|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 21, 2010 9:56:00 GMT -5
By: swordfish168 21 Mar 2010, 12:18 AM EDT Rating: Msg. 920308 of 920322 if what Hodges claimed is true there better be alot of money held for investors because if there is no money (or very little) there will be many lawsuits and class action lawsuits against the US government, Congressional hearings, indictments ETC..........................
with 50,000 investors and many years involved "WE" will not let it just GO AWAY.
YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK !!!!
best, mike
p.s. even if we get paid there still might be the above happen
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Mar 21, 2010 10:27:53 GMT -5
I agree with Mike on this, this shareholder base is too entrenched in getting restitution and seeing individuals getting a cell next to Bernie Madoff.
They know that Mr. Hodges is going to go the distance and so are the shareholders, I still think we need to get a rally put together on Wall Street and try to get at least 10,000 shareholders to put pressure on for Mr. Hodges.
I still think we will be paid, but I also think it's overdue for the shareholders to put a physical presence and pressure on the steps of the NYSE and the SEC.
I think it's time to charge the field and bring down the goal posts. We have stood on the sidelines for too long.
If we mention regulation reform within our rally it will get media attention, sometimes you have to mention other things in your rally so that the media gets involved and then you lift up your signs that reveal your true reason for the rally, of course you still push for regulation reform but when the camera's are rolling, you make sure every sign has CMKX on it, mentioning the lawsuit.
Watch for who attacks me on this, I'm telling you they definitely don't want to see us do this. If health care reform is passed this weekend and is no longer consuming the media, I say it's time to go for it.
Don IMO!
|
|
|
Post by georgie18 on Mar 21, 2010 11:49:27 GMT -5
Don....well stated and though I understand your premise I do disagree for one reason only. At least to the best of my knowledge we do not have at our disposal that one document (which Al Hodges supposedly has) that can without a reasonable doubt prove our case...yes we have tidbits, but there is always that one shred of evidence that will put you over the top and I believe that is what we as shareholders are missing. So in my estimation even if we can gather 10,000 shareholders and someone credible can hear our plight what can we give them in document form that they would take a leap of faith for us and not look at us like another bunch of disgruntled shareholders? I understand bringing attention to our cause is a good thing but the timing must be right and I believe that Al Hodges with his some 40 years of experience would make that call if he felt it would enhance our position. According to what's out there we are speaking of a tremendous amount of power and money .....so just one rusty screw out of place can tear down a well oiled machine. When Al Hodges makes a decision he does so knowing fully about what is going on behind closed doors...so his decision can be rational...we on the other-hand know very little if anything that has transpired within this case which can lead to irrational thinking. Maybe this has been resolved as we write who knows....GLTA
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Mar 21, 2010 13:40:42 GMT -5
I totally understand where your coming from, but my point is that you never ease up on the pressure, this is not to say Al doesn't and can't win without us, I believe and have said Al is just part of this long drawn out plan to get the entire issue resolved.
But when your in a fight, do you only hit your opponent once or twice or do you hit him with everything you got from every angle?
This has been kept silent for years because of that mentality and certain people like Jay Adobe and ACCA playing their role in keeping the shareholders sitting in their seats and watching with hope instead of getting into the fight. Now, I'm not saying they were bad but do you understand what I'm trying to say? Yes, in the end we will win, but how many shareholders have passed or have become seriously ill during this long journey?
We will be OK, in my opinion but as you can see, they have put certain people into the mix that I believe have been paid just to keep us sitting on our hands for years.
I think it's time for the BS to come to a end and pay up and I'm sure you agree. But like I have been saying, I think we have a ways to go, I wished I didn't feel this way but hey, it's the truth.
Don IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 21, 2010 16:47:38 GMT -5
seems Kevin West has a way of sticking foot in mouth....has on a few different occassions....c'mon Kevin get your "stories" straight !! ty sully47 & pennypauly Kevin West via phone last week..... « Thread Started Today at 10:57am » My friend Frank from New York called me.....he had just received a return call from Kevin West (you have to call Frizzies office....leave a message....and Kevin hopefully will return the call). Kevin said that they are in litigation with Ed Koch over the assay samples. Further, Kevin said he had never seen them and don't know what they contain. WHOA! WAIT A MINUTE! Didn't Kevin say he traveled up to Canada to look at the core samples? I believe he did.....
|
|
|
Post by brodiggy on Mar 21, 2010 18:37:30 GMT -5
MR. bahama Pete do you have anything new to comment about your conversations with Koch. Thank you, I remember the December phone conversation you had posted and it sounded good. My opinion is that this Kevin West is on a bit of power trip just thought you sir could shed some light on this..
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Mar 22, 2010 9:21:52 GMT -5
Isn't UC in Canadian court today?
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Mar 22, 2010 13:37:03 GMT -5
From PalTalk Scroll (FWIW):
(9:58 AM) golddigger_8: at this point wyatt i dont understand why all shareholders cant be privy to the info u have - ? not trying to be disrespectful just frustrated. I am ready for payment - it is ridiculous having to wait ° (10:00 AM) wyatt11_11: Sorry golddigger. The information that was shared with me from Al was only to be share with the other plaintiffs. I am only to tell you that all is well and Al is upbeat and positive ° (10:00 AM) wyatt11_11: Gold we all are ready and need payment (10:01 AM) golddigger_8: why would that hurt to have 50 k shareholders in the know u know? seems like it would help - i hope the other info that u know is good ° (10:02 AM) wyatt11_11: I have an unfair advantage being that I am so near to Al's office. I have been supportive of him and his actions from the beginning. At this point it is up to Al what and when to share information ° (10:03 AM) golddigger_8: whatever is hidden i hope it is good (10:03 AM) golddigger_8: wyatt - do u see this going to court? (10:03 AM) wyatt11_11: It is GOOD Gold trust me it is GOOD (10:03 AM) golddigger_8: great to hear - ty
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Mar 22, 2010 14:10:18 GMT -5
this is the same Wyatt that said last week that we would be paid...just words wyatt
|
|
|
Post by johnjrambothe2nd on Mar 22, 2010 14:23:44 GMT -5
IMO, Wyatt's source is Al Hodges, you either believe in Al's efforts and the plaintiffs' vague renditions, there of, or you do not. When time lines and deadlines are communicated and do not happen is a great deal worse than being silent and communicate after fruition. Soooo, d*mned if you do and d*mned if you don't, this shareholder base nerves are fried up beyond repair(myself included).
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Mar 22, 2010 15:11:06 GMT -5
seems Kevin West has a way of sticking foot in mouth....has on a few different occassions....c'mon Kevin get your "stories" straight !! ty sully47 & pennypauly Kevin West via phone last week..... « Thread Started Today at 10:57am » My friend Frank from New York called me.....he had just received a return call from Kevin West (you have to call Frizzies office....leave a message....and Kevin hopefully will return the call). Kevin said that they are in litigation with Ed Koch over the assay samples. Further, Kevin said he had never seen them and don't know what they contain. WHOA! WAIT A MINUTE! Didn't Kevin say he traveled up to Canada to look at the core samples? I believe he did..... So who is telling the truth here? BF told me the KW had traveled to Canada and Sharon (correct me single if wrong,,,LOL) brought the samples to KW in a pick up truck.
|
|
|
Post by enoughalready on Mar 22, 2010 15:19:59 GMT -5
I cannot imagine that people do not know the results of the samples..I think we are past that point.
|
|
|
Post by speedomodelisback on Mar 22, 2010 15:33:14 GMT -5
seems Kevin West has a way of sticking foot in mouth....has on a few different occassions....c'mon Kevin get your "stories" straight !! ty sully47 & pennypauly Kevin West via phone last week..... « Thread Started Today at 10:57am » My friend Frank from New York called me.....he had just received a return call from Kevin West (you have to call Frizzies office....leave a message....and Kevin hopefully will return the call). Kevin said that they are in litigation with Ed Koch over the assay samples. Further, Kevin said he had never seen them and don't know what they contain. WHOA! WAIT A MINUTE! Didn't Kevin say he traveled up to Canada to look at the core samples? I believe he did..... So who is telling the truth here? BF told me the KW had traveled to Canada and Sharon (correct me single if wrong,,,LOL) brought the samples to KW in a pick up truck. Sooner, Just my two cents: Core samples are split in two. One is (usually) tested and the other is stored in a "secure" location. This way, if the rights to the claim is sold, then the other part of the core sample can be tested to confirm its content. That's why half is stored under the utmost secure conditions, especially if the sample appears promising and/or the one half was tested and found to contain valuable contents. Driving around with core samples in the bed of a pick-up truck is not only stupid, foolish, and extremely unprofessional, it pretty much negates any chance of proving that the sample was taken from its supposed site. But, hey, this is CMKX where nothing makes any sense. We shareholders just seem to be a target for everyone involved in this mess to take pot shots at us just for entertainment. JMO
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 22, 2010 17:57:08 GMT -5
seems Kevin West has a way of sticking foot in mouth....has on a few different occassions....c'mon Kevin get your "stories" straight !! ty sully47 & pennypauly Kevin West via phone last week..... « Thread Started Today at 10:57am » My friend Frank from New York called me.....he had just received a return call from Kevin West (you have to call Frizzies office....leave a message....and Kevin hopefully will return the call). Kevin said that they are in litigation with Ed Koch over the assay samples. Further, Kevin said he had never seen them and don't know what they contain. WHOA! WAIT A MINUTE! Didn't Kevin say he traveled up to Canada to look at the core samples? I believe he did..... So who is telling the truth here? BF told me the KW had traveled to Canada and Sharon (correct me single if wrong,,,LOL) brought the samples to KW in a pick up truck. Right Sooner, and if I remember correctly Chrisl visited Tyler the same day you did. What I believe he reported when he came back was that Frizzell had told him that kevin was taken to a secured warehouse to view the core samples. At that time you & I discussed the difference in "stories" told by Frizzell on that day. Frizzell, Kevin and whoever from Tyler talk out of both sides of their mouths, occassionally sticking foot in mouth... says here that he DID see them......FAQ Session #3: September 6, 2007Q) Can you provide any information on the core samples which were mentioned during the first question and answer session? Kevin West was shown the core samples but no geologist or geophysicist was present to explain why such samples might have value. FAQ Session #2: August 23, 2007Q) What tangible assets does CMKM have on hand at this time and what are the results of the core samples viewed by Mr. West? The Company presently owns a certificate for 45 million shares of Entourage Mining. This certificate remains whole and is the only tangible asset belonging to the company at this time. When the core samples were viewed by Mr. West, there was not a geologist present as promised to give any opinions of the sample. Emerson Koch explained to Mr. West that no testing had been done on the core samples. The Company has no knowledge of what value, if any, can be placed on the claims that are currently held by Mr. Koch and contracted to Entourage Mining. So who is the liar? Another CMKX Mystery?? SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 22, 2010 18:28:42 GMT -5
Tom Fant (tfant53) #1 CMKM/USCN EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR Re: Power hunger and misstrust: kevin vs emmerson « Reply #2 Today at 5:17pm »
Granny talked to Emerson Koch today. She will post later this evening. From what I was told things are looking good!!
Tom
|
|