|
Post by gabbyhayes on Feb 6, 2010 19:55:58 GMT -5
Talk to us Bob Please....
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Feb 6, 2010 20:57:00 GMT -5
Gabby get ready for a long wait and get ready for the gov to do what they do best and that is stall and slow this down for years, you can thank me in 3 years when you are the only left here...turn out the lights OK
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 6, 2010 21:25:30 GMT -5
BHollenegg,
I have some questions to ask you but will understand if you cannot answer them. Answer what you feel comfortable answering.
1. Is Al in contact with a credible entity (in your humble opinion)that has authority to get us paid? (Meaning someone from the Govt, Trust Adminstrator, etc)?
2. If question 1 is true, does Al feel (in your humble opinion) that the other side is cooperating now?
3. Has Al stated to you, others that viable progress is now being made (in your humble opinion) and all that is left is logistical issues to work out? (I base this on your previous posts, where Al is waiting for something).
Thank you! Davesaint
Hello Davesaint,
1. Yes.
2. I cannot answer for Attorney Hodges on how he feels on whether the other side is cooperating now. I am not privy to all his information. I do know that if the funds are released to the Shareholders, the lawsuit will be dropped.
3. Attorney Hodges made a substantial impact on what is going on and the amount of attention being focused to the refunding program. Do not forget that the opponents are powerful and some are corrupt. It is not prudent at this stage to release detailed information before the release of the funds. CMKX is not the only ones benefiting from the release of the funds. The situation is complex. Please understand when events do not occur on our timetable.
Thank you Davesaint, BHollenegg
|
|
Irish7
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 32
|
Post by Irish7 on Feb 6, 2010 21:40:22 GMT -5
Thank you Bob.. any news is good news whether you can state the facts or not. Can you confirm that the SEC is planning on taking us to court??
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Feb 6, 2010 21:47:34 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 06 Feb 2010, 09:42 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 909522 of 909522
Jump to msg. # NEXT MOVES ANNOUNCED NOW
I will out two moves now that I was going to out tomorrow, but I have asked Al to back up his statements in court now, in my case.
I have emailed Al to request, per a previous conversation, that he back his statements and the fact this was a sting, and to back that the funds are there and the problems and the process that has really happened since he put out his update to the plaintiffs on dec. 16th.
Al told me that he would talk to me about it at the appropriate time, that time is now, as I go to court monday.
Now does this ending represent the truth, the truth would be that everyone involved wants the quickest conclusion to this. The quickest conclusion to this case, if it is not already over, is to back my default case.
In cases like this, that are this big, a default normally requires a re-serving of the defendants before a default judgement. But given the fact Al Hodges has been in talks for over a month to release the trust funds set up for us a default should just be given.
I have requested of Al to be available for a conference call with the court house on monday, and conference call to canadian gov't officials I am talking to already.
For those that thought the people could do nothing, that we are helpless, well we are far from that.
Al didn't pr his case to the world for a reason, now we hear it was sent to a couple news agencies, well we will pr his work to the world, and we will pr his confirmation of evidence given in my case on monday.
Like I said, this is now on our time, the rumor are now filed in the garbage bin, we are actually taking action to secure your money. Your donations and your call to action is the difference, you are the difference. We will not sit here helpless another day, we will not hear multiple possibilities of endings, we will make the ending.
I am preparing the most damaging opening statement in history, and I will present it in court for all of you. It will be our statement, and we will get it out to the media, we will get it everywhere.
We are now in control of this, not them, and if anything happens to stop me from going to court monday except payment news, I want everyone who reads this to download my case and file it at once where ever you live.
I should not have to serve the sec again, Al will hopefully testify that not only do they know full well about all of this, but that they have been front and center in talks to release our money, that they have promised Al that payment is in the process.
