|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:53:17 GMT -5
JustJanet Administrator Mod Chick Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Thread Started on Today at 5:27am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: imsoweary Soonerlew 07 Jan 2008, 12:46 AM EST Msg. 641646 of 641658 (This msg. is a reply to 641503 by bhollenegg.)Jump to msg. # bhollenegg & Goodolboy27, Urban had prior business ties to both Mahue and Stoecklein so no matter which came first, it was probably inevitable that both would be brought in. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:54:06 GMT -5
Soonerlew mgl Mod Squad By: rosencrantz2010 07 Jan 2008, 07:25 AM EST Msg. 641670 of 641675Jump to msg. # maybe some cash from the edwards case can be used to pay the stocklein legal bill allowing cmkx to gain control of the entourage shares. shares go back to entourage and cmkx gets back the claims. the drill results by koch are released and we have claim assets worth something. the financials should be ready to go. once we have the financials and some decent assets CMKX comes back to life. we trade again,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, when,,, may,, june,, july? - - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 07 Jan 2008, 07:50 AM EST Msg. 641674 of 641675 (This msg. is a reply to 641670 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # it will be exciting to see the CMKX claims currently held by entourage return to us. these assets will drive CMKX pps to open at .0007. millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:55:38 GMT -5
Soonelew gosh DIAMOND JEDI MASTERRe: Gossip Discussion 1/7/08 « Reply #1 on Today at 7:30am » that statement is true... I recall reading the dd on it a year or so ago....and Maheu although outstanding has lost on a penny stock before as has stoeklein However, we can get a roi \ the claims were there and worth mucho the nss was there etc etc millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701499 ~¤Franko¤~ DESIGNERRe: Gossip Discussion 1/7/08 « Reply #2 on Today at 8:12am » -The Claims do not go back to us,.. they go to Emmerson... we defaulted on the agreement and lost them ourselves prior to Entourage signing for them,.. Now we could always get them back if Emmerson wanted to,.. but no one says he will..
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:56:43 GMT -5
Soonerlew mgl Mod Squad Re: Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Reply #2 on Today at 7:57am » By: rosencrantz2010 07 Jan 2008, 07:56 AM EST Msg. 641676 of 641676Jump to msg. # the courts will be able to track down and return 90%+ of the cash pulled out of cmkx. that much cash will allow cmkx to buy into SHORE or any other mining interests worldwide. as the bashers delight in pointing out, urban and edwards are reputed to have stolen $200 million. $200 million buys a lot,,,, permitting cmkx to trade again with significant assets on the books. - - - - - By: rosencrantz2010 07 Jan 2008, 08:05 AM EST Msg. 641678 of 641678Jump to msg. # fortunately for cmkx investors, entourage holds the claims and the cash was salted away in accounts that are all traceable. we might lose $5 million, $10 million, even $50 million. who cares? with the claims and $150 million we can do anything and our pps will be worth far more than it ever trade for in 2004 millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:57:54 GMT -5
Soonerlew pennypauly GC Mod Re: Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Reply #4 on Today at 9:48am » ty misisipiflyer A Message From Desperado...« Thread Started on Today at 8:34am » (7:56 AM) Desperado2100: I will state this short and sweet, due to the fact that bad people are prone to change the context and words of what I say. (7:57 AM) Desperado2100: I will NOT be answering all the individual IM's (as I usually do) for that reason and to insure that no mis-quotes or info appears (7:58 AM) Desperado2100: As I spoke up until 5:30 PM (Sat nite)... Acca had NOT contacted me nor confirmed our dinner appointment (7:58 AM) Desperado2100: UC and wife were NEVER supposed to be there and that was a false rumor started by someone wishing to post pis-information and start trouble (IMO (8:00 AM) Desperado2100: A noted poster indicated Acca and I spoke (by phone) from dinner/thingytails... I can only assume that was a joke... as no such dinner or call took place (8:02 AM) Desperado2100: I do NOT know (at this point) why Acca no-showed... however, I will give him the benefit of doubt until we speak and he provides an explanation... of which there may be many possible (legitimate) ones. (8:05 AM) Desperado2100: I did stay under cover most of the weekend... to see if Acca responded and to allow me to provide the most accurate information (that I could) to all of you! (8:05 AM) Desperado2100: My position and belief in near-term payment (to