Post by nospromod on Feb 8, 2007 10:02:34 GMT -5
board=main said:
SECond gLANCEJonathan Katz, Secretary of the S. E. C., revoked St. George’s (SGGM) registration and granted CMKM Diamonds request to be revoked on the same day and at the same time, with CMKM document number 34-52694 followed by SGGM document number 34-52695? Are SGGM and CMKX connected together? And why would Jonathan Katz take the time from his busy schedule to take care of this matter concerning two pink stocks?
Hold on a SEC…
SGGM is from Arlington, VA and registered in Nevada. SGGM invested $10 Million Dollars in CMKM though SGGM was dormant for 2 years. Where did the funds come from?
Got a SEC?…
CMKM SGGM Key Personnel SEC connections:
Roger Glenn was Federal Securities Counsel for CMKM, worked over 19 years with the SEC.
Donald Stoecklein was Federal Securities Counsel for CMKM, from Stoecklein Security Law Institute, provided information to Jonathan Katz, Secretary of Security Exchange Commission, on The Final Rule, which covers investor protection, naked shorting, shell company mergers and reporting. Stoecklein’s input is referenced numerous times in The Final Rule authored by Jonathan Katz.
William B. Haseltine, was President of SGGM, presently has own law firm specializing in Federal Securities, worked for over 19 years with the SEC and with Jonathan Katz:
William B. Haseltine, Special Counsels,
Division of Corporation Finance,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Mail Stop 3-12, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Just a SEC..
SEC exercises remedial sanctions because:
CMKM stopped reporting April 2003.
SGGM stopped reporting May 2003.
Hmmm…both stopped reporting about the same time.
Both CMKM and SGGM were revoked consecutively on the same day. Yet, the best Federal Securities counsels were involved with these two pink stocks? Why? Naked shorts, imho.
Why would anyone illegally naked short CMKX with these individuals involved? It only takes a SEC to look over the situation. Must be because they have a short memory. I am sure the naked shorts won't forget now considering there are plenty of inCENTiveS to make them RECALL... Just(ice) a SECond gLANCE.
We were in good hands…we still are in good hands.
All the best,
BHollenegg
cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=5826330593224&lang=en-US
www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52695.pdf
www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52694.pdf
www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id298rgm.pdf
www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id291bpm.pdf