|
|
Post by greenman1515 on Dec 12, 2007 22:10:37 GMT -5
12-12-07 Dear shareholders, It has been over eight months since the reigns to this Company were signed over to me by Urban Casavant. There has been a lot of work accomplished during this time that has not been made readily available to the public because of ongoing litigation. During these last few months, the Company has subpoenaed and otherwise acquired over 200,000 pages of documentation that has well established what really happened to your investments. Many of you have read the lawsuits that the Company has filed and understand the facts that are presented under oath in these petitions. Some of you have continued to deny what has taken place in this Company under the control of former management and are looking to current management for answers to questions that have been answered over and over. In the normal course of litigation, the plaintiff does not give out the documented evidence it has acquired for dissemination to the public. Normally a statement of facts is presented in the lawsuit petition along with exhibits to support those facts. This is eventually followed by interrogatories and document requests by the opposing side. In our lawsuit filed by the Company against former management and other insiders, there has not been an opposing side to show up in court to request our evidence. I have discussed releasing some of our documented evidence to the shareholders via this public website. Company legal counsel has advised me against doing this because it is not a normal legal course of action. However, I am going to release a portion of our evidence because of the obligation that I feel to the shareholders to share with them the facts as they have happened. There are many documents that simply cannot and will not be made public at this time due to their role in a potential recovery of assets. With the support of our legal team, I still hope to be able to recover some of the assets that belong to the Company. If and when enough assets are recovered, they can provide a financial basis for this Company to appoint a Board of Directors and hire officers to initiate a formal business plan and finally move this Company forward to become a real and viable entity. Many are wondering about the talk in the past of naked shorting of the Company’s stock when it was publicly traded. The Company does have proof of actual fails to deliver in our stock. The number of fails and the number of shareholders affected by this problem have not yet been established due to an ongoing shareholder audit. Most people do not realize the number of hours and the amount of money that has to be expended with every step the Company takes in any of the ongoing issues, the shareholder audit being one of most exhaustive of these resources. . Having a shareholder base of 40,000+ people multiplied by the fact that our shareholder base is from around the world, makes every step a massive undertaking. Because of the enormous size and international locations of our shareholder base, any event that would require the Company to attempt notification of all shareholders through a certified process would cost a minimum of $250,000 by the time all costs were added together. Many are asking me to disclose my personal salary. Since this is a private company, I am not obligated to do so. However, since it is not a big secret, I will provide this information to you. Just before his resignation on March 29th of this year, the former Chairman of this Company gave me a new 3 year contract as sole officer and director of the Company at $10,000 per month. Since the Company was left with little more than $500 in the bank when I took over on March 29, 2007, the Company has relied upon loans put together by Bill Frizzell to continue to survive. Because most of this money has to be used in an effort to recover assets for continued survival, my personal income has been very minimal and has not been enough for my salary to be paid in full through July of this year. Many are asking about the interpleader action that was supposed to have been filed by the former attorney of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., John T. Moran lll. The Company still does not know what actually took place during the time that Mr. Moran was hired to file the interpleader because that attorney is still refusing to turn over our Company’s file. At this time, the Company is now involved in yet another lawsuit that was filed by Entourage Mining in British Columbia in an effort to reclaim the shares of Entourage stock that was supposed to be included in the interpleader that was never filed in Nevada. This lawsuit must be decided before any further actions can be discussed or taken with these holdings. The Company will not answer to threats by shareholders or anyone else. Current letters that have come to my attention that are threatening a phone, fax and email campaign will not be answered in any way, shape or form. Anyone that believes that wasting the very limited time and resources of our legal team and other service professionals are only looking for ways to get recognition and these acts are no help to the Company or the shareholders. These suggested ways to try