|
Post by enoughalready on Aug 18, 2010 11:56:10 GMT -5
I would say if you have access to politicians well of course you should mention this and see what informaiton you can find out..hello..what are you waiting for?
|
|
|
Post by maraman101 on Aug 18, 2010 16:14:25 GMT -5
First I didn't say I was filthy rich. I said I was financially stable. Upper middle class is were I would be. The ten lawyers comment was just making a point, I could afford to hire ten if I needed to, but would probably run me a pretty large bill. A .0001 stock is an inexpensive high risk. 10 million shares cost what a $1 thousand. Like everyone here I got sucked into the hype of making one million millionaires. Just like going to Foxwoods or Vegas dropping a grand on the black jack table, taking a shot trying to making a pretty penny. To me it was a low cost high reward investment. As far as talking to my poltitican contacts, I would, but they have never heard of CMKX and I have know evidence to show them. So I wouldn't expect them to take anytime to look into a matter that A) they have never heard about or B) I don't have an ounce of physical evidence to show them. So If this stuff blew up and evidence was starting to make its way out. I would be more than happy to run it by some of my contacts and see what they think. Maybe I could even get Scott Brown to look into this matter, I did donate to his campaign.
|
|
|
Post by theotherside on Aug 18, 2010 22:30:49 GMT -5
Just curious, everytime someone raises a question trying to figure out whats going on with AL and Bob they get attacked. Is their an evidence link that I have not seen were all the proof that we have money whating for us is? Or is there a room that has the Kool Aid and we all have to drink? Now this is directed toward bob, I am in a good financial situation, I can afford to hire 10 lawyers to look into this matter for me. I have a friend who works at JP Morgan Chase who looked into this matter and didn't know of any rumor or money heading toward the shareholders. How can I find out personally what Al has for evidence. Do I have to be part of the lawsuit? Through my field of work I get to meet many politicans, and if I had some evidence I would be more than happy to talk with them to see if they could help us out. This whole thing is like a drug, when you think you kicked the habit you find yourself doing it again. Just looking for closure thats all, no hidden agenda. Just tired of all the years of broken promises, missed dates. In this high level field of yours, how do you correspond with the "many politicians" that you meet? I'm guessing it's verbally, nothing written or typed, right?
|
|
|
Post by maraman101 on Aug 18, 2010 23:45:53 GMT -5
Yes Verbally, I never said I was friends with these people. One of my income sources is the restaurant industry. I own a restaurant and function hall. So I have quite a few political events at my establisment. Nothing on a grand scale, like presidents or high ranking officials but some people I get to meet could find out some info. if I had some concrete info for them.
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Aug 21, 2010 17:00:52 GMT -5
Hey All, I hope all are doing well, Pixie and Manny had way too many drinks on the trip, I had you both covered. I see 9 days vacation has brought more of the same from CMKX land. It was nice getting away on a cruise to Grand Turk, Half Moon Cey and Nassau. Didn't think about CMKX once. I had a conversation with a individual before I left and he seemed to think we would be paid in the next 2 weeks but I have to beg to differ with him. (No, don't ask, I won't tell) As I see what continually comes from the horses mouth (AL) I get the feeling I'm still on course for this Fall or even early 2011, my fall is OCT. bye the way. Why? because I get the feeling it has no ties to the mid-terms, which I did think was a possibility. But the more AL speaks the more I feel he gives strength to my initial DD of he is playing his role in getting us to that timed release, yes, the plaintiffs will disagree with me as will many others. But ask yourself these questions? Why has AL, 3 times now agreed to push dates back? Why is AL, who I consider a great lawyer, who has ties to Maheu take this Bivens to court with only a cap gun? (minimal evidence) Wouldn't any good lawyer you know, take a machine gun loaded with 5 clips full of ammo into a courtroom if he intends to slay Goliath? Why would any good lawyer allow his clients to chat on boards giving out false information? or true information for that matter? Would he