|
Post by bkscott on Aug 19, 2010 18:41:22 GMT -5
Mona will post a new rumor every week until we get paid. This way she can say she has been right all along. She will get it right eventually. Law of averages.
BKscott
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Aug 19, 2010 18:50:55 GMT -5
Mona gets donations every month from her room and I was told that she is taking in more then the cost of the room thus the stories and rumors every month year after year. I wonder if the IRS knows this?
Shhhhhh...its secret so nobody repeat it OK
Cheers,
PS Watch her every month its s new sensational rumor...month in month out...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 19, 2010 18:57:18 GMT -5
latteplease DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Thread Started Today at 4:56pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I feel strongly that we more than qualify for RICO damages from all offending parties. That is some serious money. Add to that the compounding interest of collected monies, that has to be staggering, especially after so many years. Do we want all that is due us? What shareholder in their right mind would not? Not only because it is our right, but it is justice. Here is a link to some RICO facts: www.ricoact.com/ricoact/faq.aspThere is a 4 yr statute of limitations on RICO claims. Some have asked over the years, have we been duly or legally named as plaintiffs either directly or indirectly in suits for damages and collection of funds set aside)? Is that necessary? Some have asked if we are technically labeled "bonafied shareholders" in such suits. It seems we are, but I would love to get that written in stone and confirmed beyond all shadow of doubt. The banks and brokerages and govt agencies that daily profit from our money is by far a larger, or at least as large a crime as the original one. How can anyone even contemplate giving back a dime to these scoundrels? I just can't relate to that. They owe us the entire sum plus interest, and they owe it now. Overdue and collecting interest as we sit here. Are we crossing all the t's and dotting all the i's? I think so, I sure hope so...but would like to see something that officially names us as bonafied shareholders in a legal proceeding. I mean a direct link to us by name and the actions being taken at this point in time. The 6 dollar figure seems so very real and plausible. Why would anyone think it is not? Do the math, count the years, and remind yourself of all the illegalities that have, and continue to take place with OUR rightful return and in addition to that, times it by 3 and add the value we all know our company has and had. Heck, If they try to sell us off for even a penny less than is there, then I think what Bud Burrell said a few years ago makes sense, tie up the entire justice system with individual suits by shareholders, filed in every county of the country, and do it all at once. IMO drillbit DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Reply #1 Today at 6:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IF there were rule of law, I would agree. Enjoy the BHO Cabal and know their real agenda that total government works. It hasn't any where before in history but forget that. PLEASE READ HISTORY! AMERICA was made great by free enterprise. NOTHING ELSE! latteplease DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Reply #2 Today at 6:42pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COME NOW Plaintiffs DAVID ANDERSON, LT. COL.; NELSON L. REYNOLDS, LT. COL.; SHEILA MORRIS; PATRICK CLUNEY; ROBERT HOLLENEGG; ALLAN TREFFRY; and REECE HAMILTON, individually (and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who, for causes of action herein allege:) I assume we're good based on this language... millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=33577
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Aug 19, 2010 19:00:43 GMT -5
Mona gets donations every month from her room and I was told that she is taking in more then the cost of the room thus the stories and rumors every month year after year. I wonder if the IRS knows this?
Shhhhhh...its secret so nobody repeat it OK
Cheers,
PS Watch her every month its s new sensational rumor...month in month out... if you really want to mess her up, report her for tax evasion
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Aug 19, 2010 19:01:47 GMT -5
Maybe I already have?
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 19, 2010 19:29:48 GMT -5
Mona gets donations every month from her room and I was told that she is taking in more then the cost of the room thus the stories and rumors every month year after year. I wonder if the IRS knows this?
