|
Post by yetihunter on Jan 14, 2011 1:25:07 GMT -5
now they're blaming maheu's son for the delays? the president, the queen, the government, the black farmers, the chinese, the dinar, the maheus... (notice i used the correct "they're" for all you grammar lovers out there) Maybe so, but you didn't capitalize now. d'oh!! i knew i forgot something! ;D
|
|
zibel
Diamond Finder
Posts: 57
|
Post by zibel on Jan 14, 2011 6:06:54 GMT -5
Always found it odd that such a trillions USD case is handled by one single lawyer ... Maybe he's David versus Goliath like stated on the last update of his website ... but When googling Al Hodges adres in Passadena : 4 East Holly Street and using streetview, I get this view : can anyone confirm this is the entrance to the office of Al Hodges ? regards, z.
|
|
slappy
Dr. Of Diamonds
Posts: 120
|
Post by slappy on Jan 14, 2011 6:30:13 GMT -5
Didn't mommy ever tell you never judge a book by it's cover!
|
|
|
Post by MannyFin on Jan 14, 2011 9:48:13 GMT -5
Always found it odd that such a trillions USD case is handled by one single lawyer ... Maybe he's David versus Goliath like stated on the last update of his website ... but When googling Al Hodges adres in Passadena : 4 East Holly Street and using streetview, I get this view : can anyone confirm this is the entrance to the office of Al Hodges ? regards, z. I can, so what of it, its a secure building and he has a very nice office!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2011 10:02:34 GMT -5
Manny, What's your old bones doin up so early??
D4E
|
|
|
Post by gjfromfla on Jan 14, 2011 10:02:49 GMT -5
What does it matter the type of office building someone works at? If he had a two story building would it make you feel better? Maybe he owns the entire top floor, or whatever... I work with some companies that 90% of their employees ( 50 - 1000) work from home. Helps them reduce cost... I don't think all or most attorneys have plush offices but still do very well... Don't judge Attorney Hodges from his office. ( I don't think a brinks truck is rolling up front with our packets going to be delivered to him directly).
|
|
|
Post by ccohen5017 on Jan 14, 2011 10:05:25 GMT -5
i am sure the rent on that building is not cheap, check out the area and I am sure it is high dollar
|
|
|
Post by agfadoc on Jan 14, 2011 10:07:16 GMT -5
a 1200 sqft home built in 1950 went for $800K - 1.1M in Pasadena before the crash.
There isn't anything cheap in Pasadena..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2011 10:13:39 GMT -5
Your right on Agfadoc, Just looked it up and apts go for 800k+ so offices must be 4x that.
D4E
|
|
zibel
Diamond Finder
Posts: 57
|
Post by zibel on Jan 14, 2011 10:22:42 GMT -5
Did I made a judgment ? I just wanted a confirmation ...
|
|
|
Post by sweetsp7 on Jan 14, 2011 10:30:58 GMT -5
Re: My hope for tomorrow.... « Reply #9 Today at 7:04am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 7:01am, ines wrote: Today at 6:58am, cmkxdiamonds wrote:i am expecting er considering we had a supreme court directive to pay us by december 31st...people are breaking laws daily and nobody is paying for it but us....and the sad part nobody seems to care...how do you pay for healthcare when you need it and are broke....how about shareholders who need expensive medication and cant get it....how about shareholders who's children are sick and you cant afford good healthcare...these freakin crooks dont care and this easy excuse for the holdup is our crooked government so their is not a thing you can do but die while your waiting.... _____________________________________________________________________________ there is no proof of sc directive. people have called sc and there was none, second .. if we assume there was one, obviously .. it did not happen. all and all it points to that there never was one. Ines ___________________________________________________________________________ Directive, opinion, ruling, whatever you call it, it exists. Making the assumption that there was never one is making a big leap, and a wrong one. One could make the assertion that there is one but was never followed, which in fact is the case. Just because you cannot find evidence of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, especially if sealed. Chucky « Last Edit: Today at 7:21am by chucky » millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36683
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 14, 2011 10:50:48 GMT -5
Re: My hope for tomorrow.... « Reply #9 Today at 7:04am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 7:01am, ines wrote: Today at 6:58am, cmkxdiamonds wrote:i am expecting er considering we had a supreme court directive to pay us by december 31st...people are breaking laws daily and nobody is paying for it but us....and the sad part nobody seems to care...how do you pay for healthcare when you need it and are broke....how about shareholders who need expensive medication and cant get it....how about shareholders who's children are sick and you cant afford good healthcare...these freakin crooks dont care and this easy excuse for the holdup is our crooked government so their is not a thing you can do but die while your waiting.... _____________________________________________________________________________ there is no proof of sc directive. people have called sc and there was none, second .. if we assume there was one, obviously .. it did not happen. all and all it points to that there never was one. Ines ___________________________________________________________________________ Directive, opinion, ruling, whatever you call it, it exists. Making the assumption that there was never one is making a big leap, and a wrong one. One could make the assertion that there is one but was never followed, which in fact is the case. Just because you cannot find evidence of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, especially if sealed. Chucky « Last Edit: Today at 7:21am by chucky » millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36683 Old Chucky seems to be standing by his guns... I like that...
|
|
|
Post by ishmel on Jan 14, 2011 11:52:32 GMT -5
Chucky, standing by his guns? Hardly. If that is the case then chucky doesn't know what he is grabbing for; the pistol on his belt or the banana in his pocket. He shows he doesn't know whether it's and actual ruling or an opinion or a directive. All 3 are very different from each other. chucky Directive, opinion, ruling, whatever you call it, it exists. Making the assumption that there was never one is making a big leap, and a wrong one. One could make the assertion that there is one but was never followed, which in fact is the case. Just because you cannot find evidence of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, especially if sealed. Chucky millionaires.proboards.com/index.....3&page=1#519219
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jan 14, 2011 12:01:51 GMT -5
Chucky, standing by his guns? Hardly. If that is the case then chucky doesn't know what he is grabbing for; the pistol on his belt or the banana in his pocket. He shows he doesn't know whether it's and actual ruling or an opinion or a directive. All 3 are very different from each other. chucky Directive, opinion, ruling, whatever you call it, it exists. Making the assumption that there was never one is making a big leap, and a wrong one. One could make the assertion that there is one but was never followed, which in fact is the case. Just because you cannot find evidence of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, especially if sealed. Chucky millionaires.proboards.com/index.....3&page=1#519219 I still like him....
|
|
|
Post by hacksawjim on Jan 14, 2011 12:05:39 GMT -5
I still like him.... agreed. hack
|
|