Post by sunbeam777 on Mar 23, 2011 17:40:09 GMT -5
dicek18
Dizardos, can you clarify what changes have been made in the payment process?
And, where did you get this information? Was it a plaintiff? Al Hodges?
Would you also explain what the monetary allocation problem is all about? And if you could also refer to your source here as well, that would be great.
Thanks a lot!
dizardos
Payments have been integrated just as the paperwork and should thus all be paid out in a much shorter time span than previously calculated. It has its efficiency advantages.
Considerable amounts of money have been collected. This posed the 'monetary allocation problem'. Such money can be used to accomplish a variety of strategic aims. Often a main corporate theme is whether money should remain within the corporation or whether it should be returned to shareholders. There were internal conflicts about this issue, but they have been resolved. Logically this pertains to the 'company that will trade again'.
Sources cannot ever be mentioned. While some work on acquiring information, others are working on limiting information due to security matters. Both sides have good but nevertheless conflicting intentions. In general it is simply is best not to cross those 'security' lines. Put it another way: Anyone who talks too much soon enough stops talking at all. Remoaz just mentioned that Bonney was requested by Al Hodges to remain silent after he said too much. Have you wondered where the Listener went who provided Chucky amongst other well known shareholders with information? Maybe he said too much. Or Contact 2? What else can it be than that he said too much? Do you know why I was tracked down by the Department of Defense AND contacted by Al Hodges' office? Mainly because I mentioned a name. There are does and don't s. Gatekeepers are everywhere, also within our ranks.
As you can see the request for sources cannot add anything of value to what is already there. You know me long enough to make a judgment about whether my words are of value to you or not.
akoller84
Diz,
Have you had any kind of inkling of a time frame by which all is suppose to be complete(packets/funds to the shareholders)? I understand it is a fluid situation, but many people are saying this week or by end of month. Are you in line with that?
dizardos
The general consensus indeed seems to be that it will be done this month. I sure hope so, but I cannot say that with absolute certainty. There is always Murphy's Law.
There have indeed been indications that certain Prosperity Packages have been going out. Shortly (not more than a few days at most) after that entire event CMKX should follow according to the original plans. Once this happens, the CMKX tax component can be activated by the government which will be used to revalue the Dinar. This seems to be 'the horse' that Cottrell referred to as mentioned by 737man.
Keep in mind that there will absolutely be no notification of incoming packages beforehand. Security protocols.... So it will not be known until we actually receive our package.
swmiller3
Diz,
What do you mean by this statement?
"the CMKX tax component can be activated by the government"
Thanks,
Steve
dizardos
The taxes that were taken out of our trust funds.
camrhon.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=6685&page=14
Dizardos, can you clarify what changes have been made in the payment process?
And, where did you get this information? Was it a plaintiff? Al Hodges?
Would you also explain what the monetary allocation problem is all about? And if you could also refer to your source here as well, that would be great.
Thanks a lot!
dizardos
Payments have been integrated just as the paperwork and should thus all be paid out in a much shorter time span than previously calculated. It has its efficiency advantages.
Considerable amounts of money have been collected. This posed the 'monetary allocation problem'. Such money can be used to accomplish a variety of strategic aims. Often a main corporate theme is whether money should remain within the corporation or whether it should be returned to shareholders. There were internal conflicts about this issue, but they have been resolved. Logically this pertains to the 'company that will trade again'.
Sources cannot ever be mentioned. While some work on acquiring information, others are working on limiting information due to security matters. Both sides have good but nevertheless conflicting intentions. In general it is simply is best not to cross those 'security' lines. Put it another way: Anyone who talks too much soon enough stops talking at all. Remoaz just mentioned that Bonney was requested by Al Hodges to remain silent after he said too much. Have you wondered where the Listener went who provided Chucky amongst other well known shareholders with information? Maybe he said too much. Or Contact 2? What else can it be than that he said too much? Do you know why I was tracked down by the Department of Defense AND contacted by Al Hodges' office? Mainly because I mentioned a name. There are does and don't s. Gatekeepers are everywhere, also within our ranks.
As you can see the request for sources cannot add anything of value to what is already there. You know me long enough to make a judgment about whether my words are of value to you or not.
akoller84
Diz,
Have you had any kind of inkling of a time frame by which all is suppose to be complete(packets/funds to the shareholders)? I understand it is a fluid situation, but many people are saying this week or by end of month. Are you in line with that?
dizardos
The general consensus indeed seems to be that it will be done this month. I sure hope so, but I cannot say that with absolute certainty. There is always Murphy's Law.
There have indeed been indications that certain Prosperity Packages have been going out. Shortly (not more than a few days at most) after that entire event CMKX should follow according to the original plans. Once this happens, the CMKX tax component can be activated by the government which will be used to revalue the Dinar. This seems to be 'the horse' that Cottrell referred to as mentioned by 737man.
Keep in mind that there will absolutely be no notification of incoming packages beforehand. Security protocols.... So it will not be known until we actually receive our package.
swmiller3
Diz,
What do you mean by this statement?
"the CMKX tax component can be activated by the government"
Thanks,
Steve
dizardos
The taxes that were taken out of our trust funds.
camrhon.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=6685&page=14