By: king1000
14 Apr 2012, 10:01 AM CDT
Msg. 1079588 of 1079597
(Reply to 1079587 by king1000)
so many company posters tried to convince
the shareholder the brokers didn't commit massive rico crimes while at the same time their buddies Kevin West and Bill Frizzell and Mark Faulk sat on that evidence against the brokers. Weird only if it wasn't a sting. If it wasn't a sting those people should be strung up.
By: king1000
14 Apr 2012, 10:28 AM CDT
Msg. 1079589 of 1079598
now that our company has come out and admitted there was massive rico fraud, it is interesting to think about the ramifications of that fact.
1. It proves the sec, fbi, and doj covered up their crimes purposely. We can prove that easily.
Now these questions in the complaint filed against the FBI, in which an official investigation is ongoing, are more relevant than ever. In particular the evidence proving the sec and doj tried purposely to conceal the rico fraud of the brokers by making it appear all the fraud was committed by a all group of corrupt insiders. Same thing our company did, until Mr. Kirkpatrick arrived.
Below are the second set of questions and requests that the Coalition feels needs to be answered legally by the FBI and SEC.
1. Why is the DOJ/FBI in Nevada refusing to corroborate Al Hodges allegations and investigate his evidence which clearly contradicts the Nevada DOJ and FBI, fully-knowing that pertinent information would affect the indictments in this case? It is the legal duty of the FBI in this case to investigate this information as it comes from a credible source who is directly involved in this matter.
2. Why has the FBI refused to investigate the allegations that extortion is taking place which prevents the release of the restitution illegally held from victims in this case? Why have they not questioned Al Hodges and Michael Cottrell regarding this matter when they can corroborate the allegations put forth? The FBI apparently is doing nothing to stop the crimes currently being committed, further harming the victims in this matter.
3. Mr. Hodges says he has an eye witness to the fact that the restitution should have been released over five years ago. It is the legal duty of the DOJ/FBI to depose Al Hodges' witness to the facts as it has dramatic impact on their current indictments in this case, if necessary he should be subpoenaed.
4. The DOJ/SEC subpoenaed the fraud records used in the indictments and civil actions in 2004, then allowed the fraud to continue for well over a year. Was the DOJ/SEC allowed to use CMKX and its shareholders as a vehicle in a sting operation and hide that fact from them? I talked to officials at the SEC, but didn't mention CMKX; those officials said that it is the SEC's legal duty to stop the fraud when detected, to halt the stock. In CMKX's case, they not only didn't stop the fraud they allowed it to continue unabated costing shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in loses.
5. Was it the legal duty of the DOJ/SEC to include the fraud records they had subpoenaed in the SEC file given to company officials and lawyers in June 2005? Those records ended up being the basis for most of the actions by the DOJ and SEC against Urban Casavant and John Edwards. I personally spoke to John Martin of the Owner's Group (which hired Bill Frizzell to represent the shareholders) and according to Martin they were fully aware of the Silver State Bank fraud records, as were all shareholders as it was on the internet in Feb. 2005. The fact that the management and shareholders' lawyer had access to these confidential records and then worked with Urban Casavant proves this was either a sting operation, or they aided this fraud and its cover up. The Coalition demands to know exactly what confidential banking records management and Bill Frizzell were privy to and when to prove if this was a sting operation.
6. Mr. Hodges claims in his bivens case that the DOJ/SEC told CMKX officials that the release of funds was imminent on many occasions, but this was not true. Is it legal to have secret negotiations to take place regarding our restitution, and is it legal for the DOJ/SEC to lie to company officials about the release of their money? Does that not violate the rights of the victims and should the DOJ/FBI be required by law to investigate the facts surrounding these negotiations? Exactly who were these officials?
7. Reece Hamilton, plaintiff in Mr. Hodges bivens case, claimed that Mr. Hodges trustee received the codes from the authorities to release our restitution on or about DEC 30/31 2009, and that the taxes were taken out at that time. This was later confirmed by Mr. Hodges, and the tax issue confirmed in a complaint to AG of New York Andrew Cuomo, which is in the evidence package. Did giving our trustee the codes and having them not work violate our victim's rights, and should it be the duty of the DOJ/FBI to investigate the officials who gave those codes and why they didn't work? Who exactly gave the codes to our trustee?
