|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 13, 2007 21:15:12 GMT -5
my69z Ace of Diamonds
Who started these 2 rumors.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- money in a trust fund from sold claims
Kev/Frizz and whooever else are the hold up due to wanting like 40%,,,,or sumphin like that
tia
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 13, 2007 21:16:24 GMT -5
BHollenegg King of Diamonds
Status: Offline Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 591 CMKX's Substantial Assets « Thread Started on Today at 8:13am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is not about going after insiders of a pink stock company with very little assets left…this is about going after outsiders of a pink stock company with substantial claims, with substantial finds, with substantial shareholder base, that was naked shorted in the trillions by outsiders. This is a company still fighting on-going raids on their acquired and identified assets, period.
CMKM Diamond’s stocks were naked shorted. Urban Casavant did four years ago take steps to protect the company and the legit shareholders from the naked shorting of its stocks. CEO Kevin West confirmed this to me when he called me in April 2007. This is also evident from the SEC Filing stating Urban Casavant locked-up 600 Million shares of CMKI with TCC for three years with the stipulation that Urban retains the voting privileges from the locked-up shares. The CMKI share count was 17 Billion. Urban Casavant continued with the plan and retired to the Treasury Department over 16 Billion CMKI Shares. This left Urban Casavant with the majority of the voting shares, 600 Million, and approximately 100 Million Shares dispersed amongst CMKI Investors. The stock symbol was changed to CMKX. The X differentiated the voting shares CMKI from the naked shorted non-voting shares. The naked shorting problem got way out of hand. Roger Glenn, Donald Stoecklein, and Robert Maheu were sent in and worked with government agencies to resolve the naked shorting situation. The certificate pull was the pinnacle of the operation, which identified the bona fide stockholders and the perpetuators of the naked shorting, period.
How serious was the naked shorting? It was serious enough for an executive from E*TRADE to fly in personally to deliver their records of CMKX transactions. It was serious enough for E*TRADE to waiver the $40.00 fee for each certificate…in my case $200 waivered for 5 certificates. E*TRADE had thousands of clients who bought CMKX shares through them. Why would E*TRADE waiver hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees plus absorb all the costs of the time and effort it took employees to handle the CMKX requests? E*TRADE was part of the naked shorting and legally can not charge fees for illegal transactions. E*TRADE was just one of many firms that naked shorted CMKX. Stockholders affected by illegal naked shorting are to be compensated. It is the law! Enough laws were broken …we do not need another law broken, period.
Was there money collected to cover the naked shorted shares? Yes. The transfer agent had to hire more help, work longer hours, dedicated their staff mainly on issuing CMKX Certificates, while Urban paid the expenses of the certificate pull and the Task Force was paid by other entities, not by CMKM Diamonds. The costs of having a cert pull of 40,000 to 60,000 stockholders, and the costs from all others involved, were not to end up issuing certificates for free. You don’t have a cert pull of this magnitude involving the perpetuators of the naked shorting, involving various government agencies, involving top securities attorneys, involving Robert Maheu, and involving 40,000 to 60,000 stockholders just to get a piece of paper indicating how many shares investors own of a revoked stock. A considerable amount of money was involved in the naked shorting situation; a considerable amount of money was used to resolve the naked shorting situation. Stockholders were led to believe the cert pull was done to identify the bona fide shareholders for the distribution of Entourage Shares and other assets. You don’t need a cert pull of this magnitude to distribute dividend shares for a pink stock company. The other assets required the cert pull of this magnitude because of the magnitude of the assets, period.
No matter which side shareholders align themselves with, the new or the old CMKX, the bottom-line is: shareholders are adults who have respected the powers in charge, waited patiently considering everything that they have been subjected to, remained loyal, and rallied with dedication in exposing the counterfeiters. Shareholders not only earned respect, but also deserve respect. Shareholders are owed a compensation package or an accurate explanation package or both.
Shareholders need to focus their energy on the correct pot, the pot of gold; not the crock pot, the pot of accusations, period.
