|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 30, 2007 18:00:47 GMT -5
By: ibaft2006 30 Mar 2007, 06:14 PM EDT Msg. 514338 of 514359 (This msg. is a reply to 513673 by jarta.) Jump to msg. # Don't fret Jim...
either we make money or we don't with CMKX. Life goes on. As for Hughes to Jensen and ECNI, it was what it was. Every attorney offered a job does whatever research he can to see if it is a viable business opportunity. I did mine. Obviously, you did your's too and came to the same conclusion I did - that ECNI WAS VIABLE - or else you would not have invested over $100K into it. Logical?
So, are you blaming me for bad DD? If so, then the much self-vaunted Jim Rooney is equally as guilty of such poor DD for you invested in it as well. Are you blaiming me for taking a job in good faith that - by the way - I was underpaid for and ended up holding several hundreds of thousands of shares uncashed? Are you blaming me for not working hard enough to save the company? If so, please come over and see all my files. I have 3 feet thick of ECNC documents and dozens upon dozens upon dozens of computer files, representing hundreds upon hundreds of hours. My work consisted of mediations, judgment-debtor hearings, several court appearances on multiple lawsuits, conducting and answering discovery, negotiations with opposing counsel on everything from debt management issues to the federal class-action litigation, endless letters, tax issues, accounting and filing, profit/loss statements, LOANING THE COMPANY MY OWN MONEY, admiinistrative hearings and law, and so on and so on. I hope you get the picture.
So, what really is your beef, Jim? That I worked for Jensen? So what? Attorneys can do work for great athletes and it does not make the attorney a great athlete. I just represented a Muslim in a business transaction yet, I am not a Muslim. I am sure that in your tax-related law practice, you have represented people who broke the law by failing to pay the proper tax amounts; yet, does that make you a criminal? If Jensen has done something wrong, which I am not asserting, it does not mean I have done anything wrong. The law is the law and let the chips fall where they may.
Simply put, you need to get over your "Allan Treffry fetish." It is really getting old and in part, costing you the peace clearly so lacking in your own soul.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 30, 2007 18:09:19 GMT -5
From Paltalk Shareholders room...... Another "guru" ? <sigh> mSnadi: I AM ONE OF THE OLDEST SHAREHOLDERS OF CMKM mSnadi: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 0.02 cents will be paid on July 13. A press Release will be issued on April 11. It's Open bar now with PRs...... mSnadi: I won't say anything anymore.... wait till April 11 and you will see...it's not bullshi* !!! mSnadi: That's the only serious news i have today.... mSnadi: please wait for the PR on April 11 for more information
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 30, 2007 18:56:32 GMT -5
abadgoodgirl DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD *****
This has to be part of the plan. come on. Frizzell knows why he cannot go after NSS anymore..even though he has/had piles of evidence. Why? Because big money was already paid and we all got delivery of our stock certificates...except maybe people who we don't know about.
The money is THERE IN A TRUST. PERIOD.
WHY DO I FEEL LIKE A BROKEN RECORD.
PROOF THAT THE MONEY IS THERE IS DEMONSTRATED BY FRIZZELL NOT GOING AFTER THE NSS ANYMORE. SHEESH. WHY? BECAUSE HE CAN'T! THEY PAID FOR IT!!!!
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2007 1:25:21 GMT -5
leadorfollow DIAMOND MINER My E-mail response from Nevada ( IRS?)
I've been so busy I just looked at my email and here is the response to my inquiry re/cmkm & ent.ourage.. I think I had posted my letter before..
well it is a cheesy response but it is not a canned response like the SEC's we can't confirm or deny an investigation even though the other gentleman I spoke w/did in fact confirm there was one on going..anyway the last woman I spoke with referred me to Nevada as that was where both companies had filed...
short and sweat here was the "cheesy" response I got with little/no title nor name but I am including the return path captured to verify/confirm....
