|
Post by soonerlew on May 1, 2009 20:31:29 GMT -5
By: ravenpeach1 01 May 2009, 06:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829919 of 829922 (Reply to 829915 by stockrich0) Jump to msg. # StockRich.... Here is my take.... Entourage reported its Financials up to Dec 2008 Now we wait for Entourage to tell us what has or is happening to 1st Qtr in 2009...... I expect to hear something..... soon.... I expect to get something regardless or Entourage though.... Now I await Monetary's more pronounced reading..... God Bless Ravenpeach By: stockrich0 01 May 2009, 06:53 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829923 of 829954 Jump to msg. # Raven, funny you say that... ...because when I looked at the pr a little while ago, what really stuck out was the opening line in the report.. "REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM" This quarterly report is also giving status of the 'new ENTOURAGE'. New ticker, new cusip #, new OS. This is a fresh start company...fresh start for what? I don't know. The point is... This type of statement would have to be made after so many changes. It is a summation of activity and the consequences thereof... ...excluding of course, This secret information between CMKM and Entourage, that cannot be released until all details have been resolved. My, of my, why would CMKM be without a secret! Stockrich. By: ravenpeach1 01 May 2009, 07:01 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829924 of 829955 (Reply to 829923 by stockrich0) Jump to msg. # Thank you StockRich.... Now I see a little more than I did before myself.... Thanks.... I am sooooo glad it is Friday! I don't think I would have made it another day this week, working....... Tired tonight, but hope to Party real soon..... God Bless Ravenpeach
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 1, 2009 20:32:20 GMT -5
By: ravenpeach1 01 May 2009, 07:43 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829931 of 829956
Jump to msg. # Another one, bites the dust.... as in taking investors money....
This should make the ones not yet exposed, very nervous....
God Bless
Ravenpeach
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 1, 2009 20:32:58 GMT -5
By: restripe2007 01 May 2009, 08:18 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829937 of 829956
Jump to msg. # I predict that we will hear from jay before the end of this month
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 1, 2009 20:33:21 GMT -5
By: sportsman93306 01 May 2009, 09:07 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829944 of 829956 Jump to msg. # ALADIN AND MONETARYSHIFT SHOWED ALMOST AT SAME TIME They were not to be found all day, and now both showed up. SO R THEY SAME PERSON, OR WORK IN TANDEM. STRANGE BUT TRUE. THANKS SPORTSMAN By: ravenpeach1 01 May 2009, 09:16 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829948 of 829956 (Reply to 829945 by sportsman93306) Jump to msg. # Sport... Very silly... One point... Great minds do think alike ! That saying is true.... Aladin and Monetary are Great People... Stay around, you may pick up a thing or two.... or not.... of course it is up to you.... Some like being in DENIAL! God Bless Ravenpeach
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 1, 2009 20:36:15 GMT -5
By: aladin99 01 May 2009, 09:34 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829957 of 829957 Jump to msg. # You know that RTP is the biggest mining company in the world...one time BHP offered $470B...but the deal failed,,,,RTP does not have 1.9M acres in SASK area..... so CMKM = RTP + POT!!!!!!!! : ))
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 0:09:04 GMT -5
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:57:33 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 271561 Post # of 271638 Marco Glisson SEC filings 04/30/2009 viewer.zoho.com/docs/tvcddeviewer.zoho.com/docs/twkfeYou’ll like the second link! IT IS ORDERED that Attorney Robert Bretz file a Motion for Permission to Practice Pro HacVice and Designation of Resident Attorney Admitted to the Bar of this Court and Consent Theretowithin ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Otherwise, counsel is to cease appearances on behalf ofDefendant Posted by: jarta Date: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:07:17 AM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 271565 Post # of 271638 Pedro, ... Don't read too much into the two most recent orders in the Glisson case. The first order (the schedule) was agreed to by Bretz and Molly White from the SEC. They provided a draft order to the judge which they had already signed off on. The judge signed an order giving them the dates they had asked for. The 2nd order has more effect on Glisson than on Bretz. Bretz is admitted in California. If you are not a member of the Nevada bar, you make a motion to practice pro hac vice (Latin for this case only) - which is routinely granted if a member of the Nevada bar vouches for you and is brought into the case as local counsel in case an emergency arises and a local attorney has to get over to the courthouse without much notice. The local counsel could also incur the wrath of the judge if Bretz turns out to be a nut case. All Bretz has to do is find someone local to sponsor him. All Glisson has to do is pay the local attorney. Unless Bretz is some sort of nut case (I don't know, but he doesn't look like one from what I was able to find out), the only problem might be getting funds from Glisson. The Statement of Economic Interests is due soon. I would not expect it to be as juicy as you have speculated. But, we'll just have to see what it says. ... eom
