|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jul 27, 2011 9:11:08 GMT -5
« CMKI Message list | Reply to msg. | Post new msg. « Older | Newer » By: upchuck 27 Jul 2011, 09:55 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 1029314 of 1029314 (Reply to 1029313 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Gusjarvis- Hodges did not testify UNDER OATH- What else in your post is CONTRIVED?
Attorneys that file cases don't testify, where do you dream up this garbage?
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jul 27, 2011 12:13:58 GMT -5
« CMKI Message list | Reply to msg. | Post new msg. « Older | Newer » By: upchuck 27 Jul 2011, 09:55 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 1029314 of 1029314 (Reply to 1029313 by gusjarvis) Jump to msg. # Gusjarvis- Hodges did not testify UNDER OATH- What else in your post is CONTRIVED? Attorneys that file cases don't testify, where do you dream up this garbage? ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1029340FWIW By: gusjarvis 27 Jul 2011, 12:23 PM EDT AFFIDAVIT OF A. CLIFTON HODGES I, A. CLIFTON HODGES, do hereby state and declare: 1. I am an attorney at law, duly licensed to practice before all the courts of the Stateof California. I am the principal in the law firm of Hodges and Associates, counsel of record for Plaintiffs-Appellants David Anderson, Lt. Col, et al., Case No. 11-55169. I am familiar with the facts and circumstances respecting the matters herein addressed by me; and have personal knowledge of the same, unless otherwise indicated in this Affidavit. 2. I submit this Affidavit in support of Plaintiffs’-Appellants’ Motion For Extension of Time To File Opening Brief, of even date herewith, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Appellants’ opening brief is currently dueon or beforeuly 25, 2011, pursuant to having received a (14) day extension of the time to file its opening brief, pursuant to 9 Cir. R. 31-2.2. In its concurrent motion to this Court, Appellants ask for an additional time extension of thirty (30) days to file its opening brief. 4. Upon information and belief, after careful inquiry and upon such further investigation as I have, in my opinion, deemed necessary and appropriate, taking into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances available to me, I have concluded as follows: (i) Appellants have good causeand substantial need for this thirty (30) day extension of time, since within just the past hours, I have learned that there is a substantial and serious likelihood that sustained and comprehensive official efforts to settle and conclude this matter are now underway, and the substantiveelementsthereof would provide to Appellants-Plaintiffs the compensation and relief requested in their Complaint. Given the very recent and unanticipated appearance to me of this information, it would be impossible for Appellants to have exercised a more timely due diligence by moving this Court for an extension of time seven (7) days before July 25, 2011, as contemplated by 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). Likewise, this request for an extension of timeto file a brief is an application for procedural relief, and is not therefore a matter contemplated by 9th Cir. R. 27-3 (and Circuit Advisory Committee Noteto 27-3(3). (ii) Accordingly, the information described above, gathered by or through me, or presented to me by personswithin the scope of protected, professional privilege, and work product confidentiality, my resulting conclusions, taken to their logical and legal conclusion, strongly indicate and make it much more likely than not, that the instant appeal will soon become moot. (iii) Continuing this case for thirty (30) days, and extending Appellants’ deadline to file its opening brief accordingly, would be well within the parameters of the stated rules of this Court, and an appropriate exercise of the Court’s discretion inherent in deciding procedural matters such as this. (iv) Appellants’ motion would likewise serve to lessen the unnecessary, yet considerable expense and hardship attendant to all parties if required to continue this appeal even though there is now pending an expected, imminent settlement of thiscase; and (v) Appellant and Appellee are both in accord and have stipulated and agreed to join in this motion, thereby asking the Court to agree with the litigants and treat thismatter as consensual, routine and appropriate. By telephone conference late in the afternoon of July 20, 2011, counsel for Appellees-Defendants (AUSA, John Nordin, Esq.) have agreed to join in and otherwise stipulate to Appellants’ Motion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 21st day of July, 2011, at Pasadena, California, /s/ A. Clifton Hodges A. Clifton Hodges CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system on July 21,2011. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ ECF system. Dated:uly 21, 2011. HODGES & ASSOCIATES /s/ A. Clifton Hodges A Clifton Hodges 4 East Holly Street, Suite 202 Pasadena, CA91103 Telephone: (626) 564-9797 Facsimile: (626)564-9111 Email: al@hodgesandassBy: gusjarvis 27 Jul 2011, 12:54 PM EDT So read it, there are talks happening that will grant al hodges the relief sought, relief that includes money from the sting. Now of course it may not happen, but he is aware the talks are happening, so you can infer the sting did happen. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1029346By: gusjarvis 27 Jul 2011, 01:26 PM EDT So unless al hodges lied under oath, the restitution as a result of a doj sting operation is going to be released imminently, and talks are under way to do so. Or al hodges will be disbarred for lying under oath. Now we get back to the ramifications of that........\ ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1029349
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jul 27, 2011 18:39:07 GMT -5
jymskee: bluetripp1: Hodges extension request granted jymskee: ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1029385By: cbaughan 27 Jul 2011, 07:32 PM EDT Mr Hodges' request granted: Case: 11-55169 07/27/2011 Page: 1 of 1 ID: 7835375 DktEntry: 12 FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 27 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS DAVID ANDERSON, Lt. Col; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHRISTOPHER COX, an individual; et al., No. 11-55169 D.C. No. 8:10-cv-00031-JVS- M LG Central District of California, Santa Ana ORDER Defendants - Appellees. Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner. Appellant’s motion for a second extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 24, 2011. The answering brief is due September 23, 2011. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. amt/Pro M o commish 25July 2011 courtesy Bluetripp
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jul 27, 2011 19:17:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Jul 28, 2011 6:17:03 GMT -5
You know they just might pull this off!!!
