|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 11:49:02 GMT -5
lt.kk Senior Diamond Miner This is a clue ...a big one. « Thread Started Yesterday at 7:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a lead story on MSNBC. BoA online banking down ten hours today. Possibly all of their electronic transfers? Problem corrected at 5:15 pm est today. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15666
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 11:51:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 11:55:58 GMT -5
By: jfarn 15 Jan 2011, 10:29 AM EST Rating: Msg. 987974 of 988007
Jump to msg. # Dissenting Opinion re: Uncle Al
Might be time to wheel ole out to the dog track and pick him at the end of the day. Update from Al Hodges 1/14/11 « Result #2 Yesterday at 9:56pm » Happy???
This is total insanity and anyone that buys this crap, believes it and listens to it, is equally insane.
I am anxious to hear what the authorities think of this. It is no wonder now when I read some posters and wonder what in the world they are thinking. That is explained by those listening to Hodges and his followers.
So why bother with an appeal .. It will have no bearing on this.. Hodges just admitted that himself.
I wonder when the states will show up with the straight jackets.. Shouldn't be too much longer now...
To do this to people is not only a sign of insanity, it is cruel, vicious and criminal in my book...
I will not waste one more minute of my life reading or listening to what Hodges and the rest of this clan have to say...
J WB
Re: Update from Al Hodges 1/14/11 « Result #3 Yesterday at 9:39pm » Is this for real? This is the serious update an attorney puts out to shareholders by quoting a message board post of a shareholder and states that 3 people who agree with him get it?
Are you serious..??
Looks more like Attorney Hodges may be looking for an "insanity" exit out of this mess..
This is unbelievable..
J WB
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 11:57:05 GMT -5
By: mt.men 15 Jan 2011, 11:08 AM EST Rating: Msg. 987984 of 988007
Jump to msg. # I maintain that Peter would not miss the chance to see his Dad go out on top of his game with all these heavyweights in one room squirming as they paid the Piper.AIMHO. Of course.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 11:58:33 GMT -5
By: trixijude 15 Jan 2011, 11:27 AM EST Rating: Msg. 987994 of 988007
Jump to msg. # Good questions:
Please help me understand... « Thread Started Today at 1:10am »
Just some questions to help me understand…
What has been cleared up by this update?
Do we actually know more now than we did yesterday? If so, what?
Why would a professional reputable lawyer reference internet chat room posters in regards to his own credibility in a serious update about a multi-trillion dollar lawsuit?
What is the pay-out scheme?
#3. "I understand that you may not be happy with what's going on." What really is going on?
Has anyone (besides Al Hodges) ever confirmed that there is actually some real thing called the 'World Global Settlements'?
How could CMKX possibly be connected to the Dinar or the Queen?
If the current CMKX happenings really are a scam, how could anyone possibly continue to generate more interest in what is going on and drag things out longer than the way that Al Hodges is going about things? (just a question, no disrespect)
Has anyone (besides Al Hodges) confirmed that the JCS are actually involved in CMKX in any capacity at all?
Outside of Al Hodges and his reports, why does anyone think China is involved in any capacity with CMKX?
Why hasn't Al Hodges post the actual correspondence with the POTUS? Re-read number 10, Al does not confirm that he heard back from the POTUS
A couple thoughts…
It seems that Al Hodges would be frustrated beyond belief that he has never seen any packages with his own eyes, or seen the "evidence video" as rumored to have been created by IBM.
It appears to me that we keep getting lumped in with other world happenings, why? It wouldn't be hard to believe that if this was a complete joke, that associating this case with other 'real' cases would make this one seem plausible (if in fact it was a scam in and of itself).
How would you conduct things differently if you were trying to keep a huge scam going?
I mean no disrespect to anyone. These thoughts and questions are presented to help me understand what is going on, and process the information.
