|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 8, 2010 22:13:47 GMT -5
By: briwaddtx 08 Feb 2010, 07:39 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910114 of 910181
Jump to msg. # Gus, I think
you and your coalition need to become one of Hodges Planitffs! It is only my opinion, but if you are going to fight this battle on behalf of all shareholders, I would feel more comfortable knowing that you (we) are being represented by legal counsel.
Once again, it is alot easier to make an argument when there is no opposing view point present.
Briwadd
By: gusjarvis 08 Feb 2010, 08:04 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910119 of 910181 (Reply to 910114 by briwaddtx)
Jump to msg. # briwaddtx that would take away one thing
I can do wtf I want any time I want
I will try and be apart of the talks for you and everyone who are just ordinary people, there is a difference even though I believe al is 100% behind you.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 8, 2010 22:16:04 GMT -5
By: narvo0 08 Feb 2010, 06:14 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910070 of 910181
Jump to msg. # Gus, is this still a go from your post yesterday? You will pr the evidence? tia.............
Al didn't pr his case to the world for a reason, now we hear it was sent to a couple news agencies, well we will pr his work to the world, and we will pr his confirmation of evidence given in my case on monday.
NEXT MOVES ANNOUNCED NOW
I will out two moves now that I was going to out tomorrow, but I have asked Al to back up his statements in court now, in my case.
I have emailed Al to request, per a previous conversation, that he back his statements and the fact this was a sting, and to back that the funds are there and the problems and the process that has really happened since he put out his update to the plaintiffs on dec. 16th.
Al told me that he would talk to me about it at the appropriate time, that time is now, as I go to court monday.
Now does this ending represent the truth, the truth would be that everyone involved wants the quickest conclusion to this. The quickest conclusion to this case, if it is not already over, is to back my default case.
In cases like this, that are this big, a default normally requires a re-serving of the defendants before a default judgement. But given the fact Al Hodges has been in talks for over a month to release the trust funds set up for us a default should just be given.
I have requested of Al to be available for a conference call with the court house on monday, and conference call to canadian gov't officials I am talking to already.
For those that thought the people could do nothing, that we are helpless, well we are far from that.
Al didn't pr his case to the world for a reason, now we hear it was sent to a couple news agencies, well we will pr his work to the world, and we will pr his confirmation of evidence given in my case on monday.
Like I said, this is now on our time, the rumor are now filed in the garbage bin, we are actually taking action to secure your money. Your donations and your call to action is the difference, you are the difference. We will not sit here helpless another day, we will not hear multiple possibilities of endings, we will make the ending.
I am preparing the most damaging opening statement in history, and I will present it in court for all of you. It will be our statement, and we will get it out to the media, we will get it everywhere.
We are now in control of this, not them, and if anything happens to stop me from going to court monday except payment news, I want everyone who reads this to download my case and file it at once where ever you live.
I should not have to serve the sec again, Al will hopefully testify that not only do they know full well about all of this, but that they have been front and center in talks to release our money, that they have promised Al that payment is in the process
By: gusjarvis 08 Feb 2010, 06:18 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910074 of 910181 (Reply to 910070 by narvo0)
Jump to msg. # narvo it has already started behind the scenes
but yes, and as I said I hope you are not too burnt out for this:
we are as a group going to do many things but first and fore most, the very first thing that could end this the quickest, is to get the word out.
So this is not about me, it is about us, and the coalition can pr anything we want. So to start a list of media who refuse to report the largest crime in history. We could add all sorts of things like eagletechs case if we want, but to get going the quickest we have the information that the WSJ and Washington Post have not run Al's story, that is where we start.
We start by asking them why not first and reporting any good answers, actually phoning there and talking to them, and actually emailing both of them and asking them why they are not running this story. Then we make a contact list with real names on it of people in each media outlet we pick, ie nbc, bloomberg, cnbc, everyone, but one at a time with names that we can include in the list. We will tell them they will be on the list if they refuse to report the story.
I went to my local media and ask them to run this story, I have the name of the cbc reporter and will include his name and a supervisor if they will not run this story.
I am talking to my M.P. and M.L.A, if they do nothing at all, they will be on my list, but it is about getting the media first to do something, to force them to act.
