|
Post by JoeRockss on Dec 14, 2007 17:29:13 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 14 Dec 2007, 04:48 PM EST Msg. 632874 of 632876 Jump to msg. # starbase, I was almost with your little speech until you said you didn't care if you were 6ft. under and hadn't been paid yet... That was a little over the top.
The only people who do not want to pay what they stole is the SEC/DTCC/Federal Reserve/Government officials/Corporate criminals.. etc.
After 4 or 5 years in this investment, it is time to demand the distribution of the ETGMF or give us the truth of why we have not received our shares of ETGMF.
It is time to be proactive. The stockholders did what was asked, and maximum value was extracted by the bona fide stockholders.
If you think Casavant told the SEC he'd let them off the hook by giving them 'shares' to cover the cert pull IN ADVANCE!, you are off your friggin rocker.
Not even the dumbest business man would do that...
Give enough shares to cover cert pull IF the SEC would clean what up? Sheesh... that is way off.
Another issue. Maheu didn't work for the government mostly? Where would you get that rediculous idea?
He managed the richest man in the world's empire for almost two decades.
Breaking the oil contract became a 'cut-out' job because he needed the contacts.
He did work for the FBI and played a critical role in deceiving the Germans at Battle of Normandy.
But then he went into PRIVATE PRACTICE.. he did all sorts of jobs.
One thing you failed to mention was that he hated the corruption in Vegas and both he and Hughes did not care for the Northeastern Establishment.. which right now starbase, is our enemy, imo.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Dec 14, 2007 17:29:36 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 14 Dec 2007, 05:12 PM EST Msg. 632882 of 632886 (This msg. is a reply to 632874 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # If we have oil in production how long could it be kept under raps? 1 year, 2 years? 3 years? By now it surely would be time to hatch the plan and pay the shareholders. Oil /eom
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Dec 14, 2007 18:01:11 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 14 Dec 2007, 05:12 PM EST Msg. 632882 of 632886 (This msg. is a reply to 632874 by abadgoodgirl.) Jump to msg. # If we have oil in production how long could it be kept under raps? 1 year, 2 years? 3 years? By now it surely would be time to hatch the plan and pay the shareholders. Oil /eom If we do already have oil in production the article below must have missed it...they are speaking of "...encourage sustainable development of the province's oilsands resources" as a future item...not something that's going on at present. If this is part of a cover story, then so-be-it. JMHO. Catdaddy Saskatchewan Premier...Oilsands Potential « Thread Started on Today at 10:07 » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Technology Magazine December 13, 2007 www.nickles.com:80/ntm/extra.asp?article=NTM2007_DD0000.htmlSaskatchewan Premier Commits To Exploring Oilsands Potential Premier Brad Wall wants both industry and Saskatchewan's new government to look at ways to encourage sustainable development of the province's oilsands resources. The premier delivered a message this week of investment optimism around both oilsands and conventional oil to a Regina business audience attending a Saskatchewan oilsands seminar organized by Wellington West Capital Inc. "There is a lot of room for new investment in Saskatchewan's industry and the energy science and technology associated with it," Wall said. "Our oilsands could offer tremendous opportunities for economic growth if they are properly developed." More than 100 business people attended the seminar, "Global Oil Sands Development: A Washington Perspective," which featured Paul Michael Wihbey, a Washington-based geopolitical energy strategist. In November, Wihbey presented "Oil Sands: Pivotal to a New World Oil Order" to blue ribbon investors in Zurich and Geneva where he positioned Saskatchewan as a significant energy producer leading the charge on North American energy security. "Saskatchewan has an energy diversity that no other Canadian province can match in terms of primary energy supply," Wall said. "Oil is a critical part of that diversity, but we need research and new technology to unlock the resource that we have in not only oilsands but light, medium and heavy crude as well." Saskatchewan's initial oil in place is currently estimated at just over nine billion barrels, with more than 30 billion barrels remaining beyond reach -- for now. If technology increased recovery rates by only five per cent, Saskatchewan's remaining recoverable reserves would more than double from current levels. "That is why we committed to $4 million over four years in Petroleum Technology Research Centre funding," Wall said. While the extent of the province's oilsands resources is still unknown, government geoscientists estimate northwestern Saskatchewan contains 27,000 square kilometres of land with some level of oilsands potential. © 2007 Copyright Nickle's Energy Group.
