|
Post by vulcanized crawler on Apr 30, 2021 6:10:44 GMT -5
no vaccine is approved by the fda. they are all experimental. now you know what it is to be a lab rat. all have dna changing properties, except the johnson and johnson one that was halted. eugenics rock n roll
|
|
|
HOW
May 3, 2021 10:21:23 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 3, 2021 10:21:23 GMT -5
COVID: Vaccinated people shedding and spreading genetic disaster to unvaccinated women?
by Jon Rappoport
MANY women are posting reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.
What’s more, some of these women haven’t received the COVID vaccine, but they’ve been in close contact with others who have been vaccinated---leading to the question:
Can the COVID vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment) “shed” something harmful that can be passed from person to person?
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but in the world of genetics, much can go wrong.
In fact, for the past 25 years, we’ve had an illustration of shedding right in front of our eyes: GMO crops.
If you recall, Monsanto assured one and all that these crops---genetically engineered to survive the sprayed herbicide Roundup---would flourish, while weeds would succumb to the chemical.
So what actually happened? The weeds were resistant and became super-giants. And the Monsanto genes drifted from farm to farm, contaminating crops that were never meant to be engineered.
The Monsanto genes were “shed” and they spread.
This spread was not only the result of obvious cross-pollination. Bacteria in the soil, and in human digestive systems, also picked up and incorporated the Monsanto genes.
Why couldn’t “shed and spread” occur with a genetic COVID vaccine?
The COVID injection contains a piece of RNA. The RNA nanoparticles enter human cells, forcing those cells to manufacture a protein similar to a protein in the purported SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune system mounts a neutralizing attack against that protein, thus “rehearsing” to defeat the virus if it comes along later.
That’s the hypothesis.
In practice, who knows how many different dangerous and harmful processes can be detonated in the human body---plus the drifting of those genetic effects from person to person, whether vaccinated or not.
Yes, I know the experts will point out the difference between inserting genes into crops and inserting them into humans. They’ll say the GMO crops are supposed to hold on to those new genes long-term, but the COVID injection only has short-lived genetic effects.
Supposedly, this is true. Supposedly.
The universe of genetic experimentation, however, is rife with problems, mistakes, unintended consequences, as well as efforts to make weapons that attack life at basic levels.
Consider, for example, gene drive technology, which asks the question: what species should we make extinct today?
Why are Bill Gates and the US military involved in forwarding that technology?
A gene-drive scientist says, “I have a plan. By manipulating genes, we can make invasive rodents extinct, on an island where humans are living.”
In the next fraction of a second, a flurry of questions pops up.
The overarching question is: Does this mean genetic manipulation can make ANY species extinct?
Here is a passage from Gene Drive Files, a vital site with an enormous amount of referenced information on the subject:
“Gene drives are a gene-editing application that allows genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait. For example, recent experiments are fitting mice with ‘daughterless’ gene drives that will cascade through mouse populations so that only male pups are born, ensuring that the population becomes extinct after a few generations.”
“Proponents have framed gene drives as a breakthrough tool for eradicating pests or invasive species. However, the Gene Drive Files reveal that these ‘conservation’ efforts are primarily supported by military funds.”
Gene drive technology could be deployed to wipe out troublesome plant-parasites, weeds, crops, animal pests, animals, and…humans. Mull that over with your morning coffee.
Several years ago, certain UN member nations were considering a recommendation to call a moratorium on the use of gene drives. However, Bill Gates showed up to try to squash the moratorium.
The Gene Drive Files reports: “Documents received under Freedom of Information requests reveal that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid a private agriculture and biotechnology PR firm $1.6 million for activities on Gene Drives. This included running a covert ‘advocacy coalition’ which appears to have intended to skew the only UN expert process addressing gene drives…”
“Following global calls in December 2016 from Southern countries and over 170 organizations for a UN moratorium on gene drives, emails to gene drive advocates received under a Freedom of Information request by Prickly Research reveal that a private public affairs firm ‘Emerging Ag’ received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to co-ordinate the ‘fight back against gene drive moratorium proponents’.”
