|
Post by cmkx4ever on Aug 13, 2012 11:50:16 GMT -5
I was just thinking the same thing, just a thought could the guru's who keep giving false dates and promises a little gun shy knowing they are officially being monitored now ?
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 13, 2012 12:11:03 GMT -5
I was just thinking the same thing, just a thought could the guru's who keep giving false dates and promises a little gun shy knowing they are officially being monitored now ? Now? I think it's been a lot longer than that! =^ .". ^=
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Aug 14, 2012 8:36:45 GMT -5
This cmkx-betrayal person has been a humongous complainer lately, but I am curious if anyone knows what he is referring to here. Has this other person by the name dbsox shared something positive? Never seen this name before, so that raises a flag with me. But still curious.
By: CMKX-Betrayal 14 Aug 2012, 08:47 AM CDT Rating: Msg. 1117586 of 1117591
Jump to msg. # dbsox new guru in town
|
|
|
Post by transversal on Aug 16, 2012 15:02:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cmkx4ever on Aug 17, 2012 16:45:40 GMT -5
Dbsox has been around awhile and gets all his info from PJ imo
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2012 10:17:45 GMT -5
This crazy story deserves national attention – perhaps even a movie production and/or book. Take care! Steve K
Now there's an idea for the company. CMKX productions presents "Naked Shorts" The story of how to defraud 50,000 people with the help of our government.
We can become a production studio. The title alone will sell the movie. People today are so stupid they will think they are going to see a sex movie, we will make billions in the first weekend!!
D4E
|
|
|
Post by str8biodiesel on Aug 18, 2012 16:01:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 19, 2012 15:04:43 GMT -5
This reads like an infomercial:
By: Theophilus1 17 Aug 2012, 05:57 PM CDT
Tuscan9,
Joshua, just called back. 5:35PM Very nice young man.
Joshua the Financial Adviser told Joshua the Branch Manager to have
me hold on, and wait till what ever those legal issues are, are
cleared up. I guess its those issues Joe P. mentioned the other day.
Oh, the other persons name on the phone a little while ago was
Justin. Everyone was nice & helpful as could be. I like to be able
to say that!
Look I'm just going to say this..... Whoever has been, and is
doing all the Work to help us SH., I can not express how very much
it is appreciated, I am Grateful! I just want you to know! So many
UnderCover Angels, ETC.. to point them out. I know you are out
There. I am Thankful for every Word that ProSeeds from the mouth of
The Good Father, and Those who carry it so Faithfully.
Well Connie, Thank U! and have a Great Weekend!
By: tuscan9 17 Aug 2012, 06:27 PM CDT Msg. 1118516 of 1118645 (Reply to 1118503 by Theophilus1)
yes, Theo..there are many undercover folks
who worked beyond normal means to get shareholders to this point.
They never will get their due notoriety or Thank You's personally.. they are bashful not touters.
so, yes, We need to make known the Few Good Men and Women did Grand!
glad your experience ended satisfying
and you Too have a Grand Week end
|
|
|
Post by chris on Aug 19, 2012 15:07:40 GMT -5
Tuscan is a little old lady living in a make believe world. She's been posting the same garbage for years
|
|
|
Post by swather on Aug 20, 2012 2:23:46 GMT -5
Tuscan is a little old lady living in a make believe world. She's been posting the same garbage for years I was in her room several years ago when an individual asked her some questions on her theories. She booted him out, asked everyone to write down what he said and then asked everyone to take their hard drive out of their computer to hide his statements because the "men in black" are watching and will destroy all that evidence. So, she continued, we must be careful of all people who come into her room. Therefore, all members of her room must sign up by giving their full names, addresses and phone numbers before they are allowed into her room......that was my one and only visit to the nut cage........ .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2012 11:44:47 GMT -5
There is a problem with a few individuals having so many shares as to make the shareholders with less than 10million insignificant as voters. As I do believe that one vote per share is the legal correct and fair way to hold an election, I do not believe this applies to our situation. We are not a trading valued company and our shares at this point are worthless. Since many shares were ill-gotten, and accumulated illegally, I believe the shareholders who spent real money to purchase their shares have more of a right to be weighted differently than those who acquired their shares in other ways. One way to do this would be to only let the persons who hold CIM vote and the other way would be to limit the maximum number of votes any individual can cast to 100 million. This would better represent the wishes of the legitimate shareholders. Just so you know. I do not hold CIM so this would eliminate me from voting. I believe more strongly in the rights of the original shareholders who bought into this company legitimately than I do of my own rights as a Deli shareholder as should SK and the company. Just my 2 cents.
D4E
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Aug 20, 2012 14:09:31 GMT -5
D4E, the bad guys would never let a plan like yours fly. They are hiding something big in my opinion.
And they want to keep it hidden.
|
|
|
Post by thunkerdrone on Aug 20, 2012 14:21:24 GMT -5
Tuscan is a little old lady living in a make believe world. She's been posting the same garbage for years
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Aug 20, 2012 15:08:37 GMT -5
just more of a side show to keep us busy. and BH comes out every 3 months or so and tells us another couple of weeks and then goes into a hole becaus we hurt his feelings when nothing actually happens. Same old drill it appears.
|
|
|
Post by skoondog on Aug 21, 2012 6:17:01 GMT -5
There is a problem with a few individuals having so many shares as to make the shareholders with less than 10million insignificant as voters. As I do believe that one vote per share is the legal correct and fair way to hold an election, I do not believe this applies to our situation. We are not a trading valued company and our shares at this point are worthless. Since many shares were ill-gotten, and accumulated illegally, I believe the shareholders who spent real money to purchase their shares have more of a right to be weighted differently than those who acquired their shares in other ways. One way to do this would be to only let the persons who hold CIM vote and the other way would be to limit the maximum number of votes any individual can cast to 100 million. This would better represent the wishes of the legitimate shareholders. Just so you know. I do not hold CIM so this would eliminate me from voting. I believe more strongly in the rights of the original shareholders who bought into this company legitimately than I do of my own rights as a Deli shareholder as should SK and the company. Just my 2 cents. D4E Good post!!! skoondog
|
|