We are a huge group so lets systematically call them out, the game starts now with wsj and washington post, we send them this and ask them simply when they are going to run this or why they aren't, and get a name to report back with. It doesn't matter where this came from, it is true so send it or whatever you want to say that is similar. Game on
CMKM/CMKX CASE DOCUMENTS: Press Archive for this report [29th January 2010] Case Number CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx): SERVICE OF CMKM.CMKX $3.87 TRILLION SUIT VS. S.E.C. The biggest lawsuit in world legal history: The phantom share giga-scandal.
Note: If the current report [7th February 2010] is displayed, access the Archive for immediate display of our CMKM/CMKX report dated 29th January. All preceding reports, at least back to December, are also relevant to the current state of tension brought about by these gangsters.
NEW REPORT STARTS HERE:
WALL STREET JOURNAL, WASHINGTON POST SILENT ON $3.87 TRILLION SUIT On or approximately 11th January 2010, Mr A. Clifton Hodges, of Hodges and Associates, Pasadena, California, lawyers for the CMKM/CMKX Plaintiffs in their suit against the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] [Case Number: CV10-00031 JVS (MLGx)] filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, sent copies of the Complaint seeking monetary payment of $3.87 trillion in the biggest financial fraud case in world history, to the following two US newspapers:
• The Wall Street Journal.
• The Washington Post.
Mr Hodges informed the Editor of this fact by telephone from California in the early evening UK time on Saturday 6th February 2010.
By the date of this report, neither of these so-called ‘mainstream’ newspapers, had mentioned or covered this filing – notwithstanding that this is the biggest fraud case taken to court in history.
We hereby PROVE to you that the so-called ‘mainstream’ press and media in the United States are in fact, as we have repeatedly pointed out, FAILING in their Fourth Estate duty to hold authority to account. Or, to put the matter more succinctly:
• The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post are disgracefully failing to inform the American and international publics about the biggest fraud case in world history, in which about 2.25 trillion of Phantom Shares were floated from within the very body body that is supposed to REGULATE the securities markets – the Securities and Exchange Commission itself.
U.S. NEWSPAPERS IN CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE RE GIGA-SUIT AGAINST THE S.E.C. Whatever the reason for the dereliction of their duty to inform the American people and the world of this 2.25 trillion Phantom Shares case, failure to perform on the part of these components of the Fourth Estate confirms, beyond all doubt, that these big US newspapers are not doing their job properly. The papers have been in possession of $3.87 trillion complaint for three weeks already.
By: narvo0 08 Feb 2010, 06:29 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910080 of 910181 (Reply to 910074 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Gotcha Gus, sounds like fun, but are you going to pr his confirmation of evidence? Keep dateline last as they may end up seeing the names on the list and not seeing their name on it and probably run it. IMO.
Thank you Gus & co.!
By: gusjarvis 08 Feb 2010, 08:36 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910124 of 910181 (Reply to 910080 by narvo0)
Jump to msg. # narvo a pr is being written right now, it will though
also include the fact that certain media are purposely not reporting the largest fraud case in history. I am making a list of culprits starting now of just who is colluding to not report this and other very important stories.
The media did not cover eagletech's rico case, john oquinns rico class action the largest in the world, it did not pr many huge stories related to this crime. The pr will be as soon as possible.
I will talk to Al and select what to put in the pr later this week. Hang in there my friend, and know just because this action is taking place to force issues, issues are being worked on behind the scenes.
Also, I am including other names now that I have to refile, those entities are being talked to before their names go in.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 8, 2010 22:17:24 GMT -5
By: briwaddtx 08 Feb 2010, 08:50 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910134 of 910182 (Reply to 910119 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # lol, gusjarvis
Luckily for you, if Al has a case, this will never see the inside of a Court room. If this case does go to Court, you are going to luck like an idiot up against the SEC's attorneys!
If what you are saying is true regarding your conversations with Al and Al has in fact told you that he is working with the SEC directly, then that puts me at ease.
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 8, 2010 22:18:14 GMT -5
By: jfarn 08 Feb 2010, 08:57 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910138 of 910183 (Reply to 910122 by gusjarvis)
Jump to msg. # Hey Gus, got a call that you were looking for some info. Your timing is uncanny. I sent Al Hodges a message tonight re: your recent commentary re: the SEC.