Hello,
We do not have an investigation into this matter but I am told that the office of the IRS in Las Vegas is looking into this matter. I do not have their phone number but I am sure you can find it on the net or through directory assistance.
Return-Path: <SBalder@sos.nv.gov> Received: from rly-mc02.mail.aol.com (rly-mc02.mail.aol.com [172.20.118.144]) by air-mc04.mail.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMC44-10b460bc70193; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:02:46 -0400 Received: from MX2.STATE.NV.US (exch3.state.nv.us [167.154.2.132]) by rly-mc02.mail.aol.com (v114_r3.5) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMC27-10b460bc70193; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:02:42 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7720A.E5581779" Subject: CMKM Diamonds Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:02:32 -0700 Message-ID: <14BF94FB8DB0DA4BAC1A0F10B38153F6057A449A@MX2.STATE.NV.US> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: CMKM Diamonds Thread-Index: AcdyCuV+9yx2McZyTuKXsiStC1LMeQ== From: "Scott Balder" <SBalder@sos.nv.gov> To: <xxxxxxxxxx@aol.com> X-AOL-IP: 167.154.2.132 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:317564949:6710886 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2007 17:56:21 GMT -5
By: jmopp 31 Mar 2007, 02:25 PM EDT Msg. 514889 of 515018 (This msg. is a reply to 514883 by dedes016.) Jump to msg. # I don't think so. Again, I don't think the monetary damages are what the co is going after here. The $10,000 number is merely a threshold number to get into the higher court. It's the share cancellation that is the real goal here IMO. I don't think they will respond to the suit. When the judge passes judgement, he will ask what monetary damages are you requesting? The company can withdraw that portion of their claim and just ask for the cancellation of shares. I think the monetary portion has been settled. It doesn't take two years to come up with a document such as this, but it could take two years to negotiate a settlement. 'We move forward when the share structure is fixed'
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Mar 31, 2007 19:58:34 GMT -5
forward lookin thinker:
By: stock_hippie 31 Mar 2007, 08:19 PM EDT Msg. 515055 of 515066 Jump to msg. # SHAREHOLDERS DEMAND A NEW WATER COOLER!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 31, 2007 22:38:09 GMT -5
By: machcobra2 30 Mar 2007, 09:05 PM EDT Msg. 514516 of 514661 Jump to msg. # So Jonazzz, your pay came from Edwards and his sidekick. I wondered about that... Can you draw unemployement, ROTFLMAO, and how bout the rest of you morons, can you? Only good any of you did here was make people laugh... Sad part about it is RB allowed all of this, hmmmm think about that folks...
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 31, 2007 22:38:37 GMT -5
stinky DIAMOND DIGGER * Re: Friz update lawsuitS
very interesting - page 5 - item 13: ... CMKM acquired assets that will allow it to return to trading status. Current management plans to restore CMKM to a viable entity....
MoodSwingTrader DIAMOND DIGGER * I noticed and jumped of joy ... it's gonna be a double whammy ...
shorts plus assets
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 31, 2007 22:39:06 GMT -5
By: stkupnc 30 Mar 2007, 09:52 PM EDT Msg. 338912 of 338919 Jump to msg. # naz...I believe $10K is the threshold number for the Civil suit. Less than that goes to small claims court. As I recall.
By: ctla_4_me 30 Mar 2007, 10:26 PM EDT Msg. 338913 of 338919 Jump to msg. # Plus the cryptic reference to 10K makes the nakies sweat out just how much they owe. I like that.
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 31, 2007 22:42:57 GMT -5
By: Bellingus 31 Mar 2007, 09:37 AM EDT Msg. 18270 of 18296 Jump to msg. # All this excitment and... ...we're not even looking at the main event. LOL
By: zahnj 31 Mar 2007, 12:51 PM EDT Msg. 18294 of 18296 (This msg. is a reply to 18270 by Bellingus.) Jump to msg. # Bellingus I've always enjoyed your posts and your take on events. I've noticed that several times you've alluded to the Main Event as opposed to what's been happening in front of us.
