|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 14:49:54 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 20 Oct 2007, 01:59 PM EDT Msg. 615264 of 615284 (This msg. is a reply to 615255 by imsoweary.) Jump to msg. # weary sggm was a stoke of genius you are right sggm was obviously dd'd by bill frizzell as they gave ten million dollars and their whole company to cmkx for 5% of our claims. SGGM was run by an ex-sec lawyer at the same time cmkx was run by an ex-sec lawyer at the same time chis cox held stock in newmont mining. Newmont was partners with sggm, who we own almost all of, so newmont was partners with US. So newmont, our parnter, is running our claims we "let go" to shore gold who they are parnters with, so our partner is running our claims. Newmont is now partners with cornerstone who you have all seen the dd is connected to us, and low and behold they are doing gold claims in equador where we had gold claims and built a processing plant as things were going so well there, hmmmm.
Now you have sggm, us, and cmkx, us, revoked on the same day by the secretary of the sec mr. katz (days after we asked to be revoked), who worked with don stoecklein on the "final rule" of sho. And don still has our certs to entourage.
Now if you can't figure this out you are dumb or a liar
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 14:50:49 GMT -5
By: leowanta 20 Oct 2007, 02:22 PM EDT Msg. 615271 of 615284 (This msg. is a reply to 615266 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # yes, we all expected to get the sggm dividend from the 200B shares of sggm given to CMKX.
unfortunately, we counterfeit shareholders won't get that benefit...that is unless...the sec put us in Newmont Canada, which is very possible...since that dividend was suppose to have been paid, September 28...then held up...it is possible it was held up for this alliance.......looking very positive for all of us ...except the non-shareholders who continue to hang around .... you folks need to move on...it's over for you here....
leowanta
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 14:52:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 19:02:00 GMT -5
tramp Administrator *****
Are we waiting for Oct 28th?
« Thread Started on Today at 5:44pm »
statute of limitations..oct 28th, 2 years, revocation. ----------------
INES1OO: spiderman1959: Required Notice of Claim....Under the FTCA, before you can file a law suit against the government, you have to file an administrative claim with the agency that committed the negligence.
spiderman1959: That claim has to be filed within two (2) years from the date you knew, or through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known of the negligence.
spiderman1959: This two (2) year period is known as the Statute of Limitations period. The claim must be made in writing, and it must contain a demand for a "sum certain." The "sum certain" requirement means that the claimant must ask for a specific dollar amount. If the claim does not contain a request for a "sum certain," it may be deemed to be invalid.
next friday/sunday..is 2 years.. is this it?
remember, we are bonafied, what about those who refused to get certs, or just didn't bother with it? also remember about the newspaper add and the postcards.. everything was done right and very careful for notification.
my question is, i know my friend has cmkx in her acct and she was shorted 295,000 shares in a cert, but was given 4 mil, 305,000 shares of cmkx and put into her acct' to make 5 million.. i know, they goofed up, but, what happens to those shares.. and some are hers.. actually all are now.. hahaha..
i just know sharehoplders won't be left out, but.. always that but...
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 20:16:49 GMT -5
Thanks to bikinipro!!!!
By: bhollenegg 20 Oct 2007, 08:02 PM EDT Msg. 615351 of 615385 (This msg. is a reply to 615259 by baloney_cleaver.) Jump to msg. # Baloney Cleaver,
You want me to name at least one positive fact since revocation…
I will give you more than one.
1. Positive fact that Bona fide Shareholders are locked in and identified for plan distributions.
2. Positive fact that the parties guilty of counterfeiting, naked-shorting, and fail to delivers are locked in and identified.
3. Positive fact that the revocation allowed us to do a cert pull without the SEC accusing the company of manipulating the stock price.
4. Positive fact that paid bashers are still on the message boards concerned and harassing shareholders in itself is a confirmation that there are other entities, which do not own CMKX Stocks, but feel threatened by CMKX's potential value.