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 0:24:17 GMT -5
Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:57:33 PM In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 271561 Post # of 271638 Marco Glisson SEC filings 04/30/2009 viewer.zoho.com/docs/tvcddeviewer.zoho.com/docs/twkfeYou’ll like the second link! IT IS ORDERED that Attorney Robert Bretz file a Motion for Permission to Practice Pro HacVice and Designation of Resident Attorney Admitted to the Bar of this Court and Consent Theretowithin ten (10) days of the entry of this order. Otherwise, counsel is to cease appearances on behalf ofDefendant Posted by: jarta Date: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:07:17 AM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 271565 Post # of 271638 Pedro, ... Don't read too much into the two most recent orders in the Glisson case. The first order (the schedule) was agreed to by Bretz and Molly White from the SEC. They provided a draft order to the judge which they had already signed off on. The judge signed an order giving them the dates they had asked for. The 2nd order has more effect on Glisson than on Bretz. Bretz is admitted in California. If you are not a member of the Nevada bar, you make a motion to practice pro hac vice (Latin for this case only) - which is routinely granted if a member of the Nevada bar vouches for you and is brought into the case as local counsel in case an emergency arises and a local attorney has to get over to the courthouse without much notice. The local counsel could also incur the wrath of the judge if Bretz turns out to be a nut case. All Bretz has to do is find someone local to sponsor him. All Glisson has to do is pay the local attorney. Unless Bretz is some sort of nut case (I don't know, but he doesn't look like one from what I was able to find out), the only problem might be getting funds from Glisson. The Statement of Economic Interests is due soon. I would not expect it to be as juicy as you have speculated. But, we'll just have to see what it says. ... eom Posted by: Pedro2004 Date: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:16:39 AM In reply to: jarta who wrote msg# 271602 Post # of 271638 jarta -- you're an a$$hole that never quits. Even Allen knows when to shut up! Posted by: jarta Date: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:24:22 AM In reply to: Pedro2004 who wrote msg# 271603 Post # of 271638 Pedro, ... You are a layman interpreting a complicated system you do not function in every day. I am a licensed professional who has had to navigate through that system every day for the last 40 years. You can find materials quite well. Your interpretation of the meaning of court materials you find is sorely lacking. Gotta go now. I'm on trial today. Have a nice one! ... eom
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on May 2, 2009 17:55:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chris on May 2, 2009 20:26:54 GMT -5
Looks like pumpers ( and we al know who they are) hawkeye, tramp, clark, tiger etc have gone into hiding after last week's ridiculous rumours. Those pimps should be fried and extinguished forever!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:22:37 GMT -5
passinthru3 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Weekly Buzz Chat 4/27 « Reply #119 Today at 8:34am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMKX Patrick May 1, 2009 8:00 PM GMT www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_19/b4130017095980.htm Dont know if anybody has seen this. Its listed at bottom of page under comments. indianajune936 DIAMOND MINER Re: Weekly Buzz Chat 4/27 « Reply #120 Today at 10:17am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for posting the link! Maybe NY Attorney General Cuomo, or one of his staff, will be checking on how Cuomo's interview with Maria Bartiromo, was written/printed in Business Week, and then read the "Comments section" at the bottom of the page. And decide CMKX/CMKM is Cuomo's next "go get 'em, make 'em pay" cause it looks good on the resume, case! Re: bottom page comments '700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT. CMKM CASAVANT INTERNTIONAL MINING NAKED SHORTED BY HEDGE FUNDS, BANKS, BROKERAGES,SEC DID NOTHING EXCEPT ABSOLVED THEMSELVES.' There's more to this comment, in Business Week! Or this just might come to the attention of someone else that is willing to take up our cause.......... It is an attention getter, short and not so sweet! Telling it like it is! I always read the comments, opinion's and letters section first in any newspaper or magazine. I want to know what the average person is thinking, not necessarily what someone is paid to write..... Thanks to 'Patrick' for his hopefully eye catching, right on the money comments, for CMKX-CMKM shareholders! indianajune
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:26:21 GMT -5
Jo DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Why Citigroup? « Thread Started Today at 5:42pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A member on this board asked if I would repost my comments from another thread regarding Citi. It is just a theory or hypothesis I guess. Well here it is, maybe it will open up some discussion and brainstorming.
