mojito
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 7
|
Post by mojito on Oct 27, 2009 18:23:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Oct 27, 2009 19:37:21 GMT -5
By: bhollenegg 27 Oct 2009, 08:11 PM EDT Msg. 880922 of 880923 (Reply to 880912 by jonathonanders)
Jonathonanders...I communicated with Attorney Hodges' firm several months ago. At the time there were several activities which looked promising that the shareholders may be hearing information or possibly receiving compensation/funds. There were communications concerning restitution posted on the boards. During this call, I was informed about the legal action will proceed if the compensation or information about the compensation did not occur as expected. I posted a message that the shareholders will be hearing information. Nothing happened, therefore we are taking legal action. I informed the shareholders.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 20:52:37 GMT -5
Posted by: IQ1 Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 5:08:22 PM In reply to: Investorman who wrote msg# 281975 Post # of 282004
It this was poker I would bet my money on the following, and yes this was even stated multiple times by the CMKX CEO that the NSS is going to be delt with in a huge way once we get the first part out of the way. That means putting people in jail and retrieving the company assets, which is basically some of the money we invested.
Now once this is done, Frizzy will move forward with the evidence and I'm betting its enough to provide doubt in the courts that NSS has taken place.
This will launch a full scale investigation. It will be interesting, maybe they'll burn down some building to make it go away. LOL Or do what nasa did, record over the original moon landing tapes. ha ha ha
It will be interesting to see.
I wonder where UC hid those home movies. Didn't he say he was recording hours of the CMKX scam. LOL Called it a documentary.
And now we will see what really went on. If the FBI is involved, it will get HOT
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Oct 27, 2009 21:02:18 GMT -5
ty bikinipro Ugh....sorry guys, but it is gossip! By: joesixpack333 27 Oct 2009, 10:09 AM EDT Rating: post rating 0 Msg. 880752 of 880758someone confirms caspers latest.. FWIW.. not that I believe anything casper posts but since the Chinese 1T loan us due today.. and Japan is supposedly going to announce, today, that it is dumping the dollar.. well.. ya just never know.. (fm Rumor Mill News) Reader: "I CAN CONFIRM WHAT CASPER'S SAYING..." Posted By: hobie Date: Tuesday, 27-Oct-2009 02:13:20 In Response To: 2nd CASPER for OCT 26th - "HEADS UP - PACKS ARE MOVING AGAIN TONIGHT" (hobie) (Thankd, I. : ) Reader "insider" writes: *************************************************************************** Re: 2nd CASPER for OCT 26th - 'HEADS UP - PACK.... Hobie, I can't tell you my sources but be assured I can confirm what Casper is saying is correct. Obama did block deliveries but they are back on the move and we expect good news tommorrow. cheers, insider I told you CASPER will be RIGHT TOMORROW...HA HA...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 21:17:59 GMT -5
By: aladin99 27 Oct 2009, 03:50 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880872 of 880950
Jump to msg. # Partially settled.....that keeps us alive!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 21:27:15 GMT -5
By: bhollenegg 27 Oct 2009, 09:16 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880934 of 880954 (Reply to 880925 by jonathonanders) Jump to msg. # Jonathonanders...All information should be scrutinized for correctness...if it not correct then take action. The SEC may have Sovereign Immunity, but this may be overturned.... registeredrep.com/news/SEC_Broker_Dealer_Exemption/ "Surprise! FPA Wins Lawsuit Against SEC and the Broker-Dealer Exemption" Thank you, BHollenegg By: jonathonanders 27 Oct 2009, 09:35 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880941 of 880955 (Reply to 880934 by bhollenegg) Jump to msg. # Bob, I dont think sovereign immunity will be overturned..but i do think a worthy lawsuit presented does have a small chance. I know madoff victims have sued the sec, that should be a good barometer on whether this one will stand a chance. A ton of lawsuits against the sec have been thrown out. Dont get me wrong here either, i would love to see it.. i just have grave doubts after hearing what the evidence is. For instance, that VWAP site was misunderstood imo .. we watched that for ages, starting long before revocation, it was always showing weird numbers. why would someone cover at say 4 dollars..when tons of shares were available at .00005-.0001?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 21:32:07 GMT -5
By: planter82 27 Oct 2009, 09:35 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880942 of 880955 (Reply to 880525 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # oil.ipo now that Hodges has proceeded with his legal action I would bet that he has a very good idea what the out come will be. As a Lawyer you dont ask questions you dont know that answer to
