|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 7, 2009 17:26:57 GMT -5
By: chuck522450
07 May 2009, 05:27 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831452 of 831458
Jump to msg. #
I see chats with the CEO are on a need-to-know basis now. The questions were entertaining, but I guess he got tired of them.
Fading, fading.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:28:03 GMT -5
pennypauly Mini Mod Re: weekly buzz... 5/4 « Reply #89 Yesterday at 9:36pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ty diamondd Re: weekly buzz chat...5/4 « Reply #122 Today at 7:24pm » Wodan update: He has been told that we should hear something soon. He doesn't know if it will be public or we will recognize it pertains to us. If it happens he will let us know either way... it has. This should be the start of us getting a ROI. No timeframe on any first payment or amount. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=25641&page=5 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:29:00 GMT -5
seagull Mini Mod Re: weekly buzz... 5/4 « Reply #90 Today at 7:05am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: richy (as he jumps for joy) . 1 wk news, 2week news, 3rd week hey KK all I'm told is mayday payday millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ad=25641&page=5 |
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:45:29 GMT -5
By: tuscan9
07 May 2009, 04:12 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831448 of 831480
Jump to msg. #
So, the LIST of Names in the scroll
that don't want cmkm to be paid are established...
done ~ fini ~
their dream is inscripted in rock, so to say now... ! ;-0
Done....~
Fini ~
You ask and you shall recieve... zippo that is ~
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:47:29 GMT -5
By: tuscan9
07 May 2009, 05:55 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831457 of 831484
(Reply to 831454 by johnnyic)
Jump to msg. #
johnnyic's.. citi NEEDs moolah..
How perfect.....TIMING is Everything...
and the Media is saying citi et al feel CONFIDENT they will get that money from the 'Private Sector'.......
yeah sure you betcha ! On Ledger......it can NOW make the next quarters books look REAL FAT !
They have Primed the Pump for the Public...
only we have eyes that SEE the REST of The STORY ~
tic tic
By: rosencrantz2010
07 May 2009, 06:48 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831465 of 831484
(Reply to 831457 by tuscan9)
Jump to msg. #
and if CITI needs money then how are they paying out?
By: tuscan9
07 May 2009, 07:15 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831473 of 831487
(Reply to 831465 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. #
Hello rosen... Ledger....ON Ledger.....
What a wonderful thing..... !~
Think Negotiations had a FED Bank GET
the deal to cover this mess....?
Where is citi deepseated... with huge roots?
EVERYbody ends up happy... no one loses ~
:-)
By: rosencrantz2010
07 May 2009, 07:17 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831474 of 831487
(Reply to 831472 by tuscan9)
Jump to msg. #
tuscan, let's hope you are not saying something similar three month from now because i sure remember a lot of jay_adobe fans saying much the same thing over and over and over three years ago, then two years ago and about a year ago.
so, let's see if you are right this time.
what do you say? is three months from now a fairly reasonable timeframe?
i know others have recently said with all the authority in the world that THIS would BE the MONTH.
lol
and now you are suggesting we are on the threshold. that's great, unless you don't really know shiittt from shinola and are only acting llke you know.
well, let's see.
By: tuscan9
07 May 2009, 07:20 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831477 of 831487
(Reply to 831474 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. #
rosen...shinola...ahhh good stuff...
now, IF you hold a cert... and IF you have spent all the time I have seen you spend - Then you would not be proposing those issues...
and you sure would have understood by now what adobe and all the other hinters with clues dropped over the years added up to...??
Maybe you are one who DIDn't have a window seat.
Lets leave it at that and both belt up now...ok?
By: rosencrantz2010
07 May 2009, 07:31 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831478 of 831487
(Reply to 831477 by tuscan9)
Jump to msg. #
tuscan,
please, spare me the lecture. i own half the window seats.
we've been told to buckle up for years. these cute scenarios were old a year ago. by now they are getting to be downright painful to read.
i have all the best wishes in the world they are true but when they end up being wrong, as they have so many times before, it backfires on you and your friends,,,, unless you are working with shorty and know your predictions are NOT coming true.
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:49:23 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 06:48 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831463 of 831484
Jump to msg. #
Darlene wants to know if the negative ones are lonely over there in Tyler all by themselves :-)))
By: rosencrantz2010
07 May 2009, 06:50 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831466 of 831484
(Reply to 831463 by monetaryshift)
Jump to msg. #
so, is TYLER working with us, taking orders from URBAN, or out on their own? spell it out. you've been suggesting all of the above.
if you know what they are doing then say it.
By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 07:43 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831480 of 831487
(Reply to 831466 by rosencrantz2010)
Jump to msg. #
Rosie, Darlene says: Tyler is setting the table for their upcoming forensic PARTY :-)))
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:55:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 7, 2009 18:55:47 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 07:46 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831483 of 831488
Jump to msg. #
Darlene wants to know if the negative ones R prepared 2 explain how they got shares but R unable 2 get certs, and if they have contacted the unshareholder website as instructed. And if not, why not?
