|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 21:32:40 GMT -5
By: tuscan9 07 Apr 2008, 10:02 PM EDT Msg. 699689 of 699703 Jump to msg. #
This SEALS cmkm shareholders...
Set in stone... for the world to see.
SEC approval...(lol)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 21:33:13 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 07 Apr 2008, 02:17 PM EDT Msg. 698871 of 699703 Jump to msg. # www.sec. gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20519.htm - - - - - By: jfarn 07 Apr 2008, 09:40 PM EDT Msg. 699663 of 699703 (This msg. is a reply to 698871 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Jay, Sulzberg call you too this am? I wish I wasn't tied up in a meeting, I would have loved to chat with her directly. jf - - - - - By: jay_adobe 07 Apr 2008, 09:54 PM EDT Msg. 699679 of 699703 (This msg. is a reply to 699663 by jfarn.) Jump to msg. # jfarn, Not today she didn't. Today is deemed necessary for the finality of it all, I think, but remains a distraction much akin to a bouncing ball, much akin to an event, much akin to smoke and mirrors. imo - - - - - By: ravenpeach 07 Apr 2008, 10:04 PM EDT Msg. 699693 of 699705 Jump to msg. # Now I hate to go to bed...... Tuscan, Jay, Silver, good to see you all.... Nite.... God Bless Ravenpeach - - - - - By: tuscan9 07 Apr 2008, 10:21 PM EDT Msg. 699703 of 699705 (This msg. is a reply to 699693 by ravenpeach.) Jump to msg. # Raven.... This is a grand day ... a double super day in the cmkm saga... We can sleep well... and watch the rest of the saga from the OTHER side... in days to come. Night Tuscan
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 21:55:43 GMT -5
stormgrey43 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: sec files suit against cmkm diamonds... « Reply #126 Today at 9:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:11pm, welshdra wrote: Welshdra, What are your feelings on the idea that no MAJOR brokerage firm has been named as having sold Naked Short shares of CMKX. Prior to becoming Interim CEO, Kevin West stated to a friend of mine that E*Trade was never in possession of a bulk cert. Later, in a CEO update, he mentioned that he had proof that a Major Brokerage Firm was attempting to purchase a counterfeit bulk cert. Very recently he stated that he was in possession of irrefutable proof that NSS shares of CMKX have been sold by brokerage firms. I ask this question because NevWest seems to be the only "fall guy" thus far for the brokerage firms, which lends some credence to the theory that the major brokerage firms may have settled to keep their names in the clear. I know for a fact that E*Trade was selling hundreds of millions of shares of CMKX right up til revocation because I was buying. Oddly enough, I did get my certs from E*Trade despite what Kevin stated earlier about them not having a bulk cert. Also strange how they had a representative hand carry a box of certs to the Task Force, all for a lowly, sub-penny Pink Sheet company....... My point in all this is that IMO the worst-case scenario is that we get compensated for damages, BUT not just from those put on stage for the public eye, but from those who "paid" to remain anonymous. One thing is for sure, all of this will eventually lead to closure - which sure beats the heck of being stuck in a vacuum! Personally I am intrigued at today's events and even more intrigued by what/who was not mentioned in the suit. Best of luck to us all, Storm millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19003&page=7
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 21:59:41 GMT -5
portrush Mod Squad It is what it is, it will happen when it happens. Re: sec files suit against cmkm diamonds... « Reply #137 Today at 9:57pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:41pm, diamond4me wrote: Hahahahhaha! You really think so? C'mon now, they could have killed this company LONG ago. You don't think they've dragged this on for sport do you? IF and I will qualify it...IF this is the biggest "whatever" in history, it takes some time to figure out just how you're going to deal with it. I don't remember who "promised" it last week, but they were right...if not before, today the world knows about CMKX. Between the SEC notice and the one from Canada...not to mention the article in the NYT (such as it is) it is kind of hard to say this company is flying below the radar any more. pr millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19003&page=7
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 7, 2008 22:04:40 GMT -5
welshdra DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: A very interesting paragraph.... « Reply #3 Today at 9:20pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oaks, in all respect, Casavant was either a complete idiot with a drinking and gambling problem or he was in just as deep as Edwards and the other scum. The facts of the matter are progressively being laid at our feet yet many people remain in deep denial. You need to stop making excuses for Urban and just admit that you exercised poor judgement by working for and trusting a man you claim to have never even met. IMO oaks DIAMOND JEDI Re: A very interesting paragraph.... « Reply #5 Today at 9:25pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Welshdra... All I have ever cared about is that you and all shareholders will WIN when all is said and done. I still see that as a very strong possibility and the SEC document is yet another EVENT that will eventually get us there. Oaks (aimho) millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19013