"If Citigroup truly bought us out, even partially, then the govt owns what now? 40% or is it 60% of Citi? So that would explain the government control of our payout? That would explain all the rumors of this being tied to energy and national security. If you believe we have the incredilble value most think, it could make sense. Can you imagine if this entire bailout was about the govt getting control of a bank? I'm probably stating the obvious but Im slow to conclude..."
sptrader DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD ** CITI has NOTHING to do with CMKX and NEVER did. That was just a BS rumor put out years ago. CITI publicly DENIED any association with CMKX(or cmkm diamonds) and they NEVER sponsored the race car. Those are documented FACTS !!! jmho
737man DIAMOND MINER Re: Why Citigroup? « Reply #3 Today at 6:16pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPtrader, also a documented fact that Citi bought Knight derivatives trading that would further leverage Citi in the fixed income and equity (stock) options business. 40% of Knight's average daily share volume in Feb 2004 was CMKX. 3.5 billion or so I seem to remember and lasted for several months...yup, guess that really insulates Citi from CMKX....both happened in 2004...what are the odds that the BOYS IN CITI had no idea of the daily trading of the Knight Derivatives Trading Group they were to acquire? Didn't do DD on the assets and liabilities for $225 million? Had no clue of CMKX? ...yup...look past the race car and follow the money...hehe and jmo
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:36:31 GMT -5
By: my69z 01 May 2009, 11:43 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 829974 of 830073
Jump to msg. # April 30th '09,,,,, 1010's Entg Shares...
" In October 2008, the parties entered into a proposed settlement which was subsequently agreed to verbally by all parties. However, the parties have agreed to keep the details confidential until the fulfillment of certain conditions. "
" The 3,388,888 consideration shares paid to 1010 are no longer part of the proposed settlement as they have been assigned to a bona fide third party shareholder. "
Entourages filing
By: rosencrantz2010 02 May 2009, 01:26 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 829978 of 830074 (Reply to 829974 by my69z) Jump to msg. # my69z, good to see you back. what's up with the 30th? is that part of the agreement between ent and cmkx?
3.388m shares is nearly 10% of the total shares.
how could one bona fide shareholder get that many shares? that would mean that person would had to have 10% of all the bona fide cmkx shares,,,, right?
in other words, the person would had to have had roughly 60B cmkx shares
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:48:52 GMT -5
By: eaglesrock2008 02 May 2009, 04:05 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830021 of 830074 LOU MANHIEM Sat, May 2, 2009 at 02:56 PM EST hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/04/wall-street.html?cid=152477381#comment-152477381 CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY. Subject: File No. S7-08-08 From: A. Clifton Hodges, Esq. Affiliation: Attorney March 27, 2008 www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-08/s70808-151.htm To The SEC Commission and Financial Industry at Large: Naked shorts in the United States = “counterfeit shares.” The case of CMKX represents the greatest “counterfeit shares” fraud in the UNITED STATES. CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. suffered THE LARGEST NAKED SHORT IN HISTORY. Trillions of stock shares traded and changed hands UNTIL CMKX revoked itself and had every stock holder pull physical stock certificates out of brokerages, and out of street name, to trap those whom had committed fraud. CMKX is also the LARGEST STOCK CERTIFICATE PULL IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES” Naked short selling is a case of short selling the shares without first arranging a borrow. hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/04/wall-street.html?cid=152477381#comment-152477381 (yoohoo bashers, cmkx was sting )
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:58:03 GMT -5
By: joesixpack333 02 May 2009, 07:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830044 of 830076 (Reply to 830040 by planter82)
Jump to msg. # planter.. I think we can all agree... atmospheres have been conditioned.. the master/Iron Bob/Mr. Maheu.. lived up to his reputation and kicked some serious azz.. I know we longs have been here for a VERY LONG time.. but we really can't, or shouldn't whine.. personally.. I just sit back and watch the show.. hey.. we have a front row seat to the STOCK PLAY OF A LIFETIME.. (however some money would be nice... waaaaaaaaa... /ok.. whine over)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 2, 2009 21:59:30 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 02 May 2009, 09:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830059 of 830076 (Reply to 829661 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # It is time to take all collective information and make it available, visible, and transparent -publicly. In the same way that misinformation has fueled distraction, it would make good sense to see smart information that is held with such high regard by the Grand Pubar of sources placed in highly visible media/medium, and have this "valuable information" communicate urgency for CMKX shareholders to finally help them be compensated for their sustained damages. The same information that is held back, and protected for the "SOURCE" should be cut loose, and discussed, promoted, and used (in the same way) that promotion used the shareholders. It makes absolutely zero sense to protect these rumor Lords any longer for such "good stuff" that has done nothing to connect anyone with any consideration in real dollars. If these sources really have an interest and any regard for their information then they would want to see it publicized in a way that helps put the legal pressure where it needs to be in order to coordinate justice with justice served, or help someone out there. Not the holding it down, and holding it back so that not too much information is leaked out to protect any possible eventual payment, individuals, or conclusion that has never occurred in years. I have seen more of an effort to "protect a source" than to eradicate the obstruction of justice that holds back the restitution payment that is rumored to be on the way every day.
Why not put it all out there and make those that are comfortable very uncomfortable with their bureaucratic arrogance, denial, selfishness, stupidity in holding back what is accountable - in the land where the LAW prevails ONLY under public scrutiny?
AIMVHO2~
Oil
By: guya 02 May 2009, 09:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 830066 of 830076
oil, I couldn't agree more!
I also think that we should join Sherrie's SEC litigation!!
|
|