|
Post by sunbeam777 on Sept 2, 2011 12:05:46 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 02 Sep 2011, 12:57 PM EDT (Reply to 1035263 by rosencrantz2010) rosencrantz2010 nothing to really report other than the line is open... i didn't ask to much of Tyler "this time"...i have no questions, i'll await word. on one of my visits to The Great State of Texas i was treated to a long converstion from the horses mouth that has left a lingering bad taste in mine for five years after being lied to (or the truth still in hiding). i thought this was over in 2006, early 2007 without a doubt...yet here we are that said, i still believe 100% in "The Good Outcome" and to "extract" maximum value even though i have not one bit of greed. i want nothing more or less than ever penny "extracted" from those who are corrupted and i don't give a d*mn who gets the spoils as long as it goes to those who will actually help in a crisis and make changes for the betterment of all. way to much unnecessary suffering, it makes me sick to my stomach to think about.. sorry to bore you with a response without "facts", but i don't think many will get facts from the hotline that will be of any substance. anywho...CHEERS!! Enjoy The Weekend! and the week after )) ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1035271
|
|
rowe
Diamond Finder
Posts: 55
|
Post by rowe on Sept 2, 2011 12:27:51 GMT -5
<<i called no answer...>>
skoondog, what time did you call. I called at 12:10 EDT and Steve answered. He was happy and willing to answer all of my questions. However, I must admit that I was not adequately prepared as I did not expect an answer.
I asked if Tyler had considered an on line stockholder's meeting and Steve said that he believes that it is not allowed by the SEC.
I asked about results of the 2005 core samples. He said they have not been tested because if they were tested the results would have to be made public within 2 years. Now, I am not sure what that means to us. I am not sure why it is important that the results not be made public.
I asked to see audited financial statements. Steve told me (and, we already knew there were financials for 2007-2010) that the company does have financials for 2007 thru 2010 but they have not been audited because of the expense of the audit.
I asked with whom we have joint ventures. Steve said the only joint ventures of which he is aware are those concerning New Corp (w/ Emerson Koch). New Corp would require $4,000,000 to happen and we (the company/shareholders) would be responsible for 80% ($3.2 million).
I asked about properties owned by CMKX. He told me of properties in Ga and Va that Bill Frizzell spoke about in his Dec. 31, 2010 Litigation update. I remember reading that update but do not remember about property in GA and VA; however, after I post this message, I will read that update again.
I also asked how the Chinese were involved but Steve was unable to help me there (probably because I did not know exactly what to ask).
Steve said there are 800 Billion authorized shares and 696 Billion unauthorized shares. He is being paid from restricted shares owned by the company. He is working from his home in California.
I regret that I was not better prepared with questions but I was pleased to find Steve ready and willing to answer any question I had. If he did not know the answer to my question he tried to find it. I believe Steve to be one of the good guys. He has been a stockholder since November of 2002. I do hope someone who is better briefed than I finds an opportunity to speak with Steve.
Rowe
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Sept 2, 2011 12:35:51 GMT -5
<<i called no answer...>> skoondog, what time did you call. I called at 12:10 EDT and Steve answered. He was happy and willing to answer all of my questions. However, I must admit that I was not adequately prepared as I did not expect an answer. I asked if Tyler had considered an on line stockholder's meeting and Steve said that he believes that it is not allowed by the SEC. I asked about results of the 2005 core samples. He said they have not been tested because if they were tested the results would have to be made public within 2 years. Now, I am not sure what that means to us. I am not sure why it is important that the results not be made public. I asked to see audited financial statements. Steve told me (and, we already knew there were financials for 2007-2010) that the company does have financials for 2007 thru 2010 but they have not been audited because of the expense of the audit. I asked with whom we have joint ventures. Steve said the only joint ventures of which he is aware are those concerning New Corp (w/ Emerson Koch). New Corp would require $4,000,000 to happen and we (the company/shareholders) would be responsible for 80% ($3.2 million). I asked about properties owned by CMKX. He told me of properties in Ga and Va that Bill Frizzell spoke about in his Dec. 31, 2010 Litigation update. I remember reading that update but do not remember about property in GA and VA; however, after I post this message, I will read that update again. I also asked how the Chinese were involved but Steve was unable to help me there (probably because I did not know exactly what to ask). Steve said there are 800 Billion authorized shares and 696 Billion unauthorized shares. He is being paid from restricted shares owned by the company. He is working from his home in California. I regret that I was not better prepared with questions but I was pleased to find Steve ready and willing to answer any question I had. If he did not know the answer to my question he tried to find it. I believe Steve to be one of the good guys. He has been a stockholder since November of 2002. I do hope someone who is better briefed than I finds an opportunity to speak with Steve. Rowe I called at 1100 hours, EDT... Skoondog
|
|
|
Post by jonathonanders on Sept 2, 2011 12:49:44 GMT -5
Did he say "unauthorized" shares ..or did he say Unregistered shares? big difference.