and manipulate management into discussing matters that are pure fantasy are only going to further delay what we are trying to accomplish for the good of everyone. Bill Frizzell and I have taken time out of our very busy schedule to visit with many shareholders who have dropped in without an appointment, but our limited time simply does not allow for unscheduled visits in the future. I would suggest that these individuals get a shareholder representative to call the law firm and ask to schedule an appointment to come and look at the real facts. If shareholders want to hire an attorney and have that attorney call Bill Frizzell, he will be happy to schedule time for him or her also. As discussed earlier in this update, I am going to release some of our many documents on this website for shareholders to view. These documents are going to be released as we have time to put them into a form suitable for public viewing. These documents are only being shared as a way to show shareholders the truth as to what has happened. The Company will not give any opinions on these documents as they are pretty much self-explanatory. Out of everything that I have to deal with on a daily basis, my biggest burden is for the families of those that continue to live in a fantasy land of big checks coming that will save the day. Families are suffering for the actions of spouses that are addicted to these get-rich-quick rumors. There are no checks coming from any source. As shareholders, our only hope for liquidity and any possible ROI in the future is to get this Company back to trading status with value in it so that you can one day make a choice to either sell your holdings or hold on and grow with the Company. Those that continue talk of checks are only misleading you for their own purposes or for the purposes of those that do not want to face the wrath of this shareholder base for the crimes that they have committed against them. As the CEO, I am thrilled with the results of our legal work. I have confidence we will be successful in our efforts to rebuild this Company. Sincerely, Kevin West CEO, President & Chairman -Back to Top www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/ceoupdates.php |
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 12, 2007 23:55:01 GMT -5
 WoW.... that was fast..... ..... less than 24 hrs? and a reply (I assume) in response to the letter sent out by damondbilly and PB86 ? specific questions asked.... general answers, most of which we have heard before in other updates or Q&A. We did find out some new things kevin's "promised" salary visitation by appoinment only few more documents on the website and the beat goes on........... and on and on and on <sigh> So we wait..... and wait some more..... Single 
|
|
|
|
Post by granny2shoes on Dec 13, 2007 0:14:36 GMT -5
here is my post from yesterday, the update was already planned and had nothing to do with the letter,
Re: Gossip Discussion 12/11/07
« Reply #48 on Dec 11, 2007, 5:33pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i wrote Goldie about the hurry up deal and she wrote back, she said she never said that and i believe Goldie, that is fact, it's posted and i talked to Bill for a long time early this morning and he said Kevin is going to put out some info before long, there are going to be more suits filed shortly, and Bill said if anyone has any questions, just call and ask or come see him and he will be glad to sit time aside to meet with you , , just wanted to let everyone know what he said about Kevin before someone thinks that a letter that someone is going to send has anything to do with him putting out the info. i don't know if Billy has sent the letter yet or not, but if he has i talked to Bill before it was sent. so looks like things are in the works on their end, granny
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 13, 2007 1:00:49 GMT -5
FRIZZELL LAW FIRM 305 S. Broadway, Suite 302 Tyler, Texas 75702 (903)595-1921 E-Mail jmartin@cmkxownersgroup.com Greetings Members, I would like to take the time in this update to discuss several items with you. Appeal Process: Many of you have read the company's response to the SEC's Motion For Affirmance. I have received nothing from the Commission which suggests the Motion For Affirmance will be granted. As it stands right now, a brief from the company will be filed on or before September 6. The SEC will most likely file their response by October 6. The company will have until October 20 to reply to the SEC's brief. Mr. Stoecklein and I spoke yesterday about the brief and we have agreed to collaborate in the preparation. He has already begun the briefing. I will probably be asked to offer input after the first draft is completed. Mr. Stoecklein is a competent attorney and I expect the brief to adequately cover things from the shareholders' perspective. The wording in the order makes it apparent the Commission does not desire a brief from me or any other party. In order to file a brief on behalf of the shareholders, I would need to obtain permission from the Court before doing so. I do not plan to do that. Litigation: Thanks to some incredible work from some of your dedicated shareholders, I have been able to keep abreast of many lawsuits