|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 8, 2010 0:48:58 GMT -5
PR, My understanding is that this isn't correct. Those that purchased from Deli have received bonafide certs from the company and new TA. I'll be doggone if I don't understand how the man can continue to sell them...but he is and they are being approved by Kevin West. pr WoW ! some pretty bold statements, you have made here. Ok... I have heard the rumor that Deli was selling again, but now you state it as fact. And the BIG ZINGER is your statement (as fact) that they are still being approved by Kevin West.... Even with the SEC & other alphabet agencies breathing down everyone's necks?? .....again WoW !! From where/who? .. or how did you become privy to this information? TIA SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by Duc N Altum on Jul 8, 2010 4:16:20 GMT -5
PR, My understanding is that this isn't correct. Those that purchased from Deli have received bonafide certs from the company and new TA. I'll be doggone if I don't understand how the man can continue to sell them...but he is and they are being approved by Kevin West. pr WoW ! some pretty bold statements, you have made here. Ok... I have heard the rumor that Deli was selling again, but now you state it as fact. And the BIG ZINGER is your statement (as fact) that they are still being approved by Kevin West.... Even with the SEC & other alphabet agencies breathing down everyone's necks?? .....again WoW !! From where/who? .. or how did you become privy to this information? TIA SINGLE My thoughts too SINGLE. The whole issue is not that if he were STILL selling then the shares should not count. Instead, look at it as it was said by Frizzell a couple weeks back in 06 after Bill Frizzell made an update about a BULK CERT situation of where these particular BULK CERTS the task force was made aware of and that they were not going to be counted in the cert pull. Around 2 weeks after Bill Frizzells statement of the BULK CERTS SITUATION, Bill publicly said that Deli's shares were good. And also was it not always thrown around that a share was a share and if that thought is thrown around in this example, if Deli's shares are in fact good as Bill Frizzell said back in 06, then what would make the difference at the present time? Time should not be of an issue, if a share is a share, is the way I see it and also someone who was a part of the cert pull filtering process like Bill Frizzell, I would take his word over anyone outside of that circle. All in my opinion!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 8, 2010 9:14:46 GMT -5
WoW ! some pretty bold statements, you have made here. Ok... I have heard the rumor that Deli was selling again, but now you state it as fact. And the BIG ZINGER is your statement (as fact) that they are still being approved by Kevin West.... Even with the SEC & other alphabet agencies breathing down everyone's necks?? .....again WoW !! From where/who? .. or how did you become privy to this information? TIA SINGLE My thoughts too SINGLE. The whole issue is not that if he were STILL selling then the shares should not count. Instead, look at it as it was said by Frizzell a couple weeks back in 06 after Bill Frizzell made an update about a BULK CERT situation of where these particular BULK CERTS the task force was made aware of and that they were not going to be counted in the cert pull. Around 2 weeks after Bill Frizzells statement of the BULK CERTS SITUATION, Bill publicly said that Deli's shares were good. And also was it not always thrown around that a share was a share and if that thought is thrown around in this example, if Deli's shares are in fact good as Bill Frizzell said back in 06, then what would make the difference at the present time? Time should not be of an issue, if a share is a share, is the way I see it and also someone who was a part of the cert pull filtering process like Bill Frizzell, I would take his word over anyone outside of that circle. All in my opinion! Ok, I see your point in that the timing should not make a difference, and back when, that Frizzell said Deli's shares were good. But, I am still confused on why or how this still could be happening, and whose shares Deli is selling at this time. If I remember correctly, back a few years ago (2005 I believe) ... Deli was supposedly helping some members from TOGI to dump their shares, after they got an inkling (only privy to them) that all was not well , in CMKXland. They were dumping, all the while pumping... and we not privy, to the same info, were buying. The SEC files charges against Deli, for (I think) making a market in CMKX shares, and he is still awaiting hearing? I am going by memory, so I could be completely off base here, but I seem to remember in the SEC docs reading that Deli had very few shares left of his own. I am still confused on what ? who's ? why's ? and how? this is still going on & with the approval of Kevin West. Is there something being accomplished here? Is there a reason behind these activities? Sorry, just trying to get this straight in my own mind..... just doesn't make sense to me. SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by diamond007 on Jul 8, 2010 9:28:21 GMT -5
SINGLE
There is something which is not making sense to me too ... I mean why would someone wants to sell his/her shares in 0.0001 when he/she can make 60 Mil out of his 1000$ investment ... I mean trust has 3.87 Trillion dollars, Its alot and enough to cover everything... why he is selling shares for few hundrad times less than the prize Mr. Al CONFIMRED!!