It is time! It is time to see what the Master Chef has prepared for the stockholders. It is time for the accurate answers. It is time for the company’s trust in the shareholders, and it is time for the company’s Trust in the shareholders’ accounts. It is time for the company to reciprocate, period.
Thank you, BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 13, 2007 21:39:35 GMT -5
acca moved date to the 24th
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 13, 2007 21:44:24 GMT -5
acca moved date to the 24th :oAre we sure we didn't already know that would happen? This is a sloooooow dance to September.......
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 13, 2007 21:48:37 GMT -5
but he promised for real this time
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 13, 2007 22:16:11 GMT -5
golden1101 Administrator Re: Rumor: Lawsuit dismissed without prejudice... « Reply #20 on Today at 6:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 3:46pm, kbarry1969 wrote:DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - When a case is dismissed but the plaintiff is allowed to bring a new suit on the same claim. dismissal n. 1) the act of voluntarily terminating a criminal prosecution or a lawsuit or one of its causes of action by one of the parties. 2) a judge's ruling that a lawsuit or criminal charge is terminated. 3) an appeals court's act of dismissing an appeal, letting the lower court decision stand. 4) the act of a plaintiff dismissing a lawsuit upon settling the case. Such a dismissal may be dismissal with prejudice, meaning it can never be filed again, or dismissal without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of bringing the suit again if the defendant does not follow through on the terms of the settlement. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1187039833&page=2
|
|
|
Post by blu1236 on Aug 13, 2007 23:44:37 GMT -5
Funny I have not seen any one alude to this yet so I guess I'll put it out there. It is possible that UC was threatened by many sources considering the extent of the nss. I do know he was threatened.
UC has to be cleared of CMKX to get the pressure off him. Bill and Kevin supposedly know nothing of assets or trusts. Settlement is accomplished through unknown entities to keep the heat off.
imco (in my creative opinion)
blu
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 13, 2007 23:53:28 GMT -5
Funny I have not seen any one alude to this yet so I guess I'll put it out there. It is possible that UC was threatened by many sources considering the extent of the nss. I do know he was threatened. UC has to be cleared of CMKX to get the pressure off him. Bill and Kevin supposedly know nothing of assets or trusts. Settlement is accomplished through unknown entities to keep the heat off. imco (in my creative opinion) blu Blu.... as good. as possible and as creative as any I have heard.... Rumor has it that UC was under protective custody....... Right now we are on hold....... What the outcome will be ... remains to be seen. There are too many unknowns........ so we just have to wait........ errrr some more !! <sigh> Kudos SINGLE
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 14, 2007 5:49:52 GMT -5
Acca MP3 8-13-07 www.zshare.net/audio/312686109a4aac/ ines DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: Acca MP3 8-13-07 Few notes from the evening for those nice people that come to the board and want to hear about it. GF clause is effective Oct. 15th. count back 60 days... and that is the day it should appear on the register. THey have 35 days to cover previous fails. Now granfather clause is supposed to be posted on register this week. By the end of this week which is 17th. Acca said that 17th and 24th are important. Now the 24th is some kind of statue of limitations date in Clark County some kind of legal case.. Acca also said that he does not care very much about that on 24th that will be dismissed. Acca said that urban cant talk due to legal procedings still going on. That Tyler group is not happy nor they should be. That he will not even talk about them any more and not to worry about it. And not to worry even if they put out some of their updates. That they are toast. Also that the first payment is the most important. That the 3rd enitity is in charge of when it will be distributed. Somebody asked .. that 2 billion out of that trust that has to come to us cant cover .005 for all shareholders and that it was said before an agency will be responsible to pay for the rest of the shares going over the legal count. This person asked if that money was collected already. Acca answered that is has been collected a 1.5 years ago. Some discussed is it that we have to wait like we have heard that all the short companies have to be paid.. as somebody got info from sec that would be toward end of the year or into 2008. Acca said not. That we dont have to wait for all those other companies.. to get paid etc.. That that timing is totaly off in his opinion. That is all i remember .. for the rest listen to the mp3.
