Post by 3bid on Jan 24, 2015 16:16:41 GMT -5
Published on Jan 24, 2015
This is not like a war that is ultimately going to be won by the vigilantes. Because throughout history the corrupt state has always failed in the end. So now we're at the endgame and the vigilantes -- the global insurrection against banker occupation, are now on the march. Injustice always leads to this.
In this Keiser Report from Mexico City, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss mind carnage in the markets as price discovery goes astray due to market intervention, and the rise of vigilante groups around the world looking for Rolex watch and Gucci belt wearing politicians. In the second half, Max interviews businessman, radio show host and anarchist, Jeff Berwick, about becoming a taxpayer, living in Mexico as a tourist and the ending of the drug wars.
Henry Servatt ยท Top Commenter
Almost all recent usage of the word is predicated upon negative connotation. The root of the word seems to indicate "watchful" - i.e., vigilant - which is a good thing in my book. I am concerned about the descent of modern rhetoric into political correctness. I recognize that many "vigilante" groups have been no better than gangs of thugs, but that shouldn't mean the word itself isn't from noble origins. The idea of a "watchman on the wall" notifying a primitive city of the arrival of true vandals simply cannot have been a bad thing. I wonder why we so seldom hear of the many good cases of noble civilian "vigilantism". Can it be that the idea of civilian power is repugnant to those who would grasp "the power?"