|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 13:41:12 GMT -5
By: oil.ipo 21 Aug 2007, 02:35 PM EDT Msg. 592864 of 592865 (This msg. is a reply to 592780 by ejagacki.) Jump to msg. # Yes ed, the obvious is often times the truth, however Ed, even Acca knows what he was stepping into as he digressed into that subject (of his actions) at least twice that I heard, and believe me I WAS LISTENING. I won't quote him as I do not have his exact words but he alluded to his own statements about his remarks, and he said that he was going for it regardless. I personally feel as I stated that he was posturing himself. To justify a guy who has clearly been on the side of dis-inform/misinform is a rough spot to be in (even for me) so I must go with my post from here, and it speaks about a reversal of personality, and time line. It's now up to the events to speak not me.
Regards,
Mega/Oil
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 13:50:22 GMT -5
By: runningrich 21 Aug 2007, 02:06 PM EDT Msg. 592817 of 592888 Jump to msg. # IN THE MATTER OF: THE SECURITIES ACT
-and-
IN THE MATTER OF: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. NOTICE OF HEARING
TAKE NOTICE that The Manitoba Securities Commission ("Commission") will hold a public hearing ("Hearing") at its offices at Room 500 - 400 St. Mary Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba on Wednesday, the 24th day of October, 2007 commencing at 9:00 o’clock in the forenoon or so soon thereafter as the Hearing can be held, and from day to day thereafter until the Hearing is concluded, to consider: 1. whether or not it is in the public interest to order, pursuant to section 148 of The Securities Act, R.S.M. 1988, c. S50 as amended ("Act"), that CMKM Diamonds, Inc. ("CMKM") be cease traded;
2. whether or not it is in the public interest to order, pursuant to subsection 19(5) of the Act, that:
(a) subsection 19(1) of the Act does not, with respect to such of the trades referred to in that subsection, apply to CMKM;
(b) subsection 19(2) of the Act does not, with respect to such of the securities referred to in that section, apply to CMKM;
2. such further and other matters and the making of such further and other orders as the Commission may deem appropriate.
BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEGATIONS:
By reason of an Order issued by the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission dated November 9, 2004, to be filed, and such other material as staff counsel may advise and the panel may allow.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that a person or company attending or submitting evidence at the Hearing may be represented by counsel of its choice.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that any party to the proceedings may, at the Hearing, call witnesses and submit such evidence relevant to the Hearing as it may wish and, for that purpose, it may obtain from the Director of the Commission at Room 500 – 400 St. Mary Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, a form or forms of summons to compel the attendance of witnesses.
AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that upon failure of any party to attend at the time and place aforesaid, the Hearing may proceed in that party’s absence and the Commission may make or give any decision or order as though that party were present.
DATED at Winnipeg, Manitoba this 17th day of August, 2007.
Director, Legal and Enforcement
TO: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC.
repost from proboards 70 - - - - -
By: mjl62 21 Aug 2007, 02:45 PM EDT Msg. 592878 of 592888 (This msg. is a reply to 592817 by runningrich.) Jump to msg. # IN THE MATTER OF: CMKM DIAMONDS, INC. NOTICE OF HEARING
Not that I personally believe this could be true. But I must admit, it's a possibility!
I just had a thought. What IF they are trying to permanently stop trading due to the fact that IF KW gets this thing trading again. There actions would in fact eliminate any possibility of a short squeeze? The timing is most interesting! With the elimination of the GF clause. Think about it.
- - - - -
By: jay_adobe 21 Aug 2007, 02:50 PM EDT Msg. 592888 of 592888 (This msg. is a reply to 592878 by mjl62.) Jump to msg. # mjl, No. Wrong rabbit trail. Think legality.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 15:35:38 GMT -5
By: oneeyedjack2007 21 Aug 2007, 03:08 PM EDT Msg. 592902 of 592933 Jump to msg. # 3 things to ponder for shareholders
1 how can Frizzel say we have no value but yet we own shares in the JV partners and own partnerships in the JV partners?
2 how can Frizzel say he spent $1800.00 to serve Urban and can't find him or get him served when he turned down David Jmar's offer to give him his address and tell him where he was after the hearing in Vegas?
3 how can they keep bringing ACCA into the International room when we all know he will never be right he is only part of the dog and pony show?