|
|
rowe
Diamond Finder
Posts: 55
|
Post by rowe on Sept 2, 2011 15:30:40 GMT -5
<<Did he say "unauthorized" shares ..or did he say Unregistered shares? big difference. >>
He used the word authorized when he referred to the 800 billion... my notes say unauthorized but those may be my words.
|
|
|
Post by irwin4star on Sept 2, 2011 15:46:41 GMT -5
so, hmmmm. How could brokers sell any?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2011 19:03:32 GMT -5
Steve said there are 800 Billion authorized shares and 696 Billion unauthorized shares. He is being paid from restricted shares owned by the company. He is working from his home in California.
Could authorized mean the naked shares that were never delivered? and authorized mean certs on hand?
D4E
|
|
|
Post by cessation on Sept 2, 2011 19:38:46 GMT -5
Steve said there are 800 Billion authorized shares and 696 Billion unauthorized shares. He is being paid from restricted shares owned by the company. D4E Really? Steve told me at 4:10pm that he and transfer online were being payed by cmkm using money from a single property we acquired back and sold.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 2, 2011 23:31:55 GMT -5
ty bikinipro
Cbaughan 02 Sep 2011, 06:55 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 1035297 of 1035325
I just had a very nice talk with Steve on the CMKX Hotline. I informed him at the end of our talk that I would put a recap of our discussion out to the shareholders. He was fine with that. Forgiveness asked in advance if I have misrepresented anything he said and of course I hope he will comment if I got something wrong. These are taken from my notes during our talk.
After congratulations were given on his new position I asked him two questions.
My first question: Is there anything you would say to the shareholders who have waited so long on any return on our investment?
He told me that he was well aware of the frustration level of the shareholders that have been promised things would happen “soon” repeatedly, week after week, for years on end. He hates that word SOON as much as any of us. He commented on this question by saying “We still have a company, still have people working for us, and many are not crazy about the job they have done.”
He said he was “reluctant to take the job. I don’t want to lead people on. But I got the impression that things are happening. I believe that we will return to trading, and they are working on that now. New Corp deal is on the table and we are teamed (I believe that is the word he used, writing hard to read regards to the word he used here) with Emerson Koch.
Question two: Can you say where the money is coming from to fund the TA and yourself? His reply was (and he said I could go ahead and repeat this because he isn’t trying to hide anything and he knows it will come up again) “I am getting no monetary compensation. I am getting 5 million restricted shares of CMKX per month.”
He answered regarding the TA monthly expenses, that he does not know exactly how they are paying the TA but keep in mind that we have monies coming in from court cases and specifically one of our properties was sold giving them the monies to fund these things.
He mentioned something about the financials not being done and auditing not done at this time. I mentioned that CMKX Tyler update a year ago that says what I thought meant that they were up to date. Here is the update I am referring to (I retrieved after the phone call):
September 17, 2010 CMKM Diamonds, Inc. is very happy to announce the completion of the form 1120 Internal Revenue Income Tax Returns for years 2002, 2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,and 2009. Using the subpoena power granted by the District Court of Clark County Nevada, we have been able to recover all of CMKM bank records from various banks accounts known to us that the prior management used in years 2002 -2005. After intensive work by the Company’s accounting firm, 4 years of financials have been prepared based on the information we could gather. Current Management had already filed years 2006-2008 on time. However, after completing the previous years, the new financial data obligated the Company to restate years 2006, 2007 and 2008. Each of these IRS filings have been filed in addition to the most current year filing for 2009.