5. Positive fact that the revocation stopped the naked shorting of CMKX.
6. The fact that CMKX is still here after revocation indicates there are assets worthwhile the concerted effort.
7. The fact that the revocation with the cert pull united the Bona fide Shareholders.
BHollenegg
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 20, 2007 20:28:35 GMT -5
sandi posted this on the Vegas board............... By: ilikejagmedia 16 Oct 2007, 06:17 PM EDT Msg. 89457 of 89526 (This msg. is a reply to 89456 by dogdays_2.) Jump to msg. # Dogdays, try to get through your feeble and bitter mind. The JAGH fails are in the ex-clearing system. The stock is not on the Reg SHO threshold list. Therefore the fails will not be generated through the DTC until shareholders go to sell their shares that are counterfeit ones deposited by journal entry in their account. They will go to sell them sometime after the merger and the buyer will demand delivery. OOPS the broker can't deliver and according to the new REGS will have to buy in real stock to deliver on behalf of the seller. As posted yesterday, Jim Cramer, was talking about naked shorts in Crox, but OOPS Crox is not a mainstay of the reg SHO list so he must hae been referring to EX CLEARING FAILS. Darn, I hate how these facts get in the way. ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=JAGH&read=89457 When shareholders go to sell counterfeit shares, ALL HELL will break loose.
|
|
|
Post by imSINGLEruRICH on Oct 21, 2007 10:05:29 GMT -5
bikinipro Mini Mod Re: Gossip column 10/21/07 « Reply #2 on Today at 9:44am »
tramp Administrator *****
Re: the sharp mind of the confidant Bob Maheu « Reply #5 on Today at 9:30am »
we discussed this yesterday in the 500 room shortly..
who takes a vacation in the middle of the war.. and also, we believe ibm dropped us a hint, and we are tlaking now in the grapevine.. fasten your seatbelt..
Maheu turns 90 this month, but neither age nor cancer nor heart scares have noticeably slowed him. As you read this he is on a two-week cruise with his friend Virginia Richardson - she's of the same generation, but of course we would never divulge a lady's age - and my guess is they are the focus of attention from the crowd huddled around the shuffleboard court
I mean who wouldn't want to listen to stories about the amazing Mr. Hughes, and how he would phone Maheu at all hours of the night from his sequestered ninth-floor suite at the top of the Desert Inn and say, "Fasten your seat belt, Bob, this is going to be a big one."
now, who goes on vacation in the middle of a war?
answer..: NO ONE..UNLESS ITS ALL DONE.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 10:35:56 GMT -5
tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1192845647gusjarvis posted this.................................. By: bhollenegg 20 Oct 2007, 08:19 PM EDT Msg. 615362 of 615383 (This msg. is a reply to 615346 by nufced.) Jump to msg. # Nufced...SGGM no connection??? Jonathan Katz, Secretary of the S. E. C., revoked St. George’s (SGGM) registration and granted CMKM Diamonds request to be revoked on the same day and at the same time, with CMKM document number 34-52694 followed by SGGM document number 34-52695? Are SGGM and CMKX connected together? And why would Jonathan Katz take the time from his busy schedule to take care of this matter concerning two pink stocks? Hold on a SEC… SGGM is from Arlington, VA and registered in Nevada. SGGM invested $10 Million Dollars in CMKM though SGGM was dormant for 2 years. Where did the funds come from? Got a SEC?… CMKM SGGM Key Personnel SEC connections: Roger Glenn was Federal Securities Counsel for CMKM, worked over 19 years with the SEC. Donald Stoecklein was Federal Securities Counsel for CMKM, from Stoecklein Security Law Institute, provided information to Jonathan Katz, Secretary of Security Exchange Commission, on The Final Rule, which covers investor protection, naked shorting, shell company mergers and reporting. Stoecklein’s input is referenced numerous times in The Final Rule authored by Jonathan Katz. William B. Haseltine, was President of SGGM, presently has own law firm specializing in Federal Securities, worked for over 19 years with the SEC (FINANCE...hmmmm) and with Jonathan Katz: William B. Haseltine, Special Counsels, Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Mail Stop 3-12, Washington, D.C. 20549. Just a SEC.. SEC exercises remedial sanctions because: CMKM stopped reporting April 2003. SGGM stopped reporting May 2003. Hmmm…both stopped reporting about the same time. Both CMKM and SGGM were revoked consecutively on the same day? Yet, the best Federal Securities counsels were involved with these two pink stocks? Why? Counterfeit shares, imho. References: www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id291bpm.htmwww.sec.gov/info/smallbus/gbfor23.pdfStoecklein Law Group working closely with the SEC for Amendment to the Penny Stock Rules www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/txt-srch-sec?text=stoecklein§ion=Entire+Website&sort=datewww.sec.gov/rules/final/34-51983fr.pdfStoecklein s email, cc Debbie Amigone to Jonathan Katz Secretary of SEC comments on proposed rules concerning Naked Shorting www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72303/stoecklein010504.txtxml.10kwizard.com/filing_raw.php?repo=tenk&ipage=3331089cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=5826330593224〈=en-USwww.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52695.pdfwww.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/34-52694.pdfBHollenegg Link to Post - Back to Top 65.54.98.27