It is my belief that these are mere distractions to the real story that has yet to manifest it's self to us
SO STAY OFF THE KOOLAID NO MATTER WHO IS SERVING
- - - - - By: nufced 21 Aug 2007, 03:10 PM EDT Msg. 592905 of 592933 (This msg. is a reply to 592902 by oneeyedjack2007.) Jump to msg. # Because Frizzell said he is going after assets. Until he can collect, what value is there?
I wouldn't believe davidjmar after some of the crap hes pulled.
Gives them a warm fuzzy feeling. - - - - -
By: oneeyedjack2007 21 Aug 2007, 03:18 PM EDT Msg. 592923 of 592933 (This msg. is a reply to 592905 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced there were more than one person present when that happened for a fact - - - - -
By: nufced 21 Aug 2007, 03:19 PM EDT Msg. 592925 of 592933 (This msg. is a reply to 592923 by oneeyedjack2007.) Jump to msg. # they also said FBI gal was there..she wasn't FBI. He also thinks UC is wonderful. I heard him say it. - - - - -
By: oneeyedjack2007 21 Aug 2007, 03:25 PM EDT Msg. 592930 of 592933 (This msg. is a reply to 592925 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # nufced everyone is entitled to there opinion but Frizzel did pass on help to find Urban so I consider what was mp3'd yesterday as part of the show - - - - -
By: nufced 21 Aug 2007, 03:27 PM EDT Msg. 592933 of 592933 (This msg. is a reply to 592930 by oneeyedjack2007.) Jump to msg. # Thats right, and had I been Bill, I would not have accepted an offer from jmar. After all...look what eventually he was spewing about John Martin. Makes me ill.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 15:36:20 GMT -5
By: chris_2525 21 Aug 2007, 03:22 PM EDT Msg. 592928 of 592939 Jump to msg. # Give me questions for Tyler Texas. - - - - -
By: klonopin2mg 21 Aug 2007, 03:35 PM EDT Msg. 592937 of 592938 (This msg. is a reply to 592928 by chris_2525.) Jump to msg. # chris'
I asked the important questions and was given a very DIRECT "NO COMMENT"!
believe i'll just play along with the Q & A routine, like some others......
i don't keep track of what's in plain view for "PUBLIC" consumption.......this things beyond the learning curve as intended and as expected.
I wish Bill and Kevin the best!
still some hedges in need of trimming and still some trash that needs taken out!
think i'll sit back and watch as all the chores unfold...as they have been for as long as i can remember. all very logical and all JM2Sense!!
have a great day and a better tomorrow! - - - - -
By: stockseekerok 21 Aug 2007, 03:48 PM EDT Msg. 592953 of 592959 (This msg. is a reply to 592928 by chris_2525.) Jump to msg. # chris 2525- 1 post , and only because no one is taking you seriously enough to provide actual questions.
1- Exactly how much are the Properties in Vegas worth in Dollar Value to CMKM ?(any/liens/mortgages/or are they free and clear)
2-exactly how much money did discovery find in the named trusts,trading accounts,bank accounts listed in the TRO ?
3-Is in fact all title/interest into CMKM Old mineral Claims in fact gone?( like we own nothing)
4-Do they intend to address the Manitoba CMKM hearing issue ? and If not why ?
5-Why has thier not been roes and does added to the suits as implied in the past ?
6-Since CMKM is now a Texas Corp. do they intend to enter other litigation issues in the State of Texas or do the civil issues against individual roes and does have to be filed in the state of thier residence, as is often court procedure ?
7-Why in the heck did they not use the 588.00 to buy Kevin our CEO some kind of old clunker car at least ? (That one was in jest)
Thats the best I can do for now chris, I am tired and need some rest time.
I only will post here this one time, but I can still read. - - - - -
« Last Edit: Today at 2:53pm by mgl »
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 15:40:01 GMT -5
By: chris_2525 21 Aug 2007, 02:36 PM EDT Msg. 592866 of 592952 (This msg. is a reply to 592859 by baloney_cleaver.) Jump to msg. # baloney as you know acca has backpeddled seriously over the last few days but than having a bench warrant put out on you I guess would change a person's perspective on things.
jay has pretty much disappeared as his lies even though he is a "mere shareholder" as he puts it.
So now who do the sheernips have left?
richy_63 this guy has lied from day one. He mysteriously appears out of nowhere with all the lies.