There’s more from the Gene Drive Files. It involves the military:
“A trove of emails (The Gene Drive Files) from leading U.S. gene drive researchers reveals that the U.S. Military is taking the lead in driving forward gene drive development.”
“Emails obtained through a freedom of Information request by U.S.–based Prickly Research reveal that the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has given approximately $100 million for gene drive research, $35 million more than previously reported, making them likely the largest single funder of gene drive research on the planet. The emails also reveal that DARPA either funds or co-ordinates with almost all major players working on gene drive development as well as the key holders of patents on CRISPR gene editing technology.”
“These funds go beyond the US; DARPA is now also directly funding gene drive researchers in Australia (including monies given to an Australian government agency, CSIRO) and researchers in the UK. The files also reveal an extremely high level of interest and activity by other sections of the U.S. military and Intelligence community.”
As I’ve shown in past articles, the latest and greatest gene-editing tools (e.g., CRISPR), which are used for gene drives, are far from slam-dunk precise, despite official assurances.
For example, Nature Communications, May 31, 2017, “CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome.” That’s UNINTENDED genetic “deletions and insertions.”
And how about this study? It was published in Genome Biology on June 14, 2017, and is titled, “CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing induces exon skipping by alternative splicing or exon deletion.” An exon is “a segment of a DNA or RNA molecule containing information coding for a protein or peptide sequence.” So you can see that exon skipping or deletion is a very bad outcome.
In other words, ANY gene editing done on ANY species opens the door wide to all sorts of errors and unforeseen consequences. Doomsday genetic warfare and mutually assured destruction are the far shore of insanity…but closer in, where more limited experiments are taking place, there is no safety zone, either. Insanity reigns there as well.
Read what adorers of genetic experimentation have gushed:
“I went to Monsanto, and I spent a lot of time with the scientists there, and I have revised my outlook, and I'm very excited about telling the world. When you’re in love, you want to tell the world.” (Bill Nye, the Science Guy)
“I know it's a long shot and people would say it's 'too absurd'… but I'm doing this with hopes of making a Mickey Mouse some day.” (Arikuni Uchimura, quoted in "Japan bio-scientists produce 'singing mouse'", The Independent, 21 December 2010.)
On the other hand, there is this: “Genetic engineering is to traditional crossbreeding what the nuclear bomb was to the sword.” (Andrew Kimbrell, executive director of Center for Food Safety)
So…we have a new COVID vaccine, based on experimental technology that delivers genetic instructions to cells of the body---instructions to create a protein that would otherwise never be created.
We’re told nothing can go wrong.
We have many examples of genetic technology going very wrong.
Farms that were supposed to be protected from Monsanto gene-drift turned into GMO Monsanto farms. So why couldn’t unvaccinated people turn into vaccinated people, through “shed and spread,” without ever receiving the COVID injection?
The problem is, the officials and experts who would answer that question for us are riddled with conflicts of interest; and they pretend to know what they don’t know; and they’re afraid of losing their jobs if they contradict the party line; and they’re experienced professional liars.
They’ve rewritten the old fable, The Boy Who Cried Wolf. These professionals NEVER cry wolf, no matter what disasters are brewing.
So we can never believe what they say.
Now let’s consider a key Pfizer document titled: “A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.”
On page 67, we find a warning about potential adverse effects of the vaccine. The abstruse term “study intervention” pops up. It surely means “vaccination.” “Environmental exposure” means contact with elements of the vaccine other than by injection.
Warning of adverse effect: “A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:”
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.”
“A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
These warnings, from the vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer, are shocking. They imply that women can be harmed by breathing in, or contacting by skin, the vaccine as it moves from person to person. Which would be “shedding.”
And what is being transferred from person to person? What is in the vaccine? Genetic material. RNA.
---There is a Coda to this whole business. I write it because I don’t believe in ringing lots of alarm bells and leaving people with nothing but fear.
From personal experience, and 83 years of living, I know that people have an extraordinary ability to outlast elite insanity, no matter what.
Our faith, desire for freedom, creative force, resistance, outrage, immortal refusal to give in; these are the core of a story that has been unfolding for centuries and millennia.
This story goes beyond the forces arrayed against us. Regardless of the machinations brought to bear on humanity; regardless of claims that “there is no way out,” we find ways.