skoondog
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 28, 2011 15:22:18 GMT -5
You know they just might pull this off!!! skoondog Given the white hat report I think it's safe to say we are back to "Square one" meaning we really don't know where we stand.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 28, 2011 15:45:37 GMT -5
A person over on RB asked why so many, (+1 million) posts on a dead pinky stock. Below is a reply from "kcab_syorlik" Below that is my comment. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Post # 1029500 laskin_49, that's 1 MILLION posts (2 million if you count the old CMKX board as well). Very active dead issue board, eh? There's a lot of non-shareholding posters VERY concerned about CMKX speculators (they feel are stupid) believing in a "fantasy". It gets under their skin to no end, but I can't imagine why. (Actually, I can, but they won't admit it, LOL!) BTW, Gary Weiss has been routinely posting here under the alias, medchal, as in Medchal, India (his wife is from India). Gary was quoted as saying, "only a fools writes for free". Gary Weiss is also a major "cyber-vigilante" shill for the naked-short seller cabal(as described in DeepCapture.com's "The Miscreants' Global Bust-Out"). Strange that this old, long-revoked pinkie would be such a priority in the mission of Gary Weiss, isn't it? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My only comment is that I can see why folks like us, shareholders, keep posting about cmkx, we're dreamers, no? But why years of knocking cmkx? Something has to be coming back alive. Just has to. I lost over 40K in Jdsu when the tech bubble burst. I'm not over on a jdsu board bashing it. I don't even think about it anymore. But people for years have hammered cmkx and they still do. Day in and day out like it's a regular job.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 28, 2011 15:52:22 GMT -5
Another by kcab_syorlik: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laskin_49, as far as I know, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has not filed bankruptcy and still legally exists. The motivation for the shareholders is that they hope there is some kind of ROI for their speculation (whether sting money or restitution by disgorgement or whatever). The motivation for the non-shareholders is a darn good question. I guarantee it's not the old "Volunteer Scambusters Club" excuse, since it's been no threat to new investors for more than 5 years. Besides, "volunteer fraudbuster" is a bit of a fantasy too (see Barry Minkow's sentencing, etc.). Neither is it the old "perverse entertainment syndrome" excuse. These non-shareholders (or their "benefactors") have a financial position in this issue, or they wouldn't be on an obscure board of a long-revoked pinkie with such animosity. Period. Besides Gary Wiess' (mechal's) tagline is, "only a fool writes for free".
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Jul 28, 2011 18:26:10 GMT -5
noahltl1.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cmkx1&action=display&thread=3060prestonat DIAMOND MINER Posts: 280 Reputation: 6 Re: Is Al Hodges Ok? « Reply #31 Today at 4:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23taramonique DIAMOND MINER Posts: 356 Reputation: -4 Re: Is Al Hodges ok? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There is nothing confusing. Al does not have the proof and I think he is bluffing. Just very sad that we've been waiting this long for an attorney to play games and wants the shareholders to distrubute a conspiracy theory story about the President. This is junk that floods the internet. Tara ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 2:19pm, dame1971 wrote:TARA do you really think he would bluff(lie) in open court to a federal judg,get real. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ prestonat Exactly. I shared the MOTION FOR EXTENSION written by Hodges to The Honorable James V. Selna with a lawyer friend and after giving it a quick read he asked me, "What do you want to know?" I replied, "Would a lawyer file this motion--with the information it contains--to a judge if it was not true?" And his reply was, "No, it would be suicide." He further added that the facts the motion contains (e.g., that there is a substantial and serious likelihood that sustained and comprehensive official efforts to settle and conclude this matter are now underway, and the substantive elements thereof would provide to Appellants-Plaintiffs the compensation and relief requested in their Complaint) is the most current information of what is happening, and that Hodges would not file the motion with the court--and the information it contains--if it was not true. millionaires.proboards.com/index.....4&page=2#571651
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Jul 28, 2011 19:53:30 GMT -5
By: sportsman93306 28 Jul 2011, 04:00 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 1029552 of 1029570 Jump to msg. # TALK WITH MR DENNIS SMITH ABOUT 1 week prior to the lateset court filing by Mr Hodges.Some observation made by Mr Smith were old one, but some new ones were interesting. The old ones, like. 'agonizing close', ..'it can happen today or tomorrow or next week',..'it will probably change your life forever'.etc etc. The new ones were.. We got Sr Bush by balls and we are sq..... it. We were misled and lot of misinformation, disinformation was passed on us.We have sorted it out. Do not know ,where the packet is. It's moved so many times. Do not know ,who will finally give 'go ahead'. Many institutions are involved. IT IS UP TO YOU GUYS TO TAKE IT FWIW. THANKS SPORTSMAN Read more: tfant53.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6405#ixzz1TS25in8h
|
|
|
Post by cmkxerlong on Jul 28, 2011 21:53:46 GMT -5
Then how do we take it? Could someone ask him to elaborate? By: sportsman93306 28 Jul 2011, 04:00 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 1029552 of 1029570 Jump to msg. # TALK WITH MR DENNIS SMITH ABOUT 1 week prior to the lateset court filing by Mr Hodges.Some observation made by Mr Smith were old one, but some new ones were interesting. The old ones, like. 'agonizing close', ..'it can happen today or tomorrow or next week',..'it will probably change your life forever'.etc etc. The new ones were.. We got Sr Bush by balls and we are sq..... it. We were misled and lot of misinformation, disinformation was passed on us.We have sorted it out. Do not know ,where the packet is. It's moved so many times. Do not know ,who will finally give 'go ahead'. Many institutions are involved. IT IS UP TO YOU GUYS TO TAKE IT FWIW. THANKS SPORTSMAN Read more: tfant53.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6405#ixzz1TS25in8h
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 29, 2011 8:45:51 GMT -5
Someone on RB said Wyatt was on the "grapevine" yesterday morning telling people there was going to be a payment announcement that evening.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jul 29, 2011 9:20:43 GMT -5
Someone on RB said Wyatt was on the "grapevine" yesterday morning telling people there was going to be a payment announcement that evening. I guess that didn't happen..
|
|
triple
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 30
|
Post by triple on Jul 29, 2011 10:27:25 GMT -5
Someone on RB said Wyatt was on the "grapevine" yesterday morning telling people there was going to be a payment announcement that evening. I guess that didn't happen.. good guess,he didn't say that
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jul 29, 2011 19:46:51 GMT -5
Atrium… Living Room… Kitchen. « Thread Started Today at 4:49am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Atrium… Living Room… Kitchen.
This week I have stood back and watched the foolishness of individuals rant and rave their perfect little world as they see it, and so brazenly post many things they have no clue what they are talking about. It becomes rather sad in a way that those who portray the United States Government in such a wonderful way, including the media that if there was something amiss or an outrage in the world somewhere that it would be broadcasted.
I have a NEWS FLASH for those who think that way. The World/Country you THINK you know is about to spank you, and in that moment, the reality comes to light, how are you going to come to terms/grip that you have been duped into believing that you had so called proof that you believed you had, when in reality, you were pacified temporarily.
The title, Atrium… Living Room… Kitchen is really simple way of explaining things, and it REALLY applies to everything in life from personal relationships all the way through business, to Government. Let me explain as follows;
In any form of communication/relationships in the beginning all conversations take place in the Atrium, and are very general, a get to know you area, where people ask, do we want to get to know you, and are you worthy of our time and future relationships. This is really where the beginning of any time of communication begins.
Give you an example, your door bell rings and you open your door and the person is doing a survey asking some questions. Most likely than not people close the door on these people or even go as far as answering the survey with false information just to appease them. Same goes for ANY business or government. No one will obtain proof by inquiring in a letter of sorts. That’s not proof at all.
The Living Room, now this is a place where trust is forming communications grow deeper as well as trusts. We are sitting down, not at the door like the Atrium and standing looking and peering in seeing what we can see or find. When people/businesses/governments detect someone peering in at the Atrium those that are trying find more are going to be given the, “thanks we are not interested pass off and will not advance any further.” When trusts have been built in the Living Room there people/businesses/government assess more about the types of relationships they wish to have with any other individual/businesses and whether trust can be taken even further. Sometimes it takes years to get from the Atrium to the Living Room in any relationship/businesses etc.
Now we enter the Kitchen. Like the adage says, “if you cannot stand the heat stay out of the kitchen” This is where all the secrets are revealed, where the TRUE information comes out, where relationships/businesses/governments are tested and refined. The heart of the matter/issues are dealt and changes made away from the Living Room and nowhere near the Atrium. Very few are ever invited into the kitchen for such TRUSTS and discussions. Those that are invited have something of value and trusts have already been established. No one will ever find out what goes on in the kitchen if you just rang the door bell to find out the recipe for what is in the making in the kitchen. All those that inquire will receive business as usual in the kitchen when in all reality the recipe has COMPLETELY changed.
I would heed to those that think they know what is brewing in the kitchen and that business is as usual, a few of the Chef’s have actually come out and have in a polite way informed those at the Atrium and Living Room the menu has completely changed and new management is in charge.
What’s brewing in the kitchen and what are the new menu changes? Lets begin with when Head Chef Al Hodges came out of the kitchen January 14 2011 and informed those in the Atrium the following;
H and A Update 14 January 2011 « Thread Started Today at 5:46pm »
|
|