Company site (but my page usually never automatically updates or refreshes) the last update I see is the CMKM vs. Wells Fargo Bank Dated... 2/14/14
I am really surprised that Steve Kirkpatrick has not addressed the alleged passing of Urban Casavant ?? Surely he has contacts who can verify or deny ??
What gives?? If true, Maybe SK thinks the family is entitled to some privacy before it is verified on the boards, knowing full well some will make a mockery or circus out of it?...... as we have already seen? Or could it be that he is exhibiting common courtesy and heeding the old idiom.... " If You Can't Say Anything Nice, Don't Say Anything At All"........ Just wondering??
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 18, 2014 11:12:17 GMT -5
I checked the Company site (but my page usually never automatically updates or refreshes) the last update I see is the CMKM vs. Wells Fargo Bank Dated... 2/14/14 I am really surprised that Steve Kirkpatrick has not addressed the alleged passing of Urban Casavant ?? Surely he has contacts who can verify or deny ?? What gives?? If true, Maybe SK thinks the family is entitled to some privacy before it is verified on the boards, knowing full well some will make a mockery or circus out of it?...... as we have already seen? Or could it be that he is exhibiting common courtesy and heeding the old idiom.... " If You Can't Say Anything Nice, Don't Say Anything At All"........ Just wondering?? SINGLE As thought & expected.............Thanks SK Posted on CMKM's site: February 17, 2014 RE: Death of Urban Casavant To All CMKM Shareholders: Reliable sources have confirmed the death of Urban Casavant on February 14, 2014 as a result of complications from a routine hernia surgery a few days prior. Casavant’s passing has been reported in PalTalk rooms and on Proboards since Friday, and it is indeed true. It would not be appropriate for this company to publish any commentary about Casavant’s death that could be construed as celebrating or gloating. I have nothing good to say about Urban Casavant, as the evidence I have seen indicates that the man did many immoral and illegal things that have done great damage to our shareholder base of 50,000+ people. However, he was a human being with a family that is likely hurting at this time over the loss of a loved one. In spite of his alleged wrongdoing, I hope that Casavant repented of his sins and received Jesus as his Savior prior to his death. If he did, he is in Heaven today – his wrongs covered by the blood of Jesus that was shed for us all. If he did not find that truth, then his eternal fate is far worse than anything we can imagine – only God can judge. The entire situation is tragic, from the massive fraud committed by former insiders, to the suffering of 50,000+ CMKM/NHHI shareholders, to the early death of a man that we can neither celebrate nor commemorate. His family deserves common respect and the space needed to grieve over their loss. I encourage all CMKM/NHHI shareholders to extend this common and decent courtesy to the Casavant family. I changed the name of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in September, 2013 to get away from the sordid reputation of CMKM and the Casavant name. The events of recent days close another chapter in the long and arduous journey of CMKM/NHHI and its shareholders. We await the decision of Judge Scann in the Wells Fargo case, the extradition of John Edwards, and the impending criminal trial to follow. In spite of the damage done to this company and its large shareholder base, we still have a strong hope for the day when CMKM/NHHI will defy the extreme odds and become a valuable, profitable company that our shareholders can be proud of. I will post Judge Scann’s decision as soon as I get it. God bless you all. Steve Kirkpatrick
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 11, 2014 14:23:23 GMT -5
I believe the reason that SK gave was ... Lack of the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2014 15:08:21 GMT -5
I believe the reason that SK gave was ... Lack of the almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ It is actually relatively cheap. I converted my corporation when I moved it from GA to OH for under $1000. Mike
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 29, 2014 7:18:31 GMT -5
vngntn2 DIAMOND DIGGER Post by vngntn2 on 13 hours ago
VERY tenuous hold for shareholder in the current company. IF the CEO & other appointed ( not elected ) BOD members decide to dilute company
who's to stop that ?
I have seen this situation more than once. Not feelin' real cozy.
Bona-Fide is a UCC classification of multiple ownership of same asset -WHO VOTES ?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 9, 2014 5:58:29 GMT -5
#2004979 tuscan201211 hours ago How does SK think Wells Fargo made this damage to shareholders when he says that the rest of the story is all inside job ?[
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 23, 2014 7:09:36 GMT -5
newpossibilities DIAMOND DIGGER
Whats the news tonight for New Horizons Holdings, Inc
Post by newpossibilities on 9 hours ago
I missed Paltalk tonight 4-22-14 could use some help. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Apr 23, 2014 9:47:09 GMT -5
newpossibilities DIAMOND DIGGER Whats the news tonight for New Horizons Holdings, Inc Post by newpossibilities on 9 hours ago I missed Paltalk tonight 4-22-14 could use some help. Thanks I have scheduled Webinar #29 for Tuesday, April 29, 2014 at 8 PM CDT. I will be using the New Horizons Holdings, Inc. Paltalk room. Here are instructions for joining the event: 1. Download Paltalk Messenger (free download). 2. Look under “Business and Finance” rooms and under the subheading “Investments”. 3. When the room is open you will see the name New Horizons Holdings, Inc . 4. Click on the room to join the meeting. 5. You can also use the URL express/paltalk.com/index.html?gid=1542973241 to join the meeting. I plan to discuss ongoing CMKM/NHHI business, including the Wells Fargo case. And, as always, I will attempt to answer as many pertinent questions as time allows. I hope many of you will attend the event. Thank you. Steve Kirkpatrick www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/index.html
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Apr 25, 2014 12:11:20 GMT -5
23taramonique DIAMOND JEDI Post by 23taramonique on Apr 21, 2014 at 10:59am
The way I see things the only way for shareholders to receive any type of payment is to trade on the open market. Does anyone know if the CEO is anywhere close to getting this company back to trading and if so are we able to deposit our CMKX certificates back into our brokerage account? How will it work if we do go back to reading with the new company with all of us owing CMKX stock certificate. Can someone please ask the CEO on the next webinar
Tara
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Apr 25, 2014 14:25:34 GMT -5
23taramonique DIAMOND JEDI Post by 23taramonique on Apr 21, 2014 at 10:59amThe way I see things the only way for shareholders to receive any type of payment is to trade on the open market. Does anyone know if the CEO is anywhere close to getting this company back to trading and if so are we able to deposit our CMKX certificates back into our brokerage account ? How will it work if we do go back to reading with the new company with all of us owing CMKX stock certificate. Can someone please ask the CEO on the next webinar Tara Seriously, if the only way we'll receive ANYTHING for our troubles, pains, loyalty, what ever you want to call it, is by trading again, well then there better be IMMENSE valuation here or we'll not even be lucky enough to get back what we put into this thing. And I sure don't see anything immense here. Yes, yes, my opinion. meow
|
|