We’re told: WELL, NO ONE CAN REMAIN HEALTHY IN THE FACE OF THAT. “That” is the latest psychotic experiment in which we are the non-voluntary subjects.
But many people do retain their strength, through their inner resources and their overriding faith, and their absolute refusal to knuckle under.
Believe that, don’t believe it; it’s real.
Permanent victimhood is not our destiny.
It never was, it never will be.
Sitting at the big table, shove in all your chips on that decision.
If you do, you’re in a community that has strengths no technocrat or secret society can begin to conceive of.
It’s not over. It’s never over. Time is very long.
We are the cure.
This is the war.
|
|
|
HOW
May 3, 2021 18:33:27 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 3, 2021 18:33:27 GMT -5
This video is a clip from Corona Investigative Committee's Special Session: International Legal Offensive – Part 1 by Oval Media and Corona Ausschuss
Ultra corrupt big pharma is way beyond being out of control.
"We need a reset; we need to clean house."
tinyurl.com/8z2sub3z
All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Find and support their work here: corona-ausschuss.de t.me/s/OVALmedia
***********
Corona Investigative Committee: International Legal Offensive Part 1 -- In Conversation With Lawyers from Germany, Italy, Great Britain, United States, Canada, Austria, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer of the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee in conversation international lawyers
tinyurl.com/2wtk7je5 00:02:46 -- RA Renate Holzeisen, Lawyer, Italy
00:28:21 -- Francis E. Hoar, Lawyer, Great Britain
00:47:52 -- Dominic Desjarlais, Lawyer, Quebec, Canada
01:04:00 -- Ana Garner, Lawyer, New Mexico, United States
01:19:00 -- Leslie Manookian -- President of Health Freedom Defense Fund, United States
01:49:00 -- Andrea Steindl, Lawyer & member of the Extra Parliamentary Corona Investigative Committee, Austria [testimony in German, translated to English by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich]
02:11:00 -- Gerald Beneder, Lawyer, Austria [testimony in German, translated to English by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich]
02:27:25 -- Dr. Michael Brunner, Lawyer, Austria [testimony in German, translated to English by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich]
02:40:07 -- Miguel Luis Marcelo Iannolfi, Lawyer, Argentina [testimony in Spanish, with translation by Belina Feldman, Chile]
03:00:00 -- Dr. Gustavo Salle Lorier, Law and Social Scientist, Uruguay [testimony in Spanish, with translation by Belina Feldman]
03:19:40 -- Natalia Ravanales, Lawyer specializing in Human Rights Law, Chile
03:50:45 -- Michael Swinwood, Lawyer, Canada (speaking from Peru)
As a service to protect and share the truth, this video is mirrored here from
Corona Ausschuss - Ausweichkanal wih video by Oval Media.
All credit, along with our sincere thanks, goes to the original source of this video. Find and support their work here: corona-ausschuss.de/
|
|
|
HOW
May 8, 2021 13:19:28 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 8, 2021 13:19:28 GMT -5
Expanded news coverage to a global audience -- Censorship vs. scientific debateOn May 4, we hosted a live webinar moderated by CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and featuring a lineup of international panelists who will discuss the importance of providing expanded news coverage to a global audience. *Watch the Webinar* childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-the-defender-5-languages-webinar/ Open public debate [free speech] is being heavily censored. A democracy -- free society -- requires free speech; the capacity to criticize our government. We absolutely need a safe place for science and evidence based debate. Good policies always evolve from a cauldron of fierce debate. Censorship is the first step toward totalitarianism. This assault on human rights is happening in every country worldwide.
|
|
|
HOW
May 9, 2021 6:07:28 GMT -5
Post by hurtsogood on May 9, 2021 6:07:28 GMT -5
The WHO, the CDC and the Davos WEF: The New Nuremberg Trials of 2021. Crimes Against Humanity
A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts lead by Dr. Reiner Fullmich have begun legal proceedings over the CDC, WHO, the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.
Fullmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud.
The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles.
All the PCR tests issued by the CDC are rated at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any test over 28 cycles are not admissible for any positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid infections tracked by the use of this faulty test.
In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention.
