|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 14:52:35 GMT -5
By: mdnj_38 30 Jul 2008, 01:12 PM EDT Msg. 746800 of 746853 (This msg. is a reply to 746797 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # If Not for Bill and Kevin UC would of BK
By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 01:29 PM EDT Msg. 746805 of 746853 (This msg. is a reply to 746800 by mdnj_38.) Jump to msg. # mdnj' so did bf and kw completed a hostile takeover?
yes, UC could have BK.....
he didn't, why?e
errrrr,,,, that BK paperwork was a farce.... Pedro's doings... By: mdnj_38 30 Jul 2008, 02:01 PM EDT Msg. 746815 of 746856 (This msg. is a reply to 746805 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # Klon' Someone posted the paper work' Just need a signature. and a " hostile takeover" lol of what ? Bar Bills. Gambling Debts. ect. Sorry i wish it was the other way.
By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 02:28 PM EDT Msg. 746823 of 746856 (This msg. is a reply to 746815 by mdnj_38.) Jump to msg. # mdnj',
you did know i was joking about a hostile takeover?lol
as for tyler posting docs on website "for shareholders to form there own opinions".....other than that being incompetent, all i can say is...
"we have" and as would be expected there are many differing opinions..
no offense taken i hope...just here for entertainment now as i wait for "$$"
Enjoy Your Night! klon'
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:02:29 GMT -5
By: mdnj_38 30 Jul 2008, 01:12 PM EDT Msg. 746800 of 746853(This msg. is a reply to 746797 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # If Not for Bill and Kevin UC would of BK By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 01:29 PM EDT Msg. 746805 of 746853(This msg. is a reply to 746800 by mdnj_38.) Jump to msg. # mdnj' so did bf and kw completed a hostile takeover? yes, UC could have BK..... he didn't, why?e errrrr,,,, that BK paperwork was a farce.... Pedro's doings...By: mdnj_38 30 Jul 2008, 02:01 PM EDT Msg. 746815 of 746856(This msg. is a reply to 746805 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # Klon' Someone posted the paper work' Just need a signature. and a " hostile takeover" lol of what ? Bar Bills. Gambling Debts. ect. Sorry i wish it was the other way. By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 02:28 PM EDT Msg. 746823 of 746856(This msg. is a reply to 746815 by mdnj_38.) Jump to msg. # mdnj', you did know i was joking about a hostile takeover?lol as for tyler posting docs on website "for shareholders to form there own opinions".....other than that being incompetent, all i can say is... "we have" and as would be expected there are many differing opinions.. no offense taken i hope...just here for entertainment now as i wait for "$$" Enjoy Your Night! klon' By: nufced 30 Jul 2008, 01:34 PM EDT Msg. 746808 of 746856(This msg. is a reply to 746805 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # klon__thats an easy answer. When you file BK, a Trustee is assigned, like in the Dvorak case and the Tomasso case. That Trustee takes over EVERYTHING. The checkbook, the records, pays any bills with any monies left, etc. Almost like an auditor. Do you think UC wanted a court appt trustee taking over? By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 02:14 PM EDT Msg. 746820 of 746857(This msg. is a reply to 746808 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nuf' yes it was easy... much easier than handing over the company to "friendly hands" and having your attorney to hand over (confidential) docs to another attorney without discovery process, no? any precident set in "cases" like "these"? hmmmmmmm....unusual, no? i reserve judgement as always. Enjoy The Day! klon' By: nufced 30 Jul 2008, 02:24 PM EDT Msg. 746822 of 746858(This msg. is a reply to 746820 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # klon, when he handed over the company, I doubt he ever gave a thought to an attorney having to hand over docs. In fact in one of the suit paperwork, it said at first, Ms Baird refused. that was a big OOPS. By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 02:38 PM EDT Msg. 746826 of 746858(This msg. is a reply to 746822 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nuf' o.k. but when you say you "doubt"....that pretty much hits the nail on the head. everything here leads to "DOUBTS". that is EXACTLY what everyone involved must have wanted...and IT'S WORKING!lol i've always said the chaos & mayhem(not maheu.lol) were part of the plans no doubt here on one thing, i will receive "$$" and NSS in the market place IS FINALLY making "THE STAGE".....the one i've been waiting almost ten years for.....the one in "PUBLIC VIEW" & "LOUD & CLEAR" that said, my goals are being reached one day at a time.... the last thing on my list is getting paid...not "if"..."when" for everything else...i'm sure we'll have answers, i just doubt the truth will ever be known...only theories. Later, klon' and i'm happy except for the suffering that continues, truely sad and so much unnecessary. By: nufced 30 Jul 2008, 03:03 PM EDT Msg. 746830 of 746858(This msg. is a reply to 746826 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # So all the bank accounts, all the checks written by UC, all the brokerage accounts, all the gambling, all the money wires, all the avoidance of any court response, much less appearances, and so far thumbing his nose at the SEC (response was due a month ago) are the chaos/mayhem PART OF THE PLAN? I don't "doubt" that we disagree...lol, catch you later. By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 03:08 PM EDT Msg. 746834 of 746858(This msg. is a reply to 746830 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced, how long does the judge let someone that thumbs his nose at the court get away with it? given all the bad faith stuff that's out there on urban if i were the judge i would have slapped him so hard and so fast it would have awaken him in saskatoon from a dead sleep. why hasn't the judge slapped him and slapped him hard? how long does it take to make a decision to hammer someone that laughs at the court? By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 03:12 PM EDT Msg. 746835 of 746858(This msg. is a reply to 746834 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # for instance, did this same judge treat edwards any differently? was edwards allowed a great deal of latitude when he didn't respond? or perhaps edwards responded right away? i can't remember. but if edwards ignored the court as well, what did the judge do to edwards? did he let edwards slide for a month or did the judge rule? if the judge ruled quickly on edwards why isn't he doing the same thing with urban? in short, is urban being treated different than edwards by the judge?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:07:11 GMT -5
By: aladin99 30 Jul 2008, 03:17 PM EDT Msg. 746838 of 746859 (This msg. is a reply to 746835 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rose...Shares sold or bought by UC never mentioned but shares sold by Edwards everyone knew...there was a big difference there....
By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 03:22 PM EDT Msg. 746840 of 746859 (This msg. is a reply to 746838 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin, no, i'm talking about not showing up to court. urban failed to appear. okay. did edwards fail to appear? and if so, what did the judge do to edwards? is the judge treating urban the same way he treated edwards?
i would think this judge would have hammered urban for not appearing. it's been a month. why not rule? the guy fails to appear, you've given him plenty of time and when after week or two he's not there you just rule. i would think it was pretty straightforward for the judge.
why no ruling on urban by the judge,,, after a month of telling the judge to take a flying leap?!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:26:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:30:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:37:10 GMT -5
from the Comglomerate Board... regarding the Etrade article....... ty Seatech www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-156.htm By: klonopin2mg 30 Jul 2008, 12:46 PM EDT Msg. 33208 of 33212(This msg. is a reply to 33204 by seatech3.) Jump to msg. # seatech', "from October 2003 to June 2005" interesting!e By: seatech3 30 Jul 2008, 01:27 PM EDT Msg. 33210 of 33212(This msg. is a reply to 33208 by klonopin2mg.) Jump to msg. # klon There you go Say it again I said oh oh domino I said oh oh domino By: bigdaddie 30 Jul 2008, 03:47 PM EDT Msg. 33212 of 33212(This msg. is a reply to 33204 by seatech3.) Jump to msg. # seatech3, probably just a coincidence, ya , that's it, ok NEXT! Thanks for bringing the info here.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 15:42:45 GMT -5
ty.... sandi66 Re: FFGO / Hunt Gold (HGLC) PRs « Reply #76 Today at 3:42pm »
Coincidences ?
