|
Post by prospector777x3 on May 28, 2010 15:24:55 GMT -5
Well, Did anyone think the SEC would take the fall? Or the Government....NOT
|
|
|
Post by mrabner on May 28, 2010 15:25:43 GMT -5
well i'm not the lawyer, and i take it niether are you, so we wait, we can both assume till the cows come home, but until we have offical word then we are both wind bags flapping in the wind, so we wait.
|
|
|
Post by agfadoc on May 28, 2010 15:27:26 GMT -5
Every good defense files for dismissal, every chance they get. I am not surprised. This is really nothing but a procedural action, IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by mrabner on May 28, 2010 15:28:47 GMT -5
Every good defense files for dismissal, every chance they get. I am not surprised. it seems we have abunch of law experts in here that no idea how a lawsuit works, but thats fine to each there own.
|
|
|
Post by mailman78 on May 28, 2010 15:28:58 GMT -5
crazy = transparent !
|
|
|
Post by jeremiah007 on May 28, 2010 15:29:01 GMT -5
Two more quotes and I will quit:
To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. He must have more than a unilateral expectation of it. He must, instead, have a legitimate claim of entitlement to it....
....Moreover, numerous cases illustrate the proposition that an individual has no property interest in a particular benefit where a government agency retains discretion to grant or deny the benefit.
So as long as we claim it is at their discretion, we have no claim at all. Do I read that right?
|
|
|
Post by ch47man on May 28, 2010 15:31:47 GMT -5
I'm sure that any attorney worth a d*mn ( I think AH must be a decent Atty IMO) Knew this was on the horizon. It is a procedure that most Attorney's use. It's a shot in the dark for the SEC. The Judge will rule based on the law and preceding cases, as shown in the motion. I think that AH may have to show a little of his hand here, or since the SEC doesnt have anything to with the release of any funds( I pray there are some funds for us) That AH has the ER and is the logistical phase. I suspect that this may indeed just melt away.
Good day all.
CH47 man.
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on May 28, 2010 15:37:47 GMT -5
Why is it so hard to understand that this can't see the light of day? Why would any of you think that anyone that has something to do with this would publicly show proof of criminal wrong doing by our government or anyone who would have put monies into a trust to pay off wrongdoing?
You want proof that you aren't going to get, Mr. Hodges has given you all he can to keep you calm without giving up critical information that could possibly become public.
Your not going to get it, never!
Get mad all you want, but you are dealing with the most powerful people on the planet, when all is said and done, there was no wrong doing as far as the public can see.
And guess what, you and I will benefit from that. I try to keep my cool but sometimes it is just ridiculous how it's like a school of pirranha's attacking a piece of bait. We will all have to face each other someday if there is a party, do you want other shareholders to remember you as cool, calm and collected or as one of the pirranha's?
Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by moneypenny on May 28, 2010 15:38:54 GMT -5
imho i just cant c al and 7 plantiffs putting up money for a bluff.
als record just dont let a bluff make cents
|
|
|
Post by portrush on May 28, 2010 15:42:10 GMT -5
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Because Defendants are moving to dismiss and must, for purposes of this motion, accept the allegations of the Complaint as true, the relevant facts are those alleged in the Complaint.
|
|
|
Post by moneypenny on May 28, 2010 15:42:11 GMT -5
sarcastic no al would not bluff. hes a better lawyer then that
so now eat me
|
|
|
Post by moneypenny on May 28, 2010 15:43:58 GMT -5
the bashers are coming to the top
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on May 28, 2010 15:44:04 GMT -5
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Because Defendants are moving to dismiss and must, for purposes of this motion, accept the allegations of the Complaint as true, the relevant facts are those alleged in the Complaint.Portrush, that is simply a requirement in order to file a Motion to Dismiss. Nothing more.
|
|
|
Post by agfadoc on May 28, 2010 15:46:16 GMT -5
the bashers are coming to the top Everyone's a basher when you don't have a clue... Hahahaha.. Duh... Duh... You must be a basher.. Huh huh
|
|
|
Post by jeremiah007 on May 28, 2010 15:46:36 GMT -5
I am just pointing out facts of the dismissal request. I am not saying anyone did or did not do or say right or wrong as far as any posters on this board or the lawyers involved. I am not trying to be controversial or argumentative. Just pointing out what I thought were interesting points in the dismissal request. I didn't mean to make anyone feel like I don't understand the way the world works or that certain things aren't plain as the light of day.
|
|