|
|
|
Post by jcnelson298 on Jul 8, 2010 10:22:24 GMT -5
Here is a thought ,,, A few days ago some one put out a list of brokers and market makers and banks that were holding shares in CMKM Diamonds,,,, WHAT IF They were only holding IOU'S and Deli had the real CERT's for those shares .... Once Deli sell all his cert's to individuals and they receive them , they get their own cert..
Once settlement is PR'ED then all of these mm'ers < bankers <brokers would have to settle at settlement price to pay their clients...
JUST A THOUGHT
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jul 8, 2010 11:30:33 GMT -5
It is my understandng that Al has agreed to show Allan Treffrey the evidence. I believe that Allan is a California attorney that offices fairly close to Al and that Al stated that he will show him the evidence one on one because the phone lines are compromised.
So does anyone know when this meeting is suppose to occur? I know Allan is controversial and some don't care for him; however, as far as the plantiffs go, I value his opinion the most...Simply for the fact that he doesn't paint everything in a rosey manner. If Allan, being an attorney, is convinced that Al has the goods, this puts me at ease..for the time being..I am not questioning Al's credibility, I would just feel more comfortable knowing that another individual has confirmed the evidence that justifies the largest lawsuit in the history of planet earth...
So that being said, if anyone knows how to contact Allan, I am sure I am not the only one curious about their upcoming meeting...
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 8, 2010 11:38:42 GMT -5
Briwadd, you have a PM
SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by pootsa on Jul 8, 2010 11:55:02 GMT -5
Briwad, Mr. Treffry left that somewhat open ended, saying before the October hearing. Seeing proof close to the hearing makes little sense as proof would be forthcoming at that point. My opinion, based on Mr. Treffry "going forward" as a plaintiff is that he will meet sooner rather than later. Too, my opinion only, is that the October date was said publicly to keep shareholders from bothering Mr. Treffry for his thoughts on the proof and gives him an out by saying he has not seen anything yet. I cannot blame him one bit.Just know that if Mr.Treffry keeps his spot as a plaintiff then he is satisfied with the proof he has been shown and will most likely be under a Non Disclosure Agreement. If he removes himself from the suit then we are in trouble. It is my understandng that Al has agreed to show Allan Treffrey the evidence. I believe that Allan is a California attorney that offices fairly close to Al and that Al stated that he will show him the evidence one on one because the phone lines are compromised. So does anyone know when this meeting is suppose to occur? I know Allan is controversial and some don't care for him; however, as far as the plantiffs go, I value his opinion the most...Simply for the fact that he doesn't paint everything in a rosey manner. If Allan, being an attorney, is convinced that Al has the goods, this puts me at ease..for the time being..I am not questioning Al's credibility, I would just feel more comfortable knowing that another individual has confirmed the evidence that justifies the largest lawsuit in the history of planet earth... So that being said, if anyone knows how to contact Allan, I am sure I am not the only one curious about their upcoming meeting... Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by portrush on Jul 8, 2010 11:55:07 GMT -5
It is illegal for this board to assist in making a market for the sale of shares of any company. There can be no public discussion of these kind on the boards. TAKE IT TO A PM. Any further post of this manner will be deleted. This is your one warning. pr
|
|
|
Post by pootsa on Jul 8, 2010 11:56:08 GMT -5
Can i get one from you too! Portrush, not only is it illegal on this board it is illegal period. I would like to add to those who are planning on purchasing shares in this manner, Caveat emptor. Briwadd, you have a PM SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jul 8, 2010 12:02:26 GMT -5
Pootsa, You have a PM..... lol
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jul 8, 2010 12:08:13 GMT -5