UCROCKS: IS it a coincidence FFGO...was just a "lucky pick" by some dd'rs out of the LOSER PINKYLAND? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence that a few of us have followed FFGO for over a year...based SOLEY on cmkx connections and fingerprints that we saw? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO is one of the very few companies that even mention Wallstreets 2 dirty words in their PR's?>Stock certificates UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO started out as Credit/Debit/PAYMENT SOLUTIONS company? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence they have elevated their services to Buying Banks and Mortgage companies? UCROCKS: Is it another coincidence they have Reinforced their value with HUNT GOLD instead of fiat? UCROCKS: Is it anothe coincidence they are buying morgage banks and are heavily involved with Trinity Mercantile Finance Group? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence with billions in value..they were STUCK @.0001 for over a year? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence that with our cmkx PAYMENTS rumor stronger now than EVER..they SUDDENLY went from the basement .0001 to Trip 9 in the last few days ? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence respected DD'rs such as spiderman/Salty /Puffer and others have found distant connections to Stoklein..? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence USCA connection has been found to St.JAMES thru Langly Park? UCROCKS: USCN UCROCKS: Is it also a coincidence of 22 PR's since May? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence Santini was/is buying back the float to protect the value buying back 45% of the company in July? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence Santini moved to HUNT GOLD because of conflicts of interest? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence mid May of o7..they did an R/s of 2000 to 1 on 639 Billion shares? saltydog19: uscn less than 2 million outstanding---isn't that right----oh my UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence 639 billion..is the same number mentioned in cmkx TASK FORCE tally? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence most of those old PR's have disappeared? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence their Billions in value have so badly been manipulated? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO is consistently giving updates almost daily on their buyback amounts all the while WARNING those that are manipulating their value? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO has not yet been discovered as a "SCAM" by outstanding DD'rs after all this time? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence NOT ONE COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE from FFGO or ANY other COMPANY will admit to any connection to cmkx whatsoever? UCROCKS: Is it all a coincidence that non believers have not done the DEEPEST of DD possible? UCROCKS: Is it all coincidence?..OR Could it be a MASTERFUL PLAM designed many years ago..to hide the truth to prevent a crash and deliver to CMKX shareholders>"MAXIMUM VALUE"? saltydog19: maybe a trust with many stockholders, are trying to buy hunt gold UCROCKS: TY for your time~
|
|
|
Post by Display Name on Jul 30, 2008 16:08:56 GMT -5
ty.... sandi66 Re: FFGO / Hunt Gold (HGLC) PRs« Reply #76 Today at 3:42pm » Coincidences ?UCROCKS: IS it a coincidence FFGO...was just a "lucky pick" by some dd'rs out of the LOSER PINKYLAND? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence that a few of us have followed FFGO for over a year...based SOLEY on cmkx connections and fingerprints that we saw? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO is one of the very few companies that even mention Wallstreets 2 dirty words in their PR's?>Stock certificates UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO started out as Credit/Debit/PAYMENT SOLUTIONS company? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence they have elevated their services to Buying Banks and Mortgage companies? UCROCKS: Is it another coincidence they have Reinforced their value with HUNT GOLD instead of fiat? UCROCKS: Is it anothe coincidence they are buying morgage banks and are heavily involved with Trinity Mercantile Finance Group? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence with billions in value..they were STUCK @.0001 for over a year? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence that with our cmkx PAYMENTS rumor stronger now than EVER..they SUDDENLY went from the basement .0001 to Trip 9 in the last few days ? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence respected DD'rs such as spiderman/Salty /Puffer and others have found distant connections to Stoklein..? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence USCA connection has been found to St.JAMES thru Langly Park? UCROCKS: USCN UCROCKS: Is it also a coincidence of 22 PR's since May? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence Santini was/is buying back the float to protect the value buying back 45% of the company in July? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence Santini moved to HUNT GOLD because of conflicts of interest? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence mid May of o7..they did an R/s of 2000 to 1 on 639 Billion shares? saltydog19: uscn less than 2 million outstanding---isn't that right----oh my UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence 639 billion..is the same number mentioned in cmkx TASK FORCE tally? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence most of those old PR's have disappeared? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence their Billions in value have so badly been manipulated? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO is consistently giving updates almost daily on their buyback amounts all the while WARNING those that are manipulating their value? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence FFGO has not yet been discovered as a "SCAM" by outstanding DD'rs after all this time? UCROCKS: Is it a coincidence NOT ONE COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE from FFGO or ANY other COMPANY will admit to any connection to cmkx whatsoever? UCROCKS: Is it all a coincidence that non believers have not done the DEEPEST of DD possible? UCROCKS: Is it all coincidence?..OR Could it be a MASTERFUL PLAM designed many years ago..to hide the truth to prevent a crash and deliver to CMKX shareholders>"MAXIMUM VALUE"? saltydog19: maybe a trust with many stockholders, are trying to buy hunt gold UCROCKS: TY for your time~ oh my god. is it a coincidence on the third monday after the first full moon of the year of the 45th anniversary of when the big bopper died that I bought my first batch of shares of CMKX? you aren't thanked for your time.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 16:46:34 GMT -5
from the Millionaire Board....
rodeoclown887 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: RICO? Didn't someone last week or the week before post that there would be 50 or so arrests/indictments that would happen and was mercilessly slammed for not providing a link or am I thinking about something else? My mind ain't what it used to be so any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thx, rodeo
TheRealJBond DIAMOND MINER Re: RICO? Yes RODEO...it was me who posted that and DICEK and INES slammed me but that is ok...The TRUTH SHALL OVERCOME the NEGATIVITY.....I have no issues with them personally...they are jaded just as most of us are from the FALSE PROFITS of CMKM that bring Lies to us. I have NO AGENDA other then to FORCE not only the TRUTH but FORCE OUR PAYMENT. I wont stop till we are paid...that you can take to the bank...Sorry I wish it was a check but if we are persistant it will eventually be one IMO. TheRealJBond
rlea10 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: RICO?