Shhhhhh...its secret so nobody repeat it OK
Cheers,
PS Watch her every month its s new sensational rumor...month in month out... what's to you how much she takes and how do you know? you are a millionare in the making.shame on you .leave her alone
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 19, 2010 19:38:54 GMT -5
latteplease DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Thread Started Today at 4:56pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I feel strongly that we more than qualify for RICO damages from all offending parties. That is some serious money. Add to that the compounding interest of collected monies, that has to be staggering, especially after so many years. Do we want all that is due us? What shareholder in their right mind would not? Not only because it is our right, but it is justice. Here is a link to some RICO facts: www.ricoact.com/ricoact/faq.aspThere is a 4 yr statute of limitations on RICO claims. Some have asked over the years, have we been duly or legally named as plaintiffs either directly or indirectly in suits for damages and collection of funds set aside)? Is that necessary? Some have asked if we are technically labeled "bonafied shareholders" in such suits. It seems we are, but I would love to get that written in stone and confirmed beyond all shadow of doubt. The banks and brokerages and govt agencies that daily profit from our money is by far a larger, or at least as large a crime as the original one. How can anyone even contemplate giving back a dime to these scoundrels? I just can't relate to that. They owe us the entire sum plus interest, and they owe it now. Overdue and collecting interest as we sit here. Are we crossing all the t's and dotting all the i's? I think so, I sure hope so...but would like to see something that officially names us as bonafied shareholders in a legal proceeding. I mean a direct link to us by name and the actions being taken at this point in time. The 6 dollar figure seems so very real and plausible. Why would anyone think it is not? Do the math, count the years, and remind yourself of all the illegalities that have, and continue to take place with OUR rightful return and in addition to that, times it by 3 and add the value we all know our company has and had. Heck, If they try to sell us off for even a penny less than is there, then I think what Bud Burrell said a few years ago makes sense, tie up the entire justice system with individual suits by shareholders, filed in every county of the country, and do it all at once. IMO drillbit DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Reply #1 Today at 6:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IF there were rule of law, I would agree. Enjoy the BHO Cabal and know their real agenda that total government works. It hasn't any where before in history but forget that. PLEASE READ HISTORY! AMERICA was made great by free enterprise. NOTHING ELSE! latteplease DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: RICO Damages, 4 yr statute of limitations « Reply #2 Today at 6:42pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COME NOW Plaintiffs DAVID ANDERSON, LT. COL.; NELSON L. REYNOLDS, LT. COL.; SHEILA MORRIS; PATRICK CLUNEY; ROBERT HOLLENEGG; ALLAN TREFFRY; and REECE HAMILTON, individually (and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who, for causes of action herein allege:) I assume we're good based on this language... millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=33577 Under RICO, a person who is a member of an enterprise that has committed any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." RICO also permits a private individual harmed by the actions of such an enterprise to file a civil suit; if successful, the individual can collect treble damages.
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 19, 2010 19:41:54 GMT -5
Mona gets donations every month from her room and I was told that she is taking in more then the cost of the room thus the stories and rumors every month year after year. I wonder if the IRS knows this?
Shhhhhh...its secret so nobody repeat it OK
Cheers,
PS Watch her every month its s new sensational rumor...month in month out... if you really want to mess her up, report her for tax evasion how do you know she did not pay taxes?
|
|
|
Post by cmkxerlong on Aug 19, 2010 19:53:46 GMT -5
varnson, if you know that as a fact then you can say it. but i have to warn you that she can sue you for defamation if false. so becareful. i'm just saying.
|
|
|
Post by hacksawjim on Aug 19, 2010 20:27:17 GMT -5
if you really want to mess her up, report her for tax evasion that's really bad karma for people that are about to come into alot [alleged] of money. imo hack
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 19, 2010 20:42:16 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 19 Aug 2010, 06:14 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 955014 of 955061 (Reply to 954798 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # Tomorrow after all of the air gets let out of the latest rumors I hope that Richard from the STOCK SHOCK let's out a fury of discipline on those responsible at the root..... the true scum_bags, POS'S who are playing the shareholders and laughing. Just gut "them" already and get it over with. Release your evidence package, and all the gore...
