|
Post by hacksawjim on Sept 27, 2010 16:45:46 GMT -5
Deli lawsuit was just for show and the shares purchased from him look lovely. hack
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Sept 27, 2010 18:15:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Sept 27, 2010 18:17:38 GMT -5
Now it's time for us to get paid so we can dismiss our case.
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Sept 27, 2010 18:18:38 GMT -5
mccurdydon1: I am strong in how I feel concerning the outcome for the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges is truly a blessing to have fighting for the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges will notify the Shareholders when it is done. I, as in the mccurdydon1: majority of the Shareholders, expect to hear from Attorney Hodges any time now. My appreciation to all who have supported Attorney Hodges and his actions to release the funds to the Shareholders...and my understanding to mccurdydon1: those who expressed their concerns. We may not all agree which path to take on this journey, but in the end, we will cross the finish line together with a just outcome. mccurdydon1: from Bob H
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2010 18:21:42 GMT -5
Sounds like a win to me! TD4E
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Sept 27, 2010 18:30:33 GMT -5
albertdavidson Diamond Finder Re: UPDATE: CBC to run CMKX story « Reply #23 Yesterday at 8:09pm » I hope I corrected this link problem. My apologies. Good afternoon CMKX shareholders, I have phenomenal information to share. No, we haven't been paid...YET, but this is potentially ground breaking nonetheless. First, let me send you a link with some personal information on Wes Christian. www.csj-law.com/attorneys_jchristian.htmlNow, here is the news. This afternoon, a very reliable source sent me an email. In that email, Wes Christian was introduced to CBC reporter Geoff Leo via a 3rd party. Wes Christian, Sandra Mohr and Brandon Mathews have all agreed to speak on their involvement in what just might be the largest class-action suit (naked shorting) in American history. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/91831754.htmlI'd like to hear what Al Hodges has to say because we know we aren't and actually don't want to hear Frizzell or West speaking out in public on behalf of the shareholders. Do the interview. Tell me this isn't heating up. [corrected second link -3bid] After reading the above all I can say is: THIS HAD BETTER NOT BE A "CLASS ACTION" SUIT!!!! Seeing us get a check for $3.45 while Hodges gets millions isn't going to sit well with folks! I WANT NO PART OF A CLASS ACTION!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Sept 27, 2010 18:31:47 GMT -5
I am pizzed after reading that! Being unemployed for some time now I am on edge AND TO READ THAT!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2010 18:44:17 GMT -5
I believe the "class action" was in addition to the legal suite. As I understand it, the class action would be a civil suite that would take place only if the legal suite fails to deliver. This would be more leverage used to get us paid. Don't stress over it.
IMO
TD4E
|
|
|
Post by beavis on Sept 27, 2010 19:39:03 GMT -5
mccurdydon1: I am strong in how I feel concerning the outcome for the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges is truly a blessing to have fighting for the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges will notify the Shareholders when it is done. I, as in the mccurdydon1: majority of the Shareholders, expect to hear from Attorney Hodges any time now. My appreciation to all who have supported Attorney Hodges and his actions to release the funds to the Shareholders...and my understanding to mccurdydon1: those who expressed their concerns. We may not all agree which path to take on this journey, but in the end, we will cross the finish line together with a just outcome. mccurdydon1: from Bob H Glad BobH is still posting somewhere... still wondering why he left this board... this sure as heck isn't as bad as RB, to say the least... and, imo, the questions asked of him on the day he deleted his account here wouldn't have hurt my feelings - and I can be sensitive! Oh well...
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 27, 2010 20:13:25 GMT -5
procmkm Brush, I Have Recently Met With Two Distinguished Gentlemen (Old Team) , Who Assured Me A ROI Of A Historic Level Within Two Weeks, This Was A No BS Meeting As It Seemed In The Past, No Sugar Coating. Two Very d*mning Docs That Will Be Distributed To Media Outlets By Oct 8. The ER Release Will Go Mainstream! ~Acca millionaires.proboards.com/index.....=19007&page=624
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 27, 2010 20:25:52 GMT -5
By: aladin99 27 Sep 2010, 06:41 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 962391 of 962429
Jump to msg. # Relax and listen news from Tyler....don't be idle....
buy good ones on dip = Make $$$$....
CLD PCX RTP AAPL LDK FSLR LVS....U name it!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Sept 27, 2010 20:27:26 GMT -5
By: tuscan9 27 Sep 2010, 07:24 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 962398 of 962429 (Reply to 962396 by hanssolong)
Jump to msg. # or maybe Urban...? Does everyone really think that he is bad?
Urban, Maheu, Stocklein.....
we KNOW for fact now.. (if you didnt before..) that STING was in gear...
Negotiations kept the Brokers out of Jail or named if they put money on the table...
Negotiations run both ways to PROTECT ANY wrongdoing or mishap Urban did...
