|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:48:25 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 18 Mar 2008, 10:09 AM EDT Msg. 686397 of 686414 (This msg. is a reply to 686389 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z
Re: Point is/was,,,"Edwards" won't be there in person....casu eit's obvious everyone is waiting to actully see him in a court.
LOL
Do you have a reading and comprehension disability?
Or do you always make things up when you’re attempting to cover up your screw up?
Do you see these words: Lis Pendens on Eton Properties!
Do you see how you are think what you want to think? Do you see how you interpret what you want to interpret? Do you see how much of a fool you are?
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
By: lilburrito0 18 Mar 2008, 07:20 AM EDT Msg. 686342 of 686371 Jump to msg. #
Looks like John Edwards is contesting the Lis Pendens on Eton Properties!
LOL
Finally ...... The battle begins!
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
By: my69z 18 Mar 2008, 07:43 AM EDT Msg. 686344 of 686373 (This msg. is a reply to 686342 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. #
Can't be Edwards cause he hasn't even appeared,,,,u can't just walk into a suit whenever u feel like it.
It's either Desemourue or the Agent
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:48:46 GMT -5
By: ravenpeach1 18 Mar 2008, 10:11 AM EDT Msg. 686399 of 686414 (This msg. is a reply to 686380 by mquietstorm3.) Jump to msg. # MQ Goodmorning I believe it will eat 'em up......
If a man profitted by evil doings.... he will go the same way.... (I may have that as an original quoting by .... ME) unless someone said it before......
God Bless
Ravenpeach
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:49:17 GMT -5
By: maheumayhem 18 Mar 2008, 10:06 AM EDT Msg. 686396 of 686414 Jump to msg. # Sometimes things are not as they appear. Sometimes things appear when others say not. MM By: dmgroup 18 Mar 2008, 10:11 AM EDT Msg. 686400 of 686415 (This msg. is a reply to 686396 by maheumayhem.) Jump to msg. # and sometimes things are just as they appear
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:50:14 GMT -5
By: dmgroup 17 Mar 2008, 02:50 PM EDT Msg. 686070 of 686416 (This msg. is a reply to 686063 by tupare2.) Jump to msg. # the carlyle group should ask bob mayheu to head up a task force to help liquidate and frustrate shareholder endlessly.
maybe he could even promise to keep them informed.
we at cmkx would like to share the pain
By: wodancim11 18 Mar 2008, 10:00 AM EDT Msg. 686390 of 686417 (This msg. is a reply to 686070 by dmgroup.) Jump to msg. # LOL
By: ravenpeach1 18 Mar 2008, 10:13 AM EDT Msg. 686402 of 686417 (This msg. is a reply to 686390 by wodancim11.) Jump to msg. # Goodmorning Wodan....
Hope you are enjoying your morning..... I wish I had more time to check everything out...but real busy today!
I will check back later....
Enjoy!
God Bless
Ravenpeach
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:51:07 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 18 Mar 2008, 10:19 AM EDT Msg. 686404 of 686417 (This msg. is a reply to 686401 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z
lilburrito0 wrote: Looks like John Edwards is contesting the Lis Pendens on Eton Properties!
my69z replied: Can't be Edwards cause he hasn't even appeared,,,,u can't just walk into a suit whenever u feel like it.
Conclusion: My69z was not aware of who owned Eton Properties!
This argument is finished.
Now I'll work on your two questions! Give me a few minutes for a reply!
By: my69z 18 Mar 2008, 10:21 AM EDT Msg. 686406 of 686421 (This msg. is a reply to 686404 by lilburrito0.) Jump to msg. # LMOA,,,i know it was Edwards thing,,,that's beeen around for yrs.
