|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jul 22, 2011 8:21:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by snifferpup on Jul 22, 2011 8:33:49 GMT -5
[shadow=black,left,300] I vote for MOOT~[/shadow]  |
|
dwg86
Diamond Hunter
Posts: 11 
|
Post by dwg86 on Jul 22, 2011 8:39:51 GMT -5
With this statement "While this cause was filed as a probable class action, no putative class has yet been certified..."
Does this mean this is not a class action suit? And if it isn't, what does that mean for the shareholders?
|
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Jul 22, 2011 8:40:33 GMT -5
From MUTE to MOOT in 30 days. I like it.
(If this isn't just more BS)
|
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 22, 2011 8:41:33 GMT -5
[shadow=black,left,300] I vote for MOOT~[/shadow] ;D Now that is my kind of pooch! Sniffer you are something else! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 22, 2011 8:42:17 GMT -5
Just sent this to a good Lawyer friend.. He called me and said it looks like this should be over within the next 30 days.. We should be getting something...He really liked the AUSA involvement.. Looks good..   If you believe this then I may have to think this over again.  |
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 22, 2011 8:44:10 GMT -5
With this statement "While this cause was filed as a probable class action, no putative class has yet been certified..." Does this mean this is not a class action suit? And if it isn't, what does that mean for the shareholders? Sounds to me like omiting of sharholders? Ok, I'm back to being very suspicious of this. Argh!   |
|
|
|
Post by victorious on Jul 22, 2011 8:49:58 GMT -5
konga? No disrespect but where do these people keep coming from? IMO this post is taylor made for the millionaires board.
On one hand the suit has been delay by our infamous atty and yet AGAIN its done according to some unknown/new guru. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by John Winston Lennon O'Boogie on Jul 22, 2011 8:51:36 GMT -5
Just sent this to a good Lawyer friend.. He called me and said it looks like this should be over within the next 30 days.. We should be getting something...He really liked the AUSA involvement.. Looks good.. If you believe this then I may have to think this over again. He is a Corp. Lawyer.. Good Family friend for years.. He said out of all the crap I sent him in the past, this is what we were looking for.. Then he said, just remember it can go one way or another and it would be back in the courts hands. He said that is not what we want to see.. He has always been right up front with me.. When I sent him the stuff from World Report, and Hodges update on the Dinar, he said this guy is just passing time right now.. Keeping us all in the dark.. |
|
|
|
Post by momoney on Jul 22, 2011 8:57:25 GMT -5
IMO anyone who does not see this as a good thing is someone who is not bonafide and unable to get their certs. This would explain being negative to the end. IMO
Go AL and Team !
Mo
|
|
vcalv
Diamond Finder
Posts: 99
|
Post by vcalv on Jul 22, 2011 9:01:21 GMT -5
IMO anyone who does not see this as a good thing is someone who is not bonafide and unable to get their certs. This would explain being negative to the end. IMO Go AL and Team ! Mo I disagree. I am bonafide and I am registered with the TA, yet I no longer get excited when I see updates such as this one. We have seen this before with nothing happening in our favor. It seems as though the bad guys are calling the shots and Al is constantly changing dates to suit their needs. I hope I am wrong but not holding my breath. |
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 22, 2011 9:05:53 GMT -5
IMO anyone who does not see this as a good thing is someone who is not bonafide and unable to get their certs. This would explain being negative to the end. IMO Go AL and Team ! Mo So of I'm suspicious of this then I don't have my cert? There's a Texas attorney who knows I have my cert. I'm suspicious but hope this is going to finally happen. Momoney, you shouldn't throw around blanket statements like that. |
|
|
|
Post by irwin4star on Jul 22, 2011 9:10:28 GMT -5
An opinion is not a blanket statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by marbearcat on Jul 22, 2011 9:12:11 GMT -5
There is a blanket statement within the opinion.
The opinion is based on that blanket statement.
|
|
|
|
Post by lurknomore on Jul 22, 2011 9:13:16 GMT -5
"within just the past hours, I have learned..."
"Given the very recent and unanticipated appearance to me of this information..."
Whatever Al has learned was SO recent that he has to ask that his motion for the 30 extension be granted IN SPITE of the fact that he is past the 7 day deadline to do so, as per 9th Cir. R. 31- 2.2(b ).
|
|