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Apr 7, 2008 22:17:23 GMT -5
A little late I would say to really help protect shareholders from UNREGISTERED shares in a hoax company when it has been on the SEC radar for YEARS IMO...but better late than NEVER I guess...sure seems funny to be seeing all this after YEARS of VEGAS BILLBOARDS...CERT PULLS...TASK FORCES...TRILLIONS counted...every man woman and child in the WORLD being e-mailed by 40,000 pissed off shareholders...yes it just seems like TOO LITTLE...TOO LATE...but we will see...someone should be responsible for DROPPING THE BALL on CMKX a LONG LONG time ago IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 6:50:32 GMT -5
By: adrienne07 08 Apr 2008, 05:43 AM EDT Msg. 699903 of 699920 Jump to msg. # Too many things missing from the SEC filing : No Criminal charges against Urban, No Complaint mentioned against D Roger Glenn(CMKX's attorney who wrote the opinion letters for the additional 300 Billion Shares,also former SEC attorney), No mention of a complaint against DeliDog(Who sold shares to people post revocation), No mention of a complaint against Robert Maheu(Trustee) and Donald stoecklien(The securities Law Institute), No mention of the Largest Naked short in the History of the Market, No mention of the Successful Cert Pull from the Task Force, No mention of the Shareholders who have not recieved shares yet, No mention of Jeffries selling 110 billion shares Ex-Clearing and never reported on the Tape,No mention of the Entourage Mining Dividend...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 6:51:03 GMT -5
By: saycapt1962 08 Apr 2008, 12:15 AM EDT Msg. 30968 of 30969 Jump to msg. # Finally charges filed..amazing...now we start..
- - - - -
By: Bellingus 08 Apr 2008, 06:49 AM EDT Msg. 30969 of 30969 (This msg. is a reply to 30968 by saycapt1962.) Jump to msg. # now we finish. em
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 6:51:59 GMT -5
luci Queen of Diamonds Re: gossip column 4/8 « Reply #2 Today at 6:17am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- killahcain Couple of Interesting Points: « Thread Started Today at 1:07am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote: In addition, the Commission seeks a penny stock bar against Casavant, Edwards, Gutierrez, Kinney, Anthony Tomasso, Kathleen Tomasso, Bagley, Anderson, Rumyantsev, Santos, and Dvorak.Finally, the Commission seeks an order prohibiting Casavant from acting as an officer or director of any public company. 1) Urban, along with the crooks barred from penny stocks.. => Dont think Urban falls in he category of penny stocks as CMKM is NOT a penny stock 2 The Commission prohibits Urban from acting as an officer or director of any PUBLIC company. => CMKM or CIM will be a PRIVATE company therefore Urban can be an officer of a PRIVATE Co... No more penny stock, no more public.... Buyout in the future... what ya say?? millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19026
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 6:54:22 GMT -5
luci Queen of Diamonds Re: gossip column 4/8 « Reply #3 Today at 6:24am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- phxgold TDEM Flyover Pilot Level 2 Re: SEC v. CMKM, Charges Fourteen Defendants In Sc « Reply #6 Yesterday at 9:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- cmkm already has a default judgement against edwards cant overturn that without an appeal and the sec cannot appeal it that would have to be edwards. Now all cmkm needs is for the damages to be calculated and awarded. millionaires.proboards86.com/v45index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=19026
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 6:55:03 GMT -5
By: klonopin2mg 07 Apr 2008, 10:39 PM EDT Msg. 30965 of 30970 (This msg. is a reply to 30957 by pickleman77360640.) Jump to msg. # hi pickleman' aimo...disgorgement...could certainly take a great deal of time.....i would suspect more news...already made forbes and many other far reaching tabloids and it's only been a few hours...and keep in mind there was a great deal of other relevant "noise" today by coincidence.
before i sleep w/o any doubts to the good outcome i defer comment on any timeline for a roi. in it's stead i give an opportunity to keep this in perspective from some wise words spoken to me....
"Hi Charles, someone once defined "Power" to me, as the ability to influence events. I responded, that True Power may be the ability to not be influenced by "an" event. I also suffer from sleep difficulty, but not from this."
no idea how long this will take, but knowing certain people gives me great comfort and i will not lose any sleep over "an event". i carefully watch the "events" being influenced all around by those with the power to influence and who speak to us in "unconventional ways".
wish i had the answers pickleman....many great people surround this stockplay....i take great comfort in knowing some of them....and knowing good folks are looking out for us as promised.
can't wait to have the opportunity to meet several and i'd like to think that time is coming.