8. Mr. Hodges filed a complaint with the AG of New York stating taxes were taken out of the settlement funds, which has now violated several banking laws, why is there no investigation into these crimes?
9. Mr. Hodges, in an update to his plaintiffs, said that he hears that the DOJ signed off on the distribution of our money, and says that his trustee is in constructive control of that money. He said he has three independent eye witnesses who have seen the packages coming to all shareholders with their restitution in it. It is the legal duty of the DOJ/FBI to investigate these eye witnesses who have seen these packages as they contain the restitution for the victims in this case?
10. Plaintiff Robert Hollenegg contacted the London FBI, and has contacted the Las Vegas FBI to give his statement of the facts as he knows them. He will corroborate public statements he made including the fact he was on the phone with Al Hodges when the funds were transferred to our trustee; funds which have still not been distributed to the victims in this case. Gayle Jacobs of the Las Vegas asked for Mr. Hollenegg's contact information but did not contact him as of yet. Why has Robert Hollenegg not been interviewed and the facts in question, substantiated?
11. Mr. Hodges claims to have first-hand knowledge that the fund containing the restitution for all CMKX bona fide shareholders was not released BECAUSE it was attached to the World Global Settlements. It is the legal duty of the DOJ/FBI to investigate CMKX being attached to the World Global Settlements and to confirm or deny Al Hodges direct knowledge of this? Mr. Hodges supposedly has direct knowledge that Senators were briefed on the situation and the pending release of the World Global Settlements, which includes the restitution of funds for all bona fide CMKX shareholders. Hodges can corroborate this fact made public by plaintiffs in his bivens case. It is the FBI's duty to corroborate with Al Hodges the public comments made by the plaintiffs in his case; public comments which were updates directly from Mr. Hodges and entered into the FBI?
12. Mr. Hodges has an eye witness to the deals made by the DOJ and Robert Maheu in Las Vegas; he claims these deals were videotaped. The Coalition wants these tapes made public immediately if our restitution is not released.
13. Work was done to identify the brokers, who counterfeited CMKX stock that includes Jim DeCosta's report; Susanne Trimbath's report; and the Cert Pull work product in possession of the SEC; all of which were hidden from the public. Is this not clear evidence of a cover up of the crimes committed by Wall Street brokers? The Coalition wants all those records made public immediately and those experts deposed, or our restitution released. These records will show which brokers stole 190 million dollars from CMKX shareholders, and will allow us to take legal actions against them if Mr. Hodges is lying and there were no deals made in secret by the DOJ and Robert Maheu.
14. The Coalition asks for a complete list of what documents were given to CMKX management in the SEC file, and exactly what confidential banking records CMKX management and Bill Frizzell were privy to and when. This will immediately prove whether this was a sting operation, or whether these individuals aided Urban Casavant to commit fraud.
15. Several letters were written and made public by Al Hodges to different world leaders that allege crimes were or are being committed by high ranking officials in the United States, including the board of the Federal Reserve. These crimes affect the release of our restitution and the Coalition would like an immediate investigation into these allegations. A list of names and contact information from all letters is available to corroborate their authenticity.
16. In file no. S7-19-07, Bud Burrell, consultant in the John O'Quinn multi trillion dollar lawsuit against Wall Street brokers for naked shorting, states the following regarding CMKX: No fewer than three federal criminal confidential informants were involved in the deal before the stock ever started trading. The Coalition would like this investigated and Bud Burrell deposed as he has information regarding the sting operation that took place. He can also comment on the size of the overall fraud that was covered up over the past decade and the Authorities role in that cover up.