us) IS S T R O N G E R that ever... based on Acca and other info I've received (8:07 AM) Desperado2100: Stay strong.... don't waiver.... don't let bashers and naysayers sway your opinion(s). Most importantly... you KNOW me, and should NOT allow the detractors to take pot shots at me or any other "LONGS". : (8:07 AM) Desperado2100: WE shall prevail... I feel positive (like Acca) about our outcome!!! (8:09 AM) Desperado2100: I will be back this afternoon... but will be very limited with any Q & A, for obvious reasons. Best thing you can do is accurately get my message out to all those who a seeking an honest answer to what occurred... and please do it ACCURATELY!!! millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 21:59:36 GMT -5
Soonerlew pennypauly GC Mod Re: Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Reply #5 on Today at 10:05am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- oaks DIAMOND JEDIRe: By: bhollenegg « Reply #29 on Today at 1:33am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Correction: Donald Stoecklein told me the following shortly after his firm got involved with CMKX during one of my conversations with Don.... After Mr. Maheu came aboard and it was officially PR'd, Mr. Stoecklein contacted Maheu and asked him who Urban was and what was CMKX all about? Stoecklein advised Maheu not to get involved and Maheu only agreed to stay aboard with Urban if Stoecklein and his firm got involved, which then lead to the PR thanking Roger Glenn for his work. Oaks (aimho) john3339Re: By: bhollenegg « Reply #30 on Today at 4:47am » Now this is an interesting bit Andy.It sounds like DS had some misgivings about IBM's involvment, yet IBM maintained his involvement. Not only that, but in spite of his misgivings, DS came on board apparently apparently to work with IBM. If IBM was so insistent to remain working with CMKX that it also took DS to come on board to make DS ok with IBM's participation, perhaps IBM knew more about the situation than DS did. Perhaps IBM knew of other alphabet orgs involvement...maybe some alphabet orgs asked IBM to work with CMKX, that DS didn't know about. Perhaps once DS knew the whole story, he came on board to make sure IBM didn't get screwed by the alphbet orgs. So, DS was apprehensive about IBM's involvement with this lil ol pinkie. Sounds like DD was done by at least DS, who then told IBM about it. And in spite of the DD, IBM stayed, and DS joined in! Must have been some compelling rationale. Anyone think DS is going to stay on board once IBM leaves? NOT FOR A MINUTE if the above account is true. Yet here he is, still involved with CMKX, by virtue of his posession of the ETGMF cert. Perhaps IBM is still in the shadows too! Nice thing about logic - the closer you get to the correct answer, the better the fit of all the pieces. Thanks again Robert and Ines...and ANDY! imo john millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199601583&page=2
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:00:33 GMT -5
Sooner pennypauly GC Mod Re: Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Reply #6 on Today at 10:10am » I have always enjoyed sparkys market reports By: sparkysantos 07 Jan 2008, 10:04 AM EST Msg. 641690 of 641692Jump to msg. # Market Snapshot for Monday - Jan 7th: The DJIA opened up about 35 points this morning and quickly climbed to just over 60. Then as more and more of the 30 index stocks opened, the Dow quickly fell back so it was up only 30 points. But now, just 20 minutes into the session, the Dow is at 12,870, up 70 points. Very similarly, the Nasdaq opened up almost 7 points and quickly spiked up 12 points. Then after just 10 minutes, the index stood at 1,413, up just over 3 points. But now, 21 minutes into the session, the Nasdaq is up a solid 10 points. In Sparky's humble opinion, in response to one of the worst new year performances ever the Plunge Protection Team has spent all weekend trying to figure out how to rig this market upward today. And also IMHO, the little uptick in buying we're seeing right now is nothing but the results of all the PPT's efforts. Will this work as a means of turning the sagging equity markets around? Because history has shown investors to be quite bright, at least in a collective sense, in the final tally Sparky doesn't think any of the Fed's recent and ongoing manipulative actions will accomplish anything noteworthy; the markets are just too huge. Could today actually end in a down day? IMHO, you bet it can; and it very well may. But do remember, both Bush and Paulson are supposedly talking later today. Bush will no doubt be announcing his stimulating plans to try and lower federal corporate tax rates, which he thinks the Street will love; but Dems will try and tear it to shreads. And Paulson, lead in his chest or not, will no doubt be explaining how the Prime Broker Pigs are going to "bail out" all the "victims" of the ongoing credit crunch; which much like hte skipper of the Titanic did, he will assure us again that all is "fundamentally" sound. Stay Tuned ~ Sparky "Paulson, lead in his chest or not," millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:01:49 GMT -5