good lord
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:51:29 GMT -5
By: supermans_mother 18 Mar 2008, 10:22 AM EDT Msg. 686407 of 686423 Jump to msg. # LET THE NAKED SHORT WALL STREET LAWSUITS BEGIN. News. cmkxnews.proboards19.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=bud&thread=1205848941&page=1 A wave of lawsuits is descending on Bear Stearns Cos. and its new buyer, JPMorgan Chase & Co., even as Wall Street struggles to come to terms with the collapse of one of its leading investment banks.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:52:08 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 18 Mar 2008, 10:47 AM EDT Msg. 686422 of 686425 (This msg. is a reply to 674208 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z' In reply to this post: ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=674208 Re: Omg,,,,,,amending a complaint means nothing in relation to waiting....and actually,,,,it'd be counter productive to go through all the intial stuff to just let it "pass" due to a timeline......if that happens,,,,the initial is dead by length violation and CMKXM would have to give cause as to why the judge should reinstate the INITIAL complaint.......so they're gonna amend a dead suit?? Lol This is just your personal opinion! Re: u serve him the 1st time,,,however the means,,,,but we'll go with publication......any amendments would then be very easy to accomplish......without alot of work,,,and actually...namin another party would have nothing to do with this,,,or whoever else from the orig group.....not in a certain way If the Amended Compliant only adds a Defendant and no Cause of Actions are changed! But if the Amended Complaint entails the change and/or add s the Causes of Action; Then each Defendant must be served the Amended Complaint! I read on RB one time where someone said that Tyler can go ahead and serve Urban, then mail Urban the Amended Complaint! LOL _ Would be hard to do since there’s no address for Urban and Urban would have been originally served by Publication! I agree with Tyler in that serving Urban the original complaint would be a waste of money because Urban will then have to be served the amended complaint by publication too! Re: Length extended....amend... ..anything would require a motion There are two types of service: ~ Personal Service ~ Service by Publication We know the time limit for Personal Service is 90 days. And any continuance will require a motion! But what is the time limit for Service by Publication? There’s no time limit mentioned in the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedures! If you can find the answer, please share! Re: The Edwards suit was amended after his publication......so to do the opposite now? Naa Did Tyler just add a new defendant? Or did Tyler amend the Causes of Action? Re: Where does it say in the Statue that if an "amendemnt" is filed,,,,,the "length" can lapse??... LOL I think this question may have been directed to someone else. Because after I read the post I have no clue what you’re talking about! ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=674192 Re: (i) Summons: Time Limit for Service. If a service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the action shall be dismissed as to that defendant without prejudice upon the court’s own initiative with notice to such party or upon motion, unless the party on whose behalf such service was required files a motion to enlarge the time for service and shows good cause why such service was not made within that period. If the party on whose behalf such service was required fails to file a motion to enlarge the time for service before the 120-day service period expires, the court shall take that failure into consideration in determining good cause for an extension of time. Upon a showing of good cause, the court shall extend the time for service and set a reasonable date by which service should be made. Thank you for the regulation on Personal Service. Do you, by chance, happen to have the regulation of Service on Publication? TIA
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:52:32 GMT -5
By: drcommonsense 18 Mar 2008, 10:47 AM EDT Msg. 686423 of 686425 Jump to msg. # Hey Wodan! You sure got in a fight with someone. They are feeding on each other. Common sense tells me there relly is stuff going down, and the slime is taking down the slime. Tis is fantastic to say the least Here is the post a must read by bashers, shorters, longs and pumpers. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=GBDX&read=7131
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:52:54 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 18 Mar 2008, 10:50 AM EDT Msg. 686428 of 686428 (This msg. is a reply to 674562 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z
Re: No service need be made on parties in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief against them shall be served upon them in the manner provided for service of summons in Rule 4.
What does this mean?
"except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief "
LOL
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 14:53:19 GMT -5
snifferpup Mod Squad Re: Gossip Column - 03.18.08 « Reply #1 on Today at 8:46am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- john3339 DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Squeeze me Gently! But Pay Me BIG! Re: Bear StearnsInvestor Loses 800 Mil « Reply #9 on Today at 6:26am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, the Fed guaranteed JPM against loss in their take-over of BS. Sounds just about like how the FED is ultimately responsible for covering the naked shorts. But in this case, they helped JPM take over BS. JPM takes over BS's liability assumptions (including naked shorts), and JPM pays what they can. When they can't pay out any more, the Fed steps in, under the guise of fulfilling their promise to prevent losses to JPM, and THEY cover the rest of the naked short positions. Now, if other cmpanies think this is a neat way out, remember, BS is out of business. The BS stockholders have already filed a class action suit against BS for misrepresenting the financial picture. Some from BS are probably going to go to jail. And it didn't take Federal action to do it....except to start the rumor that BS didn't have enough liquidity to meet their market calls. That rumor started the run, and made the liquidity rumor true. Pretty slick. And the Federal agancies have clean hands in the whole matter...and no market melt-down...and the other crooks see the writing on the walls. THIS is called market reform through the back-door. This is called the day that "soon" got a heck of a lot closer to NOW. imo john millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1205839601
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 15:06:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Mar 18, 2008 15:23:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Mar 18, 2008 15:24:13 GMT -5
"Soon" = days..weeks?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 15:36:34 GMT -5
Who Knows anymore? I surely don't!! However, I doubt anyone really knows anything, IMO....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 18, 2008 15:42:19 GMT -5
By: ravenpeach1 18 Mar 2008, 10:32 AM EDT Msg. 686412 of 686584 (This msg. is a reply to 686407 by supermans_mother.) Jump to msg. # Supermans mother....
Do you remember when Pres B went to Wall Street and Smiled and shook their hands as if saying, you will be taken care of.... I hope that wasn't meant harmful to the rest of us.... I pray now that manipulation is stopped.....
That was my impression....then.....and it didn't set right then and still does not today....
The real truth behind this mess is sure to come out.....
What a mess......
I just read a quip from Lincoln, and it said something like.... America will not be won over by war.......but will be won from the inside by evil...... I can't find the statement...... but close to that....
COME ON AMERICA.... STOP LETTING THESE PEOPLE WHEN YOU OVER....
WATCH OUT NOW, BY THOSE TRYING TO SAVE THE PLANET...AND DO GOOD.... THEY SEEM TO BE GREAT>>>>>>>BUT.....>>ARE THEY? OR ARE THEY AGAIN, TRYING TO BUY US OUT....
I am praying and will continue for God to lead our people through this evil.....
God Bless
Ravenpeach
|
|