hugs and kisses from Darlene
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 7, 2009 22:01:40 GMT -5
By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 08:57 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831497 of 831542 Jump to msg. # Shara, Darlene wants to know: If Entourage hired the big Hall??? Thanks, Darlene  By: sharasilva
07 May 2009, 09:11 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831501 of 831544
(Reply to 831497 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # tell duhling that ent wants nothing to do with cmkx shareholders By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 09:17 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831508 of 831545 Jump to msg. # Shara, Darlene wants 2 know: What did GK mean when he said ENT share structure was designed for CMKM shareholders???  By: sharasilva
07 May 2009, 09:40 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831524 of 831546
(Reply to 831509 by monetaryshift) Jump to msg. # shifty, by making that statement GK was proving he was a deluded creep. By: monetaryshift
07 May 2009, 09:27 PM EDT
Rating: Msg. 831512 of 831546 Jump to msg. # For those who dont know - GK = Greg Kennedy and the statement was made on CFRN radio CEO broadcast :-)))
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 7, 2009 22:58:07 GMT -5
Same ole' response sent to others... Posting again....just in case ya missed it b4......Thanks... joesixpack333 07 May 2009, 11:39 PM EDT Fm PB102.. from SEC.. subtlerise
vegas member grnfrst e-mail reply from the SEC today re: cmkx
« Thread Started Today at 7:19pm » As you may be aware, the SEC filed a civil action against CMKM Diamonds and others in April 2008. The complaint involves an alleged scheme to issue and sell unregistered stock of CMKM Diamonds. The SEC alleges, among other things that as part of the scheme, the defendants issued false and misleading press releases. Paragraph 46 of the complaint alleges that, " n early January 2003, CMKM asked shareholders to hold their shares in certificate form 'indefinitely' to help the company combat naked short selling." The staff is seeking various remedies, including disgorgement.
We cannot predict whether or not the SEC will be successful in bringing this case and obtaining the remedies sought. Nor can we predict when the litigation will be concluded. Since the filing of the complaint, the SEC has settled with CMKM Diamonds and several other defendants.
Investors, who are interested in monitoring the litigation, can do so through what is known as the PACER system, available through the website of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
I note that the SEC civil action against CMKM Diamonds and others does not allege manipulative naked short selling. Instead, the complaint alleges that certain defendants were telling investors that naked short selling - rather than their own conduct - was causing investor losses.
In addition, let me note that monetary and other penalties that the SEC may seek depend on the fact and circumstances of the individual case, are outlined in the federal securities laws. For example, see Section 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, uscode.house.gov/download/pls/15C2B.txt.
Although the SEC seeks disgorgement and penalties against certain defendants in the CMKM Diamonds litigation, the Court has not yet entered any judgment awarding disgorgement and/ or penalties.
The SEC does not seek a specified amount of disgorgement or civil penalties in its complaint and the Court will order the amount of disgorgement and penalties that it deems appropriate. Because we are in litigation, we cannot comment further on this issue other than to direct you to the information that is publicly available in the court files.
subtlerise
vegas member
Re: grnfrst e-mail reply from the SEC today re: cm
« Reply #1 Today at 7:25pm »
grnfrst: THAT IS THE JIST OF SEC EMAIL RESPONSE - THE REST IS SEC BOILERPLATE JARGON !
|
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on May 8, 2009 9:13:20 GMT -5
I still don't understand why we haven't heard more about the Eton Properties "victory"..how do we not know anything about that and what it means for us?
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 8, 2009 17:39:17 GMT -5
]anezo
DIAMOND DIGGER
Documents
« Thread Started Today at 8:32am » how very odd! the name Lou Colacino appears on the DTCC documents that were recently posted. the one dated april of 06 and the most recent one dated 5/1/09. well i called the DTCC yesterday asked for this Lou Colacino and was told " he no longer works here, (wow he was there in 06 and his name was referenced on the doc on 5/1/09 and 5 days later he's gone? she then asked if there something she could do for me?" i mearly said i was just reading some documents on the internet and had some questions. she said "is this regarding CMKM Diamonds?" i said "yes it is" her reply was.. do you have a broker , i said yes but i hold my paper certs she said "i know call your broker if you have any questions". so i did he said he was confussed because the document was 3 years old. i replied i know it is so where are my Entourage distribution shares? hmm no response back yet. i never mentioned CMKM so i am assuming that any doc with this Lou Coacino's name on it alerts them that the caller is going to ask about CMKM ?? does this seem odd to anyone else? besides the fact that the date that the commission bill settlement (2nd doc.) is in effect happens to coincide with the date of our cert pull extention 5/15/ hmmmmmm . does anyone else think there never was a ecomonic crisis and that this was created to explain the trillions of dollars floating back and forth that no one could possibly follow? clay1999
DIAMOND MINER
Re: Documents
« Reply #3 Today at 9:30am » I found this... what does it mean? maybe nuttin NSCC Important Notice - May 1, 2009 - Commission Bill Settlement May 15 Non-Confidential. DTCC is now offering enhanced access to all ... should be directed to Lou Colacino of the Cashiering area at ... Lou Colacino ... www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2009/nscc/a6816.pdf you may have to cut and paste link
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 8, 2009 17:41:42 GMT -5
sptrader
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: Documents
« Reply #6 Today at 10:40am » The value of the Entourage cert isn't worth enough, to warrant distribution.- Do the math. $100k(max val) / 40k shareholders = $2.50. CMKM Diamonds is far better off, trying to trade the cert for our old claims, if they are proven to have value. jmho  portrush
Mod Squad
Re: Documents
« Reply #9 Today at 11:41am What exactly IS the value of the Entourage cert? And...can you provide documentation showing 40K shareholders? Thanks! pr
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 8, 2009 17:42:49 GMT -5
swather
DIAMOND JEDI MASTER
Re: Documents
« Reply #13 Today at 12:56pm » we are not getting Entourage shares................the 45 million shares will be canceled when returned to Entourage...........according to Entourage management this is all perfectly legal
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 8, 2009 17:44:23 GMT -5
 hermannmaier0
DIAMOND JEDI
Re: Documents
« Reply #19 Today at 4:58pm No going away. No forgetting about it. CMKX brings a lot of evidence forward, dispite our great lack of conclusion. We need to make sense of it and hold all parties accountable. It still doesnt make sense. Too much remains unknown/hidden. To many contradictions. To many powerful players were involved. IMO. This is a great group of shareholders for resilience and tenacity. Keep digging and hounding.
|
|
