|
Post by chris on May 27, 2009 18:46:15 GMT -5
You can see how stupid aladin is; he's comparing apples to oranges or worse. How many shares outstanding does USCN have?
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on May 27, 2009 19:42:48 GMT -5
I am still trying to figure out what the Eton settlement was all about and what that means for us? Does anyone have a clue on that and why we haven't heard?
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on May 27, 2009 20:51:20 GMT -5
Heck...WHO KNOWS what any of it means???...it is beyond me...all I know is the IDIOTS that run CMKM are not fond of letting the SHAREHOLDERS in on the SECRETS...well the CURSE is on the MONEY...so WHOMEVER gets THAT will REGRET IT until it is returned to its rightful OWNERS...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficiaL)
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on May 27, 2009 20:56:47 GMT -5
y: rosencrantz2010 27 May 2009, 09:05 PM EDT Rating: post rating 0 Msg. 837128 of 837136 (Reply to 837127 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # the latest word is TYLER does not want to reveal the value of that decision for fear URBAN and his family are going to go after it. well, i suspect it is too late. everything, and i do mean everything, is considered fair game after the amount of endless defamation that has gone on. the ETON property is the last thing TYLER needs to worry about. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=837128\...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on May 28, 2009 0:37:31 GMT -5
Chris may not dominate our thoughts with positives, to shelter us with images of pending success by coaxing those warm fuzzy feelings... but, who cares? Rumor and personal opinion are the essential structure and form of this beast. To be consumed is to be in its belly, and that is not going to get us to the end of the tunnel, in relative comfort. To anyone with intent to criticize or to calculate hidden numbers: Intelligence has no gender, and personality can hide more than it reveals; nothing here is as it seems. The pen is mightier than the sword in many subtle and indirect ways, at this seance to prove life after death in CMKX.
Stories behind Famous Sayings The Saying: THE PEN IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD. Who Said It: Edward Bulwer-Lytton When: 1839 The Story behind It: In Act II of Bulwer-Lytton's play Richelieu, Cardinal Richelieu learns of a plot against him contrived by a friend and confidant, the monk Joseph. Since as a priest he could not challenge the monk to physical combat, Richelieu issued a written statement which contains the following: Beneath the rule of men entirely great, The pen is mightier than the sword. Bulwer-Lytton was not the only one, nor was he the first, to have the thought. The Greek poet Euripides, who died about 406 B.C., said, "The tongue is mightier than the blade." In 1600 Shakespeare had Rosencrantz in Hamlet say that "... many wearing rapiers are afraid of goosequills." In 1621 Robert Burton wrote The Anatomy of Melancholy, in which he stated: "From this it is clear how much more cruel the pen may be than the sword." Also preceding Bulwer-Lytton was Thomas Jefferson, who in 1796 sent a letter to Thomas Paine in which he wrote: "Go on doing with your pen what in other times was done with the sword." www.trivia-library.com/b/origins-of-sayings-the-pen-is-mightier-than-the-sword.htmSound check: Testing, one - two - three... Testing, one - two - three... Testing, one - two - three... Testing, one - two - three... [optimal]
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 12:02:28 GMT -5
I would usually send a private PM to the posters who posts I have deleted, but for some reason my computer freezes each time I try soooooooooo....... I cleaned up this thread..... EVERYONE is entitled to their own thoughts BUT keep the attacks out of it ! My time is limited and would rather use it to post on the board.... not deal with this RB type of crap !! Follow the rules please !! SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 12:07:13 GMT -5
3bid Dr. Of Diamonds Re: SEC Suffers from 'Deregulatory Capture' « Reply #3 Yesterday at 7:56pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tell us what you think. E-mail Gregg Carlstrom. gcarlstrom@federaltimes.com <gcarlstrom@federaltimes.com> The SEC has the upper hand to exercise control in a bad situation -- to prevent trading to continue. And this certainly didn't happen with CMKX, at a time when the fires of desire were burning and the emotional tides were the highest. All red flags were up and waving, and the SEC was there and aware... but failed to act. The sirens were deafening, as is the silence that now fills the ears of 50,000 victims of CMKX. The gross negligence of the SEC in this situation was and is outrageous; the loose ends are everywhere. The rips in the fabric of the financial system include the victims of a negligent SEC. It's good to hear of serious plans to fix the system. But any vigorous and effective program would not abandon the victims who suffered when regulation was absent, and the SEC was not. A gaping hole must be filled, but harmed CMKX shareholders shouldn't be buried in a pit that went to the center of the earth, because of an [aware] SEC that did nothing. Silence and avoidance of this issue is another serious red flag waving in the winds of 'change', or is it just more hot air? -3bid
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 12:14:12 GMT -5
So what happened to the CMKX wronged shareholders (per the SEC) ??.....and the awaited $$$$$$$ judgement from Judge Larry Hicks?? Hakala did not address it ?? Helluva housekeeper... huh?? Just try to sweep everything under the rug to protect their own crooked, useless, incapable a$$e$?? Ain't gonna work !! She should know by now... WE ( the CMKX shareholders) ain't going away !! skoondog DIAMOND JEDI Just Talk to the SEC!! « Thread Started Today at 12:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello Guys, Just talk to Les Hakala, with the SEC just two minutes ago. Sorry folks but she said no money. At all, none!! and NO trust Funds!! NONE!!!! Her no# 323-965-0086 skoondog: Good Luck to all!!