Protecting what Urban had at the TIME of STING...who do we all really think is protecting all that prime land? think its gone? I don't...........
when this is said and done.....the Rising of the Land up North and the conglomerate will be awesome, imo. .. for those that HOLD a cert ! a Bonafide one !!
- - - - -
|
|
|
Post by hafizesh on Sept 27, 2010 22:56:15 GMT -5
thanks pj
By: procmkm aka Acca
Brush, I Have Recently Met With Two Distinguished Gentlemen (Old Team) , Who Assured Me A ROI Of A Historic Level Within Two Weeks, This Was A No BS Meeting As It Seemed In The Past, No Sugar Coating. Two Very d*mning Docs That Will Be Distributed To Media Outlets By Oct 8. The ER Release Will Go Mainstream! ~Acca
------------
Today at 6:47pm, brilliance wrote:thanks acca , any hint on the 2 distinguished gentlemen? Distinguished Sarbanes....... Utterly Coy~ Acca
--------
Today at 6:55pm, brilliance wrote:or Don Stoecklein & Urban Casavant? Latter ~Acca
--------------
Today at 6:43pm, procmkm wrote: Brush, I Have Recently Met With Two Distinguished Gentlemen (Old Team) , Who Assured Me A ROI Of A Historic Level Within Two Weeks, This Was A No BS Meeting As It Seemed In The Past, No Sugar Coating. Two Very d*mning Docs That Will Be Distributed To Media Outlets By Oct 8. The ER Release Will Go Mainstream! ~Acca
------------------------------------
Are these "threatened" to go to media, or "promised?" Reason I ask, because someone even closer to the action said..."never can be fully public."
If the latter is true, the former never can be.
pr
Promise By The 8th If No ER ~ Acca
--------
Today at 7:00pm, portrush wrote:Well, that would put the Dream back into Woodward Cruise, wouldn't it?
pr
It Most Certainly Would PR! ~Acca -----------
Today at 7:08pm, brilliance wrote:Pro - any mention of global settlements during the meeting? In your opinion are we tied to them or is that all for show?
Smoke Screen, Total BS! ~Acca
-------------
Today at 7:08pm, groundfog wrote:Acca,
Are they really afraid of this doc? Do you think they will finally relent and release iyo?
Two Documents, If I Was This Agency I Would Be poop tin Bricks, Huge Bricks! ~ Acca
------------
Today at 7:14pm, brilliance wrote:Did the meeting include any talk of numbers? any mention of 3.87 trillion? Numbers Were Discussed, Cant Elaborate. ~Acca
------------
Today at 7:18pm, marygrace wrote:I suppose this will satisfy us nicely until next Wednesday, Oct 8th?
I asked you nicely, Acca.........to please keep it to yourself. Since you haven't.........please have to decency not to do it again if/when the 8th passes and we have nothing. Promise??
Mary Fair Enough, I Won't Have To Do This Again After The 8th , Period. ~ Acca
------------
Today at 7:24pm, twinnster wrote:Boy Acca - sure hope you are right - losing lots of our shareholders; lots losing everything that they have. Just isn't right to keep us waiting and waiting...they should pay us something...come on - it's been years. We are just tired of waiting now. Natives are really restless now. Just go pop into the vine now and listen!
In A Perfect World The Pay Us Something Would Be Wonderful, Unfortunately We Don't Live In That Perfect World!, As IBM Said It's All Or Nothing!! He Got Us The ALL! `Acca Signing Off! ~Acca
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 27, 2010 23:36:44 GMT -5
Starlight King of Diamonds Re: Acca 9-27-10 « Reply #3 Today at 9:24pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmmm.... Distinguished Sarbanes would be D. Roger Glenn since he was instrumental in writing the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the SEC to abolish NSS... And let's see...Utterly Coy would be Urban Casavant...UC...who has been utterly coy for the past few years with a gag order in place... Starlight tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=14512
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Sept 27, 2010 23:39:37 GMT -5
bikinipro Gossip Column Queen Re: The Weekly Buzz 9/27 « Reply #8 Today at 7:14pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- monalisasmiles Diamond Finder Re: Deli Dismissal « Reply #1 Today at 7:42pm » BIG VICTORY FOR DELI...A BLOW TO THE SEC viewer.zoho.com/docs/ojAadjdeli judgment denied...It means the the SEC was trying to get the judge to rule on Deli without a trial..the SEC got handed a blow when they were denied an immediate judgment without trial and now it must go to court and Deli will be able to show his innocence and the SEC will have the ball in their court. Of course this doesn't mean it's over..but it means the the SEC did not get what they wanted and now must prove it in court. Mona Lumiere gave a great definition: Denial of a summary judgment motion means that the judge found that there exists an issue of fact that must be decided by the jury or court as the finder of fact. In other words, the case goes to trial. The government had tried to avoid the trial by claiming that there were no disputed facts. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=34251
|
|