"Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

[3bid]

Bombshell Claim: Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

by Tyler Durden

Fri, 07/12/2019

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which 'climate change' is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found "practically no anthropogenic [man-made] climate change" after a series of studies.

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence — could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover.

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it," comments Professor Hyodo in Science Daily. "This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect."

In their related paper, aptly titled, “No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic [man-made] climate change”, the Finnish scientists find that low cloud cover "practically" controls global temperatures but that “only a small part” of the increased carbon dioxide concentration is anthropogenic, or caused by human activity.
We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why 6 J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.

This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries' populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's "drastic measures to cut carbon emissions" which would ultimately require radical legislation changes to "remake the U.S. economy" would not only potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn't even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.

To put AOC's "drastic measures" in perspective — based entirely on the fundamental assumption of the monumental and disastrous impact of human activity on the climate — consider the following conclusions from the Finnish studies:

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”

Which leads the scientists to state further:

“Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased carbon dioxide is less than 10 percent, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change,” the researchers concluded.

And the team in Japan has called for a total reevaluation of current climate models, which remain dangerously flawed for dismissing a crucial variable:

This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate. When galactic cosmic rays increase, so do low clouds, and when cosmic rays decrease clouds do as well, so climate warming may be caused by an opposite-umbrella effect. The umbrella effect caused by galactic cosmic rays is important when thinking about current global warming as well as the warm period of the medieval era.

Failure to account for this results in the following, according to the one in the series of studies: "The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models."

"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice," the researchers conclude.

Though we doubt the ideologues currently pushing to radically remake the American economy through what ends up being a $93 trillion proposal (according to one study) — including AOC's call for a whopping 70% top tax rate — will carefully inquire of this new bombshell scientific confirmation presented in the new research, we at least hope the US scientific community takes heed before it's too late in the cause of accurate and authentic science that would stave off irreparable economic disaster that would no doubt ripple across the globe, adding to both human and environmental misery.

And "too late" that is, not for some mythical imminent or near-future "global warming Armageddon" as the currently in vogue highly politicized "science" of activists and congress members alike claims.

...................................................................



It’s not all bad news about climate change! Miley Cyrus has announced that she will not have any children because of climate change! Now that is an unexpected benefit!

But wait! It proves global warming has fried her brain!

The Catholic Church has always been “infallible” on all things unproven, like god and science.

Galileo and Copernicus were summarily excommunicated from the Church for their now long proven theories of astronomy and mathematics. For their efforts on behalf of scientific inquiry in the face of imprisonment and subsequent banishments from Catholicism, centuries later, I am a huge fan of both men. Popes? Not so much.

I have a deep mistrust of all organized religions including the newest entry, the global warming/ climate change mobsters. All religions seek to seize the minds of the ignorant and turn them into virulent ideologues using fear, reprisal and punishment, including death, to anyone who dare challenge them or question their belief or motives. Their collective drive is to achieve their ultimate ends, accumulating power and wealth.

Trained in the sciences and having paid close attention to human impact on the planet, I’ve read and studied for decades, in some depth, the observations and arguments on the physical world, earth science, weather and, ultimately, climate change.

If you can’t agree that earth’s climate has been an ever changing process for the 4.54 billion or years, +/-, of its existence, well, you’re an idiot. Since “modern man” as best we know, has been around for about 200,000 years, that’s a whole lot of dramatic climate change for which man just can’t be blamed.

If you believe that man is THE MAJOR DRIVER of climate change without taking into account astrophysical observations, measurements and impacts on earth from within our solar system, our galaxy and far beyond, join the Flat Earth Society and get a therapy pet. Try thinking outside the box. Wait, just start with thinking.

Closer to home, there are geophysical forces in and around the planet from core to crust, and crust to atmosphere that we still struggle to comprehend and understand. You’d get a truer picture of what happened on earth in the last few hundred years in diverse areas of the planet by examining tree rings than you’ll ever get by reading about science topics and opinion in the NYT, WAPO or USA Today.

MSM is proving that it is terrible at reporting useful information, just in general. At reporting on science, if there’s a level below “ dreadfully terrible ”, the media is approaching that metric. Disinformation or misinformation, you can take your choice.

It is now accepted that anything can be politicized will be politicized. Al Gore is the High Priest of politicizing climate. But who could argue with the guy who invented the Internet?

It has been uncovered that researchers in many basic science disciplines can be bought and data manipulated as long as there’s money to be made and political power to be maintained. “The Economist” ran some startling articles on this subject a few years ago. It rattled my belief in the sanctity of science and its pursuit of he truth.

The importance of having scientific study results checked by multiple, unbiased sources and then duplicated using the same materials and methods is the gold standard for verification of theories. But it is expensive, time consuming and re-proving a point made by someone else is never as exciting as having an original idea, THEN experimenting to reach a conclusion. But that concept is also fraught with the inherent bias of the investigators.

Man’s impact on resource mismanagement is one thing. Short of nuclear Armageddon, it is both comical and arrogant to believe that mankind has such power as to be the sole driver of earth’s demise by man’s actions on the planet’s surface.

If this observation by Finnish and Japanese scientists is proven true, we may actually be able to reach a climate “steady state” if the scientifically imbecilic politicians and “chicken little” proponents of man made climate doom just kept their pie holes closed as their bloviating hot air alone is what is likely raising earth’s temperature.

Cheers



www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-11/scientists-finland-japan-man-made-climate-change-doesnt-exist-practice