I've been traveling a bit and away from the boards for the most part. My off the cuff impression is that urban leaving doesn't matter, CMKX events don't really matter, the interplead doesn't matter. Why? Because the claims and assets have been transferred or sold to another entity. That company is the "Main Event" CMKX is a shell and the only value cmkx may have for us is in the naked short it incurred and the money we might get for that.
Am I close at all to your "Main Event"?
By: zahnj 31 Mar 2007, 12:55 PM EDT Msg. 18295 of 18296 Jump to msg. # Bellingus ~ one more thought. I think the derivative lawsuits are being used as leverage. File the lawsuits, get to discovery with the first two and open the books. Then when the other entities to be sued see this (e.g. broker dealers and others) they do their risk analysis: settle out of court or risk revealing all of the trades on their books
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Mar 31, 2007 22:43:37 GMT -5
pianoplayer DIAMOND DIGGER *
« Message sent on Today at 1:06pm »
Maybe a little gossip for the column. I got this off Tramp's board posted by Seagull.
PJ found this on the PalTalk scroll......
(9:54 PM) trackeer1: a little birdie told me today, the 1.61 in the next 45 days 0.50 first fast-we expect a big pr around wednesday-cim ipo and the rest of the money next year-we expect also more pr from frizzell and kevin
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2007 22:59:10 GMT -5
By: teamplayersbc 31 Mar 2007, 04:08 AM EDT Msg. 338921 of 338943 Jump to msg. #
Thats one magic Interplooper, now you see it, now you dont
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Mar 31, 2007 23:06:14 GMT -5
John Martin on George Stevenson and dividend« Thread Started on Today at 6:41pm » Please don't shoot the messenger.. I do, however believe it's important to note what John said. I believe what he said but your mileage may differ... a) "George doesn’t know anything about CMKX, and IF he got caught on the phone by a shareholder, he would have told them so. Someone is making things up again" and b) "Oh, there is no settlement, and there has never been any discussion of a settlement
|
|
|
Post by bfranklin on Apr 1, 2007 11:26:00 GMT -5
Zahnj, you are sooo right about the effect of the discovery process. Once the books are opened and illegal trading activity is uncovered THEN the legal system has the right, nay duty to inspect trading in 'other' stocks. This will help them to determine if the wrongs perpetrated against CMKX were focused on them alone or evidence of a pattern of abuse in other stocks also. The prosecutors will attempt to get as many counts against the perps as possible to gain the best leverage to settle the case in or out of court. JMHO - RTB
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Apr 1, 2007 12:09:32 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 31 Mar 2007, 08:59 PM EDT Msg. 515067 of 515069 Jump to msg. # All of the NAME BRAND Aliases from PALTALK to Message Boards have a thing for EGO. No getting around it. When it comes down to it they were ALL played as nothing has proven out in the time that any of them has discussed, retracted, retraced, and disguised with excuses of world economy to company dealings, to participants of title from office to corporation. Why not just say as Wodan has so candidly, and honestly. "Hey guys, we were ((all)) used"... No the rest of you are all going to hedge, and fudge it up with more EGO and give us some great links of DD and some more parallels to Government, Sec etc, while saying "We have the outcome correct just not the time lines". I would say that is a little hard to know, (swallow yet) when you aren't able to read into the future past the current minute.
Let's just be honest enough to follow one GURU who said it like it was. NO ONE KNOWS the facts until they are out. All of the DD is out there only there was no certification done for " it " yet either. NO PR, NO OFFICIAL WORD from CMKM to tie us to it... NO CERTIFICATION THAT IS...
JMHO.
Oh i do remain very bullish as I am here with my position, and my beliefs that UC (retired or not), and Company will provide the answers that so many need to move on with their lives. When that happens it will be all or nothing. I say all. .. eom
Oil
|
|