I have recently provided Al with David's direct office line and encouraged him to call. He had Dennis call in his stead and I believe Dennis spoke to two of his investigators. Al can provide you his number, his email, my email, and my number.
Thanks for your work Gus.
Sincerely
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Feb 8, 2010 22:19:26 GMT -5
By: briwaddtx 08 Feb 2010, 10:05 PM EST Rating: Msg. 910174 of 910184 (Reply to 910171 by sharasilva)
Jump to msg. # Obviously I did not mean
'everyone'; however, many do think Al has a strong case. I am prepared to give Al Hodges the benefit of the doubt. He has made some serious allegations and I have trouble believing that he is flying by the seat of his pants. I do not buy into the fact that he accepted the case just to make a buck off the plantiffs.
I am cautiously optimistic of a positive outcome; however, I do not believe in the ridiculous pps that many of these 'nuts' are proclaiming on the boards and in Pal Talk.
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Feb 8, 2010 22:23:49 GMT -5
ptrk99, Why is it when someone tries to vent and talk about the truth they get jumped on, I know I'm in the same seats your in. I'm just saying what 90% of the shareholders feel, they are tired of the B.S. all the guru's who think they have the answers and are NEVER right. I didn't know if you're in direct connect with the insiders and have the facts and know with all, or that you know exactly how this is going to end, why don't you share your proof of what you think is happening since you seem to want to defend the obvious. All we have is hear say and not one ounce of true FACT in writing that says how much has been collect other than a judge ruled 33 million in default against Urban which I haven't seen one penny of. Look I want my money I deserve as well as you, but it's this cult like rumor mill that everyone buys into that has not once ounce of proof that we will be paid, I'm just waking up after buying into it myself for 6 1/2 years. We as shareholders had our chance a long time ago to do something about it, it's too late for us as a group to do anything about it now, if Mr. Hodges doesn't get the so called money released that he says is there within the next month, will you then realize he is stalling just like those before him? or will you still be sitting in these cheap seats talking about the same ole' thing, which is RUMORS. Wished I could be more positive at this point but sorry I can't, trust me I won't say another word. But if you still want to show me some proof of your information let me know. Until then stop dogging me for what I think is happening, it's not like I or you are able to buy or sell our stock. Trust me I'm sure many feel like I do. Don We have some SOLID FACTS not rumor or hearsay:
1- Tyler is a an ongoing concern with an attorney (100% dedicated to CMKX), CEO and staff running for several years (Who's financing them and to what end).
2- We have a CA attorney (AH) expending a considerable amount of capital (financial & political) on CMKX, not to mention his credibility and legacy are on the line.
3- Mineral Claims with unknown value, that have yet to be determined and a PR from Tyler saying stay tuned for a new Corp. TBA.....
4- Arrest warrant for UC, who is in our back yard in a country that we have all kinds of ties and treaties with and he is still on the loose.
5- A one of a kind Cert pull unrivaled in history of the markets.
6- No CMKX bankruptcy filing to date.
............................................etc
Above are facts that makes you think and contemplate all day long, on the other hand, the above facts do not constitute evidence of future share holder value. Our hope is that somewhere, be that in Tyler or with Mr. Al Hodges or both; that such evidence of share holder value exist...
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Feb 8, 2010 22:27:33 GMT -5
Rambo, I always liked that bit of evidence that Bob Hollenegg discovered; you know, the one about the hot-rod shop and Maheu's direction of it. That's one thing that's always kept me from falling over the edge of despair.
