|
Post by shrubberpa on Dec 30, 2009 20:10:24 GMT -5
I wonder ,what information Mr.Hodges got from the unshareholders ?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 30, 2009 23:12:26 GMT -5
KFL DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
What you fail to realize is that Al Hodges, Esq. is bound by the constraints of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 11, which provides in pertinent part, sanctions, including disbarment (loss of law license), for the filing of frivolous litigation by an attorney in Federal District Court. Additionally, you left out the key phrase "in excess of", which clearly infers that $3.78 Trillion is the minimum low end of alleged damages. Are you actually suggesting that Al has somehow "fudged" his damages allegation?
A man of Al's integrity, professionalism and ethical conduct clearly would not risk nor jeopardize his impeccable, forty year legal reputation by filing an allegation of damages that exceeds the evidence in his possession.
On the other hand, how did you arrive at your conjecture and speculation that "3.8 trillion in damages [seems] to be extremely high...." Did you use tea leaves or just winged it?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 31, 2009 10:48:04 GMT -5
Hopefully Bhollenegg or Al will comment on this email??By: unpaltalker 30 Dec 2009, 10:33 PM EST Rating: Msg. 895314 of 895358 Jump to msg. # From: Bill Majcher To: XXXXXX Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 4:59:15 PM Subject: RE: lawsuit Hi XXXXX, I will be brief and to the point. I have never heard of CMKX. I have never spoken with Bob Maheu and I have never been part of any negotiations or discussions whatsoever in this matter. The statement you have highlighted concerning me is 100% false and a fabrication. The issue of naked short selling was something that definitely I was aware of but during my tenure with the RCMP I never opened a single active investigation, although information about the practice was discussed on occasion by people who claimed to be victims of the practice. I definitely did not get involved in any negotiation of a settlement with anyone for any reason. While I sympathize with victims of naked short selling and hope they find justice, I have zero knowledge of the allegations made out in the purported statement of claim drafted by Hodges and Associates. I would appreciate any further information you may have in this matter. Thanks for the email. Regards, Bill William Majcher, Managing Director
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 31, 2009 11:16:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Dec 31, 2009 11:38:34 GMT -5
Hopefully Bhollenegg or Al will comment on this email??By: unpaltalker 30 Dec 2009, 10:33 PM EST Rating: Msg. 895314 of 895358 Jump to msg. # From: Bill Majcher To: XXXXXX Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 4:59:15 PM Subject: RE: lawsuit Hi XXXXX, I will be brief and to the point. I have never heard of CMKX. I have never spoken with Bob Maheu and I have never been part of any negotiations or discussions whatsoever in this matter. The statement you have highlighted concerning me is 100% false and a fabrication. The issue of naked short selling was something that definitely I was aware of but during my tenure with the RCMP I never opened a single active investigation, although information about the practice was discussed on occasion by people who claimed to be victims of the practice. I definitely did not get involved in any negotiation of a settlement with anyone for any reason. While I sympathize with victims of naked short selling and hope they find justice, I have zero knowledge of the allegations made out in the purported statement of claim drafted by Hodges and Associates. I would appreciate any further information you may have in this matter. Thanks for the email. Regards, Bill William Majcher, Managing Director Hello Single, My first reaction was the same as yours 'WTF' (What's The Facts). Attorney Hodges' update came out on the 16th and the email was received on the 17th almost less than 24 hours, yet it makes its appearance late on the 30th on RB three days later? I question the authenticity of the email. All the best, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 31, 2009 12:03:12 GMT -5
Bob, Thanks for your quick response. I suspected the same as I know unpaltalker is not a loyal long. Although I am sure there other shareholders who are attempting to contact Mr Majcher regarding this email..... Is there any way You or Al can verify it's legitimacy or not ? As always another crazy mixed up day in CMKX world... <sigh> Thanks Single PS..... of course my first reaction was "what's the facts".... lol
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 3, 2010 0:07:52 GMT -5
By: nufced 02 Jan 2010, 12:29 PM EST Rating: Msg. 896083 of 896300 after going through some posts, whats the consensus. did Al or didn't he? say the Is he or isn't he? gonna file Monday
By: zahnj 02 Jan 2010, 02:07 PM EST Rating: Msg. 896166 of 896300 (Reply to 896083 by nufced) Nuffy,
1 Happy New Year!
2 I "know" through PT one of the plaintiffs paying AH. He swears AH is ready to file.
What do you think of the possibility that AH got to Richards and has some interesting ammo there?
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 3, 2010 0:23:46 GMT -5
By: stockrich0 02 Jan 2010, 07:28 PM EST Rating: Msg. 896229 of 896300 Hodges was always 2BE 'The Closer' ...eom
|
|
|
Post by sweettime on Jan 3, 2010 8:47:28 GMT -5
southtexan: does anyone in here know that Treffery is a plainiff in this Hodges lawsuit? JoesephM: Yes, Treffrey, Saltydog, heavyg, sheila, Bob Hollenegg, and 2-3 others
knowing that Treffery, Salty, and HeavyG are a part of the Hodges efforts just killed any and all hope i had that Hodges could back up his claims. d*mn really sucks...i was excited that the Hodges thing was legit and all his claims were legit in his update letter...
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Jan 3, 2010 11:03:40 GMT -5
It doesn't matter WHO the plaintiffs are as long as they own CMKX shares IMO...Hodges can still throw a monkey wrench into the SEC...AND subpoena the TF/OG records for our INFORMATION...since we PAID for it...I hope another THOUSAND Hodges do the same...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|