Girl trixi
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:01:07 GMT -5
By: sportsman93306 15 Jan 2011, 11:43 AM EST Rating: Msg. 988000 of 988008
Jump to msg. # I AM SPEACHLESS.EM
By: sportsman93306 15 Jan 2011, 11:43 AM EST Rating: Msg. 988001 of 988008
Jump to msg. # IT'S MIND-NUMBING UPDATE. FOR BOTH SIDES.EM
By: sportsman93306 15 Jan 2011, 11:44 AM EST Rating: Msg. 988002 of 988008
Jump to msg. # SORRY, BUT EVERY POINT HAS MAJOR LOOPHOLE.EM
By: sportsman93306 15 Jan 2011, 11:45 AM EST Rating: Msg. 988003 of 988008
Jump to msg. # WHY DID'NT AL CHECK PACKAGES HIMSELF?TRILLION $, SO CHECK IT PERSONALLY,SIR.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:18:34 GMT -5
ShowMeTheMoney Mod Squad Re: Weekly Buzz 01/10/11 « Reply #54 Yesterday at 8:09pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hawkeye via Seagull hundredtoone.websitetoolbox.com/printthread/?id=2275661&trail=615In 2003, Urban Casavant locked up CMKI shares. The shares were put in escrow with TCC and Associates. The 1,095 days Lock-up (Escrow Term) of 600 Million CMKI Shares was to protect the shares and to increase Stockholder’s value. During the Escrow Term, Urban Casavant agreed that he will be unable to sell, transfer, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the Shares. Also during the Escrow Term, Urban Casavant retained all other rights afforded to him as a shareholder of CMKI, including but not limited to the receipt of dividends when declared and use of voting rights. www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Filings.asp….=Hits&Show=EachUrban changes the symbol name to CMKX. Why the separation? The O/S was increased, the selling continued in the billions, however the allotments from the company were not settled as required between the transfer agent and the sellers. Jeffries held the SELL price down for weeks though the demand was high. Billions of shares were blatantly traded each day at sub-zero prices. Dividends were paid and allocated to Stockholders. The company used the dividend payout as rough indicators as to how many shares were counterfeited. Items to ponder... Why would Urban Lock-Up the voting shares for 1095 Days when usually Lock-ups are 120 to 365 Days? Why would Urban Lock-UP the majority of the company’s shares CMKI (voting shares), which gave him total control and then changed the symbol to CMKX (non-voting shares) and increase the authorized shares to 800 Billion while the CMKI is Locked-Up? What evidence did Urban have that convinced the guilty parties of naked short selling to pay up? Did Urban keep the actual 800 Billion CMKX Shares in protective custody as proof that “Phantom Shares” of CMKX were being traded and sold to investors? The dividends paid on CMKX proved there were over 1.4 Trillion Shares of CMKX…..800 Billion plus 622 Billion = 1.422 Trillion,imo. The Cert Pull attached names to actual investors as proof that the 622 Billion shares were sold to investors. If 800 Billion Shares are in protective custody, then this would explain why the funds collected for the Shareholders are divided by 622 Billion, imo. What does the X in CMKX stand for? Does ‘X’ stand for ‘crossed off’ shares? Your thoughts? Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36573&page=3
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:23:24 GMT -5
pennypauly Mini Mod Re: Weekly Buzz 01/10/11 « Reply #60 Today at 9:42am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- jbgoodNow What? « Thread Started Today at 3:45am » Al said we won? I don't feel like we won... He said we are no longer linked to WGS? Sounds good... Al said we don't need no stinkin ER. Again, sounds real good! He said GI is the hold up now? Why? According to Al, the Dinar and WGS are out of the picture, which means that the 21st is irrellevant to us, right? Right? Al? Bob? Chucky? Anyone that has a clue? What now? harvscorvetteJan 21 2011 is irrelevant to us. Look for a delivery. traderboy Harv,How long we have to wait for a delivery? I have a lot of respect what's Mr. Hodges doing behind the scenes. His update sounds good but I don't have a good feeling about a delivery in the near future. A lot questions remains open. I really thought Jan 21 is the next date to look forward. Now you are saying this date is irrelevant to us? Please explain yourself Harv. What's your thought on the situation Harv. Thx for your positive comments, whe need it With respect, John. harvscorvetteJohn, when reading this 8th highlighted paragraph from Mr. Hodges, let us break it down into more easier understanding what it is saying. 8. Prior to the recent change of process by the Chinese lien holder it was a requirement, based upon BASEL, that ER be obtained prior to the time that certain other payments could be made( since the Chinese have now taken over the process of payouts, there will be no Economic Receipt needed as required). As I have previously stated on many occasions we were waiting for Michael Cottrell and his companies to receive their payments as they were Number 20( this is no longer the case to wait for Mr. Cottrell to be funded, it was, not any longer notice the wording " we were waiting" past tense, this has no been completely revised and does not affect us ), the very last payee, on the BASEL list. Because the Chinese lien holder has changed the process, I now understand that Michael Cottrell will be paid on or about January 21, 2011 ( Jan 21 2011 is the dead line for Mr. Cottrell and his companies to be funded not CMKX, Jan 21 2011 has nothing to do with us ), after all of the Prosperity Program money has been paid out which is estimated to take between 4 – 5 days ( Mr. Cottrell will be funded after the Prosperity Program money has been paid out ). This is no way suggests that ER continues to be a requirement of the release of CMKX payments ( I wonder if Mr. Hodges meant to use "IN" as compared to "IS" Economic Receipt as it reads is not required for release of our funds which is a strong indicator to be on the look out for delivery anytime after Tuesday). As set forth above, I have tried desperately to contact Global Intelligence to secure their agreement to authorize immediate release of the CMKX packages, as I believe that the reason for delaying their delivery has now evaporated( GI made an agreement with Mr.Hodges to release the funds immediately, delivery of our packets are imminent and we should be on the look out for them. Government is not in control of the release of our funds )millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36573&page=4