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Feb 8, 2010 22:30:45 GMT -5
Rambo, I always liked that bit of evidence that Bob Hollenegg discovered; you know, the one about the hot-rod shop and Maheu's direction of it. That's one thing that's always kept me from falling over the edge of despair. I guessed I missed that, whatcha talking about? Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by UponThisRock88 on Feb 8, 2010 22:45:54 GMT -5
Rambo, I always liked that bit of evidence that Bob Hollenegg discovered; you know, the one about the hot-rod shop and Maheu's direction of it. That's one thing that's always kept me from falling over the edge of despair. I guessed I missed that, whatcha talking about? Briwadd Is this it?? by: bhollenegg 31 dec 2005, 09:16 am est msg. 293361 of 293381 jump to msg. # the world’s most expensive diamond, the cmkx/cim nss hope diamond, produced by the casavant sting, setup by ex-s.e.c. sarbanes oxley expert and sting architect, roger glenn, implemented by stoecklein law institute, and the final result carved and polished by the cmkx nss diamond’s and shareholders’ guardian, robert maheu. cmkx held claims to vast areas of some of the world’s most lucrative mineral deposits. cmkx was brazenly turned into a minefield by hedge funds, competitors, mms, and brokerage firms trying to short the company into bankruptcy and ultimately carving up the spoils amongst themselves. fortunately for shareholders, cmkx was used as the vehicle to deliver stoecklein and maheu to the perpetrators. the information from the s.e.c. files gathered from their website, forms a picture of the impending sting. “donald j. stoecklein (stoecklein), current counsel for cmkm diamonds, owns the securities law institute in las vegas, nevada, which assists approximately forty-two public companies in their periodic reporting obligations, including cmkm diamonds. (tr. 315-16.)” donald stoecklein and debbie amigone, from stoecklein security law institute, worked closely with jonathan katz, secretary of security exchange commission, on “the final rule”, which covers investor protection, naked shorting, sho, shell company mergers and reporting. it was donald stoecklein who according to the s.e.c. brought robert maheu into the picture. “robert maheu (maheu) has known stoecklein for a number of years and is part of a team assembled by stoecklein, which maheu believes will clear up past mistakes and will result in compliance going forward. (tr. 285-86, 296.) maheu set up the small defense plant administration fifty years ago, and later the small business administration. (tr. 285, 287.)”. what part does debbie amigone have in this picture? the sting was almost unraveled by a shareholder and a cover up was implemented….”in february 2005, debbie amigone was one of stoecklein's employees working on cmkm diamonds matters. (tr. 163.)””on march 4, 2005, cmkm diamonds announced that, effective march 1, 2005, it had relocated its executive offices to 5375 procyon street, suite 101, las vegas, nevada. (div. ex. 53.) however, as of april 6, 2005, this address was occupied only by a "hot rod" shop. (div. ex. 55.) "debbie" at the securities law institute, which is owned by cmkm diamond’s counsel, reported in an e-mail sent on april 6, 2005, that a shareholder had visited the site, discovered this fact, and reported it on the company's web site.6 "debbie" advised that "you might want to call urban [casavant] or michael and have them 'move in' and talk to the owner of the hot rod shop and also tell andy what to tell shareholders when they call." (div. ex. 55.)” i feel the value of cmkx’s claims is known because…“stoecklein also owns opus pointe, which is an accounting and bookkeeping company and a division of the securities law institute. (tr. 167, 326-27.) opus point and the securities law institute are working on cmkm diamond matters and an employee of each firm testified at the public hearing. (tr. 167, 314.) 9. cmkm diamonds did not pay opus pointe's retainer; rather, it was paid by the securities law institute. (tr. 169.)” what’s missing from the picture is the settlement. robert maheu is inspecting the final cut, cim, making sure there are no nss flaws before providing each shareholder their share of the world’s most expensive diamond, the cmkx/cim nss hope diamond. keep the pressure up with your brokerage, fax your certs in. we are in good hands. bhollenegg references: www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id291bpm.htm www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/gbfor23.pdf stoecklein law group working closely with the sec for “ amendment to the penny stock rules” www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/txt-srch-sec?text=stoecklein§ion=entire+website&sort=date www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-51983fr.pdf stoecklein’s email, cc debbie amigone to jonathan katz secretary of sec comments on proposed rules concerning naked shorting www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303/stoecklein010504.txt :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel: :propel:
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Feb 8, 2010 23:02:04 GMT -5
You all don't get where I'm going with this, I'm trying to get everyone to ask for fact (in writing) from these individuals that claim so much.
Trust me, I want to win and yes we have a lot of things that could be possibilities but not one solid true piece of evidence, if the money has been collected for all the reasons claimed, then why is it not released?
