|
Post by eastcoastswing on May 3, 2007 14:49:03 GMT -5
Understood. I just wish it was a matter of me reading faster to find out what happens at the end of this book!
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 3, 2007 17:27:54 GMT -5
By: DrillBit 02 May 2007, 02:59 PM EDT Msg. 538070 of 538939 (This msg. is a reply to 538058 by restripe2007.) Jump to msg. # restripe, wait to see what the REAL OS tallys as it may surprise many. I contend that I have naked short shares via my cert and that they are viable as to a payout. JMO
By: jay_adobe 03 May 2007, 02:44 PM EDT Msg. 538935 of 538939 (This msg. is a reply to 538070 by DrillBit.) Jump to msg. # Drillbit, would it not be surprising if Mr. C had retired all shares as promised in the previous PR, and our certs are the actual NSS count?
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on May 3, 2007 17:28:33 GMT -5
my69z Ace of Diamonds *****
..Cert Pull = Reverse Sting ??..
« Thread Started on Today at 5:39pm »
Whay was the cert pull initiated??....cause of the FTD's right,,,,not due to insiders selling.
Could it have had 2 objectives??? FTD's & Insiders sellin are 2 different issues.
Make everyone think that as long as you get in 1st....under the 703,,,,,your ok. ( remember recent sells of "Certs" believed to be "insider sales"..)
If your a crook,,,,,,you'd have taken(replaced) your shares in cert form.....easier to then turn around and cancel certs once you've proven which people/entities obtained shares illegally.
It wouldn't matter what any guilty parties did with those certs because all transactions today come through the companies T/A under a microscope.
And all CMKX would be doin is reducing that 634B....and could (will... imo ) make the structure what they choose to for "us".
That MIGHT explain why they now say..... 700B was dumped.And that's also how you could counter them NOT wanting to cert people to keep our numbers below the threshold.
And what made me kinda twist this is......do you really think that major brokerage juuust....recently tried to buy shares for themselves?? I'd do it in the frenzy......the cert pull.
I'd think that'd at least give you a better shot at success.
But the company said......10B was our pre-fraud O/S ( wow) I'd expect them to now move to only recognize that number....and if they increase the numbers to say,,,,50B to legitamize "us" and then did a 50% reduction of our stock...now 25B O/S..and have say somehow,,,a few billion in cash after this....then,,,,,,,hmmmmm
And who's to say after things get goin they can't announce a buy-back or somethin??
Just off the top my head thought,,,,that's all....feel free to chop it up..
Gltua! Chris
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 3, 2007 18:06:23 GMT -5
Mark Faulk from 70: Re: Desormeau Letter ... Ay yay yay... « Reply #7 on Today at 2:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In all honesty, I knew this was ugly from the start, but I had so many puzzles with just enough pieces missing that I couldn't always say with 100% certainty exactly how it went down. The work Frizzell and Kevin have performed is the most detailed description of how this works that I have ever seen. Frizzell has done a masterful job of putting it all together. Sadly, it far uglier than any of us even imagined.....and I thought it was pretty ugly to begin with. That letter represents everything that was wrong with CMKX, all rolled into one painful read. Thanks to Bill and Kevin, tomorrow, for the first time, I'll be able to speak freely on the radio about the truth in this mess. Link to Post - Back to Top Logged -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.faulkingtruth.com/
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 7:57:32 GMT -5
Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Thread Started on Today at 6:44am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- seagull Board Addict ***** Watch list -A-Trade showing all my cmkx shares « Thread Started on Yesterday at 8:50pm » This mornings watch list showed cmkx but no shares... This evening's watch list showed my total number of cmkx shares!! never mind that they are now in cert form and I had some of them with another brokerage Strangely, I began getting 2 watch lists per day a while back when they added cmkx back on... then they took off the number ... now the number of shares is back on!! millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1178279043
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 7:58:32 GMT -5
millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1178279043 Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #1 on Today at 6:47am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: ibaft2006 03 May 2007, 09:47 PM EDT Msg. 539319 of 539401 (This msg. is a reply to 538813 by leowanta.) Jump to msg. # Sorry... that is not quite accurate.... What is necessary for a preliminary injunction to be granted is for the judge to make a preliminary factual finding, based upon the evidence presented in the moving papers, that the moving party has a 51% or greater chance of success on the merits to win the case. Not all the evidence in a case need be presented at this stage, even though the more at this stage the better, for it insures a greater chance of getting the preliminary injunction order granted. Much more evidence can later be discovered, so to assume that they have 100% of the evidence already is likely a great stretch, although conceivably possible. It is early on in the case and although the company probably has a lot of evidence already, depositions and other discovery will very likely lead to even greater amounts of evidence. The merits of a preliminary injunction don't just go to factual evidence, they must also show that unless the judge acts immediately to restrain a party from acting or ordering him to act in a certain way, an irreparable harm will befall the moving party. Irreparable harm is a critical element in