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on May 28, 2009 12:43:11 GMT -5
I would usually send a private PM to the posters who posts I have deleted, but for some reason my computer freezes each time I try soooooooooo....... I cleaned up this thread..... EVERYONE is entitled to their own thoughts BUT keep the attacks out of it ! My time is limited and would rather use it to post on the board.... not deal with this RB type of crap !! Follow the rules please !! SINGLE Thanks, Roe. Catdaddy
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 13:28:42 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:42:13 AM In reply to: goldbarren58 who wrote msg# 272342 Post # of 272362 This is getting out of control. Is someone trying to cover up the truth on this bb ? Looks like everyone involved with CMKX has been a crook now even our legal support!!! Soon we will learn that the SEC themselves were in on it. lol content.lawyerlinks.com/library/sec/cases/pdfs/958_fsupp_846.pdfPosted by: jarta Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:51:19 AM In reply to: IQ1 who wrote msg# 272343 Post # of 272362 IQ1, ... "Looks like everyone involved with CMKX has been a crook now even our legal support!" Crooks hire crooked attorneys to represent them because legit attorneys won't have anything to do with them. Stoecklein is a crafty attorney who is well-acquainted with LV scamsters. He doesn't represent clean clients. And, he was never, ever, looking out for the CMKX stuckholders' interests. ... eom Posted by: jarta Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:50:14 AM In reply to: h24ever who wrote msg# 272345 Post # of 272363 h24, ... "Bill is !!!"Bill is what? Concerned about the welfare of individual CMKX stuckholders? Not really. He's much more concerned about finding CMKX sufficient revenue to repay his loans and deferred legal fees so that he doesn't suffer a complete financial disaster. But, Bill's not Stoecklein. ... eom
|
|
|
Post by ohiogirl on May 28, 2009 13:43:45 GMT -5
Single, I just dialed that phone number that was given for Les Haskala at 323-965-0086 and it comes back and says number has been changed, disconnected, etc...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 15:10:35 GMT -5
Single, I just dialed that phone number that was given for Les Haskala at 323-965-0086 and it comes back and says number has been changed, disconnected, etc... Hi Ohiogirl...... nice to see ya.... still hangin' in huh?? <sigh> I dialed the number also.... but all I get is an open line or something......... no ringing , no nothing..... will check and see if skoondog corrected the number in another post.... Single
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on May 28, 2009 15:15:56 GMT -5
Don not Ron~
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 15:16:05 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 26 May 2009, 08:25 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 836763 of 836812 Jump to msg. # my sources in NJ are indicating URBAN is laying the groundwork for a major defamation of character lawsuit against the SEC (or whichever federal agency is appropriate) and TYLER. both groups have been lying. the fact that neither the SEC or TYLER has been able to support their outrageous claims of fraud and theft is obvious evidence of their lies and by conjecture the harm it has caused the clients of the firm representing the CASAVANT family members. there is a discussion about breaking the suit into multiple suits to increase the damages claim. i hear there is only so much the various family members can take. they have suffered mightily at the hands of the SEC's HAKAKALALA and TYLER. both entities have damaged the CASAVANT family members repeatedly and often over the years. the CASAVANTS have suffered not only the loss of income but irreparable harm to their standing in their various communities. it's been unbearable for them personally and for their children, and now they want compensation. their lawyer is seeking far more in damages than anything previously sought in similar cases. this could make history. who can blame the CASAVANTS for going after the SEC and TYLER? By: rosencrantz2010 26 May 2009, 08:28 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 836768 of 836815 (Reply to 836767 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # defamation of character is a serious charge and one that will pay off handsomely for those on the right side of this issue. too bad SEC and TYLER. By: zahnj 28 May 2009, 10:05 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 837167 of 837262 (Reply to 836763 by rosencrantz2010) Jump to msg. # rosencrants sorry but that's so funny I'm still laughing. Either you like to fabricate or someone is pulling your leg. If Urban thought the SEC was lying in their actions against him why didn't he respond to the charges through legal channels? There is no defamation of character if the charges are true. And by not responding he's guaranteeing a judgement against him. Sooooo go back and figure out another story to tell the sheep. Lol. By: rosencrantz2010 28 May 2009, 11:24 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 837176 of 837262 (Reply to 837167 by zahnj) Jump to msg. # zahnj, the fact that neither the SEC nor TYLER have proven a thing and have NOT won their lawsuit since the judge refuses to issue a summary judgement, URBAN has every right to sue them for defamation of character. JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED. you can't go around issuing press releases stating someone if a thief and crook, sue them, fail to win the suit and then expect that person to sit quietly in a corner while you continue to beat them over the head with false claims. if you can't win your suit then you will eventually be required to defend yourself because that person will grow tired of you making claims that defame you and your family members. after this many YEARS someone needs to pay, and pay dearly. if the SEC and TYLER can't prove what they are saying then they deserve being sued.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 28, 2009 15:50:23 GMT -5
Don not Ron~ Sniffer..... to be honest, i did not take the time to read this document..... but it seems Ron is Donald's brother ...... and is mentioned different times in the doc..... from the document....He arranged to have his brother, D. Stoecklein, open brokerage accounts and sell a large portion of the stock. 9. D. Stoecklein represented virtually every witness subpoenaed to testify during the SEC investigation that preceded this litigation. (D. Stoecklein Aff. of 8/7/96 (hereinafter "D. Stoecklein Aff.") ¶¶ 2-3 (appended to Stoeckleins 1st Aff.)) go figure.....
|
|