|
Post by speedomodelisback on Oct 22, 2009 15:16:39 GMT -5
I apologize if I offended anybody.... [/size][/quote] Rambo, you didn't offend me and you don't have to apologize for anything you post. Five years of this nonsense has ensured that for all of us. Take care, friend.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 23, 2009 6:33:26 GMT -5
thanks bikinipro
TheRealJBond Re: CMKX Shareholders:Legally Yours (By:Bhollenegg « Reply #8 Today at 1:26am »
DONT COUNT OL BOB H OUT..>He will get it cracked along with some BIG NAMES...Watch and see!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 23, 2009 6:34:12 GMT -5
scruffy2 Re: Update From Gus & Omega - Draft PR added - Pag « Reply #244 Yesterday at 7:02pm »
Quick note from Gus:
If anyone would like to send comments and suggestions directly to the team, the email address is cmkxshareholderscoalition@hotmail.com. Similarly, if anyone wishes to contribute financially to the effort, PayPal contributions can also be sent to this address.
Thanks everyone!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 23, 2009 18:19:47 GMT -5
Posted by: bigbadjohn Date: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:25:45 PM In reply to: None Post # of 281643
Here is Mona after she talked to Hodges office
(edited by portrush at the request of Mona...who said she didn't authorize an MP# of her comments)
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Oct 23, 2009 20:05:23 GMT -5
I hope and pray that class action is never in our future.....
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 23, 2009 21:15:20 GMT -5
it's in this thread BUT imo ...not a rumor.leadorfollow DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Press release: Official and finished version « Reply #31 Today at 6:14pm » normally when the shareholders get ....fed.... up ( no pun intended )...and start to take action the co comes out with an update all of a sudden......
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 24, 2009 22:43:33 GMT -5
And how would they have a clue? .... Our beloved government has a habit of keeping "Joe Q Public" , quite ignorant, telling us ONLY what they want us to know. Hence, Believe little of what you hear and nothing you read in the newspaper. What we are witnessing now (imo) is just the tip of the iceberg. Karma is a bit$h...... & the dominoes are falling slowly, but at least some are falling.... INFORM THE UNIFORMED!! sully47 DIAMOND JEDI MASTER One interesting thing I have noted........ « Thread Started Today at 9:20pm » in talking with people about naked shorting. Bear in mind I work with a lot of successful and wealthy people with sizeable investments.....mainly established/specialized surgeons. When I first discussed naked shorting as the REAL cause of the collapse of our markets they would make smalltalk and blow me off....probably as a kook! Then I started distributing several copies of Rolling Stone and bought/distributed a copy of Stock Shock (I still haven't forgotten you good shareholders in Peoria). THEN I had investors seeking me out and wanting to discuss what happened to Sirius Radio. Then it hit me like a ton of bricks! The reason for their cool initial response is that they had no clue what the Hell naked shorting is and its impact on our markets. When they watched Stock Shock (esp. the last half) a lightbulb went off in their heads.....they SAW how it's done and HOW it screws honest investors. One surgeon even KNOWS Patrick Byrne through his daughter and has had dinner with him! Bottom line.....imo, the MAJORITY of investors can't grasp the CONCEPT of naked shorting and/or don't believe that our FED would let this happen! sully
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Oct 25, 2009 9:01:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 25, 2009 11:37:24 GMT -5
By: chrisl_is_chrisl 25 Oct 2009, 12:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880314 of 880323
Jump to msg. # About 9 months ago there was a small group of us that were pursuing legal action against a couple of entities. We did not go out on the boards looking for financial assistance like these people are doing. We were going to fund this ourselves.
We spoke to a couple of high powered attorneys that have dealt with the SEC and companies that are corrupt. It never materialized cause there is nothing to go after.
Once they researched what was provided to them thru documentation that is available from public records it comes down to there is noting to go after.
It is just a matter of time before bhollenegg and others start to ask for money. The day they ask for money is the day you should question their true motives.
You have been warned.
