|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Jan 28, 2011 10:52:55 GMT -5
Another new discussion thread !! Waiting for the day we can end all this chatter?
Fire away!!
Single
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jan 28, 2011 10:58:08 GMT -5
Al Filed « Thread Started Today at 10:03am » Al filed « Thread Started Today at 6:58am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- go2guy Al Filed.. « Thread Started Today at 9:54am » 01/27/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiffs David Anderson, Reece Hamilton, Robert Hollenegg, Sheila Morris, Nelson L Reynolds. Appeal of Order Dismissing Case 32 (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (Attachments: # 1 Order of Dismissal, # 2 Service List)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 01/27/2011) convert.neevia.com/docs/2d597b5b-2e78-4cf7-b8d3-acbb8e54836f/1.pdf01/27/2011 REPRESENTATION STATEMENT re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 33 . (Hodges, A) (Entered: 01/27/2011) convert.neevia.com/docs/af988a56-d6d1-44e8-81e3-dd1d55d662d0/2.pdf01/27/2011 Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 33 (Attachments: # 1 Order of Dismissal, # 2 Service List)(Hodges, A) (Entered: 01/27/2011) convert.neevia.com/docs/a3566b74-a778-441e-9be7-ec1fb09dba8e/3.pdf
|
|
|
Post by TakeItEZ on Jan 28, 2011 11:33:08 GMT -5
tigerherb: (9:20 AM): Salty says that after talking to other plaintiffs that were texting Mr. Hodges last night, there appears to be an information blackout because Al would not respond to them. Salty also said it was unusual for Hodges not to respond. This is from the old rumor thread. Why would AH respond? Salty is not plaintiff anymore.
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jan 28, 2011 11:45:34 GMT -5
Lets see, Al isn't responding and a few gurus have left the building.
Ok, hmmm, interesting if nothing else.
^ .". ^
|
|
|
Post by goldengriff on Jan 28, 2011 16:00:26 GMT -5
Hello Everyone! Just saw that Al Hodges has appealled the Bevins suit. And didn't pay the fee btw. Anyway I just wanted to let you good folks know that I have been following not only many of the CMKX lawsuits but those of other conglomerate companys like Overstock, CSHD, as well as companies not known to be among the conglomerate. Other than being in a federal court, being sued or charged by the government, they all have one very important issue in common...DELAY. And they all seemed to be delayed often and all around the same time. That is not coincidental, I assure you...way too frequent and timing is too close. As you all know in this country you have a constitutional right for a speedy trial unless you refuse it. In all the cases I follow it is very obvious that the wrong doing was not done by the defendents but by the government along with their mafia wall street buddies. The government is guilty of neglect while the wall streeters are gulity of market manipulation, fraud, bribery, and god knows what else. So the defendants have nothing to hide and you would expect these defendants to open their arms to a speedy trial but they don't, they actually forefeit that right in every case. BUT WHY? The answer to that question is very simple, these court cases are not about proving innocent, it has to be about so much more like this:
I have posted here before, "nothing will happen until we get announcements" Announcement about the gold standard, currencies revaluing, USTREASURY, USTREASURY BANKS, and so much more including the return to CONSTITUTIONAL LAW There you have it folks, the return to CONSTITUTIONAL LAW....BINGO case dismissed And like this:
EXPOSURE! The government nor the wall street mafia types want their crimes to go main stream. So the defendants open their arms to forefeiting a speedy trial to keep the pressure on Like an ace in the whole, or a royal straight flush. Like the lone cowboy facing down an army of bad guys knowing all along there are 3 armies of good guys just over the hill. Their venue is federal court, how more public can you get. It would be impossible for the media to ignore the type of evidence that would be presented in a federal court given the subject matter
Now this Bevins suit is alittle different than the others I follow in context. It seems to be just the first round of exposure, and a shot wizzing by the ear so the "delayers"get the message load and clear. You know like the lone cowboy I mentioned. And this case too has been extended, delayed from its conclusion. Got to love patterns, they tell you so much
So my point is this, and thanks for hang-in with me. Don't put to much importance on the court issues other than understanding their implied purpose. The worst case is more time is needed to get the details worked out to bring this part of our journey to a conclusion. And that time needed is probably defined in days, maybe weeks, not in months or years as the court cases imply. Just wanted to add my two cents GG
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jan 28, 2011 16:15:16 GMT -5
By: cbaughan 28 Jan 2011, 03:41 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 991143 of 991148 Jump to msg. # What kind of man is Peter Maheu If you are like me, with all the recent public reports from Al, etc. regarding Peter Maheu, you might be wondering..what kind of person is he anyway? Would he be so unlike his father Bob? Would he really try to hold up our money for crooked reasons? I believe if you read this ENTIRE article published Jan 22, 2011 I think you will bet a big clue despite the fact that this article has nothing to do with our stock. www.lvrj.com/news/team-effort-pro....04.html?ref=004 Mona PS. It appears we are still in good hands! But you did not have to hear that from the latest greatest guru. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=991143
|
|
|
Post by Ed Jagacki on Jan 28, 2011 16:19:33 GMT -5
Thank you, GG... I can appreciate that patterns can tell us much.