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:24:05 GMT -5
lt.kk Re: H and A Update 14 January 2011 « Reply #53 Today at 8:42am » Thank-you Al....I believe Mr. Maheu knows exactly what is going on and has ALWAYS been in our corner....He is the Hammer, Al is the nail and the coffin is now closed! Lt.KK I am very happy! tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?bo....ad=15667&page=3
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:25:22 GMT -5
bikinipro Gossip Column Queen Re: Weekly Buzz 01/10/11 « Reply #63 Today at 11:27am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- snifferpup Possibly: Future occurrence: Shareholders receive first contact and within, a treasury check for said amount.....................Along with that is instructions as to future contact along with a statement and possibly a story from Peter Maheu and or Global Intelligence..............A story about security for each shareholder and his family going forward.......One that would make you think first before running out and telling the world.............Like those dreams of going to the teller you don't like and handing that check to them to see their face.......................Or telling your boss to pound sand as a limo pulls up to pick you up in front of him......etc etc etc etc etc..........................A wake up call to be on the down low... So say it happens................A year from now if someone was researching this, what would be the last thing they see from Al Hodges................A update that says basically we are not p[aid yet............And the only place they can find that is on thousands of websites in a Cut And Paste format...........The link might be there, but unless your a member of Tramps board, you won't get in................But still, having the link to Tramps board to see the actual post does what for you as far as truth in your research..........................Like a dead end with no clarity and your not even a shareholder, but just trying to find truth... You go to Global Intelligence website and find nothing......................You make contact and they deny everything... And one pup smiles because his drink has 3 umbrella's in it.....................What's the possibility of that~ millionaires.proboards.com/index.....ad=36573&page=4
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:27:06 GMT -5
ggroovy DIAMOND MINER Re: Hodges Update 1/14/11 « Reply #240 Today at 11:55am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Noone asks about the Chinese lienholders? Lienholder on what? I first read about it in the World Reports article dated 14 Dec 2009. Yes, the Chinese can certainly cause leverage to see to it the WGS are distributed: LIEN EXECUTED AGAINST TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE IN THE SUM OF $47 TRILLION Following further intransigent obstruction, the Chinese parties who obtained the necessary World Court Writ of Execution and Lien on the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, duly exercised their powers and imposed the Lien on or around 6th December 2009. The Lien against the Treasury is in the sum of $47 trillion, which is approximately the aggregate identified by this service in 2007. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36723&page=13
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:28:19 GMT -5
stinky DIAMOND MINER Re: Hodges Update 1/14/11 « Reply #241 Today at 12:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think Al uses those qualifiers only when he, himself, has not has his own eyes or ears on certain information - just like a journalist uses the word "allegedly." For instance, we know Jared Lee Loughner shot a bunch of people in Arizona last week, but journalists must use the words "alleged shooter" until he is convicted in court. Al says three independent people have informed him that they have seen packages for shareholders. Al himself cannot say he has seen them with his own two eyes - so for the sake of fairness and with a healthy dose of legalese, he must use these types of qualifiers in his language. Thus, I doubt Al would convey such information if he didn't feel that his sources were reliable... I'm not saying that your red flags aren't worth noting - they absolutely are - but I doubt highly that Al & co would be stroking us if he didn't feel good about the final outcome. Today at 8:58am, rocketship0 wrote: millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36723&page=13
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:30:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:32:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Jan 15, 2011 12:38:44 GMT -5
ShowMeTheMoney Mod Squad Re: Hodges Update 1/14/11 « Reply #171 Today at 2:05am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I've seen several posts, and received a PM, from folks who have their certs from the Stock Pull, but are only now wondering if they should have registered their shares with the new TA, Transfer Online. In my opinion, that would seem prudent... if for no other reason than so they know how to reach you. Here is their contact information: Transfer Online, Inc 512 SE Salmon Street Portland, OR 97214 503.227.2950 503.227.2950 [F] 503.227.6874 503.227.6874 [E] info@transferOnline.com [W]www.transferOnline.com
As I recall, you will need the following:
Your full name(s) as printed on your cert(s)
Your Cert Number(s)
Number of shares on each Cert you own
The CUSIP No.
millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36723&page=9
|
|