Your missing my point, I have for 2 years tried to get shareholders to rally and force their hand and no one has responded with, Yes, let's go to Washington and protest. Instead there is this group of shareholder gurus that keep feeding you empty rumors that keep you from rallying the shareholders on Washington.
All I'm saying is we have trusted so many so called rumors for 6 1/2 years and all they have done is kept us sitting in front of our computers and buying the BS.
Those who want this to stall this are winning the battle by watching the shareholder base sit and wait for the next date. What I'm truly trying to say is Mr. Hodges is part of the stall, I said it after his second contact with us. It may pan out but I personally don't think it's going to happen anytime soon.
This is why I said nothing will happen until this coming fall, you watch. You can call me stupid all you want.
Don
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Feb 8, 2010 23:14:42 GMT -5
You all don't get where I'm going with this, I'm trying to get everyone to ask for fact (in writing) from these individuals that claim so much. Trust me, I want to win and yes we have a lot of things that could be possibilities but not one solid true piece of evidence, if the money has been collected for all the reasons claimed, then why is it not released? Your missing my point, I have for 2 years tried to get shareholders to rally and force their hand and no one has responded with, Yes, let's go to Washington and protest. Instead there is this group of shareholder gurus that keep feeding you empty rumors that keep you from rallying the shareholders on Washington. All I'm saying is we have trusted so many so called rumors for 6 1/2 years and all they have done is kept us sitting in front of our computers and buying the BS. Those who want this to stall this are winning the battle by watching the shareholder base sit and wait for the next date. What I'm truly trying to say is Mr. Hodges is part of the stall, I said it after his second contact with us. It may pan out but I personally don't think it's going to happen anytime soon. This is why I said nothing will happen until this coming fall, you watch. You can call me stupid all you want. Don You couldn't be more wrong IMO! While I am truly frustrated (as everyone else). I don't believe for 2 seconds that Al Hodges is intentionally stalling, that's complete nonsense. In fact, I believe that he is our best asset to date. Yes, I would like to hear tomorrow that we are getting paid, but the sheer magnitude of this thing would inevitably lead to delay after delay. I am hoping we at least get an update from Hodges this week explaining the delays if they continue. I don't need money this week, I just want confirmation from some government entity acknowledging that there is money that is pending distribution to shareholders. Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Feb 8, 2010 23:19:22 GMT -5
Rambo, I always liked that bit of evidence that Bob Hollenegg discovered; you know, the one about the hot-rod shop and Maheu's direction of it. That's one thing that's always kept me from falling over the edge of despair. I guessed I missed that, whatcha talking about? Briwadd Briwadd, yes, UTR posted the info. Thanks UTR. I extracted the specific data from his post: what part does debbie amigone have in this picture? the sting was almost unraveled by a shareholder and a cover up was implemented….”in february 2005, debbie amigone was one of stoecklein's employees working on cmkm diamonds matters. (tr. 163.)””on march 4, 2005, cmkm diamonds announced that, effective march 1, 2005, it had relocated its executive offices to 5375 procyon street, suite 101, las vegas, nevada. (div. ex. 53.) however, as of april 6, 2005, this address was occupied only by a "hot rod" shop. (div. ex. 55.) "debbie" at the securities law institute, which is owned by cmkm diamond’s counsel, reported in an e-mail sent on april 6, 2005, that a shareholder had visited the site, discovered this fact, and reported it on the company's web site.6 "debbie" advised that "you might want to call urban [casavant] or michael and have them 'move in' and talk to the owner of the hot rod shop and also tell andy what to tell shareholders when they call." (div. ex. 55.)”