|
|
|
Post by gabbyhayes on Oct 25, 2009 12:45:06 GMT -5
Chrisl is nothing more than a pos basher from various other boards. ;D
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Oct 25, 2009 15:18:34 GMT -5
By: chrisl_is_chrisl 25 Oct 2009, 12:13 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880314 of 880323 Jump to msg. # About 9 months ago there was a small group of us that were pursuing legal action against a couple of entities. We did not go out on the boards looking for financial assistance like these people are doing. We were going to fund this ourselves. We spoke to a couple of high powered attorneys that have dealt with the SEC and companies that are corrupt. It never materialized cause there is nothing to go after. Once they researched what was provided to them thru documentation that is available from public records it comes down to there is noting to go after. It is just a matter of time before bhollenegg and others start to ask for money. The day they ask for money is the day you should question their true motives. You have been warned. I have it on good authority that the assumptions made by Chrisl in this post are way off target. But, when he and others tried to go after this legally...I'm not surprised that they ran into legal blockades. I'm sure there will be some...and this won't be easy. Just as certain as I am that Hodges didn't go into this blindly. pr
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 26, 2009 6:45:02 GMT -5
talking about Frizzell....from an old update
Posted by: jimmym4 Date: Sunday, October 25, 2009 7:04:33 PM In reply to: mretgnol who wrote msg# 281769 Post # of 281804
he has the proof..Read this>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
this request is being made on behalf of 5,050 shareholders of CMKX stock. These shareholders own over 300 billion shares of common stock. This number does not include shareholders who possess certificates of ownership. A current NOBO/OBO list has confirmed that there exists a minimum of 59,669 accounts in various firms with holdings of CMKX. A December 2004 certificate detail report from the transfer agent states that 2033 people hold certificates of ownership. Those certificates represent 326 billion shares being held by individuals other than Cede and Co. By these numbers 626 billion shares are owned by only 7,083 shareholders. The company states that 703 billion shares are issued and outstanding. The CMKX shareholders that own the balance of the 59,669 accounts (an estimated 50,000) are confirmed owners of the remaining of the outstanding stock. I trust you can understand our need for the information requested in this document. I will be glad to provide you with documentation of my group’s share ownership upon your request.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 26, 2009 6:47:03 GMT -5
supercim DIAMOND JEDI MASTER April 19, 2007 : Last Day of Cert Count « Thread Started Yesterday at 11:36pm » The shareholders really do not have a real count of how many certificates were given out. The cert counting page was taken down and off the internet before we reached 703 billion shares. The number of shareholders may be up to 60K. web.archive.org/web/20070419160614/http://www.cmkmtaskforce.com/Total Received Fax's: 42723 Total Fax's Filed: 42723 Number of Certs: 55495 Total Shares: 634,983,934,884 Number of Shareholders: 39863 cmkxdiamonds DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: April 19, 2007 : Last Day of Cert Count « Reply #2 Today at 6:02am » they obviously got what they needed...
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 26, 2009 6:59:35 GMT -5
By: lilburrito0 25 Oct 2009, 04:21 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880359 of 880511 (Reply to 880356 by whereistheend) OMG Ines, you are running away from the problem (again).
Re: the conversation is about mark faulk, and cmkx, and him and you not willing to talk about nss in cmkx and also his change of not wanting even to say nss or naked shorting, but now he says failed to deliver.
Yep!
That's because of what happened after the evidence was looked over by the two lawfirms.
Re: Now tell me, after all this time, that we have been revoked, and all the time we have given to brokers to send out certs and straighten their books, how can we even call any of our shares failed to deliver.. when they are really naked shorted?
If you have a certificate, then you don't have any NSS shares (or FTD shares).
Those that still have electronic shares with their broker fall into the category of holding NSS (FTD's).
Re: and yes i remember jefferies letter well.
Good! Then you're aware of the two CMKM insiders that were shorting CMKX and covering (closing) the short sale with a certifiate?
By: whereistheend 25 Oct 2009, 10:06 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 880459 of 880511 (Reply to 880359 by lilburrito0) response to burrito,
1. talking about 2 law firms looking at the case and refusing to take it. My understanding is that you said 2 law firms looked at the case, that refering to shareholders effort to find law firms and not mark faulk or cmkx.. which is 2 different things.
are you talking about 2 law firms looking at the evidence presented by shareholders or mark faulk and the company?
2. the shareholders really do not have a real count of how many certificates were given out. The cert counting page was taken down and off the internet before we reached 703 billion shares.
I personaly did not like that the page was taken off the net so abruptly when we got at around 622 or so.. not sure but around.
I have a sense of mistrust and foul play whenever there are issues that others did not want out.. like sec not wanting us calling of our certs nor god forbid proving nss..and off course SEC was on our neck and calling all the members of the task force for the depositions as soon as we called for certs.
Even more, as we have read it, Mr Pettillon from SEC.. or similar name.. warned Frizzell that they dont want the company to try to cause some kind of short squeeze ..
Now obviously .. SEC was concerned with short squeeze.. protecting shorty .. more then protecting the company itself of its shareholders, which are investors in this financial system of usa.
It is more then obvious from our little universe cmkx .. to the whole universe of fin markets of usa that SEC can not be trusted.
So whats the real share count.. I dont think i have the real info. Cert counting page was pulled at around 622 or 650 billiion shares .. and I would not be surprized that SEC forced company to do it.
Were all the shares counted in at that point.. is a secret.
3. I will read it again, but i do not remember any mention of cmkx insiders to that case. I only remember that jefferies did not count any orders that were larger then 10 mill shares .. because their system was off.. bs excuse imo.
No place in Jefferies letter did I see any mention or connection to any insiders.. nor they mentioned it.
And by the way, when Mark Faulk was asked about same jefferies letter on his cfrn show, he said that jefferies covered their position. Again, I did not see any documents that showed me or other shareholders what happened with that jefferies situation after.
So how can Mark Faulk be sure that they have covered? And when and how did you connect Jefferies "oversight" in their system that shut off recording any trades that were larger then exactly 999,999 shares.. to insiders?
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Oct 26, 2009 11:05:52 GMT -5
The ones that should be SUED now are the GOV AGIENCIES for allowing all this to happen IMO...along with those IN CHARGE right now...I think the more trouble the BETTER...and may the GODS BLESS anyone or entities that have the resources to pursue this to the END OF TIMES...IMO...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|