If the above isn't proof enough that a thorough immediate investigation be conducted of the DOJ, the SEC and the FBI, then perhaps what is written below will convince you from deepcapture.com. This is one of the Authorities own admitting the truth over a decade ago, the Authorities were and are completely captured. This is evidenced by the fact the crimes talked about below continue unabated to today:
In 1996, FBI Special Agent Robert Wright launched Operation Vulgar Betrayal, the FBI's first major effort to crack down on what would later be termed the SAAR Network of financial entities with links to Hamas, Al Qaeda, and other jihadi outfits. Among Agent Wright's principal targets were the billionaire hedge fund manager Yasin al Qadi (who, as I say, was Osama bin Laden's favorite financier) and his U.S.-based bagman, Yaqub Mirza. But Wright (who referred to Yasin al Qadi as Al Qaeda's banker) was removed from the investigation in 1999. Operation Vulgar Betrayal was shut down in 2000. According to Wright, his team's efforts were foiled by U.S. politicians and FBI higher-ups who were unnerved by the fact that he was investigating powerful people who had considerable influence in both Washington and Saudi Arabia (ostensibly a key U.S. ally). Former Special Agent Wright said, in essence, that the U.S. Department of Justice had been captured by Al Qaeda's most important financiers. The capture apparently extends to the SEC, which has shown no signs of investigating the trading of people like the billionaires who comprise Al Qaeda's Golden Chain and who funded the SAAR Network. (In fact, in the view of Deep Capture, the capture of the SEC by criminal financial operators is essentially total, unlike the DOJ.)
When Agent Wright blew the whistle on the political interference with his FBI investigation, he literally broke down in tears as he publicly apologized for the FBI's failure to complete its mission.
In conclusion, the Coalition demands our restitution be released immediately, or a thorough independent investigation into the evidence entered in this complaint. We demand an outside agency investigate on our behalf as we have clearly shown that the Authorities are not capable of being unbiased as Former Special Agent Wright said, in essence, that the U.S. Department of Justice had been captured, he should have included the SEC.
By: king1000
14 Apr 2012, 10:46 AM CDT
Msg. 1079593 of 1079598
(Reply to 1079589 by king1000)
also now that the company has finally admitted
there was massive Rico fraud by the brokers you can look back and see how the sec concealed that fraud. By Mark Faulk,
There is no gag order of any type from the SEC or anyone else concerning naked short selling or fails to deliver, or anything else for that matter. I began using the term fails to deliver when I discovered that the SEC was covering up a lot of fraud from brokers by not flagging BROKER fails as naked short selling. This first came up in the Global Links story years ago, here's a quote explaining why I began to call brokers' fails "fails to deliver', in August of 2006:
"This is the most egregious sleight of hand of all, the misdirection that Wall Street, the SEC, and the DTCC hopes will make this whole ugly mess disappear. By collectively agreeing on a ridiculously narrow definition of "naked short selling," the industry and various regulatory agencies have begun to deny that naked short selling is a pervasive problem, while turning a blind eye to the larger problem of stock market fraud in general, and failed deliveries of stock in particular. In the case of Global Links, 27 millions counterfeit shares were sold, but (and here's the catch) not by short sellers, by the brokers themselves. In this case, as in many cases, the brokers are the naked short sellers, but the SEC doesn't recognize them as such. That's why the OTC short selling list shows only 6,800 shares short for Global Links, but the SEC records show almost 6 million fails. It's a trick! The long fails are still counterfeit shares sold to an unsuspecting public, and never delivered by the brokers."
By: inTrouble
14 Apr 2012, 10:48 AM CDT
Msg. 1079594 of 1079598
(Reply to 1079593 by king1000)
Gus
Ps makes you wonder why the company posters tried sooo hard to make it look like Urban was the only criminal, completely minimalizing the brokers fraud, when it was massive. Why didn't Mark, or Keven, or Bill demand accountability from the authorities? Why did shareholders have to?
only reason possible $$$$$$$
By: king1000
14 Apr 2012, 11:02 AM CDT
Msg. 1079595 of 1079598
(Reply to 1079594 by inTrouble)
introuble you are exactly right, bill, kev, and mark
and the sec and fbi and doj covered the brokers short, that is clear. Or they are all guilty, along with the company posters, of defrauding all cmkx shareholders.
"It appears to me that the largest perpetrators of failed stock deliveries in CMKX were the brokers, hence the term "fails to deliver" instead of "naked short selling", which technically only includes fails that occur when someone (not the broker) is shorting the stock, and the broker fails to borrow shares to cover the short."
Yes Mark the brokers were the largest counterfeiters of cmkx stock, that has now been made public after the statute of limitations ran out. If their crimes were not dealt with cmkx management needs to be dealt with.
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI