|
Post by prospector777x3 on May 23, 2010 13:39:33 GMT -5
If you google how to contact the whitehouse it gives all the contact information and it does say dont expect the President to respond or even be informed of your fax or correspondence in a short amount of time....Im thinking any fax you send will get a response that the President/white house has received your info. I think we may all be reading way to much into the post indicating the president has received your fax...Jesus after the initial post most on here were saying it had to mean the president was corresponding with Hodges ...and anyone saying otherwise was a basher!!!
|
|
|
Post by williamoverture on May 23, 2010 15:18:29 GMT -5
So I doubt there will be any kind of answer to this, however, that has never stopped from asking questions before.
I know we are getting all kinds of references as to the money being out there for us somewhere. My question is, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most sure, how sure is the Attorney that there are really any funds sitting in an account somewhere for us? I also know that this question has been asked a 100 times over. But, for the life of me I can not find anywhere that really states the fact that there is a fund with money for us out there? So again can anyone give me a number? It all really seems to be speculation to me. It is wonderful to be told there is some kind of Money out there, however, personally I would just as soon not be told that if it is not fact? I want to be given the true fact of the matter?
I also am getting contradicting reads as to whether Mr. Hodges is being paid or not?
|
|
|
Post by 3bid on May 23, 2010 15:46:07 GMT -5
So I doubt there will be any kind of answer to this, however, that has never stopped from asking questions before. I know we are getting all kinds of references as to the money being out there for us somewhere. My question is, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most sure, how sure is the Attorney that there are really any funds sitting in an account somewhere for us? I also know that this question has been asked a 100 times over. But, for the life of me I can not find anywhere that really states the fact that there is a fund with money for us out there? So again can anyone give me a number? It all really seems to be speculation to me. It is wonderful to be told there is some kind of Money out there, however, personally I would just as soon not be told that if it is not fact? I want to be given the true fact of the matter? I also am getting contradicting reads as to whether Mr. Hodges is being paid or not? The plaintiffs bear the burden of paying the bill as charged by their attorney. As for the money, we'll all believe it when we get it. -3bid
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 23, 2010 16:18:56 GMT -5
So I doubt there will be any kind of answer to this, however, that has never stopped from asking questions before. I know we are getting all kinds of references as to the money being out there for us somewhere. My question is, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most sure, how sure is the Attorney that there are really any funds sitting in an account somewhere for us? I also know that this question has been asked a 100 times over. But, for the life of me I can not find anywhere that really states the fact that there is a fund with money for us out there? So again can anyone give me a number? It all really seems to be speculation to me. It is wonderful to be told there is some kind of Money out there, however, personally I would just as soon not be told that if it is not fact? I want to be given the true fact of the matter? I also am getting contradicting reads as to whether Mr. Hodges is being paid or not? Well William, Your asking of questions that only Al Hodges has the answer to.... suggests that maybe you should read the TEXT of the lawsuit again. In an update Al Hodges told us to read the entire suit and we will know what has happened to our investment.... (exception being #'s 35 & 36 where the phrase .... herein are informed are stated) You have been pointed in this direction before & was given the same advice..... evidently, you do not understand what you are reading or did not read it at all.. Seems to me that because of statements, made in this legal document , Al Hodges totally believes that there IS a trust with funds that belong to the shareholders. Make it whatever # suits your fancy! You are asking questions that have already been answered by Al Hodges himself. Your choice to Take it or leave it. To each their own... SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by williamoverture on May 23, 2010 19:14:09 GMT -5
Single,
You do not care for me very much, do you? I am sorry that you obviously feel that I am a DA. I have read the post from Mr. Hodges several times. However, I can not for the life of me see anything that is in them that says there ls definitely money set aside for us. Sorry, I just do not see it. Appears to me to all be supposition by Mr. Hodges? I really was hoping Mr. Hollenegg (sp) would be the one to respond. And I heard or read somewhere that he was not charging the group for his services? Maybe I am mistaken, I hope that is ok with you? If he is charging that makes me think differently about things.
Again I do not mean to aggravate you in any way.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on May 23, 2010 19:54:45 GMT -5
Single, You do not care for me very much, do you? I am sorry that you obviously feel that I am a DA. I have read the post from Mr. Hodges several times. However, I can not for the life of me see anything that is in them that says there ls definitely money set aside for us. Sorry, I just do not see it. Appears to me to all be supposition by Mr. Hodges? I really was hoping Mr. Hollenegg (sp) would be the one to respond. And I heard or read somewhere that he was not charging the group for his services? Maybe I am mistaken, I hope that is ok with you? If he is charging that makes me think differently about things. Again I do not mean to aggravate you in any way. William, My answer to you was not at all meant to show dislike towards you. It was just stating what I feel is the answer to your question. you asked..on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most sure, how sure is the Attorney that there are really any funds sitting in an account somewhere for us?in the TEXT of the lawsuit....FACTUAL CONTENTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION:cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4455#2..through their acts and omissions knowingly, consciously, wrongly, without compensation and without due process of law have effected a taking of property from each of the named Plaintiffs and all who are similarly situated.#33.. During the period from November, 2004 through April, 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan, Canada, mineral claims to three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.#34.. During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A. Maheu, with assistance from others, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time.#37..Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month. Each of said representations have been made knowing them to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated#53b.. knowingly, intentionally and wrongfully cause certain acts and omissions to proceed in such manner as to hinder, delay, and ultimately prevent the distribution of moneys held for the benefit of PlaintiffsSo when you ask the question..how sure the attorney is (1-10.).... imo.... This should give you somewhat of a clue to what his stance is. SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by prospector777x3 on May 23, 2010 23:15:36 GMT -5
I hope we dont need 10 plagues to dispurse the silver and gold....we have toiled for years with no straw for the brick.
|
|
|
Post by williamoverture on May 24, 2010 9:03:53 GMT -5
I have been trying to fax a letter to the so called Presidents fax number all morning. It never answers!!!
202-456-2461
|
|
|
Post by remidtown on May 24, 2010 10:01:55 GMT -5
I'll freely admit I'm new to this whole situation and, while I've read a good bit of the information and links on this site, I still haven't read ALL of the data. That said, a couple of points jump out to this novice:
1. If there is money in an account waiting to be disbursed, it means that the wrongdoers have already paid their pentance so what benefit is it to anyone for the money to not be released? I just don't see the other side's position for NOT releasing the funds.
2. If there isn't money in an account, why would a reputable attorney such as Hodges invest so much time and energy taking on this case and why release those letters explicitly naming the POTUS? His reputation as an attorney is worth FAR more than any hourly wages he may be paid. So I just don't see this as being a wild goose chase.
The problem I have is that those two points contradict each other which only leads me back to square one which is:
I don't have freaking clue what the heck will happen so I continue to wait (although in fairness, my waiting started about 3 weeks ago so please don't take this as complaining, I'm not at all).
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on May 26, 2010 12:35:51 GMT -5
Vague questions get vague anwsers from vague people. Maybe try to single out the most important DIRECT question you want asked,post it, and you might get a better response than posting a copy of the same thing over and over again.
Just a suggestion. I have gotten a better response that way. Not ripping on you or anything. PLH
|
|
|
Post by moneypenny on May 26, 2010 21:57:25 GMT -5
good post all i can add is
TIC TOC TIC TOC TIC TOC
|
|