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Dec 14, 2007 19:49:59 GMT -5
How do we know this is actually true? Are we putting all our hopes in the fact that BM is orchestrating this plan with smoke and mirrors and that one day we will see a nice ROI. OR is this just part of the rumor mill to keep us quiet? ============================================================ I hear that Maheu is still with us. You're likely to hear ALL KINDS of foolishness, if you listen to enough people...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 14, 2007 21:55:15 GMT -5
phxgold Explorer Re: New Documents 12/14/2007 « Reply #4 on Today at 5:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ag enterprises was incorporated in jan 2004 pres sec treasurer david desormeau there is a letter from brian dvorak (john edwards attorney) that gave ag enterprises 10 billion shares and a 2 for 1 f/s in 2004 for "work done for cmki in 2001 a full year before cybermark merged creating cmki. here is the good part ag enterprises was incorporated in jan 2004 a full 2 years before it supposedl;y did work for cmki which want even born unil nov 2002. arnold gutka is the officer on the sos site when he was really a front man for desormeau as evidenced by the original corporate docs. here is where it gets good. ag enterprises had a trading account with bsic his brooker was arthur daryll pryor. there is 35 pages of dumping cmkx stock in oct of 2004 in this document with sweeps totallying millions of dollars into personal bank accounts of desormeau. not sure if my math is correct but were talking 9million from oct 1 til oct 19 2004. just from ag enterprises alone. you really need to read that doc. also i found in the checks a check on page 21 written by desormeau to casavant golf the account is drawn on casavant mining account. The phone number is listed as 702-433-1374 which is registered to who? www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=702+433+1374this is 8 months before casavant mining was formed. on feb 12 2002. guess we should call him and let him know how much we hopes he makes it to the discovery confrence on monday. and how much we appreciate his dump in oct 2004 BTW the number still works i called this afternoon. cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=1197674414
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 14, 2007 21:56:05 GMT -5
phxgold Explorer Re: New Documents 12/14/2007 « Reply #9 on Today at 6:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am willing to testify that Daryll Pryor told me personally that every trade in cmkx that went thru bsic crossed his desk and he handled it. I am also willing to testify that Daryll pryor told me personally that there was a huge naked short position on cmkx and alot of brokers were gonna go under because of it. he also told me that he was personally buying every share he could get his hands on and that he personally owned billions of shares. I will also testify that daryll pryor and Urban casavant personally assured my mother and I face to face at the Hilton by the sea tac airport in 2004 of my mother retireing "sooner than you think" becasue of her investment in cmkx. Daryll Pryor was activly pumping cmkx to investors along side ed dhonau chris hanneman urban casavant anthony pulichino and carolyn casavant while facilitating the dump by personally brokering the transactions. that trading account alone should have triggered sar's and if it did not because of the personal relationship daryll held with the company someones in for a world of hurt! « Last Edit: Today at 6:04pm by phxgold » cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=1197674414
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 4:29:32 GMT -5
smeagol8 King of Diamonds Try this scenario on for size. Part I « Thread Started on Yesterday at 8:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe at one time there was serious concern about 'someone' taking over the company. Perhaps through the use of 'imaginary' shares, meaning NSS shares. As we have seen, NSS is not an easily defeated enemy. How then would you (Urban) stop such a takeover? One tactic would the so-called "scorched earth" tactic - spend the money, scatter the claims - leave nothing in the companies name, thus leaving no reason to seize control. Now, legally, anything you spend that money on is a company asset, and claims can be retrieved. Doing so is a time consuming task, as we have seen, even with no opposition from Urban. Of course, this scenario is entirely up to your own interpretation: Whether Urban was pillaging the company, and we hope to recover some of what he spent - OR - Was Urban basically hiding the assets, SO that it could be recovered later.....both actions are identical to an outside observer, and that's us. (As well as any 'bad guys'). How are we to tell which was happening? To be continued. www.cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1197684072Part II It is obvious that Urban 'emptied' the company. But what is interesting is that after months of work, KW reports that 'Not one dime" has been recovered. Not one dime from the millions that Urban spent, not one dime from