~¤Franko¤~ DESIGNERRe: Gossip Discussion 1/7/08 « Reply #4 on Today at 9:13am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oh I agree,.. long time friends of Urban,.. Now the question is ,.. Is Urban going to stick it out with us? Seeing how he already bailed,.. I don't doubt their friendships and past investments together,.. I have them all documented well,.. I am starting to doubt we will see Urban again in CMKM ... feels more and more like petro,.. just get up and go,.. move on to the next millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701499
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:03:21 GMT -5
Sooner By: goodolboy27 06 Jan 2008, 09:26 AM EST Msg. 641358 of 641709(This msg. is a reply to 641314 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, just a small correction to your post: In the SEC documentation, it clearly stated that Stoeklein brought in Mahue, and not the other way around as suggested by the PR releases. The document was posted on PB76 a few weeks ago. The "work product" you reference was the creation of the database and subsequent data created by the cert pull. By: bhollenegg 06 Jan 2008, 04:27 PM EST Msg. 641503 of 641709(This msg. is a reply to 641358 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Hello Goodolboy27...You stated, “bhollenegg, just a small correction to your post: In the SEC documentation, it clearly stated that Stoeklein brought in Maheu, and not the other way around as suggested by the PR releases. The document was posted on PB76 a few weeks ago.” Thank you for your input. According to Attorney Donald Stoecklein’s SEC Filing EX-99 2 ex99-1.htm File No. 3-11858 “…Mr. Maheu, on behalf of the Company, immediately retained the services of Stoecklein Law Group on February 7, 2005...”. My information is based on Donald Stoecklein’s official version filed with the SEC Filing EX-99 that Robert Maheu retained the services of Stoecklein Law Group. All the best, BHollenegg Reference Excerpt from SEC Filing EX-99 2 ex99-1.htm THE COMPANY'S ANSWER TO THE SEC'S ORDER INSTITUTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING DATED APRIL 11, 2005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING File No. 3-11858 ...Therefore, the Company appointed Mr. Robert Maheu to the Board of Directors in order to oversee the necessary regulatory requirements. Mr. Maheu, on behalf of the Company, immediately retained the services of Stoecklein Law Group on February 7, 2005 for the primary purpose of coordinating the preparation of all reports due under the Act for the respective missing periods. www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000107704805000215/ex99-1.htm - - - - - By: goodolboy27 07 Jan 2008, 08:53 AM EST Msg. 641682 of 641709(This msg. is a reply to 641503 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, http:// www . sec . gov / litigation / aljdec / id291bpm . pdf Page 4 of 14. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=641682
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:04:29 GMT -5
Soonerlew mgl Mod Squad Re: Gossip Column 1/7/08 « Reply #7 on Today at 11:48am » By: imsoweary 07 Jan 2008, 12:02 AM EST Msg. 641641 of 641724(This msg. is a reply to 641314 by bhollenegg.) Jump to msg. # bhollenegg, I am only passing along what I was told or my understanding of what was told to me. I hear your arguments and recognize their validity. Even I have difficulty reconciling the differences. However, at this time, I can only go where the documented evidence and my gut feeling takes me. I may be 100% wrong, but I don't think I am. My feeling is that if there was anything else here to be told, we would have already heard at least some of it. As it stands, we have heard nothing other than unsubstantiated rumors from the likes of acca, casper, poof etc, who in my opinion are nothing more than obsessed conspiracy theorists. Nothing of any value has been heard from anyone reputable. I would love to be wrong. Nothing would make me happier and more excited to know that we are in for a windfall and that coinsguy really will get the help he needs to survive after all, but I just don't see it, Robert. The last thing I want to do is induce false hopes in coinsguy because of my own excitement. He has been through more than enough heartache for a hundred people. As much as for his sake as my own, I cannot buy into what you believe. - - - - - By: bhollenegg 07 Jan 2008, 11:19 AM EST Msg. 641717 of 641724(This msg. is a reply to 641641 by imsoweary.) Jump to msg. # Imsoweary…I understand your reasons why you are cautious about the outcome