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 14, 2007 6:22:28 GMT -5
that's not even close to what he said so now ya gotta listen to see it's short this time
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 14, 2007 9:25:28 GMT -5
Re: gossip discussion 8/14 « Reply #6 on Today at 9:02am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: oil.ipo 14 Aug 2007, 09:04 AM EDT Msg. 588992 of 589006 Jump to msg. # I have been following ACCA'S message for years. I maintained a balanced view, and only recently started posting on what I see coming back from the shareholders about their concerns regarding his messages. There has been plenty of positive feedback from me regarding ACCA. During a time there were shareholders (longs) that would not even accept conversation (IM'S) from me about ACCA and my message was like it is here (with plus's and minuses-food for thought). One long comes to mind that mentions the "Sniper" attacks on ACCA. That long would not even entertain any conversation about ACCA from me when I was clearly supporting ACCA say 1.5 years ago. This is ACCA'S man today in Paltalk. What does this mean in the long run? I guess it shows that I have been here a while whether posting under Oil.Ipo or (not) as Mega, and that I just follow the message of Longs for the most part, because I am one. How I feel is not my entire reason for posting. I do state my opinion.
What I see now in the rooms is more confusion, pandemonium, distrust, anger, and of course there are supporters also of CMKM, and ACCA. IMHO ACCA was doing fine with "His Job" as he says being proud of never being correct in over 3 years, until the days of late July early August 2007 when he insisted that he was "NOT LYING, and being truthful, and that the Shareholders, are receiving that relief payment of somewhere between .005 to .012 from the sale of claims." Subsequent updates had that payment "printed in check form/(on a register) and at hubs." Anything that he does or says that conflicts with these statements are just setting himself ablaze IMHE. He is really out of his league, and has moved out of his job criteria into a whole new realm of a "PLAYER." IMHO as I watch, very few are now getting the ACCA message, nor care too. The longs that are getting him are doing as they normally do setting that overdrive on and just looking past it all. Well, good for those guys, the rest of us are human.
ACCA needs to reboot his hard drive and come back and fix what he dealt out, deliver the checks that he promised. If he was not of the authority to do so then he should not have started with that entire "HONESTY" speech in late July/early August that "Payment was of an imminent nature." You cannot undo what is done. Share holders are planning their lives, some of them, DAY BY DAY to this coming to an end, and ACCA ignited that fuse and now it must be finished. I am hearing many people are pushed well beyond the limits of their ability to cope with BS. Does anyone in touch with ACCA have the sensibility to see the destruction that they are causing?
Again, if a job is about never being truthful that is one thing, but don't come in front of a couple thousand people and tell them that you are being truthful, and that they are going to be paid in a matter of days to weeks, and that the check is in the mail, and expect them to just forget that you said it, or go back to playing the old game of "It's all a bunch of lies".
One last thing there were 2 people that said "let me collect my thoughts for a moment" yesterday. Was that a coincidence? I really do not think so.
Again I ask all of you out there. "WHAT CONDITION IS YOUR CONDITION IN?"
-JMHO
Mega/Oil - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 14, 2007 9:45:56 GMT -5
Does anyone really believe that acca knows how much each of us are scheduled to receive on our payout? He says he knows all about the trusts and how much is each one...OR did I misunderstand him? One trust for us, north of 2 billion and locked in for us and another earmarked for other investments..............
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 14, 2007 9:50:09 GMT -5
Sooner it is amazing that some still do. You can hear it on the mp3 and see it in the scroll.
I can't tell you how sad it is unless you are there to watch it.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 14, 2007 9:52:25 GMT -5
I'm glad I've never gotten into the room thingy....LOL
|
|
|
Post by Catdaddy on Aug 14, 2007 9:56:47 GMT -5
Does anyone really believe that acca knows how much each of us are scheduled to receive on our payout? He says he knows all about the trusts and how much is each one...OR did I misunderstand him? One trust for us, north of 2 billion and locked in for us and another earmarked for other investments.............. The only thing I believe about ACCA is that his handlers had better put him in an idiot protection program. If some of the nut cases on this board find out his true identity and location, I've got a feeling he's toast. And to tell you the truth, it wouldn't bother me in the slightest if somebody did pop a cap on his lying ass. As always, JMHO. Later, Catdaddy
|
|