Full article and video......
|
|
|
HOW
May 13, 2021 13:31:16 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 13, 2021 13:31:16 GMT -5
Memo to medical bloggers living in Mommy’s basement
And to medical reporters living in New York and Georgetown pulling down nice paychecks
by Jon Rappoport | May 13, 2021
You see, bloggers and reporters, here is the problem (one among many, actually). You have no background.
You don’t understand that every time you write a medical piece, there is a context which should inform your every move:
The modern medical system kills and maims huge numbers of people.
To put it another way, THE MODERN MEDICAL SYSTEM KILLS AND MAIMS HUGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE.
Let me help you out.
ONE: “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the 2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.
Donald Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)
TWO: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.”
The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:
Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.
Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.”
So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.
THREE: July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”
Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.
In 2009, I interviewed Dr. Starfield. Here is an excerpt:
What has been the level and tenor of the response to your findings, since 2000?
The American public appears to have been hoodwinked into believing that more interventions lead to better health, and most people that I meet are completely unaware that the US does not have the ‘best health in the world’.
In the medical research community, have your medically-caused mortality statistics been debated, or have these figures been accepted, albeit with some degree of shame?
The findings have been accepted by those who study them. There has been only one detractor, a former medical school dean, who has received a lot of attention for claiming that the US health system is the best there is and we need more of it. He has a vested interest in medical schools and teaching hospitals (they are his constituency).
Have health agencies of the federal government consulted with you on ways to mitigate the [devastating] effects of the US medical system?
NO.
Since the FDA approves every medical drug given to the American people, and certifies it as safe and effective, how can that agency remain calm about the fact that these medicines are causing 106,000 deaths per year?
Even though there will always be adverse events that cannot be anticipated, the fact is that more and more unsafe drugs are being approved for use. Many people attribute that to the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is (for the past ten years or so) required to pay the FDA for reviews [of its new drugs]—which puts the FDA into an untenable position of working for the industry it is regulating. There is a large body of literature on this.
Aren’t your 2000 findings a severe indictment of the FDA and its standard practices?
They are an indictment of the US health care industry: insurance companies, specialty and disease-oriented medical academia, the pharmaceutical and device manufacturing industries, all of which contribute heavily to re-election campaigns of members of Congress. The problem is that we do not have a government that is free of influence of vested interests. Alas, [it] is a general problem of our society—which clearly unbalances democracy.
Would it be correct to say that, when your JAMA study was published in 2000, it caused a momentary stir and was thereafter ignored by the medical community and by pharmaceutical companies?
Are you sure it was a momentary stir? I still get at least one email a day asking for a reprint—ten years later! The problem is that its message is obscured by those that do not want any change in the US health care system.
Are you aware of any systematic efforts, since your 2000 JAMA study was published, to remedy the main categories of medically caused deaths in the US?
No systematic efforts; however, there have been a lot of studies. Most of them indicate higher rates [of death] than I calculated.
Did your 2000 JAMA study sail through peer review, or was there some opposition to publishing it?
It was rejected by the first journal that I sent it to, on the grounds that ‘it would not be interesting to readers’!
Do the 106,000 deaths from medical drugs only involve drugs prescribed to patients in hospitals, or does this statistic also cover people prescribed drugs who are not in-patients in hospitals?
I tried to include everything in my estimates. Since the commentary was written, many more dangerous drugs have been added to the marketplace.
—end of interview excerpt—
FOUR: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”
The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”
The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”
Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency knows the truth.
FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.
The US system for reporting severe adverse effects of vaccines is broken.
Barbara Loe Fisher, of the private National Vaccine Information Center, has put together a reasonable analysis:
“But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]”
“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.”
“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, ‘Vaccine safety,’ Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]”
“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events [per year]. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”
SIX: Here is a stunning quote from a doctor who has quite probably read and analyzed as many medical-drug studies as any other doctor in the world:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)
Compare that quote with one from “the father of COVID science,” Tony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated: “Anybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they’re talking about…If something is published in places like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA—you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things very seriously.”
They take things so seriously at the New England Journal, they routinely publish glowing studies of medical drugs which, as evidence shows, are killing people in great numbers.