that have been filed in the last few months against parties that are involved with CMKX and your investment. It appears to me that there are individuals and companies who have been the victims of some unscrupulous stock deals and they have hired lawyers to file suits to obtain redress. I am becoming convinced that litigation may be necessary on your behalf against some third parties to allow me to obtain all the facts necessary to help this group. As you may know by now a certain individual opened numerous trading accounts in 2003 and 2004 at a well known Nevada broker/dealer to facilitate the sale of hundreds of billions of shares of CMKX stock. Short selling no doubt occurred once it became known in the market that nearly 800 billion shares of CMKX had hit the streets. A lawsuit against certain parties would greatly assist us in obtaining the facts necessary to identify all parties involved in any trading improprieties and will allow us to accurately identify the short sellers. If I decide to bring any lawsuit, I will obtain permission from the shareholder that will be the named plaintiff or plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Any suit will not be brought on behalf of the CMKX Owners Group. There will be no individual shareholders named other than the individuals I select to bring any claims. If I brought a lawsuit on behalf of the CMKX Owners Group, I might be required to spend the next couple of years attending the depositions of 6,000 or 7,000 shareholders or responding in discovery to requests for documents from all of the 6,000 or 7,000 shareholders. This would of course be a waste of the shareholders time and mine. There is concern that a lawsuit by a small number of people would allow us to obtain some huge financial settlement for only those named in the lawsuit. Damages will clearly be sought against those that may be sued. The damages sought will relate to the losses incurred by the named plaintiffs. If a lawsuit went extremely well and certain defendants wished to offer any serious sums of money for settlement, it would be simple to ask the Court's permission to assist us in some way to apportion any recovery amongst the shareholders. I am not a class action lawyer and do not plan on bringing a class action lawsuit. If a class action of some type is in order, I will cooperate with such lawyers for the benefit of all shareholders, but that is not my desire nor my purpose in this potential litigation. Any lawsuit, deposition, subpoena or discovery that I might bring will benefit all of the shareholders if it benefits any one shareholder. I have been litigating cases for 27 years and I know the task I am undertaking if I choose to bring litigation. I will only do it if I am convinced I have no other avenue of obtaining the information I am seeking and there is no other way to get redress for the shareholders. This will not be a suit against the company nor Urban Casavant at this point in the proceedings. John tells me there are those that suggest a lawsuit would yield tons of money for only those that I choose to name as a plaintiff so what good would it do for the shareholders. Remarks like that are very unsettling to me. I have become very thick skinned to some of the remarks I receive from a select few. I do not respond to those that choose to make personal assaults on my integrity or my courses of action. I know that my efforts are helping the shareholders and I plan to continue to do so. Private Party in Tyler--Last week we were honored here in Tyler to have Hugo Cancio and a production crew come to my office for filming segments of Hugo's documentary on the saga of CMKX. Hugo felt it important that he document all sides of the CMKX story including the plight of the shareholders. He has been to Ecuador, Canada and Las Vegas with Urban and other insiders in the company. He is producing a story that needs to be told. Knowing that Hugo would be in town, I suggested that John invite some of the shareholders from this area to drop by while Hugo was here. Some were interviewed for the documentary. Some of your well respected shareholders came here from Northeast Texas and East Texas to meet Hugo and have a little fellowship. John invited us to his home after a long day of videoing around the office. The fine lady shareholder that allowed me to stay in her home when I went to Washington last month was able to arrange her travels to spend a night in East Texas. I took the opportunity to share a select few documents that we had obtained as a result of months of due diligence by this office and many dedicated shareholders. You have some shareholders out there that spend endless hours researching and investigating various aspects of this case. Their hard work is paying off. I would not dare name them because it would embarrass them and they are not doing this work in order to draw attention to themselves. Please know that I (and all the other shareholders) will forever be indebted to you. Kudos to all of you that are helping to shed light on the problems facing this company. Much talk has occurred since this meeting about my choice to show only certain information and only to certain individuals. I scanned in a handful of documents and