do it only because that's the information he wants out? Is the specific date tied to the government getting more taxes from this fund? If the government has already taken it's taxes in DEC. of 2009? Are they waiting for Dec/Jan time frame to pull another years worth of taxes from the interest gained in the fund over that year? Isn't the Bush Tax Cutes being eliminated at the end of 2010? Sure would be a nice increase in Fed. revenue when we start spending our money and investing it along with all the new hidden taxes in the Financial Reform Bill. If you were told that the reason we haven't been paid is for your own good and protection, would you feel better about where we stand currently? Think long and hard before you answer that. I sure want my money to be strong and worth something and not losing value daily before I can enjoy it or invest it in something that is solid. Now I'm on Al's side but someone needs to answer these questions before you attack anyone, or AL. My personal opinion is AL is going to bring this across the finish line but not even he can convince me that he is not guiding this to a specific date. The money is OURS! When is the big question? Oh, and I can't let Varnson get away with too much on this issue, Varnson, why is it that you attack only shareholders? Yes, you bash Al, you make fun of the shareholders who believe, and you say you think it's a scam, then why are you wasting so much time on here? Why don't you have the guts and nerve to go straight to the source instead of attacking him through shareholders on this board? What is your motive for pushing so hard on this worthless stock. Our day will come and it will all be worth it. Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by varnson on Aug 21, 2010 18:48:17 GMT -5
Glad you had a good trip Don, you sure spend a lot of time worrying about me and what I believe. You have to admit it is all more then murky and without many facts. I am a SH just like you but I need more info not rumors and innuendo and frankly if that is good enough for you then so be it...at this point what would you call it? a fine investment LOL I want everyone to get paid if there is in fact any money let alone the mythical 3.87T. Time will tell won't it and by the way what source do you suggest I go to bro?
Cheers,
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Aug 21, 2010 19:34:33 GMT -5
Glad you had a good trip Don, you sure spend a lot of time worrying about me and what I believe. You have to admit it is all more then murky and without many facts. I am a SH just like you but I need more info not rumors and innuendo and frankly if that is good enough for you then so be it...at this point what would you call it? a fine investment LOL I want everyone to get paid if there is in fact any money let alone the mythical 3.87T. Time will tell won't it and by the way what source do you suggest I go to bro? Cheers, Al himself, call him and ask the same questions you ask of any of us, talk to him with the same tone as you do with us, present your questions and doubts with the same mannerisms and character that you show on this board. I'm sure you say he won't take your calls. My point is, you do nothing to assist the shareholders with any facts or proof, but you insist we do. We all know the evidence is too d*mning and will not be seen by any public means. Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by Brigantine on Aug 21, 2010 21:52:19 GMT -5
A most excellent post, Don.
|
|
|
Post by prospector777x3 on Aug 22, 2010 1:11:54 GMT -5
Yes nice thought Don....It must be and it must be kept from the mass media...why wouldnt any news programs worth mention not cover this 007 story of betrayals and stings ....
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 22, 2010 12:21:49 GMT -5
Very perceptive post:
By: box_o_rocks 22 Aug 2010, 12:45 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 955442 of 955446
Jump to msg. # Here is some dd for you people.
Al Hodges said Maheu negotiated a deal with all the brokers in a room 3 times the size of the courtroom as stated below:
...... During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A.. Maheu, with assistance from Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time
He stated that the was a settlement negotiated with all the brokers. Hodges said the settlement was made in 2004-2006.
That being the case, then why were the brokers contacting Tyler about certs after they already settled? Something smells! Does this tell you and I that there was NO settlement and that this is just another fabrication.