NSS related matters, not one dime from claims related matters, not one dime from (documented) illegal stock sales. Considering the simplest case, the fact that anything Urban bought with company money belongs to the company, how is it possible that not 'one dime' has been recovered? Unless that's the way KW wants it. How could that be? Remember that possible takeover of the company? Perhaps NSS related? Perhaps that is still a problem and until the NSS problem is totally taken care of it will remain a worry. Perhaps the mentioned 'cancellation of shares' is an important step. Let's say you are a bad guy (Debeers?) and you own one trillion cmkx shares,(no, you didn't participate in the cert pull). You can't sell the shares, cause we are not trading, and there is no point in trying to take over the company, cause there's nothing there. So here comes KW, trying to cancel your trillion shares. How hard will you fight that action? The shares are worthless. And you don't want your company connected with this whole mess, there is nothing to be gained. But if KW announced that he had recovered significant funds, and had claims returned to company control, then those shares are no longer worthless, then you will fight in any way you can to keep your billion shares from being cancelled. Thus KW deliberately keeps the company worthless, as he cleans up the various problems - and there is no resistance to most of his actions, because, after all, who cares about worthless shares? To be continued. « Last Edit: Yesterday at 8:04pm by smeagol8 » smeagol8 King of Diamonds **** Try this scenario on for size. End. « Thread Started on Yesterday at 10:01pm » The odds of my scenerio being exactly right aren't all that good, but it would explain some things: Why would Urban spend so much money, so fast? Why would Urban leave a "paper trail', and give it to KW? (Who keeps gambling receipts, when it wasn't really your money?) Why does KW demonize Urban on one hand, but seemingly has NO interest in advancing his case? It advances, yes, but there is NO trace of urgency shown. Why doesn't Urban address the issue? Deny everything? Blame someone else? Why don't any of Urban's 'inner circle' denounce him? Like Melvin? This would be a great time for Melvin to say "I was fooled". But no. Why would KW repeatedly state that the company has NO assets, NO claims, NOTHING has been paid, NOTHING has been recovered, yet he also assures visitors of a good ROI and talks about returning to trading?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 5:17:15 GMT -5
jimbocmkx vegas member hmmmmm « Thread Started on Yesterday at 10:18am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -Last Friday ETGMF had some interesting vol -Byrne indicates "Huge surge in conflict free diamond sales" on FOX -Obermann goes nuts on video -Citigroup COO stepping down -Citi takes 7 SIV's ON BOOK.... 58b of debt -Approx 30 days ago Tyler said they would file answer to ETGMF suit "IN A FEW DAYS" -Now, No vol on ETGMF since 12/12 -Central Bank Bail out... no worky -Tyler update..."This lawsuit must be decided before any further actions can be discussed or taken with these holdings" Denison/Areva FALC? TIC TOC, TIC TOC BIG WAVES ARE ROLLING RIDE THE WAVE!!!!!!! camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=1197645530
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 5:18:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 5:18:42 GMT -5
B68 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: New Document on the company website « Reply #7 on Today at 1:49am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is what it shows: A) Minutes dated 3/2/04 claiming to owe 50B shares since 1/20/01. Note: AG Ent. & Business Works- is one in the same!! * see article of incorp. Each is to get 10B shares each. = totaling 20B B) Opinion letter dated 7/20/04; claims AG Ent. is owed 10B shares plus the 2/1 div/split that occurred 9/29/03 totaling 20B shares owed from when they purchased them originally back on 1/20/01. C) Nevada Articles of Incorp. shows AG Ent. Incorporated on 1/15/04. **Hmm-how can that be??? if all the above swears they purchased the shares & made agreement on 1/20/01. Plus they were given the rights to the split. D) AG Ent. Brokerage statement shows that within the month of October of 04 all CMKX shares seem to have been washed through the account. Non left-every Billion of them gone. Yet increased its portfolio value by $1.4mil within 1 month. E) On 10/15/04; AG Enter. Transfers $3.2 mil to Bank of America – cash. Also seems to be the day most shares are moved out. E.1) On 10/15/04; same day of wire transfer the following checks are made out from AG Enter. Ck#1: payable to “Vic Cassavant for $146K Ck#2: payable to “Business Works” for $25K *remember same as AG. Ck#3: payable to “CMKXTREME” for $250K **It looks as if $396K when back to CMKX. All for Shares promised prior to incorporation and profits Millions as a result. Did I miss much? millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1197675622
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 15, 2007 9:30:58 GMT -5