did a brief video presentation of some of the documents. I did not hand out any copies of the information. I did not pass out pencil and paper. It was a short show and tell. Some of the information was disturbing because it was the first time some people had seen an explanation of how these shares hit the market in such a short period of time. I have posted on the owners group site www.cmkxownersgroup.com a copy of a ledger sheet with some handwritten notes that was prepared by someone for Neil Levine as he was working on the audit before the administrative law hearing. We have entitled this document the "Share Distribution Breakdown". This was obtained by me as an item of discovery that went to all parties during the preliminary phases of the administrative proceeding. This is not the "smoking gun" that solves all riddles of the CMKX story but it is very helpful in explaining some things that bothered me (and I assume most shareholders) for a long time. How in the world can a company get nearly 800 billion shares into the market place in such a short period of time? Sometimes documents like this create more questions than answers. Believe me, we are working on answers to the questions that come from documents such as this. The facts surrounding the stock distributions will all come out when the company files it financials. Combine this document with the shareholder information which Pedro has provided you and you can start to piece this thing together. I have obtained mountains of information and more comes to my office on a daily basis. My practice is dedicated to this case alone. Those of you that suggest I am hiding information for some sinister self serving purpose should give more thought to that idea. I am simply bound by laws regarding confidentiality and common sense in the release of most of this information. Many shareholders have been to this office and you are all invited to see what goes on around here on a daily basis. You are all welcome. We are all in this together. Communication--Several people have asked about the level of communication between my office and the company. We are not having problems getting each other on the phone. I talked with Don Stoecklein yesterday. He called me while Urban, Ed Dhonau and Anthony Demint were in his office. We discussed the brief and suggestions were made to leave from Vegas to go to Ecuador after the Labor Day weekend. I expressed my desire to meet and discuss the plan for the shareholders and the present state of the claims and various businesses that make up CMKX. It is the company's position that it would violate SEC rules to selectively disclose information about assets and significant activities to certain shareholders (our owners group) without disclosing information to all shareholders. We agreed that such disclosure could occur if I would agree to make my updates following or simultaneously with an 8k. I am hopeful this will facilitate better and regular information from the company. Sorry, but I have no dates to give you on when this might start occurring. I have stated that we have no problem with such arrangement. Rumor Busting--I hate to be one to burst some hopeful bubbles, because I know the anxiety many of you experience when a rumor begins to fly. I have not been involved in any discussions about settlements with any parties. Neither the company nor any third party has seen fit to call me with any discussions of settlements or even facts that suggest a settlement is in the works. If there is talk betweent he company and any third parties, I am not privy to such talks and have not been told of any. I cannot tell you for a fact that there are no discussions of settlement. I can simply tell you that I have not been involved in any discussions with anyone about settlements. John Martin has likewise not been contacted about settlements being offered by anyone. It will be one cool update when I can relate the substance of any such discussions with you. Evaluation--I can tell you that I am comfortable in saying the claims represented by the company are being maintained. I make this statement based on reports from third parties that should be "in the know". John and I decided several months ago to make it a part of our investigation to determine as best as we could the existence and value of the claims which we have been told belong to the company. We have paid people on the ground in Canada to give us information about the claims. We do not have a figure for the $value of the claims in Canada, but I am convinced there is substantial value for many reasons. Our investigation reveals there has been a drilling program that continues as we speak. We hope to get more information for you as to the results of the drilling. The last PR about the drilling results probably did more harm than good. I believe we can get better information to you. I have told Mr. Stoecklein that I have some acquaintances of mine in the Oil business that are researching the area and there may be interest the oil concessions on our claims. It will take a another couple of weeks but I plan to continue my efforts in this regard. Phase II--Some questions have been asked about the status of my work as Phase II or Phase I. The original (Phase I if you will) employment agreement clearly states that my agreement to represent the owners group concluded with a decision by the Administrative Law Judge. This decision was handed down on July 12. John suggested a Phase II because the work we had begun in addition to the administrative hearing representation was far short of being complete. We began receiving contributions and Phase II agreements before the Judge's decision came down. Many of you have not only contributed to Phase II, some have added contributions above the requested $25. Your funds make it possible to continue the work we have begun. I am thankful for your contributions of course. But I am equally thankful to you for the words of support and encouragement that sometimes comes along with your signups. It gets discouraging when hard work gets mocked and ridiculed by certain people. There are a select few out there that seem to delight in being critical, sarcastic and demeaning to our efforts. If I am forced (and it appears I will be) to begin litigation, Phase II will be expensive and could take quite a long time to resolve. If I did not believe it would be helpful to the overall cause of this representation, I would not consider it. I am starting to believe it will be mandatory. John and I have agreed not to do separate updates to Phase I and Phase II members. I hope we do not have to revisit this decision. I have been honored to represent the shareholders as a group. I feel honored to work for the individuals I have met personally as a result of this representation . I wish there were a way to meet all of the group members. This group if it stays together will be a force to be reckoned with. The bad guys would love to see a fractured broken shareholders' group. After all, isn't that how most shareholders do when their investment goes sour? They just run away, bad mouth the promoters and write off their investment losses. A strong shareholders' group can make a difference. We can have disagreements and work them out like mature intelligent people, but we must stick together. [glow=red,2,300]Naked Shorts--In my opinion we have proved the largest naked short in the history of the market. Will these illegal acts benefit the shareholders? There are many factors that must come into play, but I am very encouraged. Management has not "run off". The real assets of the company appear to be in place. It will only take a few deals to get done before these huge short position will be at the mercy of the marketplace. I look forward to that scramble. [/glow] Caveat--I do not advise any one to buy or sell stock based on the information contained in this update. You are advised that an administrative judge has ordered a deregistration of the securities of this company because the company has failed to file financial reports required by the SEC. There are serious complications to trading your stock if the de-registration order becomes final. Seek competent advice from a competent investment advisor before deciding to purchase CMKX stock. Onward, Bill cmkxunofficial.proboards29.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=1196428882Just more BS IMO...if this one isn't true how can I believe ANYTHING that comes out of Tyler ...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) |
|
falcman1
Dr. Of Diamonds
SOON!
Posts: 131
|
Post by falcman1 on Dec 13, 2007 7:40:06 GMT -5
why would you undertake such a losing battle?
why would Urban give kevin the reigns and be afraid
of litigation?
why would kevin subpoena Urban?
why would he not just let it die?
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 13, 2007 8:59:52 GMT -5
here is my post from yesterday, the update was already planned and had nothing to do with the letter, Re: Gossip Discussion 12/11/07 « Reply #48 on Dec 11, 2007, 5:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i wrote Goldie about the hurry up deal and she wrote back, she said she never said that and i believe Goldie, that is fact, it's posted and i talked to Bill for a long time early this morning and he said Kevin is going to put out some info before long, there are going to be more suits filed shortly, and Bill said if anyone has any questions, just call and ask or come see him and he will be glad to sit time aside to meet with you , , just wanted to let everyone know what he said about Kevin before someone thinks that a letter that someone is going to send has anything to do with him putting out the info. i don't know if Billy has sent the letter yet or not, but if he has i talked to Bill before it was sent. so looks like things are in the works on their end, granny
« Thread Started on Dec 10, 2007, 5:37pm »millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1197326229 OLetter To Company Management/Attorneys
« Thread Started on Dec 10, 2007, 11:08pm millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1197346083Granny..... you really believe that the update had nothing to do with the letter created by Diamondbilly & PB86?? It is quite obvious that the update addresses most all points from that letter? The letter first hit the board on DECEMBER 10 and I would bet my life, on the fact , that KW & BF knew immediately the minute it did, or found out about it first thing in the morning from someone reporting it to them. And am I to believe that Kevin and BF do not read the boards?? lol lol....... I don't think so...... Without addressing the points in the letter, what would the update have consisted of ?? One paragraph ?? ... stating that new documents are posted on the website? What am I missing here? Single |