Also, thanx for fixing your "CapsLock" key. ;D
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jan 28, 2011 16:27:23 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 28 Jan 2011, 04:23 PM EST Rating: You rated it: Msg. 991153 of 991153 Jump to msg. # THE WHOLE LAST YEAR HAS BEEN TOTALLY FAKE from portrush to me, and yes this was a private message but at this point who really cares anymore, the whole thing is a complete joke: "I haven't heard that stated by anyone, but you can sure see it by the way things are taking place. Someone you would know and is pretty involved in this asked me..."what if you found out everything this past year was all fake...just a smoke screen to cover up what was really happening?" I replied, I would be glad this is over--would be pissed--and would never forget. And if the smoke and mirror show is real, why should the plaintiffs not end up confused too? My guess is they will. Is that true...its all fake? I don't know. But I DO know this: it will NOT be public, ever. Got that from the alphabet. I understand it completely. It cannot. You know this...you KNOW this, Dave. They cannot ever admit to having sold counterfeit stock or paying a penalty for it. It would rattle the very core of economies around the world. And THAT'S a big reason why I am confident your friend is spinning wheels with the AG effort. I know he has some willing to investigate. Let's see if he gets as far as you did in Canada before getting shut down, or in the least...ignored." ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=991153
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jan 28, 2011 16:36:05 GMT -5
FWIW:
Just had an interesting conversation with Cottrell. It was initially profanity laced; however, he eventually calmed down and apologized..lol
I'll cut to the chase. He has not been funded/paid. However, today is the deadline set by the Chinese. He made it abundantly clear, he is not an obstacle to us getting paid anymore. He said our dealings are with Maheu!! Take it worth what its worth!!
Briwadd
|
|
|
Post by NobleForce2 on Jan 28, 2011 16:38:27 GMT -5
LoL. How dare Mona speak in a condescending manner towards the latest, greatest guru. Dat be funny.
|
|
|
Post by ucaughtme on Jan 28, 2011 16:41:02 GMT -5
FWIW: Just had an interesting conversation with Cottrell. It was initially profanity laced; however, he eventually calmed down and apologized..lol I'll cut to the chase. He has not been funded/paid. However, today is the deadline set by the Chinese. He made it abundantly clear, he is not an obstacle to us getting paid anymore. He said our dealings are with Maheu!! Take it worth what its worth!! Briwadd Thank you for bringing this info forward Briwadd. Could you please elaborate on the "deadline" part? Deadline for us, or deadline for Cotrell? TY! Also, did Cottrell give you any inkling as to how the Chinese will deal with whoever is supposed to pay him, if they do not release his funds by today?
|
|
|
Post by briwadd on Jan 28, 2011 16:43:33 GMT -5
FWIW: Just had an interesting conversation with Cottrell. It was initially profanity laced; however, he eventually calmed down and apologized..lol I'll cut to the chase. He has not been funded/paid. However, today is the deadline set by the Chinese. He made it abundantly clear, he is not an obstacle to us getting paid anymore. He said our dealings are with Maheu!! Take it worth what its worth!! Briwadd Thank you for bringing this info forward Briwadd. Could you please elaborate on the "deadline" part? Deadline for us, or deadline for Cotrell? TY! Deadline for Cottrell. Cottrell doesn't give a $%# *&&^% about CMKX. He makes that abundantly clear every conversation.
|
|
|
Post by ucaughtme on Jan 28, 2011 16:52:10 GMT -5
It appears that the Jacbert blurb from yesterday was not from reputable sources.
|
|
|
Post by groundfog on Jan 28, 2011 16:52:39 GMT -5
Thanks Briwadd..much appreciated!
|
|
|
Post by sunbeam777 on Jan 28, 2011 17:09:20 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 28 Jan 2011, 05:00 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 991162 of 991164 Jump to msg. # all shareholders should contact keith staub, doj that is involved in our case and ask him how it is possible to file an appeal in this case when the doj has signed off on this case and our trustee has the money. Los Angeles, California 90012. Telephone: (213) 894-7423. Facsimile: (213) 894-7819. Email: Keith. Staub@usdoj.gov ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=991162
|
|