I hope $1.00 per share + value of claims = Awesome!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 17:16:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 18:01:26 GMT -5
By: CHICPICK 30 Jul 2008, 04:47 PM EDT Msg. 746880 of 746935 (This msg. is a reply to 746874 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen, It looks to me that everyone will benifit from the minerals in the FALC., except for the CMKX shareholders. Nice huh?
By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 04:58 PM EDT Msg. 746885 of 746935 (This msg. is a reply to 746880 by CHICPICK.) Jump to msg. # chicpick, just looking at the map and who has what i'd have to say you are right. we don't have a thing that i can see other than the possibility of getting the entourage claims back and maybe a portion of the oreo pipe. (talk to my69z about that one.)
but on the surface it looks bleak. however, i'm still sticking to the idea that NO ONE, and mean NO ONE could be that stupid as to let that much slip through their fingers in order to steal $30m and then be hounded the rest of their days.
maybe urban is brain dead? but then that raises a whole of other questions.
it really doesn't make sense that he intentionally lost it all.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 18:05:13 GMT -5
By: aladin99 30 Jul 2008, 05:07 PM EDT Msg. 746891 of 746935Jump to msg. # Ms Hakala is driving the bus.....rough ride but not bad!!!!! By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 05:10 PM EDT Msg. 746895 of 746935(This msg. is a reply to 746891 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin, how do you figure this is not bad? this is going to take forever. and did you see that they couldn't read the 56 vol bagley presented and that they are unable to tell the court for sure at this time whether or not they want to call some of the people listed in the 56 vols. good lord, aladin! bagley could call 1,000 witnesses, easy! bagley could claim she needs to interview all 50,000 shareholders! By: aladin99 30 Jul 2008, 05:14 PM EDT Msg. 746901 of 746935(This msg. is a reply to 746895 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Rose...SEC has been working on the case since cmkx was born....SEC likes CMKXers to get paid too....Believe me!!!!!!! ~Sting Stang Stung~ ~Sing Sang Sung~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 18:08:02 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 30 Jul 2008, 05:07 PM EDT Msg. 746892 of 746935(This msg. is a reply to 746889 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # this is the behavior of a man that's delaying. this man is NOT in charge. if he were in charge and he knew where the process was going (because, remember, he is in charge and maheu wroe the script!) he would be out in front and he would be chomping at the bit to get this thing moving and over. urban is not interested in getting this over with. my69z, how much longer do you guess this is going to take?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 18:12:39 GMT -5
By: aladin99 30 Jul 2008, 05:12 PM EDT Msg. 746897 of 746936 (This msg. is a reply to 746894 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # Leo...nuf has been playing 1/2 right & 1/2 wrong but her goal, pedro's goal and janice's goal are the same....they wanted UC to be indicted and no one would get paid...
By: leowanta 30 Jul 2008, 05:16 PM EDT Msg. 746907 of 746936 (This msg. is a reply to 746897 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin....nufced is not 1/2 right at all...
her interpretation of legal documents are completely wrong...nufced believed UC had to answer the discovery....it doesn't understand court preceedure at all....uc conceded...that defendant is done.
yes nufced and janice work together they both got burned by uc...uc has always cooperated with the SEC....
pedro...yes that camillion....don't judge him ...he does the devils work, but he hates the devil........just wait you'll see
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 30, 2008 18:14:41 GMT -5
By: CHICPICK 30 Jul 2008, 05:25 PM EDT Msg. 746912 of 746936 (This msg. is a reply to 746879 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nuf, Thanks for those. It looks to me that Leslie and the SEC., have put some drop dead lengthy and serious work into this. After the mega hours they have put in, it will be impossible for them to drop the ball. It also looks, from the witness list that many have decided to drop a dime on Urban, Edwards, et al. The list includes:
Bruce Harlan Vince LoCastro Chris Jensen Don Yarter Roger Glenn Ed Thompson (surfit)
Getting this case up to speed, and ready for the DOJ., when the SEC., is done, must have cost the SEC., well over a million bucks so far. It also looks from Leslie's statement that Urban is on the lam. Now I am certain that Urban and a few others will end up behind bars.
|
|