of our investment in CMKX. I believe most shareholders are just as concerned. Time is the most important factor for those who are not well health wise and finance wise. I do not agree with the amount of time this is taking to resolve mainly because of those who are suffering. I do not agree with the silent treatment either that the shareholders are being subjected to. We deserve better treatment and respect than what we have received thus far. I do not expect full disclosure of the facts due to the situation and circumstances surrounding CMKX, but I do expect shareholders to be treated honestly and with respect. I know Mr. Frizzell must be careful with what is provided outside the company considering the situation CMKM is in. I just don’t agree with the contradictions in the information being provided to the shareholders from one update to the next. My response was not an attack on Mr. Frizzell, but as I stated at the start of the message, an attempt to clarify what was stated with what is publicly known to shareholders. We may not always agree with each others viewpoint about CMKX, but we both strongly agree how imperative it is to resolve this quickly because of the circumstances shareholders like Coinsguy, ShoelessJoe, and many others are in. Please let Ed know I am hoping for the best outcome for him. Ed is fortunate to have you around to help him cope with the challenges of his declining health. Again, I appreciate you sharing your information. Thank you Keith. Take care, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701646
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:05:14 GMT -5
Soonerlew ocd DIAMOND JEDI MASTERRe: Gossip Discussion 1/7/08 « Reply #7 on Today at 11:13am » Good morning all. 1. insoweary should change his name to imsopathetic. 2. rosencrantz knows nothing and is probably another poster that has changed his/her name. 3. acca...in the 2008 Presidential campaign voters will want to know whether candidates are telling the truth or telling another acca. 4. because it's so bad let's skip #4 and go right on to #5 5. Cautious comes back with "most you already know" and the rest was told to him in the highest confidence so he can't tell us anything we don't already know? In the words of Mel Gibson (gun in one hand, pillow in the other) in the movie, "Payback"..."well, what good are you then?" millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701499
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:05:57 GMT -5
Soonerlew ocd DIAMOND JEDI MASTERRe: Gossip Discussion 1/7/08 « Reply #11 on Today at 12:31pm » I have a question for those that think we will go back to trading again. Before I ask the question, let's all pretend that we have a company that has some form of value before we go back to trading so take the obvious out of the discussion...here we go. Why would we consider trading again knowing we are going right back into the same situation of a group targeting our little stock, shorting it to death? Why would we do this? Some will say there never was a naked short which I call BS. The Friz told us, told ME, there was a huge naked short position. The only thing I can come up with is that they know the illegal naked shorting of the market has been taken care of. We all saw the Bloomberg special about naked shorting so we KNOW it exist market wide. Now if that's the case, doesn't that say something about an overall market clean up? And if that's the case, doesn't that spell STING? And if that's true then who is that has the capabilities to exam all trading records, both in the US and internationally, proving which companies are involved in this illegal practice of market manipulation? Bob "You don't want none of this" Maheu millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1199701499
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:06:45 GMT -5
hundredtoone God of Diamonds
Re: Rumors (Updated Daily) « Reply #125 on Today at 1:26pm »
Lets see...Jefferies at 52 week low...E-Turd nearly belly up...CITI on the ropes...MANY other banks hitting the skids...looks like the NSS/DERIVATIVES are taking their toll...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:07:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 7, 2008 22:08:02 GMT -5
Soonerlew By: adrienne07 07 Jan 2008, 12:43 PM EST Msg. 641751 of 641754(This msg. is a reply to 641721 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # lilburrito0: Why did Maheu, Don S., supported Urban to scam 60,000 shareholders by telling them to spend more $$$$ and energy to pull certs ? They must have known all bad things going on for long time before us (?) Why did Frizzell supported Task Force and issued many POSITIVE updates on CMKX ? Was he doing that as a blind man ? He played a major part in the Team of 4 !!! AIMO if what you said is true ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=641751
|
|