|
Post by wolfbela on Oct 14, 2010 0:48:39 GMT -5
Arkansas.. Securities Fraud statute..
This is our situation to a tee....
JWB
23-42-507. Fraud or deceit in connection with offer, sale, or purchase of securities. It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (1) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or (3) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. History. Acts 1959, No. 254, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 67-1235.
|
|
|
Post by squeezebox on Oct 14, 2010 0:57:20 GMT -5
wolf, you are the man, very nice!
|
|
|
Post by wolfbela on Oct 14, 2010 10:49:00 GMT -5
CW,
What I am hoping to do, with all my efforts, is just to post something that you can complaint about.. that's all..nothing more...
And by the way, CW, I have as much evidence as AL Hodges....
J WB
|
|
|
Post by TallyHo on Oct 14, 2010 11:49:42 GMT -5
And by the way, CW, I have as much evidence as AL Hodges.... J WB Lol wolf......I will agree there.
|
|
|
Post by theotherside on Oct 14, 2010 13:19:21 GMT -5
"It's not what you know, it's what you can prove" Alonzo Harris, "Training Day" Respectfully, your last few posts here demonstrate some of the discord of purpose I've been talking about. On one hand you've told us you don't need any proof to solicit assistance from the AGs. Here, you're quoting specific state codes related to securities that you presumably hope the AGs can help prosecute for you. But to prosecute violations of these statutes, you need...you guessed it....compelling evidence that something related to those elements of the offense has happened/is happening. You can't have it both ways. Try alleging violations of the laws you're discussing with any AG...and you go nowhere without something actionable on their end. So what is it you're hoping to do here...have the AGs come together to bring pressure on the US government, or get some kind of legal action going...or...? C-Dub Hey Gandhi, Based on this comment of yours from just a few days ago: It's not about taking down those who participate in this...just asking to keep it all together in the same thread, as I've said repeatedly through this one. C-Dub I thought you had no interest in "taking down those who participate in this". Why is it then that many of your recent condescending pontifications seem to be an attempt to do just that?
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Oct 14, 2010 13:28:12 GMT -5
Some of you folks are funny... really!
If you don't like the AG effort, then why not just be quiet and just don't involve yourself in it? If you believe in the effort, why not just ignore the "naysayers" and focus on that which you've already put considerable effort into.
Not for nothing, but some of these posts are pretty obviously screaming "Look at me! See how intelligent I am?!?" Believe me, that's not, AT ALL, what you sound like...
One man's opinion...
|
|
|
Post by goodolboy on Oct 14, 2010 13:30:13 GMT -5
Seems to me there has been a huge effort to convince people that evidence is in hand. Yet, the same group has designed a perfect excuse as to why it will not ever be presented.
Ask yourself, for what purpose does this truly serve?
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Oct 14, 2010 14:34:04 GMT -5
"It's not what you know, it's what you can prove" Alonzo Harris, "Training Day" Respectfully, your last few posts here demonstrate some of the discord of purpose I've been talking about. On one hand you've told us you don't need any proof to solicit assistance from the AGs. Here, you're quoting specific state codes related to securities that you presumably hope the AGs can help prosecute for you. But to prosecute violations of these statutes, you need...you guessed it....compelling evidence that something related to those elements of the offense has happened/is happening. You can't have it both ways. Try alleging violations of the laws you're discussing with any AG...and you go nowhere without something actionable on their end. So what is it you're hoping to do here...have the AGs come together to bring pressure on the US government, or get some kind of legal action going...or...? C-Dub Chuck, all your assessments of what the AG will or will not do is completely IYO. You should be stating as such. Wolf nor yourself know exactly what the AG will do with the information and complaints provided. Not trying would be the asinine thing to do.
|
|