|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 12, 2015 8:28:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Feb 12, 2015 16:26:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 13, 2015 17:40:05 GMT -5
Maya DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Post by Maya on 18 minutes ago
Acca saw billions in a trust. Was it a lie? Why? Acca knows his sources and has believed them over all this time. Why would Peter Maheu lie to Acca and us? What's the point? Is the $7.40 a lie or a promise from the government that has yet to materialize? What we don't know could fill a thousand books. LOL This ain't over until I say it is! Period! LOL HH
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 16, 2015 14:52:24 GMT -5
#2118814 EricGreenField 23 hours ago
EDWARDS trial is scheduled for Sept, 2015
Two questions:
1) is there a chance the trial will be postponed?
2) is there a chance EDWARDS doesn't make it to trial, the same way URBAN didn't make it?
EDWARDS is getting old and frail, especially after serving those years in prison. The ugly old fart is going to die in the next few years. What happens if he doesn't make it to trial? Can we still collect on him or is OUR money safe in a foreign account, outside the reach of US law?
|
|
|
Post by vulcanized crawler on Feb 17, 2015 7:52:15 GMT -5
death seems to be the culprits secret end game. kinda terminal, but, effective, huh?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 20, 2015 8:32:16 GMT -5
Here's your chance. In regards to the upcoming Webinar... Steve Kirkpatrick suggests........
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Feb 22, 2015 11:13:49 GMT -5
#2120565 cmkxinfoBOMB 20 hours ago
Anyone have a link to our large judgement we won
There has to be a link to this case if it happened, right lol?
The evidentiary hearing in Clark County District Court regarding a large judgment obtained by CMKM/NHHI has been delayed until March 12, 2015. The judgment debtor is attempting to get the hearing delayed further into May, 2015, which we have not agreed to, as we have been pursuing a recovery from this judgment for nearly two years. However, the court may grant a further delay in spite of our efforts to expedite a decision. Our legal team has conducted recent depositions and gathered further evidence to defend and reconfirm the validity of the judgment, and will defend our position in the hearing whenever it is held. I will report the outcome of the hearing as soon as it is completed, and will inform you if the court grants a further delay.
Can't be Wells Fargo or he would just say WF. So who is the defendant. If John Edwards why no say John Edwards.
cmkxinfoBOMB 18 hours ago
Obviously SK is a Tyler/government puppet. But what judgement? May 2013
A hearing was held 11/25/14 with regards to a large US judgment that CMKM lawyers obtained in May, 2013. The judgment was domesticated to a foreign country in an effort to collect on the US judgment, but the judgment debtor recently filed for dismissal of our judgment in US court, which would have nullified our collections effort overseas. The judge did not dismiss our judgment in the 11/25 hearing, but instead called for an evidentiary hearing, the date of which has not been firmly set. We have already provided substantial evidence in obtaining the judgment. However, the judge will require the evidentiary hearing before ruling on whether our judgment will stand or must be re-filed. If we can succeed in actually enforcing this judgment, it would provide much-needed seed capital to NHHI to begin building a real, functioning and growing business.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Feb 22, 2015 15:12:10 GMT -5
RE: Webinar #36 Recap, Updates
To All CMKM/NHHI Shareholders:
I hope everyone had a great Thanksgiving celebration with plenty of family, friends, food, shopping, and football. We had a good turnout for Webinar #36 last Tuesday night, with 65+ attendees in the NHHI Paltalk room. I have received requests for a summary of the Webinar, which I will provide today.
Hearing on Large Judgment Obtained by CMKM
A hearing was held 11/25/14 with regards to a large US judgment that CMKM lawyers obtained in May, 2013. The judgment was domesticated to a foreign country in an effort to collect on the US judgment, but the judgment debtor recently filed for dismissal of our judgment in US court, which would have nullified our collections effort overseas. The judge did not dismiss our judgment in the 11/25 hearing, but instead called for an evidentiary hearing, the date of which has not been firmly set. We have already provided substantial evidence in obtaining the judgment. However, the judge will require the evidentiary hearing before ruling on whether our judgment will stand or must be re-filed. If we can succeed in actually enforcing this judgment, it would provide much-needed seed capital to NHHI to begin building a real, functioning and growing business.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 3, 2015 8:27:00 GMT -5
lcp77 DIAMOND DIGGER Mar 1, 2015 at 6:49pm seagull likes this. Post by lcp77 on Mar 1, 2015 at 6:49pm
IMO:Nobody YET has given me a valid/credible answers to WHY.
Steve was able to hijack our company with 2 million shares! I have 30 million shares...my Dad has 184 million! Both my Dad and I have an MS in Business my Dad runs a C Corp!......Tell me what credentials SK has that makes him qualified!
|
|
|
Post by timonesock on Mar 3, 2015 21:18:25 GMT -5
Uh he agreed to screw us right along with KW BF AND THE REST OF THE CROOKS!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 5, 2015 13:17:10 GMT -5
**RUNNINGRICH** DIAMOND JEDI Post by **RUNNINGRICH** on 52 minutes ago
I'd offer this ..... WHO? Says the Trustee HAS NOT RECEIVED OUR FUNDS?
Just maybe funds HAVE BEEN RECEIVED and NOW COMES the DISTRIBUTION PART?
Just thinkin here ...
Regards
RUNNINGRICH
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 16, 2015 16:36:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 18, 2015 4:59:03 GMT -5
#2127356 EricGreenField 8 hours ago
Well? March 17.
What is the result?
What is SK saint about today's hearing?
He said he would report following the judge's decision.
I'm betting the judge delayed it, for what is now the standard, "let's play it safe and give it another week or ten."
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 27, 2015 8:48:31 GMT -5
#2130121 nhhinow a minute ago
If you're a debtor, you owe someone something....in this case, debtor is being used as a singular (not plural)...could it mean an institution, a bank, DTC or a Trustee owes us a LARGE sum of money?
Why SK uses LARGE here? why did he use the word LARGE in WF case?
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Mar 27, 2015 9:24:28 GMT -5
In English and American law, a judgment debtor is a person against whom a judgment ordering him to pay a sum of money has been obtained and remains unsatisfied. Such a person may be examined as to their assets, and if the judgment debt is of the necessary amount he may be made bankrupt if he fails to comply with a bankruptcy notice (in US, Law, an involuntary petition) served on him by the judgment creditors.
In the past, the judgment debtor could have been committed to prison or have a receiving order made against him in a judgment summons under the Debtors Act 1869.[citation needed]
Specific debts are "non dischargable" such as debts for fraud, and civil judgments that are obtained in a civil Adversary proceeding in bankruptcy. During such proceedings (US LAW) the judge whom presides over the bankruptcy declairs that a specific debt be deemed as Non Dischargeable, in that the bankruptcy will not dismiss the debt, and the debtor is obligated for the full amount of the judgment, for life.
Examinations, referred to as Judgment Debtor Exams or a (JDX) of the debtor are conducted in front of a district court judge, and the debtor is required to make the debtor answer questions about his or her assets, or face the possibility of imprisonment for contempt of court. The moving attorney of judgment holder is able to request that the court issue an order, during the exam that forces the debtor to answer questions or be jailed.
The debtor is not allowed in the law to use the fifth as a response to any questions as the debtor is already deemed as convicted and he/she must answer any question put forth to them or face an order to comply or be jailed for non compliance.
The JDX is considered[according to whom?] to be in many civil actions the most effective manner to collect judgments as the debtor's potential incarceration is used as a motivating factor for then to answer questions of pay off the judgment.
|
|