Interesting Convo... Supercim, Granny & Ines....

[imSINGLEruRICH]

This came from a thread on the millionaire board........ interesting & raises some questions....
Granny, I guess I just assumed you were not talking to RC anymore probably because he is a player in the Old CMKM camp.......... Seeing that you still are, I truly wish you would ask him for an explanation as to WHY he told you what he did. He owes you an honest answer as he put you in an really awkward position, in regards to your posting it on all boards for the rest of the shareholders to read.
Seems to me that Ron messed with your credibility.. Why would you not demand a reason for his madness??
Go get him Granny !! Single


supercim
DIAMOND JEDI
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #20 on Today at 4:33am »

granny2shoes: According to your post months ago, Ron Casavant told you TWICE on the phone that MOST SHAREHOLDERS WILL BE HAPPY. Did you call and ask him again on his comments ?


granny2shoes
Queen of Diamonds
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #21 on Today at 12:50pm »

i spoke with Ron last week, did not ask that question to him, and yes he said that a long time ago, granny


ines
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #24 on Today at 1:56pm »

It amazes me that Ron takes your phone calls Granny.
I am really curious as to what your conversations are like.
Now do you share with him the links you post.. on the boards.. like the one you posted on roger gleen or was it stocklien.. where you wanted to highlight how he was involved in some kind of lawsuit.. and he was sued back by the company..

And do you talk to him about your conversations with Maheus son .. where you posted he said something else negative in regards to cmkx and the company .. etc.

I am really curious why he takes your phone calls and what do you talk about .. when as my memory serves me on your posts the tone and focus is never positive about old team cmkx and old history cmkx.

tia


granny2shoes
Queen of Diamonds
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #25 on Today at 2:01pm »

beleive me there are other things in life to talk about than cmkm,granny


ines
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #29 on Today at 3:10pm »

Granny i am not sure how to take that,
since you are an admin on almost all cmkx proboards there are... so I would say .. cmkx is a big big focus in your life.

Now that is the first reason i would say that talking to Urbans brother Ron casavant .. interest would certainly be about cmkx.

And secondary, my impression from your posts is that you dont hold much love or trust for Old team cmkx and their actions.
Basicaly to simplify it if we divide it into 2 teams which many of the boards do ,, some say that old team is scam and all they did is scam ,, while new team kevin and frizzy are saving us.

Now, my impression from your posts is that you lean toward old team is a scam which would include Urban, Roger glenn, Stocklien .. etc.

And after all those feelings for the old team, you somehow choose to be friends with Ron,, and keep in touch to talk about other things then cmkx.

It is just kind of hard to grasp.
I talked to acca many times and at times it was not about cmkx but our communication was and always continued because of cmkx and issues of cmkx.

Very hard to take that at a face value..


granny2shoes
Queen of Diamonds
Re: IMO: Who is RESPONSIBLE for having destroyed
« Reply #31 on Today at 4:07pm »

Ines, do i think there are bad people involved or were involved in cmkm, i sure do, that still has nothing to do with who i talk to or what i talk about, i would suggest you call Ron yourself and ask him what our conversations are about, not to be disrespectful, but i don't think it is any ones business what we talk about, does he know i am not happy with urban, yes he does,i don't see that it should be hard to grasp that there is more to talk about than cmkm,i dont just have a one track mind and dwell on cmkm as some must, enough said, granny

millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1195065321&page=2

[JoeRockss]

Interesting to say the least. I'll bet Ron talks with UC everyday. Will he ever share that, with any of us shareholders? Probably not. Will ron indicate whether or not there's still things being executed by the old cmkm? Probably not. Will Ron lead anyone inquiring, on at this point? Probably not..... .....lol

[soonerlew]

You think some of these people may be thinking that they've already said too much? Probably not. As they keep talking.