CONTRACT???...that update was really STRANGE...how would UC give KW a THREE YEAR contract if he did not have CONTROLLING INTERESTS in CMKX...actually our CERTS may be for the CERT PULL ONLY IMO and may not even be REAL CMKM shares IMO...it is possible they were NSS and never had any RIGHTS attached to them...and a CONTRACT means GUARANTEED money for KW not dependent on investors we don't even know the name of...ask yourself WHY UC would give KW a CONTRACT and what that means...it tells me UC is STILL in charge here IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 16:02:06 GMT -5
pennypauly GC Mod Re: Gossip Column 12/15/07 « Reply #6 on Today at 3:02pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jay posts all in one so far, he is singing off as G now G-man or George who knows I will ask By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 12:02 PM EST Msg. 633076 of 633224 Jump to msg. # In the latest update, Mr. West specifically stated "...this is a private company..." How can this be? When did we go private? If our CEO states we are private, should not there be documentation to prove such outlandish and brash statements toward 40K+ shareholders who have certificates who believe they are part of a public company? Is that statement a truth or an untruth? Just one of numerous points to ponder. Enjoy your weekend. - - - - - ___________________________________________________ By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 01:42 PM EST Msg. 633156 of 633225 (This msg. is a reply to 633146 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Chris, I don't think we should sue Tyler. You must have me confused with another. I think Tyler boys have a job to do and they are doing it. G ___________________________________________________ By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 02:12 PM EST Msg. 633188 of 633226 (This msg. is a reply to 633170 by mjl62.) Jump to msg. # You'll be pleasantly surprised when this is all over and done. You think Mr. C is looking over his shoulder? Think again. I believe he did what he did for the benefit of the shareholders, and fortunately I and many others didn't push the sell button when the price went up. We're locked in, so why not shed the anger and blame and try to get along with the fellow shareholders? If reading this simple little meaningless message board bothers you and makes you angry, why not just stop reading it? It's really that simple. You may not like someone's opinion, but geesh, at least some are not scared into oblivion to stop continuing dialogue about something they believe in. No one can take that belief away. You can try and you can threaten, but you'll never take away the belief from the true believers. We know too much about what went on and what is happpening. Just try to get along and stop threatening people. Let them talk. It can't hurt anything to let people talk all they want. Just ignore them if you don't like them. No need to fight them, especially over a little nonimportant message board. G ___________________________________________________ By: DrillBit 15 Dec 2007, 02:02 PM EST Msg. 633175 of 633226 (This msg. is a reply to 633126 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Jay, Reserve estimates are not apples to apples. We in the US have huge reserves "locked" up in shales and to access that crude much energy is required like that of the Canadian tar sands. The Saudis have a much more traditional supply that costs very little to bring to surface. Saying the above, it is a very good thing that we have these shales and sands but lifting costs are very key in any oil and gas venture. - - - - - By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 02:23 PM EST Msg. 633198 of 633226 (This msg. is a reply to 633175 by DrillBit.) Jump to msg. # DrillBit, I agree with you wholeheartedly and look forward to the continued research and development in progress to make it easier to bring up the oil from difficult situations. - - - - - _________________________________________________ By: gr8hiker 15 Dec 2007, 02:27 PM EST Msg. 633201 of 633226 Jump to msg. # JAY_ADOBE : It's been quiet , but Jan 5th is the day targeted for markets to go paperless( no more certs). Another event? - - - - - View Replies » By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 02:35 PM EST Msg. 633207 of 633227 (This msg. is a reply to 633201 by gr8hiker.) Jump to msg. # gr8, Yes. A significant event that Joe Public does not even know about yet, and will cause tremendous turmoil when it is unleashed to unsuspecting shareholders who may try to get paper later. Also, though, an event that will supposedly assist to eliminate FTDs. We'll see how the market reacts to it and what the plan is for the future paper being held in big vaults, (or by an attorney). - - - - - ___________________________________________________ By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 02:47 PM EST Msg. 633215 of 633227 (This msg. is a reply to 633210 by TheCynic.) Jump to msg. # cynic, You must remember that I drank the last of the koolaid and then switched to iced tea. Of course I believe it. I've believed in our company from the beginning and will continue to believe. Is that not obvious?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 16:05:25 GMT -5