Enjoy The Night! peace.e
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 7:34:22 GMT -5
ocd Diamond Finder and Miner Re: UPDATED..SEC v Cmkm Diamonds Stock,YES,Finaly « Reply #26 Yesterday at 8:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- zanmia wrote one kick butt comment: Quote: Yes I agree and if I may add just a bit. It is not we (CMKX) that are under the microscope during this "civil injunction action" but rather the SEC itself. Can you imagine the pressure that Paulson, Cox and even Bernanke are feeling knowing that if they screw this up MAHEU has a sledgehammer and a can of spinach ready to be deployed? (Sing the song, you know you want to...toot toot!) Funny thing, the angrier I got the calmer I felt knowing that this whole fiasco is a complete script, start to finish. You know the SEC and their generals are freaking out because they are extremely concerned that 60,000 nuts like me will show up screaming examples of hypocrisy of their fouled up judgements of recent cases. Who wants that on the TV? BTW, I read oaks (Andy's) post and I think he's dead on...we're set fellas. tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=4758&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 7:34:48 GMT -5
AP SEC Files Charges Against CMKM Diamonds Monday April 7, 5:06 pm ET SEC Files Charges Against CMKM Diamonds in $64 Million Scheme WESTMINSTER, Colo. (AP) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday filed charges against CMKM Diamonds Inc., accusing the tiny mining company of violating federal securities laws by fraudulently issuing "hundreds of billions of shares," In a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the SEC alleged that the company, CEO Urban Casavant and several others "conspired to illegally issue and sell unregistered stock" and "lined their pockets with more than $64 million from 40,000 nationwide." The complaint alleges that Casavant generated investors' interest in the company through false press releases, Internet chat boards and funny-car race events in events across the country, without disclosing that he ran this purported gold and diamond company from his house in Las Vegas. The SEC complaint charges CMKM, a broker dealer and transfer agent involved and 11 individuals including Casavant. The commission identifies in its complaint John Edwards as the mastermind of the scheme. The SEC alleges that Edwards and others sold their unregistered stock into the public markets. The SEC alleges that Edwards profited by about $26.4 million from sales through a single brokerage firm and that Casavant received about $31.5 million. The complaint alleges that CMKM improperly issued up to 622 billion shares of purportedly unregistered stock between January 2003 and May 2005. The SEC claims that these stock issuances were based in large part on "inadequate, suspect and inconsistent" written authorization and opinion letters prepared by company lawyer Brian Dvorak. CMKM transfer agent 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC and owner Helen Bagley are also charged with issuing stack of stock certificates without restrictive legends based on these faulty documents. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions against the defendants and disgorgement of profits. The Commission is also seeking penny stock bars against each named individual defendants and an order prohibiting Casavant from acting as an officer or director of any public company. The SEC revoked the registration of CMKM in October 2005 after the company failed to file annual and quarterly financial reports since 2002. camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=safe&thread=2510
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 7:35:11 GMT -5
westburbs King of Diamonds Re: SEC charges 14 Defendants In Scheme in CMKM « Reply #20 Yesterday at 5:58pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- more abadgoodgirl from millionaire's board -------------- Re: sec files suit against cmkm diamonds... « Reply #79 Today at 4:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 2:55pm, ujellis wrote:Could this mean we might be holding NSS shares? abadgoodgirl replies: ...You're holding a credit. You're holding "loaned" shares. You're holding shares that are sitting on the DTC's books or in the Federal Reserve accounts as "loaned" shares not yet delivered (if you don't believe our team extracted the $$ for each cert). In the DTC's response and overview of its operations, it clearly makes the statement that the DTC has to deliver the security to the purchaser. They make it clear that if there is not enough $$ they will have to dip into their "retained earnings" account to make delivery on shorted shares. Therein lies the beauty. Legally, legally, legally, they are bound by their own legal process to make good on the delivery of shares they loaned to dealers to settle trades. Nobody can cry foul. The Stock Borrow Program exists. The legal responsibilities are spelled out. They knew they were engaging in the settlement of un-matched trades. They have to pay and they designed their own legal rules in that fashion. IBM said we're uniting to "extract" maximum value..notice the choice of word... "extract"... just like you "extract" oil from the oil sands via the "extraction process" cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=19543&page=2
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Apr 8, 2008 7:35:32 GMT -5
faithandlogic Ace of Diamonds Re: SEC charges 14 Defendants In Scheme in CMKM « Reply #25 Today at 2:56am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have a lot of respect for abadgoodgirl, and I know that I do not know as much about laws and litigation as she does, but I just want to point out that in the DTC's response and overview of its operations, it does clearly make the statement that the DTC has to deliver the security to the purchaser. However, it is talking about legal registered securities, and the SEC is making the charge that fourteen Defendants have sold Unregistered Stock.. Which, if proving to be true, puts them to blame and not the DTC.. IMO cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=19543&page=2
|
|