|
|
|
Post by transversal on Feb 9, 2010 0:48:33 GMT -5
ptrk99, Why is it when someone tries to vent and talk about the truth they get jumped on, I know I'm in the same seats your in. I'm just saying what 90% of the shareholders feel, they are tired of the B.S. all the guru's who think they have the answers and are NEVER right. I didn't know if you're in direct connect with the insiders and have the facts and know with all, or that you know exactly how this is going to end, why don't you share your proof of what you think is happening since you seem to want to defend the obvious. All we have is hear say and not one ounce of true FACT in writing that says how much has been collect other than a judge ruled 33 million in default against Urban which I haven't seen one penny of. Look I want my money I deserve as well as you, but it's this cult like rumor mill that everyone buys into that has not once ounce of proof that we will be paid, I'm just waking up after buying into it myself for 6 1/2 years. We as shareholders had our chance a long time ago to do something about it, it's too late for us as a group to do anything about it now, if Mr. Hodges doesn't get the so called money released that he says is there within the next month, will you then realize he is stalling just like those before him? or will you still be sitting in these cheap seats talking about the same ole' thing, which is RUMORS. Wished I could be more positive at this point but sorry I can't, trust me I won't say another word. But if you still want to show me some proof of your information let me know. Until then stop dogging me for what I think is happening, it's not like I or you are able to buy or sell our stock. Trust me I'm sure many feel like I do. Don We have some SOLID FACTS not rumor or hearsay:
1- Tyler is a an ongoing concern with an attorney (100% dedicated to CMKX), CEO and staff running for several years (Who's financing them and to what end).
2- We have a CA attorney (AH) expending a considerable amount of capital (financial & political) on CMKX, not to mention his credibility and legacy are on the line.
3- Mineral Claims with unknown value, that have yet to be determined and a PR from Tyler saying stay tuned for a new Corp. TBA.....
4- Arrest warrant for UC, who is in our back yard in a country that we have all kinds of ties and treaties with and he is still on the loose.
5- A one of a kind Cert pull unrivaled in history of the markets.
6- No CMKX bankruptcy filing to date.
............................................etc
Above are facts that makes you think and contemplate all day long, on the other hand, the above facts do not constitute evidence of future share holder value. Our hope is that somewhere, be that in Tyler or with Mr. Al Hodges or both; that such evidence of share holder value exist... Johnjrambothe2nd, please confine these types of comments to the Very Large Font thread.
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Feb 9, 2010 8:14:47 GMT -5
Yep there is 20% of USA GDP sitting in some account when the USA can not pay its interest on its debt in the first place. There is not 3.7T in any account at the moment on earth people believe it because they have not a clue as to how much a TRILLION is. AH uses a formula and that is why that # is so ridiculously high and never, ever will be paid on or in the MSM because it will be found to frivilous in nature.
Maybe .005 to .01 but dollars for undeveloped land which we don't even know if there were claims in the first place. UC could not file on time to keep the SEC happy I am sure he screwed up the claims paper work as well. Remember in the Gov case they say all the PRs were BS and UC lied on all of them. That is why I am wary of all this...because of the company's past and UC in particular not a success story in any way.
|
|
|
Post by BHollenegg on Feb 9, 2010 8:28:36 GMT -5
Mr. BHollenegg, You stated in the below post: « Reply #564 Today at 12:08am » Please do not underestimate Attorney Hodges. 3.78 Trillion is not a fantasy number. The British filed a complaint against the SEC for 5 Trillion Dollars. Watch this video...the Federal Reserve cannot account for 9 Trillion Dollars...they aren't laughingQuestion from Davesaint to BHollenegg in a previous post from Sunday: 1. The Al suit is for 3.87 trillion dollars. Do you know if this is the "Real Amount" that is owed to CMKX shareholders (is there evidence showing this) or is this amount that is for all settlements to many other parties other than CMKX (other stock settlments, etc)? 2. Is this why it's taking so long because we (CMKX) are lumped in with other settlements?
Many shareholders expect payment of over $5 per share based on the 703 billion shares / by $3.87 trillion dollars. My own opinion it's going to be way less. Thanks, Davesaint Hello Davesaint...I did not state the information below: "Question from Davesaint to BHollenegg in a previous post from Sunday: 1. The Al suit is for 3.87 trillion dollars. Do you know if this is the "Real Amount" that is owed to CMKX shareholders (is there evidence showing this) or is this amount that is for all settlements to many other parties other than CMKX (other stock settlments, etc)? 2. Is this why it's taking so long because we (CMKX) are lumped in with other settlements?
Many shareholders expect payment of over $5 per share based on the 703 billion shares / by $3.87 trillion dollars. My own opinion it's going to be way less." [/i] If these are your comments, then please do not mix it up with my comments. Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|