misisipiflyer Global Moderator Locked & Loaded Re: Tidbits......Just The Way You Like'm! « Reply #5 on Today at 12:58pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UCROCKS: puffer just emaile me..i guess he called Entourage today> "The suit between CMKM/Koch is about over ETGMF is getting the 45 mill shares back.And something is going on w/ Abbastar & ETGMF" camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=1197467838
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 16:07:46 GMT -5
tramp vegas member camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=1197743039Jay..Points to ponder from the updates: « Thread Started on Today at 1:23pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=633115By: jay_adobe 15 Dec 2007, 12:55 PM EST Msg. 633115 of 633142 Jump to msg. # Points to ponder from the updates: Trust is an absolute. Either you have it or you don't. You can't have it both ways. "...I must now once again earn your ABSOLUTE TRUST..." "...I need to delay the PR that I SAID WAS COMING OUT THIS WEEK by just a few days..." "...One of the things I am most sensitive about is COMMUNICATING WITH YOU WHEN I SAY I AM GOING TO DO SO..." "...these professionals have a huge workload and time is of the essence... I will provide you with updates on progress AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE..." "...Please have the RESPECT AND COURTESY NOT TO CALL..." "...We will obtain ALL FINANCIAL RECORDS of this company..." (Is this possible? All records???) "...We have an extremely large amount of information to share with you IN THE NEXT PRESS RELEASE." "...ask for your patience during the NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS..." "...It breaks my heart...I CANNOT ALLOW it to continue..." "...has absolutely nothing to do WITH A PLAN..." "...I am presently working on information to share with you in the NEXT PRESS RELEASE to be made public within the next couple of days..." "...I will continue to keep you up to date on events AS THEY UNFOLD..." (Not AFTER they unfold, but AS they unfold.) "...huge trust funds are not supported by the RECORDS BEING EXAMINED BY KEVIN..." (Compartmentalization, perhaps?) "...there are no funds to support a full-time IR position..." (Are you sure? Have you tried? Loans, maybe?) Are you saying that not even one of you two can or will take at least one day per week during slow periods to address the most valuable asset this company owns and man a phone line which was promised from the beginning?) "...will provide updates to you as events occur..." "...There is no evidence that St. George Metals, Inc. exists today..." (Good grief! Then dig deeper!) "...Company will not answer to threats by shareholders..." (Then answer the shareholders who do not threaten, for they really do matter in this saga, they really do) Just some things to ponder and think about over a good cup of hot tea or even iced tea, if you prefer. There are a lot of questions we all should consider. Lots of things in the public realm do not add up as the saga continues. Enjoy your weekend. Good health to all. And happy family time off these computers. - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Dec 15, 2007 16:49:25 GMT -5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: my69z 15 Dec 2007, 02:11 PM EST Msg. 344917 of 344917 Jump to msg. # And to anyone who's following the,,,,Kevin MUST provide clarity and issuing threats and whatever else you wanna call'em.... Ask yourself this...... are any of those people part of the very groups in '04/'05 and on who were saying....CMKX is a revoked "pinky" and dosen't need to report/file anything ?? And ask yourself,,,,why was it ok for "Urban" to say CMKX dosen't/won't need to report anything..... What am i talking about??......rememeber this from the 4/06/05 SEC filing ??... CMKX's stockholders should realize that among publicly traded securities, two different standards exist for providing disclosures to investors. First, companies with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act that are current in their obligations as a registrant ("reporting issuers") provide annual, quarterly and periodic reports on Forms 10-KSB, 10-QSB and 8-K, in addition to other reports for small business issuers such as CMKX. The second category contains companies that do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act ("non-reporting companies"). Reporting issues are required to provide their stockholders and the investing public with annual audited financial statements, whereas non-reporting companies do not have to provide their stockholders or the public audited financial statements. Further, companies traded on the Pink Sheets that are not reporting issuers are not required to have audited financial statements in order to continue trading on the Pink Sheets. If the Commission were to suspend or revoke CMKX's registration under the Exchange Act, CMKX would be considered a non-reporting company and would continue to trade on the Pink Sheets. So again......i guess "non-reporting" was only ok back then Chris www.cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1197747001
|
|