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 6, 2010 21:57:10 GMT -5
Thank you Bob.. any news is good news whether you can state the facts or not. Can you confirm that the SEC is planning on taking us to court?? We are taking the SEC to court.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Feb 6, 2010 21:59:45 GMT -5
Thank you Bob.. any news is good news whether you can state the facts or not. Can you confirm that the SEC is planning on taking us to court?? We are taking the SEC to court. Bob, do you personally think that this thing will see the inside of a Court room? Are you still optimistic that this thing could be resolved in the near future? Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Feb 6, 2010 22:03:49 GMT -5
The SEC will fight for many reasons but one of the first reasons is that if they lose this or settle it opens the door to many other lawsuits thats the way a lawyer would weigh this when factoring the defense or not to defend.
The second reason is even if it were say for a realistic sum of damages like 10B they would fight because they don't have to pay lawyers an hourly bill rate like we have too, they have thousands of lawyers just waiting to get in the game.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Feb 6, 2010 22:06:29 GMT -5
The SEC will fight for many reasons but one of the first reasons is that if they lose this or settle it opens the door to many other lawsuits thats the way a lawyer would weigh this when factoring the defense or not to defend. The second reason is even if it were say for a realistic sum of damages like 10B they would fight because they don't have to pay lawyers an hourly bill rate like we have too, they have thousands of lawyers just waiting to get in the game. I would rather settle for a reasonable amount of money than drag this thing out for another 2 years. Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by davesaint on Feb 6, 2010 22:14:16 GMT -5
BHollenegg,
Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I have another question that has been bugging me. Please see my question in reference to Varson's post about the SEC. Maybe you can put the question I have to rest.
Thanks,
Davesaint
|
|
|
Post by straighttalk on Feb 6, 2010 22:25:58 GMT -5
dayum ! VARNSON, I don't know how I've gotten thru life without you by my side ..
|
|
|
Post by davesaint on Feb 6, 2010 22:29:25 GMT -5
From Varson
The SEC will fight for many reasons but one of the first reasons is that if they lose this or settle it opens the door to many other lawsuits thats the way a lawyer would weigh this when factoring the defense or not to defend.
Bhollenegg - I'm hoping you can put this to rest. I see a lot of posters on the different boards stating that the SEC will fight CMKX over the funds. The question I have if this was a sting, and amounts/damages were already negotiated and agreed to by all parties (Per Al's Case), what is there to fight about? It's my understanding that the amounts/damages in question are for CMKX bonefide shareholders. If Al has undeniable evidence, agreement, trust name/s, legal signed documents what is the hold-up. I do not understand if money was collected why was/is it being held and controlled by the U.S. Government instead of an independent trustee? I understand that if the funds are released, Al drops the case.
Thanks, Davesaint
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 6, 2010 22:45:01 GMT -5
We are taking the SEC to court. Bob, do you personally think that this thing will see the inside of a Court room? Are you still optimistic that this thing could be resolved in the near future? Briwadd no, very optimistic
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 7, 2010 0:08:59 GMT -5
Mr. Hollenegg its encouraging to me that you are still optimistic. I look forward to the coming days but I will admit that I don't feel this will be over anytime soon. I understand we are taking the SEC to court but is it not fair to say that the SEC has a multitude of ways they can and will try to beat us when we go to court? I understand that Mr. Hodges or Gusjarvis cannot devuldge their ammunition until the time is right, but I just can't wrap my head around the amount we are seeking. Why won't we be laughed right out of court? If the powers that be are corrupt from the top down how in the world can we expect any kind of fair treatment? With all the descrepancies we have uncovered within prior testimonies where does the emperical evidence lie to hold the SEC, DTCC et al over the end of our double-barrell shotgun? I hope you find the time to respond to my questions but if not I do understand. Thank you in advance Mr. Hollenegg. ~twolilfish~ Please do not underestimate Attorney Hodges. 3.78 Trillion is not a fantasy number. The British filed a complaint against the SEC for 5 Trillion Dollars. Watch this video...the Federal Reserve cannot account for 9 Trillion Dollars...they aren't laughing. www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJqM2tFOxLQ&feature=related
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Feb 7, 2010 0:13:45 GMT -5
Hey, Bob, thanks for sharing with us your input. We do appreciate it. You're too kind.
|
|