9-25-08 Update on Questionable Brokerage and Clearing Firm Activity CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has received letters from a broker requesting that larger CMKX certificates (held in the same broker's name) be broken down into several smaller certs. The written request contained the notation "FOR FAILS PHY". The broker confirmed that the request was to cover a fails to deliver in the stock. In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008, over two and a half years after the Company was delisted and no longer trading. The Company also has in its possession a letter where a clearing firm discusses the cost effectiveness of obtaining stock so that they could issue certificates to their clients, saying "Given the price of the stock, it may be more reasonable for us to go out and buy the shares to cover the short." This letter is dated almost two years after the Company was delisted and its shares no longer trading. In a CMKM Diamonds press release dated April 20, 2007, it was confirmed that the Company "halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage from a third party". The Company is continuing its investigation of this and other questionable brokerage activity. Mark Faulk, CEO
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Aug 22, 2010 12:51:37 GMT -5
Very perceptive post: By: box_o_rocks 22 Aug 2010, 12:45 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 955442 of 955446 Jump to msg. # Here is some dd for you people. Al Hodges said Maheu negotiated a deal with all the brokers in a room 3 times the size of the courtroom as stated below: ...... During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A.. Maheu, with assistance from Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time He stated that the was a settlement negotiated with all the brokers. Hodges said the settlement was made in 2004-2006. That being the case, then why were the brokers contacting Tyler about certs after they already settled? Something smells! Does this tell you and I that there was NO settlement and that this is just another fabrication. 9-25-08 Update on Questionable Brokerage and Clearing Firm Activity CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has received letters from a broker requesting that larger CMKX certificates (held in the same broker's name) be broken down into several smaller certs. The written request contained the notation "FOR FAILS PHY". The broker confirmed that the request was to cover a fails to deliver in the stock. In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008, over two and a half years after the Company was delisted and no longer trading. The Company also has in its possession a letter where a clearing firm discusses the cost effectiveness of obtaining stock so that they could issue certificates to their clients, saying "Given the price of the stock, it may be more reasonable for us to go out and buy the shares to cover the short." This letter is dated almost two years after the Company was delisted and its shares no longer trading. In a CMKM Diamonds press release dated April 20, 2007, it was confirmed that the Company "halted the transfer of a large bulk certificate to a major brokerage from a third party". The Company is continuing its investigation of this and other questionable brokerage activity. Mark Faulk, CEO Just another post to try and create confusion! Remember the left hand never knows what the right is doing, this poster is trying to mesh the left hand with the right, Maheu is the right hand in negoiating with the deal! Tyler is the left hand working on pressuring the interplead and cert. count, pressuring the MM's/brokers/hedge funds to fill all cert orders. This is the left hand doing it's job and assisting the right hand without knowing what the right hand is doing. If the settlement was from 2004-2006, and the settlement was in 2006' then why is that so questionable? negotiations are finished at the end correct? Then why is it questionable that they during the negotiations (in 2005') that the brokers, MM's, hedge funds wouldn't be trying to make a deal with Tyler first to get the certs out to cover their arses? The certs were the most important thing at the time, we were all calling hard for them, the deal was behind closed doors and not a threat at the time, as long as they are still at the negation table they were safe, if negotiations were broke off and Maheu said I'm bringing down the house, then and only then would it become a threat. Do you think Al got into the courtroom without any justifiable evidence? Do you think maybe the Brokers had made a deal to cover their arses? Wouldn't you think part of the deal was to get the certs into the hands of the shareholders? At least valid up to the amount of amount of shares equal to the Authorized amount? (just over 600 B) This poster is trying to yet create another piece of doubt in our minds and look who brings it to the board, goodoleboy!!!!!! I think all legitimate shareholders are well aware of these types of posts by now. Nice try! I have a great idea, instead of posting it first, call big AL on it before you post it, that way you can get both sides of the story before you try to get everyone in your doubting mode. Getting both sides of the story should be part of your so called DD. Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 22, 2010 13:44:09 GMT -5
Maybe you missed the timeline that was presented in the post:
Hodges said the settlement was made in 2004-2006.
In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008
Where's the confusion?