granting such a motion. Irreparable harm is not usually just money damages alone, it is the more related to the loss of something unique, something hard to replace or assets that not be recovered otherwise. Keep in mind that land is almost always deemed in the law as a unique asset as no other piece of land in the world is quite the same. Also, losing an asset with no chance of future recovery, even if it is money, could be deemed irreparable harm, although tougher to assert and prove to the Court. In other contexts, irreparable harm could refer to actual physical harm to the moving party for that is almost always deemed in the law as an irreparable harm. Courts have broad-ranging equitable powers (powers to evaluate the law and facts and make an order for someone "to do a particular something" or "for someone not to do a particular something" - different from more of a legal remedy where merely a money judgment is entered). Keep in mind, the stages of an injunction is as follows: a TRO (temporary restraining order) is granted right away with a minimal finding of fact - second, usually within 30 days (depends on the jurisdiction), another hearing is held for the issuance of a preliminary injunction which holds the status quo until the trial is over. Often-times, at this stage, the court orders an undertaking to be posted (a bond). It can also be posted at the TRO stage. Finally, with the status quo in place until the trial or summary judgment adjudicates the matter, the Court then can make the injunction permanent. If the defending party wins and no permanent injunction is granted, the undertaking is often distributed to the defending party because he had loss of use of his asset for all that time. An exception might occur if the Court determines that the defending party was also at fault somehow, even if the wrongdoing engaged in did not rise to the level of making the injunction permanent. BTW, Please do not take my post as trying to discredit anyone, I offer it humbly only to share a little more accurate rendition of the law. - - - - - ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=539319tramp Administrator ***** member is offline and, if its a default, were going to get paid.. i am watching close for may 15.. i want a judge to sign off on the trusts IBM is guarding.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 9:23:14 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #2 on Today at 9:13am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- eureka1968 DIAMOND JEDI *** Gossip-response from Leowanta to Ibaft By: leowanta 04 May 2007, 12:47 AM EDT Msg. 539386 of 539425 (This msg. is a reply to 539319 by ibaft2006.) Jump to msg. # thank you ibaft2006...very good, detailed explanation on the motion before us.... i completely agree... ....i would add one more point in consideration of an order granting the injustion... and that is if the judge renders a decision in this hearing in favor of the preliminary injunction; then it's a fairly strong indication that the outcome of this case will be in our favor....(the cake is baked at this point) ...a federal judge once told me that he considers a preliminary injuction pretty much the whole case being set before him....(the whole day set aside for this hearing is not surprising)....also, i am sure our "team" has most of all the evidence they need to get this order; otherwise they wouldn't have filed this motion, and i do agree with you tho, they don't need 100% of all the evidence to get the order granted. ...i'm thinking if we get this order signed, the FEDs should pay up...for if a judge finds the irreparable damages, it's pretty evident the FEDS are gonna have to pay us; they should not run the risk of any future discovery of evidence uping the ante...and sweetens the pot...i could be wrong....but since payment has already been requested, seems like the granting of this order would seal the payout...we'll see soon enough...again, thanks for your detailed post...i disagree with jonas, your post shows me you are very knowledgeable about the law and proceedure.... leowanta millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1178279043
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 9:36:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on May 4, 2007 12:17:38 GMT -5
faulkingtruth PressCorp
member is offline
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 168 Karma: 7 [ Exalt | Smite ] Re: Mark and Debi show on NOW « Reply #54 on Today at 11:59am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey c'mon, I'm seriously trying to allow people to assimilate the truth slowly. Otherwise, it might drown some of them. At least everyone has to agree that it isn't easy to change your entire belief system overnight. You have to let your eyes adjust slowly to the bright light of truth. (How's that for a cosmic analogy?)
But the "So did the casinos set up trust funds and hold the money that Urban gave them for the shareholders" part was fun.
Play nice!
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on May 4, 2007 12:19:20 GMT -5
faulkingtruth PressCorp
member is offline
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 168 Karma: 7 [ Exalt | Smite ] Re: Mark and Debi show on NOW « Reply #62 on Today at 1:11pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I prefer to think of it as addressing the false information. If it's only spoken on the boards, then all opposing facts can be shut out. If I allow Debi to speak her mind and then respond to her comments rationally, it lets others hear someone address aloud the things that are purposely ignored on some of the boards. Think of it as being the same as BD posting on PB70. His being there doesn't mean he's buying into the sting and payout theories, he's just trying to educate those who still are.
I've always been open to hearing the opposing argument, partially because I feel I can address it rationally, and partially becaue I just like to argue.