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 10:36:30 GMT -5
tec1958 Global Moderator Helmsman Who owns our claims now? « Thread Started on Today at 6:47am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well at least a huge chunk are owned by one guy in Paltalk who was bounced last night for calling acca a liar. LOL He was going to donate 10% to the shareholders, but not any more. He recolored a map to bright red to show where his 17,000+ acres are now. Track who used to own them - it will quiet the liars I believe. watch for Frontier Investment research, LLC to pop up where the Bright red is to the middle eastern section when the new map comes out. tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2u5um44&s=2cmkxdiamond.proboards66.com/index.cgi?board=general1&action=display&thread=1192978072
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 10:37:37 GMT -5
tec again with a nugget to share.................. Re: Who owns our claims now? « Reply #1 on Today at 6:51am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- so be careful who you bounce, it just might be the only hope you have left
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 10:57:03 GMT -5
It's been slow so far. I ran across this and thought it was worth rereading..................Some of it had slipped my mind.. : camrhon.proboards102.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=1192626039CMKM Diamonds, If you don’t Mind, or even if you do Mind, “What is the Real Deal?” “Do you Mine or don’t you Mine? Shareholders are not Tone Depth… Compare the tone of the following excerpt from the attached letter below concerning the Naked Shorted Shares (NSS) and Fail To Delivers (FTD) to the government officials as compared to the tone of the present updates concerning the NSS and FTD to the shareholders …. Excerpt... “Due to the indisputable evidence of large numbers of failed deliveries in this stock, CMKM elected to distribute the 45,000,000 shares of Entourage stock to all bonafide shareholders in what was described at that time as a windup distribution. CMKM has informed shareholders that only shareholders with valid certificates from the official company transfer agent will receive their pro rata distribution of Entourage stock. In November of 2005 CMKM shareholders began requesting certs from their brokers. CMKM is currently a private Nevada corporation in good standing per Nevada state statutes….The Task Force has now received certs in the name of certain brokerage companies. Our investigation reveals a potentially huge naked short position in at least two of the very companies that have sent us certs. The certs sent to the Task Force by the brokers represent billions of shares of CMKM stock. It is not the intention of the company to distribute Entourage stock to securities intermediaries and clearing houses for them to distribute the stock at their discretion. It is clear from the Regulation SHO records in conjunction with other sources (ADP, the transfer agent and the DTCC) that huge fails to deliver in this stock currently exist.” Attorney Bill Frizzell felt obligated to contact the following government officials and inform them of the seriousness and depth of the NSS and the FTD afflicting CMKX Stocks. The Contacts... Cc: SEC-Leslie Hakala Sue Kelly (House Financial Sevices) Senator Shelby Senator Bennett Senator Hatch Senator Sarbanes Charles Moore-Securities Administrator-Nevada Senator Harry Reid Senator John Ensign Representative Shelly Berkley Representative Joe Gibbons Representative John Porter Looks like “The Real Deal is a Big Deal” All the Best, BHollenegg Reference May 31, 2006 NASD Investor Complaint Center 1735 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-1500 Re: Request for Investigation of Brokerage Conduct Involving CMKM Distribution www.petitiononline.com/cmkx2006/petition.html
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 11:15:18 GMT -5
millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1192952333bikinipro Mini Mod Gossip Column Queen Re: Gossip column 10/21/07 « Reply #3 on Today at 10:59am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: pelicanbrief114 21 Oct 2007, 11:51 AM EDT Msg. 615572 of 615574 (This msg. is a reply to 615556 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gus Nice to see you my friend. Hope all is well. Interesting eh? SGGM>>>>$10MM>>>>CMKM/X>>>>Mr. H>>>>1ST Global>>>>>GBDX (Pending TO)?? Coinkydink? HAHAHA Possibly a nice eze and seamless transition? Isn't 1ST the identical TA for all? Seems as if Mr. H HAS/IS been doing some Trolling with a big net and cleaning up the waste at the bottom of the Sea. Best Wishes. Got CMKX?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 12:07:24 GMT -5
millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1192965016Found this inside this thread...................... tramp DIAMOND JEDI Re: PPS of a company, up prior a PR, CMKX related « Reply #2 on Today at 7:24am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- one that comes to mind is shore.. i watched it go all the way down from $8.00 to 3.00 or less.. $2.75.. now, i am watching it creep back up, as it came down. you see, when the others came down, stocks, and alot did, then they went to a r/s to help shorty out.. but, if a stock is bad naked shorted like most are, they still have to cover their fails.. and wait till shareholders do try and sell and its naked shorted and the dtcc has no shares.. oops.. ex-clearing fails.. get used to the term, you will be hearing that alot in the near future.. one i am watching is my free trading usca, now uscn..i may have only 20 shares and 153 usca shares.. but, we found out yesterday why its still showing why its not uscn and why the shares are not split. no shares to give to the brokers.. .. thats why its usca and why it shows your divvy shares. OOPS..
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 12:58:54 GMT -5
A little humor within the rumor.. hawkeye1 Diamond Finder and Miner On the football sports channel a few minutes ago « Thread Started on Today at 9:34am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ESPN behind the guys talking football was a BIG sign that said IBM Getting it DONE naw...couldn't be....could it? tramp2.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1192984487
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 21, 2007 13:21:21 GMT -5
faithandlogic Ace of Diamonds Evidence Of A Sting « Thread Started on Today at 10:57am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- September 29, 2005 "St. George Metals asserts that it has been “dormant for the past two years, and has neither conducted any business nor had access to any capital,” which resulted in it not being able to file periodic reports on a timely basis." www.sec.gov/litigation/aljdec/id298rgm.pdfThe 2002 10-KSB also reported that St. George Metals had no ongoing or active business operations and was in the process of winding down its business. Other Matters Until 1995, the Company had been engaged in the acquisition, exploration and, if warranted, development of natural resource properties. At the present time, the Company has ceased all active operations, and is in the process of winding up its business......... the Company has terminated all employees and most of its consultant relationships. During the fiscal years ended January 31, 1997 through 2002, the Company had no employees..........The Company has no patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises or concessions material to its operations........The Company had no material liquidity or capital resources at year end, January 31, 2002. At that date, the Company had no current assets ($-0-) and current liabilities of $6.9 million. Current liabilities include $6.3 million of accrued interest payable which is in arrears. A substantial portion of the Company's current liabilities and other indebtedness is owed to related parties. The Company obtained no new financing (other than through one payment under an option agreement for the sale of certain capital assets) during the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2002 Stock Option Plan. In 1989, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a non-qualified stock option plan ("Plan") which provided for the grant to officers, employees, consultants and independent contractors of the Company of options to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Plan terminated by its terms in 1999, and all options granted under the Plan have expired without exercise. www.secinfo.com/d12crf.32p.htm"Mr. Haseltine resigned as president and counsel of St. George Metals on August 25, 2005, stating that he was never provided with the documents to support any filings with the SEC". 9/2/04: “CMKM Diamonds Inc.... has finalized a joint venture agreement where St. George Metals, Inc. (SGGM) will purchase a 5%...interest in any and all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in consideration for $10,000,000 US Dollars and two hundred billion (200,000,000,000) restricted shares of SGGM. The Company has received a $2,500,000 payment with three additional payments of $2,500,000 anticipated within the next 30 days.” cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1192985830
|
|