[granny2shoes]

sooner, if you are talking about me, i was asked about if i had talked to Ron and i was truthful and said yes i did last week. what ines or anyone else says or thinks about who i talk to, i really don't care, its a free world and i pay my phone bill, there is a lot more going on in my life than cmkm, when people want to know things let them pick up the phone and ask them self, this is the reason i don't post anymore about my conversations with people, i share with a few that don't badger and ask 10 million questions in return. i have no reason to lie about who i talk to or what they say.,people come on the boards and say money Fri. and it never happens and people don't question them, Ron told me what he told me and thats all i know. just because he is urbans brother has nothing to do with our conversations. i am sure there are a lot of people who talk to others who have members in their family they don't like. but i will not share anymore conversations,i really get tired of people who try to make a mountain out of a molehill when i say anything, i answered the question that i was asked, ines always jumps on anything i say. i really think people should be more worried about brokers who bought and sold shares after cmkm was revoked, that are on the boards trying to belittle others and act like they are shareholders, a lot will come out in the wash and hopefully it wont be to long. granny

[soonerlew]

Maybe not you in particular, granny. But you have to admit that early on you may some cryptic statements about your convos that were leading bits of info.

I was really talking about any who make claims. My dear departed mama said "It's the quiet ones you need to watch"..............I believe that.........................Those who are always "telling" as if they "know" usually don't. MHO

I am in this, just as you are, till the end, no matter what that is. I feel that many could make it an easier voyage if they only spoke the truth and left out the innuendos. SOme people were pegged early on as "entertainment". You weren't and as far as I know still haven't been. IMO, the respect that others afford you means your words are held to a higher level than most.

SO basically, I am saying....NOPE, wasn't talking to you or about you, but Hmmmmmm, why would you take it that I was?

I try not to be offensive to anyone and wish for the same from others. COurse that doesn't always happen but, Hey, we are all big people, we can handle it, right?

[Ed Jagacki]

Granny,

Because you're not firmly implanted in the INES/Acca camp (and contributing towards the paltalk room rent), Ines does not appreciate anybody affording you any respect.
That's the way I interpret it.

My question is, "who cares?!?" People that don't deserve a response - should not get a response.

I have no use for the Ines's and Acca's of this world...

Ed

[tfant53]

ejagacki said:

Granny,

Because you're not firmly implanted in the INES/Acca camp (and contributing towards the paltalk room rent), Ines does not appreciate anybody affording you any respect.
That's the way I interpret it.

My question is, "who cares?!?" People that don't deserve a response - should not get a response.

I have no use for the Ines's and Acca's of this world...

Ed

Of course I am a Granny supporter. She is like a 2nd Mom to me. I believe Acca and others that claim money is coming is threatened by Granny. They know from the past that she will get on the phone and get to the bottom of things. The Acca followers get upset at her because she posts the truth about her findings and it makes the guru's look bad. She has NEVER "pumped" or "bashed" CMKX, just told the truth!! IMO, When CMKX starts trading again and we see a nice ROI the guru's will disappear and we will be able to ALL work together again doing DD etc. I think I will have a cookout when that happens with one of the main courses being BBQ Crow for the people that have disrupted all the boards with their lies. I think a lot of people will be upset and embarrassed when they see how the "guru's" have strung them along!!

Tom

[MannyFin]

tfant53 said:

ejagacki said:

Granny,

Because you're not firmly implanted in the INES/Acca camp (and contributing towards the paltalk room rent), Ines does not appreciate anybody affording you any respect.
That's the way I interpret it.

My question is, "who cares?!?" People that don't deserve a response - should not get a response.

I have no use for the Ines's and Acca's of this world...

Ed

Of course I am a Granny supporter. She is like a 2nd Mom to me. I believe Acca and others that claim money is coming is threatened by Granny. They know from the past that she will get on the phone and get to the bottom of things. The Acca followers get upset at her because she posts the truth about her findings and it makes the guru's look bad. IMO, When CMKX starts trading again and we see a nice ROI the guru's will disappear and we will be able to ALL work together again doing DD etc. I think I will have a cookout when that happens with one of the main courses being BBQ Crow for the people that have disrupted all the boards with their lies. I think a lot of people will be upset and embarrassed when they see how the "guru's" have strung them along!!

Tom

Tom, a Granny Supporter, I thought you wore the other kind--LOL