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 21:35:09 GMT -5
Money returned from Frizzell ? « Thread Started Today at 12:40pm » This was posted by stock1 on millionaires. What think ye? Anyone else? The money that we paid to Frizzell in 2005 for the lawsuit has been returned to our account by the Frizzell Law firm. Just contacted his office and the person answering the phone does not know what I am talking about. I told my husband to return it back.....just does not seem right.......... That is what I am saying....the money we had given to Frizzell for the lawsuit in 2005 was returned to us by the Frizzell lawfirm today...............Something is not right.......I called his office and they said they did not want the money.....whatttttttttttttttttt? ?we gave it to them in 2005.................... Yes, I am sure it is from Frizzell...I just got a call from Frizzell himself, he said that he worked for John Martin and that some shareholders decided to help him pay for it. He said that it was put into an account for the Frizzell Law Firm, but that he did not know anything else about it. It told him that it did say from the Frizzell Law Firm account, and I told him that we were going to return it to what ever account it came from. He said that he was no accepting any money and that he worked for the Company and I told him that the money came back from the account that had been created to pay him. He said that he worked for John Martin not for the sharholders at the time and that some shareholders wanted to help John Martin out. So I told him that we would just have the bank return it to the same account that sent it to us.....Might not be anything, but we are going to return it anyway...just feels funny, If anyone needs proof I can print it out, YOU JUST LET ME KNOW. I just find it funny that so far I am the only one, if it happens to someone else, I would appreciate it if someone would let it be known, thank you...Sincerely....Stock1... The more I think about it, I did mention earlier the payment was sent by paypal but I was wrong it was by check. so post a copy already ! ok.. here's what he got......stock1 DIAMOND DIGGER Money Returned to us from Frizzell? « Reply #36 Today at 9:41pm » 10/27/2009 Deposit CU CK#67310 7/25/05 FRIZZELL LAW FIRM $26.00
BasicInstinck, this is exactly the way it was in my account. Talk soon
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 27, 2009 21:48:18 GMT -5
busheyes DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Money Returned to us from Frizzell? « Reply #19 Today at 3:37pm » What I posted in the Foret about November trial date thread: I don't know about you Daveswa, but when I sent Frizzell money, I signed a legally binding contract. He cashed my check. I believe that makes me a client. I had often considered sending a letter to F.L.O. reminding them of this and requesting the results of the investigation I retained him to do. Review the Owners Groups Updates, etc, and the information he claims to have obtained. Right up through revocation. I believe as a client I, (and anybody else who signed a contract) am entitled to review such information. And I don't have such documentation in front of me right now, but I remember from my previous 'threats' that the share count, amongst other juicy tidbits (sorry, couldn't resist) was included in his up to revocation cache of information. Those that signed Phase Two agreements would be privy to more I imagine. I invite all the DD hounds here to review their signed contracts with Frizzell and demand information from him. Like I said, I have threatened myself to do this in the past but one, I don't think its necessary; two, I really don't have the time nor inclination to do such. For those who crave this sort of info though, I submit this is a way to go about getting it. You were a client and are entitled to see the work product. (Note: I do not know Texas law but this seems reasonable to me). If he refuses to talk to you, call the Texas Bar. Regards...
|
|
|
Post by eastcoastswing on Oct 28, 2009 8:17:27 GMT -5
TRJBond is going to loose his street cred if nothing appears today ) ================================================================ ty bikinipro TheRealJBond Diamond Finder Re: gossip 10/26/09 « Reply #8 Yesterday at 6:33pm » Has anyone checked status on Pacer today...Just put in our case numbers or even just the name...If not appearing today it should be by tomorrow. I have no clue what it is I was told to keep eyes on it. I am not able to access from my location (computer) or I would look myself.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2009 11:35:24 GMT -5
ty bikinipro
abadgoodgirl DIAMOND DIGGER Re: weekly buzz chatter 10/26 « Reply #35 Today at 11:55am »
t/y to all who took time to thank me for being back. With sincerity, i can say it's not good to be back (since we're not paid what we're honestly owed.)
