|
Post by sittingtight on Jan 21, 2011 23:40:11 GMT -5
Did Michael Cottrell receive ER today Jan. 21 2011? Are we to get this packet that you have discussed? If not, will we get a update from Al Hodges and more names as to who is holding this up? As you know, the most valuable asset you (Al Hodges/Keven West) have is us, The Shareholders.. (Shareholders) Best friend or worst enemy.. O, one other thing, (Question for Al) if you have to appeal to the 9th circuit court, will all the hard (missing) evidence you have, have to be exposed in this appeal? TIA.. Pay us pennies, appeal for dollars.. IMO Only ST
|
|
|
Post by sittingtight on Jan 22, 2011 0:53:28 GMT -5
Ask not what Al can do for us,(any more than he has don, TY Al) but what can we do for Al (who has represented us) to help move this to a successful conclusion for all Shareholders...
ST
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2011 9:38:21 GMT -5
Ask not what Al can do for us,(any more than he has don, TY Al) but what can we do for Al (who has represented us) to help move this to a successful conclusion for all Shareholders... ST OK. What is it we can do for Al? Please tell me and I shall get right on it. Thanks, D4E
|
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Jan 22, 2011 9:49:38 GMT -5
Ask not what Al can do for us,(any more than he has don, TY Al) but what can we do for Al (who has represented us) to help move this to a successful conclusion for all Shareholders... ST Everybodys waiting for your advice.......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2011 9:49:48 GMT -5
sittingtight....how can there be an appeal now?? AL just said in his update the gov is out of the way now and money is in trustees hands...AL may file another suit but it would not be against same people...right?....circus rolls on! Did Michael Cottrell receive ER today Jan. 21 2011? Are we to get this packet that you have discussed? If not, will we get a update from Al Hodges and more names as to who is holding this up? As you know, the most valuable asset you (Al Hodges/Keven West) have is us, The Shareholders.. (Shareholders) Best friend or worst enemy.. O, one other thing, (Question for Al) if you have to appeal to the 9th circuit court, will all the hard (missing) evidence you have, have to be exposed in this appeal? TIA.. Pay us pennies, appeal for dollars.. IMO Only ST
|
|
|
Post by sittingtight on Jan 22, 2011 11:42:32 GMT -5
sittingtight....how can there be an appeal now?? AL just said in his update the gov is out of the way now and money is in trustees hands...AL may file another suit but it would not be against same people...right?....circus rolls on! Did Michael Cottrell receive ER today Jan. 21 2011? Are we to get this packet that you have discussed? If not, will we get a update from Al Hodges and more names as to who is holding this up? As you know, the most valuable asset you (Al Hodges/Keven West) have is us, The Shareholders.. (Shareholders) Best friend or worst enemy.. O, one other thing, (Question for Al) if you have to appeal to the 9th circuit court, will all the hard (missing) evidence you have, have to be exposed in this appeal? TIA.. Pay us pennies, appeal for dollars.. IMO Only ST jboydwv, Great question, I am not a lawyer but my understanding is that from the filling date of the dismissal, (Dec.29, 2010) Al had 30 days to appeal to the 9th. district court which is the SC . Can any one answer that question with factual knowledge? Al/Bob/At, any plaintiff? One thing I do recall in the By-laws of cmkm, is that UC would loose all claims (value) back to whom ever it was (some unknown entity) if he spoke or testified in any Court Herring except a Federal Court. If it is the sting that we are told it is, I would guess and hope that Al's Eye Witness is UC. His name needs to be cleared (IMO) if this was a sting. Like every one else, I hope this ends soon. I need the money and even more my sanity.. LOL or is that OL Any way, The last update that Al filled, closed a huge gap in a lack of information we Shareholders have had for years (IMO) now and I'm hopping with very high expectations that Al's next update will be just as informative or more (Naming Names) than the last one. ST
|
|
|
Post by 2018 on Jan 22, 2011 15:07:56 GMT -5
Did Michael Cottrell receive ER today Jan. 21 2011? Are we to get this packet that you have discussed? If not, will we get a update from Al Hodges and more names as to who is holding this up? As you know, the most valuable asset you (Al Hodges/Keven West) have is us, The Shareholders.. (Shareholders) Best friend or worst enemy.. O, one other thing, (Question for Al) if you have to appeal to the 9th circuit court, will all the hard (missing) evidence you have, have to be exposed in this appeal? TIA.. Pay us pennies, appeal for dollars.. IMO Only ST So now we have Hodges waiting for the last second, of the last day to file the apeal? and Hodges himself said that apeal will be filled, only to insure the consecutive or following payments after the first one. and Hodges has also said that our fist payments release is in hands of GI or global inteligence with Peter Maheu and associates. - which off course they denied. Suposed Supreme court directive to pay us by end of 2010, did not happen. lol. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So if Hodges is going to refile or file again, why wait to the last second of the last day? when that is anyway to ensure our consecutive payments after the first one? I guess the story goes that this is all .. nice story lines.. and there is always more events and time needed, so they just make up another story line.. and off course its always the best to extend everything to the .. umptieth second of the last hour of the last day... because that gives you more time. And everything is suposed.. suposedly .. we have .80 that suposedly somebody else has seen in treasury checks for shareholders... and suposedly.... gi has separated us from World settlements, but non the less we are getting update on how cotrells money is doing.. ( even though we are suposedly separated .. so who should care any more) suposedly , suposedly.. somebody else.. etc etc..
|
|