|
Post by e362 on Jan 13, 2012 19:16:41 GMT -5
Boogie, thank you for "playing along" as you call it, no game here fwiw. My problem lies in what AH has come out and said that the bad guys have already paid. Remember the whole RM and gathering them all into a room story? So it has nothing to do with what they "will pay" as you put it, according to AH they have, it has to do with why the trust has not been released.
|
|
|
Post by irwin4star on Jan 13, 2012 19:21:53 GMT -5
Boogie, thank you for "playing along" as you call it, no game here fwiw. My problem lies in what AH has come out and said that the bad guys have already paid. Remember the whole RM and gathering them all into a room story? So it has nothing to do with what they "will pay" as you put it, according to AH they have, it has to do with why the trust has not been released. The trust was funded because of illegal activity. It can't be released until someone is held accountable for the illegal activity. If there are no damages, there is no trust. You can't pay a fine for speeding unless you admit guilt or are found guilty in a court. When a cop takes a $20 on the spot, that's corruption and unconstitutional.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jan 13, 2012 19:22:53 GMT -5
Boogie, help me out, why do we have to wait for the court case to be over? If AH is suing for damages and not the trust, what does one have to do with the other? The trust was funded because of illegal activity. It can't be released until someone is held accountable for the illegal activity. If there are no damages, there is no trust. You can't pay a fine for speeding unless you admit guilt or are found guilty in a court. When a cop takes a $20 on the spot, that's corruption and unconstitutional. And all this time, I thought the trust was a result of individuals contributing money to avoid accountability. What your saying is contradictory to what Al is saying. Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by irwin4star on Jan 13, 2012 19:27:57 GMT -5
The trust was funded because of illegal activity. It can't be released until someone is held accountable for the illegal activity. If there are no damages, there is no trust. You can't pay a fine for speeding unless you admit guilt or are found guilty in a court. When a cop takes a $20 on the spot, that's corruption and unconstitutional. And all this time, I thought the trust was a result of individuals contributing money to avoid accountability. What your saying is contradictory to what Al is saying. Briwadd Kinda makes em corrupt doesn't it.
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 13, 2012 19:33:25 GMT -5
Boogie, thank you for "playing along" as you call it, no game here fwiw. My problem lies in what AH has come out and said that the bad guys have already paid. Remember the whole RM and gathering them all into a room story? So it has nothing to do with what they "will pay" as you put it, according to AH they have, it has to do with why the trust has not been released. Yes, just what you said.... STORY... As you all been told before, You will never know the truth.. Why wrack you brains trying to figure it all out.. It was right in front of you since day one. Mr. Casavant yelled about it and Mr. Hodges is doing something about it.. It wasn't going to take a day or 8 years to get it done.. It wasn't going to take 5 hundred to get it done..You should be able to see the lost by the Co. in the 2010 tax returns are the lost it is taking to prove the Naked Short Selling of this stock. Stop beating on the Co. and Al Hodges.. Hang in there.... Think about it---> NSS.. It's been there all along.. What is it worth for them to keep it quiet.. 0009-0010-0100--0.10... I wait for the Judge..
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jan 13, 2012 20:23:50 GMT -5
The trust was funded because of illegal activity. It can't be released until someone is held accountable for the illegal activity. If there are no damages, there is no trust. You can't pay a fine for speeding unless you admit guilt or are found guilty in a court. When a cop takes a $20 on the spot, that's corruption and unconstitutional. And all this time, I thought the trust was a result of individuals contributing money to avoid accountability. What your saying is contradictory to what Al is saying. Briwadd It has always been said as YOU just explained it. Irwin's take is a new one, imo.
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 13, 2012 20:32:13 GMT -5
I wonder what Patrick Byrne would say about NSS now? Maybe he is the one holding up our money, lol. This is beggining to stink worse than before and AL Hodges is the skunk, so far. If you have proof that he is not with anything other than his own words then I challenge you to prove he is not...
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 13, 2012 20:51:47 GMT -5
I wonder what Patrick Byrne would say about NSS now? Maybe he is the one holding up our money, lol. This is beggining to stink worse than before and AL Hodges is the skunk, so far. If you have proof that he is not with anything other than his own words then I challenge you to prove he is not... Al Hodges may just be the miracle.. Show me proof he is not.. Maybe the words he speaks are not what you want to hear, but the words to keep you here... Maybe Patrick did it his way and Hodges did it his way.. Stop jerking it around...
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 13, 2012 20:52:42 GMT -5
FYI...Im kinda board so I just called a currency trader who buys and sells the IQD. He said he's never heard anything about it revaluing... I have to say I am more inclined to believe him than anything Al says about it...Ive never met either person, the trader works for a reputable company, Al is an attorney that has never been right as far as I know...
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 13, 2012 21:01:34 GMT -5
Thats some pretty good proof ya got there JWLB! I asked for real proof, not just because he said so...stop jerking all of us around!
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 13, 2012 21:03:21 GMT -5
FYI...Im kinda board so I just called a currency trader who buys and sells the IQD. He said he's never heard anything about it revaluing... I have to say I am more inclined to believe him than anything Al says about it...Ive never met either person, the trader works for a reputable company, Al is an attorney that has never been right as far as I know... Believe the trader.. As for Al.. Believe him also.. Or if you didn't, then why are you here..?
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jan 13, 2012 21:14:26 GMT -5
I wonder what Patrick Byrne would say about NSS now? Maybe he is the one holding up our money, lol. This is beggining to stink worse than before and AL Hodges is the skunk, so far. If you have proof that he is not with anything other than his own words then I challenge you to prove he is not... Al Hodges may just be the miracle.. Show me proof he is not.. Maybe the words he speaks are not what you want to hear, but the words to keep you here... Maybe Patrick did it his way and Hodges did it his way.. Stop jerking it around... LOL You want proof? Well, me too!!
|
|
|
Post by irwin4star on Jan 13, 2012 21:15:27 GMT -5
lol. So what do you do when someone won't hold up to their end of the deal?
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 13, 2012 21:16:55 GMT -5
Al Hodges may just be the miracle.. Show me proof he is not.. Maybe the words he speaks are not what you want to hear, but the words to keep you here... Maybe Patrick did it his way and Hodges did it his way.. Stop jerking it around... LOL You want proof? Well, me too!! I don't want proof, I know what's going on.. Your the one yelling about proof.. Not sure if you asked me that question, I just happen to answer it..
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Jan 13, 2012 21:17:58 GMT -5
I guess you missed the part where I said I am bored...I also wait anxiously every day for you to post...I also want Al to be right, although with every update from AL the truth seems further and further away...
|
|