AIMHO,
Oil
By: oil.ipo 19 Aug 2010, 07:38 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 955038 of 955064 (Reply to 955014 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # I thought this had nothing to do with Global Ramifications? (latest leakage) Back in that Global Goat's Heads Soup? Man, tomorrow night I predict ACCA will be back with a beer in each hand. This is very disheartening. EOM! AIMVHO
..... PS; And I would like nothing more then to see this over and done with for us all! Come on guys wake the heck up!
Oil
By: oil.ipo 19 Aug 2010, 07:45 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 955039 of 955064 (Reply to 955038 by oil.ipo)
Jump to msg. # When is it going to be the shareholders' turn to be driving this thing? EOM!/OIL
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 19, 2010 20:44:30 GMT -5
Good Post, Oil. I am way past fed up with this crap.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 19, 2010 20:44:44 GMT -5
By: calvinwinters 19 Aug 2010, 07:10 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 955023 of 955062
Jump to msg. # 45 days vs 30 days
How many of us are understanding this to not be a 75 day period?
The Plaintiff has 45 days to be more specific.
The Defendant has 30 days to determine the applicableness of Bivens.
Or did I misunderstand?
cal
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 19, 2010 20:46:40 GMT -5
All I know is we are under 30 days to Blood and Gore or payday, whichever comes first.
At this point, I'd just as soon see some blood and gore as money, after all the crap we've been put through.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 19, 2010 20:46:59 GMT -5
By: eaglesrock2008 19 Aug 2010, 07:29 PM EDT Rating: Msg. 955035 of 955063 Jump to msg. # Judge Rails Against SEC For Doing A Horrible Job Investigating Citi And Asks Funny Normal Questions Courtney Comstock | Aug. 17, 2010, judge-huvelle Judge Huvelle A judge railed into the SEC recently over a $75 million Citi settlement they tried to get "rubber stamped," says the Wall Street Journal. It's up to a judge to approve the SEC's $75 million settlement with Citi, paid for charges that they "unintenionally" hid their exposure to subprime. According to the Wall Street Journal: If she rejects it, the two sides would have to reach a new settlement more to the judge's liking or take the case to trial. The judge, Ellen Segal Huvelle, was a great woman to have decide whether or not to approve the settlement because she asked things that normal, non-financial people would ask. And she said funny things like: "I'm baffled." "You've focused on two individuals and I can't for the life of me figure out why." Why do Citigroup shareholders have to pay for the alleged sins of bank executives? "I look at this and say, 'Why would I find this fair and reasonable?'" "You expect the court to rubber-stamp, but we can't." She was mostly concerned about how much they really tried to hunt down the Citi execs who hid the company's exposure to the decaying subprime market and whether or not the small settlement was really fair to Citi's shareholders. The judges concerns are valid. The SEC's fine is tiny, $75 million, compared to Citi's exposure to subprime, $43 billion at the time. The problem with such a small settlement is that it draws criticism that it's an encouragement to continue sketchy behavior because paying for it later costs nothing compared to the profits reaped in the meantime. The biggest part of the SEC's settlement with Citi was settling with Gary Crittenden for $100,000. His settlement made Crittenden the highest-ranking executive yet to be held (at least somewhat) accountable for not disclosing the full amount his company was at risk because of subprime exposure, but his $100,000 settlement was a pittance too - the former CFO took home $20 million from Citi in 2007. So the judge's criticism that the SEC could have gone after more than two execs (another exec, Arthur Tildesley, settled for $80,000) is right on point. Charging a small amount actually does count in the case of individual execs, because their repuation is more or less ruined. It will be great to watch Judge Huvelle's decision and hear her explanation for it. It should help bring understanding to a number of people asking the same questions as her and not getting answers. www.businessinsider.com/judge-rails-the-sec-for-doing-a-crappy-job-investigating-citi-2010-8
|
|