So…you medical bloggers living in mommy’s basement, and you medical reporters who live in New York and Georgetown and pull down nice paychecks, you now have some background. Every time you write a Mockingbird article (aka puff piece), you can fathom how deep your lies really go, and how much crime you’re really involved with.
It’s never too late to tell the truth. I’m offering you a way out.
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on May 13, 2021 15:12:35 GMT -5
"Parrhesia" -- written and presented by Kayla Henry
Published on May 1, 2021
I wrote this poem to encourage independent thinking. Mainstream media pushes fear and avoids delving deeper into major issues. We deserve the truth, and we owe it to ourselves to take the time to find it. Censorship and propaganda are driving us further away from Freedom, Free Speech, Peace, Independence...It doesn't just stop at Covid-19.
"Parrhesia" is a poem about governments and media manipulating us for profit. It is also about how fear is used to control the unaware, and how our emotions blind us from the reality that is right in front of us. Patterns throughout history depict authorities controlling the way information is (or isn't) delivered to different groups in order to get what they want from them: Book burning, censored and selective education, language barriers, emotional manipulation, financial incentives...We can't point the finger at one evil genius behind a curtain... but we can see millions (if not billions) of misinformed people with good intentions falling victim to a broken system. We all want what is best for ourselves, our families and loved ones, and yet we do not take the time to find the truth. The hypocrisy and contradictions in the way governments are dealing with the coronavirus (sars cov 2, "pandemic") should be enough to raise some red flags.
|
|
|
HOW
May 20, 2021 9:20:08 GMT -5
Post by jcagney on May 20, 2021 9:20:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
HOW
May 25, 2021 13:06:43 GMT -5
Post by jcagney on May 25, 2021 13:06:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
HOW
May 25, 2021 19:00:48 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 25, 2021 19:00:48 GMT -5
WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON IN INDIA BY THE HIGHWIRE WITH DEL BIGTREEEye witness report -- Corona is the least of their worries tinyurl.com/4h8m499k
|
|
|
HOW
May 30, 2021 9:45:09 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 30, 2021 9:45:09 GMT -5
Brian Gerrish [UK Column] interviewed by Reiner Fuellmich
Discussion includes the role of mainstream news, the official falsification of statistics, and details the malicious use of psychology to manipulate people's minds.
---> tinyurl.com/wdth8bjm Brian Gerrish is a former Royal Navy Officer from the Cold War era. Specialised in anti-submarine warfare, he worked with Royal Navy, US UK and NATO maritime forces conducting operations to locate and track Soviet nuclear submarines the Norwegian Sea, North Atlantic and US eastern seaboard.
Having left the Royal Navy in 1993, Brian spend several years working in the private sector, specialising in environmental and contaminated land risk management for large scale construction projects.
In the late 1990s he took an interest in firstly, the rise of unaccountable EU political power and influence within UK, and secondly, the corrupting influence of the political charity Common Purpose within government, and the public, private and community sectors.
Reporting his findings in written articles and public talks, Brian was steadily drawn into a new life as a public speaker and investigatory journalist, with the UK Column newspaper - which he formed together with Mike Robinson - and which is now a broad based independent news media organisation.
Alongside his continuing work to highlight the rise of a dangerous political dictatorship within UK, Brian has also remained focused on working to expose UK state sponsored child abuse and trafficking. He recognises that we fight against spiritual powers in high places.
Previous articles by Brian Gerrish:
www.ukcolumn.org/writer/brian-gerrish
|
|
|
HOW
May 30, 2021 13:08:09 GMT -5
Post by jcagney on May 30, 2021 13:08:09 GMT -5
James talks to German-American lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich about Nuremberg 2 and why those involved in the Coronavirus scare should be tried for crimes against humanity. vimeo.com/553673924Some new information that I hadn't heard before. The first is person responsible for developing the 97% false positive PCR test did it in the first few days of January 2020 without the virus being isolated. The Dresden PCR test becomes the WHO's Gold standard that is used world wide with exception of China. And second, according to two retired WHO doctors that Reiner interviewed, by about Jan 23rd of 2020 Big Pharma was badgering the WHO to declare a world wide emergency but they didn't have the case numbers. By the middle of February 2020, with the help of the faulty Dresden PCR test, and more badgering from Big Pharma, the WHO has the numbers to declare a World Wide Emergency. Pkandemic or Scamdemic anyone? I mean, what could go wrong? Could be some big announcements of upcoming court cases in the next week or two. IMHO, Jcagney
|
|
|
HOW
May 31, 2021 14:15:39 GMT -5
Post by 3bid on May 31, 2021 14:15:39 GMT -5
The Drug that Cracked COVID
May 01, 2021 01:43PM ● By Michael Capuzzo
[...]