As soon as richy_63 said his sources said to trust acca is when the saps should of known he is a liar too.
- - - - - By: jay_adobe 21 Aug 2007, 02:42 PM EDT Msg. 592871 of 592952 (This msg. is a reply to 592866 by chris_2525.) Jump to msg. # Countries will re-align. Watch. Wait. Patience. Kindness. imo - - - - -
By: justmoby 21 Aug 2007, 03:40 PM EDT Msg. 592944 of 592952 (This msg. is a reply to 592871 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # JAY ADOBE so are you predicticting the 2nd comming when all the land masses merge back into one? - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 21 Aug 2007, 03:43 PM EDT Msg. 592946 of 592952 (This msg. is a reply to 592944 by justmoby.) Jump to msg. # justmoby, Now your beeing silly.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 15:41:17 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe 21 Aug 2007, 03:39 PM EDT Msg. 592940 of 592954 Jump to msg. # "...court outside of the Province of British Columbia attempts to assert jurisdiction... this Agreement shall be terminated..." - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 15:42:07 GMT -5
By: newtopennies 21 Aug 2007, 03:38 PM EDT Msg. 592939 of 592970 (This msg. is a reply to 592871 by jay_adobe.) Jump to msg. # JAY SMOOTHIE...YOU HAVE said 're-align' many times, but what exactly do you mean by it? Monetary re-alignment, military re-alignment, philosophical, political, banking, currency.....What? And what exactly does that have to do with CMKM? TIA. eom. - - - - -
By: jay_adobe 21 Aug 2007, 03:39 PM EDT Msg. 592942 of 592970 (This msg. is a reply to 592939 by newtopennies.) Jump to msg. # newtopennies, Yes... - - - - -
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 21, 2007 15:45:49 GMT -5
is that last one saying the entourage cert will be cancelled because of being fought over in usa?
well duh, we've know that for a year or two
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 16:01:43 GMT -5
is that last one saying the entourage cert will be cancelled because of being fought over in usa? well duh, we've know that for a year or two I didn't know that!! Wonder if that means we may have much bigger and better fish to fry than that cert... ??
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 21, 2007 16:48:56 GMT -5
Alleged Frizzell mp3... Posted 8/20 on PB 70: cmkxunitedforum.proboards70.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1187648997- - - - - kingofsiam Diamond Explorer Joined: May 2007 Posts: 75 Bill Frizzlle Message to shareholders (new Info) « Thread Started on Yesterday at 5:29pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.zshare.net/audio/3231497244ddf3/Here is a MP3 of Bill talking to a shareholder. I am under the impression it is new today. I will confirm when this call was made. I thought I was told in the last 24 hours. Nice to see BF talk to 1 of us. This is positive news imo Re: Bill Frizzlle Message to shareholders (new Inf « Reply #1 on Yesterday at 5:32pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confirmed call was made today
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 21, 2007 16:49:38 GMT -5
portrush Administrator Rules to live by: tinyurl.com/drr9hmember is offline Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 9,930 Location: Here, as usual. Re: Bill Frizzlle Message to shareholders (new Inf « Reply #14 on Yesterday at 11:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well it is interesting that one week the company said they would post a Q&A section for shareholders...and just days later they have decided to allow the attorney to create an mp3 for public distribution. Contradiction squared. THIS is what riles the real bonified shareholders, the lack on consistency and integrity concerning following through as promised. The picture is being repainted. It must be repainted. They're using black paint intentionally. You can never see the real picture...no one can. Get it?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Aug 21, 2007 17:11:47 GMT -5
It's not actually BF, it's conniejac relaying her convo with BF...Right?
|
|
|
Post by tec1958 on Aug 21, 2007 17:53:11 GMT -5
i assume so
|
|
|
Post by JoeRockss on Aug 21, 2007 18:03:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Aug 21, 2007 20:57:40 GMT -5
leadorfollow DIAMOND JEDI Re: Untouchable Trust~ « Reply #11 on Today at 6:43pm » "We have had our hearts ripped out in broad friggin daylight with dull surgical tools and the lack of anastetic's............................................Blood transfusions were coming from the Nurse's, anesthetist Technion's and Doctors that care " if there was ever a case for punitive damages due to stress, etc. this has to be the grand daddy of all !...........lol...............NURSE !
|
|