Steve replied that he was not exactly sure what that announcement was referring to regards to his statement to me about financials but he said the next update will clarify it all.
So the OBVIOUS question that is on all our lips based on his remark to another shareholder I read today where he said we are waiting on the Vegas court judgment (you know the one with the jury)…”. I asked, "So the court case is finished and now it is in the hands of the jurors to decide the outcome?” He said “Yes.” I asked “How SOON do you believe we will hear the final judgment? His response was “I don’t know but it is the only thing left that needs to happen before we hear from the company.”
We shared a few observations not related to Tyler about the WGS, monetary shift, commodities backed dollar etc and we both expressed the same feelings.. we HOPE it is FACT and we hope MR Hodges is right on this topic. There is no hint of these things being true if you listen to the news.
All being said, Steve was forthright and understands the pulse of the CMKX shareholders and holds the same views as most of us do. He said “We are all in this together no matter what we think or feel and we need to move forward together.”
Mona
- - - - - View Replies »
FACT and we hope MR Hodges is right on this topic. There is no hint of these things being true if you listen to the news.
All being said, Steve was forthright and understands the pulse of the CMKX shareholders and holds the same views as most of us do. He said “We are all in this together no matter what we think or feel and we need to move forward together.”
Mona
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 2, 2011 23:37:25 GMT -5
silverbulletgirl DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Someone talked to the new IR guy « Reply #1 Today at 4:04pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I asked about results of the 2005 core samples. He said they have not been tested because if they were tested the results would have to be made public within 2 years. Now, I am not sure what that means to us. I am not sure why it is important that the results not be made public.
Because they would have to report it to the Government, once they take it out of that warehouse, which would make it public.
ps Thanks for sharing your convo, I hope to hear many more.
|
|
|
Post by lewis12 on Sept 8, 2011 11:57:43 GMT -5
Anyone calling tomorrow???
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Sept 8, 2011 15:01:18 GMT -5
it is important that it not become public knowledge until the usefulness of the valuation as leverage has been spent.
Once valuation becomes public, the game changes.
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Sept 8, 2011 15:47:54 GMT -5
Showing proof of how much money is in the ground doesn't do jack for a stock thats trading, if you're talking about going back to trading. Sure it may spark public interest and cause volume which can raise the price, but that is not a given.
There's plenty of mining companies that are light years ahead of CMKM(tyler if you will) with public released NI-43-101 forms proving they are sitting on billions, but it does nothing for the stock price. It may run, but it will come crashing down faster than it runs. Until the real life physical revenue comes in, proving valuation doesn't increase a stock price.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 15, 2011 8:24:49 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 14 Sep 2011, 07:24 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 1037073 of 1037102 where is TYLER's PR? it was suppose to be out this week. maybe by FRIDAY.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Sept 15, 2011 8:30:07 GMT -5
By: jfarn 14 Sep 2011, 08:17 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 1037082 of 1037103
Jump to msg. # Some friends swear that BF is as solid as they come..
I have spoken to him and found him quite likeable. The major issue that I and many others have is that he forgot where he came from. This is a major flaw on so many fronts. His evolutionary attitude and blatant lack of transparency on so many issues coupled with his years of public silence on the very topic that landed him his role in the first place makes him appear to be an opportunistic ambulance chaser. This all might be a bit more tolerable/understanding if he was delivering winning results.
You would think he has to have a degree of shame or at the very least frustration for how he was once perceived and financially and morally supported by most in comparison to how things are perceived now by most.
Bob Maheu provided him access because of his derivative rights petition on behalf of shareholders and then went rogue with his prior mission.
|
|