“If you were to say, tell me the characteristics of a perfect drug to treat COVID-19, what would you ask for?” he said. “I think you would ask firstly for something that’s safe, that’s cheap, that’s readily available, and has anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties. People would say, “That’s ridiculous. There could not possibly be a drug that has all of those characteristics. That’s just unreasonable. But we do have such a drug. The drug is called Ivermectin.”
If it was universally distributed at a dose that costs ten American cents in India and about the cost of a Big Mac in the United States, he said, Ivermectin would save countless lives, crush variants, eliminate the need for endless big pharma booster shots, and end the pandemic all over the world.
There were no effective, lifesaving, approved COVID-19 treatments that doctors had used to slow down or stop the coronavirus in the history of the pandemic, in any phase of the disease, except the one, corticosteroids, that Marik and company had discovered.
Now they had discovered another treatment, even more powerful, that could save the world.
Surely, Marik thought, the world would listen this time.
As Judy lay dying in Millard Fillmore hospital, her doctors did not have Ivermectin in their treatment bag. But they did have Remdesivir, and they gave a dose to Judy. Manufactured by Gilead Sciences, one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, Remdesivir costs $3,000 a dose. It is the only anti-viral treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients approved by the .....
The nurses were shocked. Michael was jubilant. The next day his mother was sitting in a chair talking to him on Zoom. But then Judy regressed. They moved her to a cardiac floor, her heart was racing, and “she was going downhill,” Michael says, and he asked the doctor for another dose of Ivermectin. This time the “no” from the doctor and administration was final. That day the family retained Buffalo lawyer Ralph Lorigo, who studied Kory’s video and the FLCCC website and sued the hospital ....
In Argentina, Professor and doctor Hector Carvallo, whose prophylactic studies are renowned by other researchers, says all his scientific documentation for Ivermectin is quickly scrubbed from the Internet. “I am afraid,” he wrote to Marik and his colleagues, “we have affected the most sensitive organ on humans: the wallet...” As Kory’s testimony was climbing toward nine million views, YouTube, owned by Google, erased his official Senate testimony, saying it endangered the community. Kory’s biggest voice was silenced ...
read the full story: www.mountainhomemag.com/2021/05/01/356270/the-drug-that-cracked-covid
|
|
|
HOW
Jun 2, 2021 12:36:38 GMT -5
Post by jcagney on Jun 2, 2021 12:36:38 GMT -5
New peer reviewed study on Covid-19 injections suggests why heart inflammation, blood clots and other dangerous side effects occur. Annoying commercial to start. Interview with Professor Byram Bridle starts at the one minute thirty second mark. omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-suggeVaccine Expert Warns: “We Made a Big Mistake” By Michelle Edwards -May 31, 2021 Note: the YouTube video link in the OP is outdated (February 2021) and doesn't contain this latest information. Canadian vaccine expert Dr. Byram Bridle recently spoke of the terrifying reasons serious side effects, including heart inflammation and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), may occur in those who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. He explained that critical information has recently been discovered that centers around spike proteins—a crucial element in both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines. uncoverdc.com/2021/05/31/vaccine-expert-warns-we-made-a-big-mistake/The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates through the blood in individuals over several days post-vaccination. Once it gets in the blood, it accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, the bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal glands. And of particular concern for me is it accumulates in the ovaries, in quite high concentrations.”