I call it "healthy debate" but others might even disagree with that point.
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on May 4, 2007 12:56:22 GMT -5
faulkingtruth PressCorp
member is offline
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 169 Karma: 7 [ Exalt | Smite ] Re: Mark and Debi show on NOW « Reply #67 on Today at 1:52pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way, I meant to add to my comment about BD being on PB70 that that message board has done a great job of adjusting their overall viewpoint as more information is revealed. Some people there accepted the facts long ago, and some didn't, but they've for the most part remained open to the truth. It's an admirable quality to possess, and it gives me hope that others will follow suit.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 13:08:41 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #4 on Today at 10:32am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: jay_adobe 04 May 2007, 11:22 AM EDT Msg. 539472 of 539488 Jump to msg. # Does anyone remember Vindication, LLC? By: winningways6 04 May 2007, 11:27 AM EDT Msg. 539482 of 539491 (This msg. is a reply to 539472 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # Regarding Vindication, LLC, I always found this post quite interesting: forums.christiantraders.com/viewthread.php?tid=3445MULTIPLE STREAMS OF INCOME!!! From PB 32 Starlight God of Diamonds Joined: Oct 2004 Gender: Female Posts: 1,742 Location: Houston, Texas MULTIPLE STREAMS OF INCOME!!! « Thread Started on Jun 29, 2005, 7:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- During this past year numerous posters have speculated to the possibility that CMKX would merge into CIM and lose its own identity.... What has concerned me about that is the fact that Urban has told numerous people at the races that CMKX would be a heritage stock. How can you have a heritage stock that merges into another entity and simply vanishes??? Also, if CMKX were to merge into CIM then how do you take possibly 2-3 trillion shares with you into another clean entity (No NSS) and why in the world would you want to do that.... Some may say that the answer to that would be a Reverse Split but Urban has repeatedly stated over and over again "NO Reverse Split." If Urban only took cert holders with him then can you imagine the mess of a situation that he may face with furious shareholders who feel lost in the shuffle....!!! How do you solve this so that everybody is happy... How about the people who may have ordered their certs at the last minute and whose orders simply did not get filled in time before the transfer agent says "NO MORE CERTS".... If CMKX were to merge into another entity then how would you explain the mega bucks that have been spent on promting the CMKX name.... That would all be a waste!!! This has had me very puzzled up until now....Perhaps Urban's plan all along was to create multiple streams of income....!!! Just this past week the poster, hermannmaier, provided a link at my request to a PR that was released July 19, 2004. I had read it as I had read all of the PRs and did not give it much thought at the time. The PR I am referring to says CMKM Diamonds, Inc. has agreed to invest US$1,000,000 in Casavant International Mining rreferred to as (CIM). CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will receive in return a 10% lifetime royalty on all mineral claims of CIM. Wow!! How in the world did I not take notice to that one last year...... Then along comes Vindication LLC, a new Las Vegas corporation that has UC and Maheu's stamp all over it!! And get this- they will be releasing their officers on 6/30 at 12:01 am- just one day before our beloved Judge Murray can rule on our administrative hearing!!! You may ask what does that have to do with anything.... I have always thought that CMKX would not passively wait until the Judge rules on our case. That is just not the style of UC and Maheu. They are the types to take matters into their own hands and throw them a curve ball. IMO I believe that CMKX will halt the trading of thier own stock then transfer the remainder of their assets into CIM. Vindication LLC (which would function as a holding company) would hold all of CMKX's shares.... the NSS and those who hold certs. Keep in mind that most of the assets have already been transferred out of CMKX into other entities or J/Vs. In this scenario Vindication LLC would hold all shares (both NSS and certs) and would trap shorty into paying on these shares for many years to come with yearly dividends. The beauty of this is that since shorty cannot sell the stock then he cannot make the money on the spread difference nor can he cover quickly while shareholders are rushing to sell quickly at the slightest spike in the pps. Perhaps Urban's plan is to take CMKX private and use it for the retail end of the business but shorty would still be locked in forever!!! If CMKX were to let their stock continue to trade on the open market then shorty could simply choose to not make a market for our stock at all if they saw a really big squeeze coming. Or the brokerage houses could collectively decide to not make a market for our stock anymore if they have gotten in too deep. Or the MMs could simply file bankrupty. This way they would be allowed to stay in business but would pay dearly each year for years to come!!! Extended pain that they would not forget!!! Now Back to the Multiple Streams of Income..... In my earlier thread, Starlight's Theory, I speculated that if CMKX had agreed to be a guinea pig in a sting operation for the SEC and the SEC agreed to reward them with the lion's share of the DTC's insurance policy in their efforts to folow the money trail of funds that could be seeping out of our country to fund offshore terrorits activities. This would explain why CMKX chose to go from reporting to non-reporting status and why the Regulations SHO has a Grandfather Clause to protect the governemnt from being liable for any and all NSS that existed prior to Jan. 2005 (that has not been proven- We have according to the OG group and already had a plan in place. In this scenario we would get the lion's share of the DTC's insurance policy- but how would the MMs pay... Now with the Vindication LLC in place this is just too perfect for words!!! So in this situation CMKX would remain a separate entity under Vindication LLC (probably private) and CIM would IPO and all those who already have shares would also benefit from any sale of their stock when the restrictions are lifted in a few months. Then our valuation would finally be released under CIM. All claims that belonged to CMKX that had been dispersed into other entities would then merge back into CIM, all our JV's would do their own IPOs and then all merge together down the road while CMKX (which would be private) would handle all of the retail part of the business. Those who did not get the early CIM dividends would be allowed to buy into CIM at pre-IPO prices. And we would all get yearly dividends (royalties) from our CMKX stock from shorty under Vindication LLC!!! Please keep in mind that the above scenario is just my opinion so please treat it as such.....!!! Still Keeping the Faith....!!! Starlight By: DrillBit 04 May 2007, 11:33 AM EDT Msg. 539491 of 539494 (This msg. is a reply to 539472 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # If memory serves it was a Trust set up many months back.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 13:09:31 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod
Gossip Column Queen
Bikini needs a new pair of Choos!