I sent Hodges some evidence procured thru my hundreds of hours of research. It shows DTCC in violation of 1976 securities processing laws...and the SEC in violation of same.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2009 13:47:40 GMT -5
By: jboydwv 28 Oct 2009, 09:14 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 880974 of 881053
Jump to msg. # You will never convince me .... there is nothing in this company!!! Kevin and Bill both know there is some kind of HUGE valu.....noone takes over a total scam, revoked, pinksheet company and puts as much money into it as they have without knowing for sure there is something big.... they have a never ending checkbook for future litigation, who would supply that for a scam pinksheet??? answer is .... NOONE!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2009 13:52:47 GMT -5
againnnnnnnnnnnn ?? By: aladin99 28 Oct 2009, 11:26 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 880991 of 881053 BF returned $26...means $$$ is coming!!!!!!! Money Returned to us from Frizzell? « Reply #36 Today at 9:41pm » 10/27/2009 Deposit CU CK#67310 7/25/05 FRIZZELL LAW FIRM $26.00 BasicInstinck, this is exactly the way it was in my account.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 28, 2009 14:02:59 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 28 Oct 2009, 08:42 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 880970 of 881054 (Reply to 880791 by whereistheend) Jump to msg. # whereistheend My answer was cut off in the last thread. Re: …. how satisfied were you with Mark faulks interview of Maheu? I believe Maheu was put-together by Urban and his buddies. And when Maheu discovered the truth – Maheu washed his hands of CMKM. As such – any correlations revolving around Faulk and Mahue’s interview I find insignificant. In fact, as far as I’m concerned, the Faulk/Maheu interview reconfirms that Maheu was played by Urban and his buddies. By: whereistheend 28 Oct 2009, 01:44 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 881029 of 881054 (Reply to 880970 by lilburrito0) burrito, re faulk and maheu What I find interesting is that Maheu is treated as some kind of victim here. By treating him as victim, its also an excuse to not probe or explain or put out true information on that whole period of Maheu Stoecklein time and their participation. Its an official excuse that serves as avoidance to shed light on maheu and stoecklein participation. To say Maheu was a victim is a farce imo. Imo company/ faulk do not want to go there.. and it has to be a reason for that. He was given a green card. And it seems intentional to me. Why mark and the company have gone for that one, i do not know, but things do not add up and Mark himself is contradictory in his book. He can not state that in his opinion he does not think its coincidence that Kevin Ryan from crystalix is coofounder and coowner of Maheus son peter company, and that per Maheu he did not know that urban gave first 2 million then additional 1 mill to urban, and then Mark states that he thinks that even though Maheu used "lies" in his career but he would not use it with shareholders.. and how honest he was with answers. Sorry, does not make sense and its contradictory. For some reason, Stoecklein and Maheu got green card from Tyler team. While Roger Glenn did not, from what it seems. In addition, if Maheu loved Frizzell so much, and shareholders, and kevin was so shocked to find only 588 in the company account, how come stoecklein and maheu did not make sure that 3 million dollars in Crystalix shares that were repaid to urban, did not end up in company account instead of URBANS private account? Now who is lying here? Kevin that says he was shocked with only 588 in company account? Was he really shocked? Mark faulk, when he states that Maheu loved Tyler gang.. and especialy frizzell, but did not take a second to look where the 3 mills from his friend kevin ryan crystalix end up ? Everybody loves everybody.. and sheds the tears.. Everybody is so surprized.. But everything that was done points to just the oposite. Seems to me that none of them were suprized with anything. Sorry just dont fit. I want to be in reality too.. but things dont fit.
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Oct 28, 2009 16:15:39 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 28 Oct 2009, 08:42 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 880970 of 881054 (Reply to 880791 by whereistheend) Jump to msg. # whereistheend My answer was cut off in the last thread. Re: …. how satisfied were you with Mark faulks interview of Maheu? I believe Maheu was put-together by Urban and his buddies. And when Maheu discovered the truth – Maheu washed his hands of CMKM. As such – any correlations revolving around Faulk and Mahue’s interview I find insignificant. In fact, as far as I’m concerned, the Faulk/Maheu interview reconfirms that Maheu was played by Urban and his buddies. Apparently, lilburrito hasn't "known" any real, red-blooded American spooks in his lifetime. Such men and women are carefully chosen and molded like a master chess player. Always one move ahead of you. Even when push comes to shove, no matter by what politician or elitist, they've got you by the balls, because they know 'where the bodies are buried' (as they say in "spook" talk). Like I said, always one step ahead.
|
|