What could go wrong? Jcagney
|
|
|
HOW
Jun 10, 2021 7:41:01 GMT -5
jcagney likes this
Post by 3bid on Jun 10, 2021 7:41:01 GMT -5
Lies on the BBC will Result in Children Dying Dr. Vernon Coleman | 9th June 2021
As you know, the BBC is the most dishonest, disreputable, unreliable media outlet in the history of the world. It’s ageist, sexist, bigoted, unpatriotic and as bent as a paperclip. Over the last year I have recorded a number of videos detailing their errors and distortions. One BBC presenter has even boasted that the BBC will not tell the truth about vaccines – they deliberately suppress those who do tell the truth about vaccines and vaccination. And they do this even when they know that they are suppressing the truth.
There is no secret about why the BBC is hiding the truth. The BBC has close links to the drug industry, the crooked, corrupt vaccine makers, and is, of course, desperate to keep its licence fee by sucking up to the Government.
Now it seems that deceiving adults isn’t enough. The BBC is now deliberately lying to children.On the 8th June the BBC ran an item headed Pfizer vaccine for children – your questions answered. The BBC put questions to someone called Professor Devi Sridhar, who is apparently Chair of something called Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh. They have to put the word global into it, don’t they? Presumably, to show their enthusiasm for Agenda 21. I’m surprised they haven’t got the word sustainable in there too. Professor Sridhar, an American academic, says: This wretched woman Sridhar, who will surely burn in hell, claims that the vaccine is 100% safe for children. And she is really reassuring about the side effects. So let’s take those three statements and analyse them. First, she says that if you have the vaccine you won’t be likely to infect your parents and the people you live with and your teachers. Where did she get this from? Who is her medical advisor? The Queen? Dolly Parton? Dermot O’Leary? Well, it’s not what the NHS says. The NHS says: In other words the vaccine doesn’t stop you getting covid or spreading it if you do get it. What it does do, allegedly, is reduce the symptoms you might get. That’s hugely different. What an unbelievably arrogant and stupid woman Sridhar is to pontificate about something she knows nothing about and clearly doesn’t seem to understand. Second, Sridhar says this experimental vaccine, which only has a temporary approval let us not forget, is 100% safe for children. And that is a downright, 100%, solid gold, lie. And for that lie alone this bloody woman should be hung, drawn quartered, boiled in oil and tarred and feathered. Sridhar is lying to children who are susceptible and vulnerable and terrified out of their wits by a year of unremitting propaganda. So, what’s the truth? The truth is that in America, the data up to the 28th May 2021 for 12 to 17-year-olds shows that there have been 4,740 total adverse events including 117 rated as serious and four reported deaths. Two 15-year-olds died and a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old. Those are the confirmed deaths. There are others not yet confirmed. And this grinning, ignorant Professor Devi Sridhar of the University of Edinburgh says it’s safe. Well, you horrid woman, death isn’t safe. Death is final. It means it’s all over. And this experimental jab is safe like being run over by a bus is safe. No healthy children have died of this year’s remarketed flu. Children get very few serious symptoms from covid-19. But in the US, at least four children have already died of the experimental jab. Third, the stupid, stupid, stupid Sridhar, whose name should now be immortalised along with Myra Hindley and Rose West, is reassuring about the side effects. Just a bit of tiredness and a headache. That is another absolute bloody lie. There were 635 reports of anaphylaxis among 12 to 17-year-olds with 97% attributed to the Pfizer vaccine. And there were 40 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis due to the Pfizer jab. And 16 reports of blood clotting disorders. And what about pathogenic priming? And the real risk of menstrual and fertility problems. And all this, let us remember, for an experimental jab intended to reduce symptoms caused by the rebranded flu – covid-19 – a disease which kills mainly people over 80 who are already dying of something else. What’s Sridhar going to do next? Tell children to eat deadly nightshade berries or pick nice colourful toadstools and eat them? Make no mistake this Devi Sridhar is a menace to children. Her advice could result in millions of children dying. She should be struck off the medical register. Except she can’t be. Because she isn’t a doctor. She isn’t a doctor. Presumably the BBC couldn’t find a proper medical doctor to praise this toxic jab. So they dug up Devi Sridhar. She has never syringed an ear or removed an appendix or written a prescription or made a diagnosis. She isn’t a medical doctor. I am. She isn’t. And believe me this woman does not know what she is talking about. She is the sort of