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Aug 22, 2010 14:04:43 GMT -5
Maybe you missed the timeline that was presented in the post: Hodges said the settlement was made in 2004-2006. In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008Where's the confusion? Do you think all MM's/Brokers settled their cert issues at the same time? I'll answer that for you, NO! Most got their certs out and covered during the 2004-2006 time frame. That post is trying to create doubt and you know it. Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by deltadon30228 on Aug 22, 2010 14:20:04 GMT -5
Hey All, I hope all are doing well, Pixie and Manny had way too many drinks on the trip, I had you both covered. I see 9 days vacation has brought more of the same from CMKX land. It was nice getting away on a cruise to Grand Turk, Half Moon Cey and Nassau. Didn't think about CMKX once. I had a conversation with a individual before I left and he seemed to think we would be paid in the next 2 weeks but I have to beg to differ with him. (No, don't ask, I won't tell) As I see what continually comes from the horses mouth (AL) I get the feeling I'm still on course for this Fall or even early 2011, my fall is OCT. bye the way. Why? because I get the feeling it has no ties to the mid-terms, which I did think was a possibility. But the more AL speaks the more I feel he gives strength to my initial DD of he is playing his role in getting us to that timed release, yes, the plaintiffs will disagree with me as will many others. But ask yourself these questions? Why has AL, 3 times now agreed to push dates back? Why is AL, who I consider a great lawyer, who has ties to Maheu take this Bivens to court with only a cap gun? (minimal evidence) Wouldn't any good lawyer you know, take a machine gun loaded with 5 clips full of ammo into a courtroom if he intends to slay Goliath? Why would any good lawyer allow his clients to chat on boards giving out false information? or true information for that matter? Would he do it only because that's the information he wants out? Is the specific date tied to the government getting more taxes from this fund? If the government has already taken it's taxes in DEC. of 2009? Are they waiting for Dec/Jan time frame to pull another years worth of taxes from the interest gained in the fund over that year? Isn't the Bush Tax Cutes being eliminated at the end of 2010? Sure would be a nice increase in Fed. revenue when we start spending our money and investing it along with all the new hidden taxes in the Financial Reform Bill. If you were told that the reason we haven't been paid is for your own good and protection, would you feel better about where we stand currently? Think long and hard before you answer that. I sure want my money to be strong and worth something and not losing value daily before I can enjoy it or invest it in something that is solid. Now I'm on Al's side but someone needs to answer these questions before you attack anyone, or AL. My personal opinion is AL is going to bring this across the finish line but not even he can convince me that he is not guiding this to a specific date. The money is OURS! When is the big question? Oh, and I can't let Varnson get away with too much on this issue, Varnson, why is it that you attack only shareholders? Yes, you bash Al, you make fun of the shareholders who believe, and you say you think it's a scam, then why are you wasting so much time on here? Why don't you have the guts and nerve to go straight to the source instead of attacking him through shareholders on this board? What is your motive for pushing so hard on this worthless stock. Our day will come and it will all be worth it. Don, IMHO! Here's some more questions for you! Do you think AL has the evidence in his possession? Do you think Peter Maheu is actually in possession of the evidence? Do you think that is why AL didn't put any hard evidence in the Bivens? If you were AL would you hold the evidence or would you make darn sure it was put somewhere in very good hands and for safe keeping as leverage? Remember they said AL's office has been broken into 3 times, do you really think he would hold that evidence? NO Do you think it's possible to have a time frame drop dead date for release of funds? And is that why AL is allowing this to be pushed further down the road? Is that drop dead date down the road for our own protection? Does the price of Gold have any connections to where our monetary system is headed? Most investors are trusting only gold as a investment right now. Sure seems like every other commercial is about buying Gold these days, is it just about making a profit or is there another reason for getting everyone to want gold coins and gold as a investment? Does it tie into a bigger puzzle? How much Gold does our country have in it's possession currently? Has our government ever recalled all gold in this country? YES, FDR did it. Could they do it again? Would a Treasury backed note benefit from a gold recall? If so would the value of the dollar go up? I'm not sure where our monetary system is heading, just asking questions. But we all want the value of the dollar to rebound, if it did, would we as shareholders benefit from that? Just getting the brain cells moving. I'm not a genius when it comes to our monetary system so any knowledge of these questions would only benefit our thought process. I believe we are waiting for something much bigger, but what is it? This has been about the FED and our monetary system to include the banks, but what is the final outcome of our monetary system. Need help with that final piece! The biggest question of all is, WHY or WHAT are we waiting for? Golden maybe you could give us some insight? I know your pretty knowledgeable about this issue. Don, IMHO!
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Aug 22, 2010 14:25:00 GMT -5
Maybe you missed the timeline that was presented in the post: Hodges said the settlement was made in 2004-2006. In a separate incident, one major brokerage firm requested the transfer of a bulk certificate from another major brokerage firm. This request was dated June 29, 2008Where's the confusion? Do you think all MM's/Brokers settled their cert issues at the same time? I'll answer that for you, NO! Most got their certs out and covered during the 2004-2006 time frame. That post is trying to create doubt and you know it. Don, IMHO! So, who handled it after Maheu died Aug 4, 2008? As far as "creating doubt" my Grandmother, may she rest in peace, told me that dinasaur bones were put on Earth by the Devil to create doubt. Sometimes things are what they are. This post is factual as far as what has been said and done. View it objectively, and base an opinion on the facts provided. What does it tell you? If all you see is an attempt to create doubt, then you obviously cannot accept the facts provided (IMO). I will respect that.
|
|