Member Info Status: online Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 3,936 Location: New Jersey Karma: 134
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Contact Icons
Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #5 on Today at 11:30am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: orionbelt22767 04 May 2007, 12:27 PM EDT Msg. 539524 of 539524 Jump to msg. # Hey Shareholders....
Well it looks like the whole picture is almost done, and ready to be displayed to the world....at this time longs need to remain strong in their beliefs and trust in their DD and the URBAN TEAM.
IMO, you have played a major part in the changing of our financial system in the US..and the saving of our country.....I would like to thank URBAN, STOCKLIEN, MAHEU, GLENN AND THE ENTIRE TEAM for their patriotism and fearless work.
I obviously do not have to mention the crazy connections, the 36 SEC vacancies, the 4 FRB Govs, the 7 Fed judges, gonzales problems, cheney problems, world bank problems, washington 'madame', new trading platforms, fights over the NSM, the GF clause, the Utah law and subsequent suit threat, the texas activity, buyins.net, nobo/obo, falling dollar/spike in dow, PPT, bond repos, housing crunch, prime brokers,DTCC, SEC, maggot mile, eagletech suit, phantom shares-bloomberg, haliburt bye, citi what, NASARA, WANTA, where is the katrina money, where is the farm money? Why would the fed res eliminate the M3, what is going on? Who is Ron Paul...our next Pres? hmmmmm
Who has the most PROLIFIC DIAMOND CLAIM IN THE WORLD? Who has the largest short in the world? Who performed a physical cert pull? Who has the largest shareholder base ever?
How big is this? Again, Maheu, Stocklein, and Glenn do not get involved in any ol project.....certainly not a penniless pinkie..
and to all the bad guys..bashers, and certain radio hosts....BLESS YOU...you will finally learn very quickly not to ever challenge the most powerful nation in the world .......
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!!
orion
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 13:11:17 GMT -5
Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #6 on Today at 11:51am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: jay_adobe 04 May 2007, 12:43 PM EDT Msg. 539533 of 539534 (This msg. is a reply to 539524 by orionbelt22767.) Jump to msg. # orionbelt Now that's a very nice post. Well said.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on May 4, 2007 13:12:34 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod
Gossip Column Queen
Bikini needs a new pair of Choos!
Member Info Status: online Joined: Feb 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 3,936 Location: New Jersey Karma: 134
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Contact Icons
Re: Gossip Column 5/4/07 « Reply #7 on Today at 12:09pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: elo54 04 May 2007, 12:52 PM EDT Msg. 539537 of 539554 Jump to msg. # Urban will have his day in court 5/15.Then he can tell us what he did with all the cash and claims and why he should be allowed continue to use the trust fund for his own personal use.Big question,will he show up.Dont bet on it. ELO
By: oil.ipo 04 May 2007, 01:06 PM EDT Msg. 539552 of 539556 (This msg. is a reply to 539537 by elo54.) Jump to msg. # Like the interpleader action (no public record, no cash to file, sealed, no file, pick one) Elo I believe "all of a sudden" solutions will occur that finalize the hour. We just have never seen the solutions yet to date that we want to see like $CASH$. But ahhh Nope I do not see any Trial, any public record, nor any URBAN ANSWERS to any questions/Depos.. Maybe his alleged partners will be drawn to fire but not him. No way. This is a game of mining shells. JMO
Oil
|
|