charlatan that the BBC should be exposing in my view. The newspapers should tear her apart. But they won’t. Because they are all bought too. And so this ignorant, arrogant woman will continue to spread lies that will lead to death, pain and agony. The latest figures from the UK Government show that in the UK the side effects involved with this jab include serious neurological problems, heart attacks, strokes, blindness and many other serious disorders. I think it is an insult to the patients who have been damaged to describe their side effects as mild. Kids, who have smaller more vulnerable bodies, are being given the same toxic junk as adults but up until the end of May 2021 these jabs had been responsible for 4,406 deaths in the US and 1,213 deaths in the UK. The VAERS figure for US deaths is now 5,165 and rising fast. Those are official government figures and they are low because less than 1 in 100 adverse events in the US is reported, and in the UK it’s probably between 1 and 10%. Many deaths have been ignored or dismissed as coincidental. There is a pandemic of coincidences. In the US there had been 1,214 cases of anaphylaxis. Horrifyingly, 14,986 had needed hospitalisation and there had been 34,474 urgent health problems. In the UK there had been 1,213 deaths caused by the jabs and 859,481 total adverse reactions. Many people have gone blind. Those are all official government figures Ms Sridhar. The truth is that the total killed and injured by these d*mned jabs will turn out to be far higher than the figures I’ve given. The figures for Europe and the rest of the world are just as scary. Weekly deaths all around the world have soared as more and more people are injected with this toxic junk. Women everywhere are noticing changes to their monthly cycle. And that’s crucial. Over half of GPs said they would not have the toxic jab. In the UK the Government has admitted that despite putting NHS staff – hospital doctors, nurses, porters and bureaucrats – under pressure at least 20% have refused to be jabbed. Perfectly healthy children are probably no more at risk of dying of covid-19 than they are of being killed by lightning? No previously healthy child under the age of 15 has died of covid-19 in the UK. Most children have hardly any symptoms if they do catch covid-19. Why would you jab against something so irrelevant? What the hell is going on? Well, we know the BBC is linked to the drug companies via the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but what about this pathetically patronising Sridhar woman? Well, just type `Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’ and `Edinburgh University’ into your favourite search engine. Or just type in Devi Sridhar and Bill Gates. Or take a look at Devi Sridhar and Wellcome Trust. The same wretched little BBC programme – which I am told is now being shown in schools by moronic teachers who believe the BBC is a broadcaster and not a bought and paid for propaganda unit for the drug industry, also contains a quote from the BBC’s paid misinformation expert, the equally wretched and disgusting Marianna Spring whose qualifications, for all I know, consist of an O’Level in domestic science and a bronze medal for the hop, skip and jump. Ms Spring says: Now that is odd because I know a lot of medical doctors who are, by the BBC’s definition, anti-vaxxers. In fact I could find more doctors who oppose giving this toxic vaccine to children than she or the BBC could find supporting giving it to children. There’s another little challenge for you Ms Spring – to add to the other challenges I’ve offered the BBC – all of which have been rejected. See how many doctors – real medical doctors – you can find who think giving covid-19 jabs to kids is a good idea and I’ll find more who know it’s dangerous lunacy. And that probably explains why instead of finding a GP or a hospital consultant or some other doc with a stethoscope, to lie to kids they dug this Sridhar out of the cave where she presumably lives. The BBC has betrayed us for a long time now. But this is a new low. Are they deliberately trying to kill as many children as possible? That’s what it looks like to me. I’m going to be doing another video about the BBC, about Ms Spring and about media doctors who are real, proper medical doctors but who have misled and lied to the public. In March 2020, well over a year ago, I warned that this was all going to be about pushing vaccines onto the public. People laughed and sneered. But that’s exactly what is happening. There is no excuse for lying to children like this. I don’t believe in the death penalty. But I’d bring it back for these two. Send copies of this to Edinburgh University and the BBC as well as the media everywhere. My wife has sent out over 300 emails. If everyone watching this does the same or a half or a quarter of that then we will defeat them. The truth deniers are so frightened of the truth that they are blocking everything I do so send people direct to vernoncoleman.org/ vernoncoleman.org/videos/lies-bbc-will-result-children-dying [15 minutes]
|
|