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 13, 2007 10:10:19 GMT -5
I can't access that site could you please post the letter...TIA... sounds like a good one...if it prompts communication however OPPOSITE of earlier PRs and communications I guess it is a GOOD THING...sure takes a LONG LONG time to do some 5th grade math to add up BONAFIDE SHAREHOLDERS huh??...how many YEARS have we been sending in account records and pulling certs now??...I have lost count...of the YEARS that is...either this is a PLAM and KW/BF are delaying for a PURPOSE...or it is/was the most incompetent and LAME TEAMS ever assembled on Gods green earth to lead a company...IMO...I sure hope it is the FORMER...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Dec 13, 2007 10:37:51 GMT -5
HERE YA GO 100-1.... the final draft that was sent diamondbilly
DIAMOND MINER
Final Draft of the Company Letter ......Sent!« Thread Started on Dec 11, 2007, 7:34pm » I've done my best to include all of what is in the greater interest of almost everyone here. At the risk of sounding too proud of myself "I think I nailed it". Your comments are still welcome as I intend to send this late this evening. Billy Bill Frizzel, Kevin West and associates,
After careful contemplation of who to ask for answers we decided to first ask our current management as you are our company employed controllers. We are committed to getting satisfactory answers and you left us no choice but to "ask" that our questions be answered, not the filtered Q/A. We'll be affording the chance for you to address us as a group or as individuals contacting you by phone calls, faxes and email, thats your choice. Those of us, whom have paid hard earned money to support Phase I & II as well as incurred costs to pull our certs and most likely are going to foot the bill in the end for the current efforts ongoing, wish no conflict nor disturbance to your efforts but the silence stops NOW. We view you both as reasonable persons and attention you to the seriousness of the lack of cohesion between the company and its supporting shareholders (us). We mean you no malice and desire your anticipated cooperation.
Please address the following questions thoroughly and in simple to understand terms:
1) The Short position as best you can with specifics. ie: the results of Phase I & II and the cert pull, give specific numbers, if estimated how the estimations were accomplished.
2) The reason the inter pleader was not filed and a clear outline of the influencing factors for that decision. We Ask that a copy of it be posted on the CMKX website. If it is not available why is the document which the company owns not in our possession? Who has it? Why?
3)Why is the Entourage stock cert (45 million shares), which is a company asset - possibly our only company asset at this time , not in the company's possession but is still being held by Don Stocklein, who purportedly is no longer connected to or working for CMKX. Why does Stocklein still possess our company's greatest and only asset?
4) Who are the party(s) currently funding our efforts and/or what are you each receiving in compensation for your current/past efforts involving CMKX?
5) We ask that the Nobo/Obo list be posted on the company website. If the company is not in possession of the list who has it? Why?
6) The official names of the organizations investigating the activities, past and present, of CMKX. Please including the specific departments and contacts in charge.
We will wait until 7:00 AM EST on Monday, December 17, 2007 for you to "Officially Reply" at answering our concerns completely as outlined here. Please don't leave us to act individually in asking these questions starting this Monday and continuing until we're respectfully addressed.
United we will move mountains !!!
Respectfully,
Many Contributing CMKX Shareholders (us)Contacts and CC's: Please add to the list if you have alternate contact info. 1. Bill Frizzel and Kevin West telephone no 903-595-1921 office Fax no 903-595-4383 Email Questions to: FAQ@cmkmdiamondsinc.com 2. David R Koch- works for Frizzell: 702-990-3155 fax:702 - 990-3156 3. Donald J. Stoecklein Telephone: 619-595-4882 Fax: 619-595-4883 Email:stoecklein@msn.com 4. Roger Glenn: drglenn@eapdlaw.com Tel: 212-912-2753 Fax:212-308-4844 6. Entourage attorney in case of entourage certs against cmkx and Emmerson Koch case. Nick Kambas, Barrisers and Solicitors, 1150 –625 Howe street, Vancouver BC Telephone: 604.669.4004 Fax: 604.669.4224 7. John T. Moran Jr., ESQ. Firm: Moran & Associates Address: 630 South 4th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: (702) 384-8424 Fax: (702) 384-6568 8. Entourage ir person and president. Entourage Mining Ltd. Craig Doctor (604) 278-4656 craig@entouragemining.com www.entouragemining.comwww.entouragemining.com/s/SendMessage.asp << send a message via this link to entourage mining.