Briwad, Mr. Treffry left that somewhat open ended, saying before the October hearing. Seeing proof close to the hearing makes little sense as proof would be forthcoming at that point. My opinion, based on Mr. Treffry "going forward" as a plaintiff is that he will meet sooner rather than later. Too, my opinion only, is that the October date was said publicly to keep shareholders from bothering Mr. Treffry for his thoughts on the proof and gives him an out by saying he has not seen anything yet. I cannot blame him one bit.Just know that if Mr.Treffry keeps his spot as a plaintiff then he is satisfied with the proof he has been shown and will most likely be under a Non Disclosure Agreement. If he removes himself from the suit then we are in trouble. It is my understandng that Al has agreed to show Allan Treffrey the evidence. I believe that Allan is a California attorney that offices fairly close to Al and that Al stated that he will show him the evidence one on one because the phone lines are compromised. So does anyone know when this meeting is suppose to occur? I know Allan is controversial and some don't care for him; however, as far as the plantiffs go, I value his opinion the most...Simply for the fact that he doesn't paint everything in a rosey manner. If Allan, being an attorney, is convinced that Al has the goods, this puts me at ease..for the time being..I am not questioning Al's credibility, I would just feel more comfortable knowing that another individual has confirmed the evidence that justifies the largest lawsuit in the history of planet earth... So that being said, if anyone knows how to contact Allan, I am sure I am not the only one curious about their upcoming meeting... Briwadd I am not asking for pictures...I just simply want to know if he is satisfied with the case after reviewing Al's evidence...An NDA should not prevent him from making such a statement.. As far as October, that is simply a date, not the date. If it is bumped once, it can be bumped again. Everyone is waiting for the response to the Motion to Dismiss that is due by the 12th (I believe)....I bet we see a continuance on that as well...IMO Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by coachphilm on Jul 8, 2010 12:17:53 GMT -5
IMO, If Ah had a smoking gun and hard evidence, this case would not be allowed ANY delays. Heres why I feel the proof is circumstantial at best. If AH had solid proof, heres a sample letter that would be sent to EVERYONE envolved, including those who agreed to pay their portion of any FTD,
Example. Dear Sir, You have till 0900 on July 25, 2010 to release all funds deignated to cmkx shareholders, that is being held at BofA located at 123 main st. anytown, VA in Trust account number XXXX-XXX1234. Enclosed is copies of the signed documents from the brokers a,b,c,d......... with amounts and shares covered. Also find our SEC agreement for the special Cert pull agreed upon by both parties dated 1/1/05 and our total shareholder count in certificate of 2.2 Trillion shares certed for this this special agreement and our Authorized share structure of 800b. Enclosed also is a current copy of the cede shares still held in street name totalling 1,1 Trillion shares. At 0900 on this date we publish all documents in a PR on every wire, then File in Federal court all documents holding all parties personally responsible for the delays and your roll in the unlawfull holding of CMKX monitary property. You have 10 days to comply.
Send this certifired to all parties, if AH has this proof, the people who have paid will be on the horn demanding results ASAP, if this type of example doesnt happen, its my opinion the evidence is at best circumstantial or tied to a much larger account not exclussive to us.
When you have solid proof, as AH says he has, then by announcing a full disclosure to the public would blow this corruption of Gov. Agencies so high that knowone could stop the breaking news on every outlet in minutes. This would be the biggest case in the history.
So this game we are playing with the SEC, Obama, Queen, etc. is just that a game. And we are the ponds. If there is really that strong of evidence, this game will end now. If not we continue this cat and mouse and extensions for a very long time. imo
OF course the letter would be done in a more prof. way, I was just showing an idea of the subject matter, lol.
Coach
|
|
4star
Diamond Finder
Posts: 80
|
Post by 4star on Jul 8, 2010 12:23:23 GMT -5
and then you would be unable to collect your money... ugh
|
|
|
Post by coachphilm on Jul 8, 2010 12:30:43 GMT -5
and then you would be unable to collect your money... ugh well right now we still dont have our money, AND the corruption continues and the bad guys/gals are getting away scott free, and spending and investing their ill gotten gains from us and living a pretty good life of crime while the shareholders continue to suffer and loose family members. At this point getting justice would seem to be our only achievement if someone doesnt see the hard evidence soon. imo coach
|
|