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 13, 2007 10:49:29 GMT -5
Thanks Single...he forgot a few questions like the VOTING STRUCTURE and SHARE STRUCTURE...although the OBO/NOBO list would give us some of that...but WHO controls the company???...but those are GOOD QUESTIONS no wonder they would not answer most of them...we would no longer need the twins if we had the answers...at $10,000/month I would keep this company PRIVATE and working on the PROBLEM as long as I could...at least as long as the LOANS kept coming in...what is REALLY funny is the FORMER CHAIRMAN giving the CURRENT CHAIRMAN a CONTRACT for THREE YEARS...what happens AFTER the three years???...and WHY would UC give KW a $10,000/month salary with NO MONEY in the treasury???...a LOT of questions are raised by this UPDATE IMO...shouldn't a VOTE have been taken on the NEW CHAIRMAN position???...who REALLY controls the VOTING RIGHTS???...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 13, 2007 12:55:31 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 13 Dec 2007, 11:52 AM EST Msg. 632258 of 632300 Jump to msg. # A reminder to Kevin and Bill, by law, if you know about a crime or potential terrorism, you have a legal duty to report it to the authorities and a fiducuiary duty to stockholders to pursue it. NSS is financial terrorism. It terrorized the company's stockholders and continues to do so till this day. With the 'etched in stone' e-mail from John Martin claiming the NSS was proved, with Frizzell stating to the Judge at the Hearing that there are "trillions" of shares in CMKM, with your own statements regarding CMKM NSS, you have more than a legal obligation to report the financial terrorism. From what I ran across yesterday in my research, you have a legal obligation to report the financial terrorism perpetrated against CMKM Diamonds and its stockholders. The stockholders are owed damages or, how did Stoecklein phrase it in his OIP brief? Punitive Effects from the SEC if NSS is proven as alleged by the CMKM stockholders. Well bucko, we've not only alleged it, it has been proven. And UC is a victim of the SEC's gross and criminal failure to enforce accurate settlement of securities as mandated by law in 1976. NSS = financial terrorism. Don't forget it. You too can be held liable for your breach of fiduciary duty and your failure to act in the best interests of the stockholders. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=632258...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) |
|
|
|
Post by greenman1515 on Dec 13, 2007 13:24:29 GMT -5
By: abadgoodgirl 13 Dec 2007, 11:52 AM EST Msg. 632258 of 632300 Jump to msg. # A reminder to Kevin and Bill, by law, if you know about a crime or potential terrorism, you have a legal duty to report it to the authorities and a fiducuiary duty to stockholders to pursue it. NSS is financial terrorism. It terrorized the company's stockholders and continues to do so till this day. With the 'etched in stone' e-mail from John Martin claiming the NSS was proved, with Frizzell stating to the Judge at the Hearing that there are "trillions" of shares in CMKM, with your own statements regarding CMKM NSS, you have more than a legal obligation to report the financial terrorism. From what I ran across yesterday in my research, you have a legal obligation to report the financial terrorism perpetrated against CMKM Diamonds and its stockholders. The stockholders are owed damages or, how did Stoecklein phrase it in his OIP brief? Punitive Effects from the SEC if NSS is proven as alleged by the CMKM stockholders. Well bucko, we've not only alleged it, it has been proven. And UC is a victim of the SEC's gross and criminal failure to enforce accurate settlement of securities as mandated by law in 1976. NSS = financial terrorism. Don't forget it. You too can be held liable for your breach of fiduciary duty and your failure to act in the best interests of the stockholders. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=632258...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial) UHMMMMMM...isnt that what they are doing???...hello...they have a stack of charges against quite a few...doesnt it stand to reason that BF is aware of the "fiduciuary" responsibilities and is responding accordingly...Sometimes i think people just want post for the heck of it....JMO...  |
|
|
|
Post by hundredtoone on Dec 13, 2007 13:54:48 GMT -5
It was just a little REMINDER of who EXACTLY owns this company...THE CERTHOLDERS...and that anything done that is NOT in their best interests will be coming out in the WASH...IMO...good to remind the LEADERS exactly WHO they are working for...IF WE KNEW...HA HA...Flying Moose(cmkxunofficial)
|
|
